War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
Ukraine ministry of defense doxes 620 FSB spies in Europe ...

list of spies

Good article in Wired about Russian leaks


Names, birthdays, passport numbers, job titles—the personal information goes on for pages and looks like any typical data breach. But this data set is very different. It allegedly contains the personal information of 1,600 Russian troops who served in Bucha, a Ukrainian city devastated during Russia’s war and the scene of multiple potential war crimes.
The data set is not the only one. Another allegedly contains the names and contact details of 620 Russian spies who are registered to work at the Moscow office of the FSB, the country’s main security agency. Neither set of information was published by hackers. Instead they were put online by Ukraine’s intelligence services, with all the names and details freely available to anyone online. “Every European should know their names,” Ukrainian officials wrote in a Facebook post as they published the data.
Since Russian troops crossed Ukraine’s borders at the end of February, colossal amounts of information about the Russian state and its activities have been made public. The data offers unparalleled glimpses into closed-off private institutions, and it may be a gold mine for investigators, from journalists to those tasked with investigating war crimes. Broadly, the data comes in two flavors: information published proactively by Ukranian authorities or their allies, and information obtained by hacktivists. Hundreds of gigabytes of files and millions of emails have been made public.

“Both sides in this conflict are very good at information operations,” says Philip Ingram, a former colonel in British military intelligence. “The Russians are quite blatant about the lies that they'll tell,” he adds. Since the war started, Russian disinformation has been consistently debunked. Ingram says Ukraine has to be more tactical with the information it publishes. “They have to make sure that what they're putting out is credible and they're not caught out telling lies in a way that would embarrass them or embarrass their international partners.”
Both the lists of alleged FSB officers and Russian troops were published online by Ukraine’s Central Intelligence Agency at the end of March and start of April, respectively. While WIRED has not been able to verify the accuracy of the data—and Ukrainian cybersecurity officials did not respond to a request for comment—Aric Toler, from investigative outlet Bellingcat, tweeted that the FSB details appear to have been combined from previous leaks and open source information. It is unclear how up-to-date the information is.


Regardless, it appears to be one of the first times a government has doxed thousands of military personnel in one fell swoop. Jack McDonald, a senior lecturer in war studies at King’s College London who has researched privacy in war, says that, throughout history, nations have kept lists of their opponents or tried to create them. But these have often been linked to counterinsurgency efforts and were typically not made public. “Openly publishing such lists of your opponent, particularly at the scale that digital operations appear to allow, that seems very new,” McDonald says.
While doxing is, generally speaking, one of the most toxic online behaviors and can ruin lives, the stakes are different in war, when the gloves are essentially off. McDonald says that publishing peoples’ names and personal details during wartime is a “murky area” ethically, but that there may be justification for it when linked to a military institution or war crimes. Violating people’s privacy is “very low down the list” of how someone may be harmed during conflict, McDonald says. He adds that verifying who is on a list and excluding the possibility that it contains incorrect information is important to not causing additional harm. Demonstrating the complexity of the issue, Google blocked access to a PDF of Ukraine’s alleged lists of Russian troops in Bucha because the file violated its policies against the publication of people’s private information. Asked about the decision to block the document, Google declined to comment further.
“When you think about what comes after the war, these lists might be a big feature of it,” McDonald says. The lists—if the information they contain is accurate—may provide a starting point for investigators looking into potential war crimes in Ukraine. For instance, a name could be linked to a photo, which is linked to a social media account, or footage that places someone in a particular location or event. Each piece of information could act as a tiny piece in a much larger puzzle. Researchers are already racing to save and archive thousands of TikToks, Telegram messages, and social media posts in formats that can be used as evidence. (Although it is unlikely that Russia would extradite anyone accused of crimes to face trials.)


More immediately, the lists may be useful in other ways. “It shows the Russians that they've got access to it,” Ingram says. For people in Ukraine, he says, the publication of the data indicates that Ukraine’s intelligence authorities are monitoring threats against them. And internationally, the information could be useful to intelligence agencies, such as the US Central Intelligence Agency or the UK's MI6. “They don't have everything,” Ingram says. “It’s always good to get information from a different source—even if you think you have it already—because what it does is it corroborates the sources that you've got.”
Ukraine’s use of information warfare has been lauded since Russia invaded—from President Volodymyr Zelensky’s videos to the “Ghost of Kyiv”—but it has not been the only nation actively publishing information about the war. US and UK intelligence officials have regularly been trying to disrupt Vladimir Putin’s efforts by taking the unusual approach of declassifying information—from revealing potential false flag operations to publishing stats on Russian military losses. “The purpose of that activity is to highlight the costs to the Russian population at home and to impose costs on individual actors,” says Jessica Brandt, a fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology. “But doxing, in general, makes me uncomfortable.”

And information published by global intelligence services is only the beginning. Since the war started, Ukraine has mobilized a volunteer IT Army that has targeted Russian websites and companies, aiming to take their services offline. Ukraine’s digital ministry has also become a polished war machine. Hactivists have also been busy. In the early days of the conflict, the hacker collective Anonymous declared it was in a “cyber war” against the Russian government, and it has claimed credit for attacks that have knocked sites offline and defaced others—despite the potential for unintended consequences. This activity has led to the publication of huge volumes of information about Russian-linked businesses and government bodies.
Transparency activists at the group Distributed Denial of Secrets, or DDoSecrets, have published more than a dozen data sets linked to Russia since Putin’s troops invaded Ukraine in late February. “Putin put a target on the back of Russian interests, and they’re getting hit all at once,” DDoSecrets cofounder Emma Best wrote in a statement posted to Twitter. DDoSecrets secrets has published more than 700 gigabytes of data from the Russian government and more than 3 million Russian emails and documents, Best says.

DDoSecrets also claims to have published more than 360,000 files from Roskomnadzor, the Russian media regulator; 62,000 emails from an investment firm owned by a sanctioned Russian individual; 900,000 emails from VGTRK, a state-owned broadcaster; 230,000 emails from the Russian Ministry of Culture; and 250,000 emails from the Ministry of Education. The list goes on. Best’s statement says DDoSecrets is concerned with improving transparency “where it’s lacking and to publish datasets in the public interest, regardless of its point of origin.”
‘Hack and leak’ operations are not uncommon—think of North Korea’s hack against Sony, or any number of ransomware extortions—but Russia has not often been a target of such operations. The Russian government has largely given cybercriminals based in the country a free pass as long as they don’t target companies within its borders. Brandt says some of the information published has parallels to Russia’s own hacking and leaking of “weaponized information,” citing the 2016 DNC hack as an example.

Over time, the published files could prove to be a gold mine for researchers wanting to understand how the Russian state operates, including its approach to censorship and media control. They may also provide a blueprint for future information operations in other countries, or other wars. For now, though, they’ve exposed Russia to an unprecedented degree. “Frankly,” Best wrote, “we’ve never seen this much data out of Russia before”
 
I can’t imagine if that dude under the van got out and how to report that to command. Holy shit.
Dear Commandat a grenade was tossed in my direction, having at once realised the danger it posed to myself and my comrades, I bravely picked up the munition to toss it back in the direction it came from.
Sadly throwing has never been my forte and it rebounded from my fumbled toss and the rest of the story is now tragic history.
 
there were no concession to Crimea remaining in Russia's hands, merely 15 year agreement to work things out politically and any land consessions meant that it had to be approved by a nationwide referendum, i.e. not approved.

In the most recent interview Zelensky mentioned that if Mariupol falls then it will be end to negotiations. Reportedly there are still civilians there, I have no idea how, but they are pretty much the considered hostages. If they don't exist, the will to negotiate changes a whole lot.




This is the other "kid" MIA on Moscow. The parents are bitching that he is a conscript and was in combat, but they knew his assignment on Moscow and said absolutely nothing ... until Moscow was sunk. Comrade Putin said himself "no conscripts in combat"

The whole MIA at sea is very sus, unless there was a shitshow with liferafts you should be able to reasonably account for people. MIA only if they don't know where all liferafts are and they had a bunch of dudes jump overboard and there is a slight possibility that he is washed out to Odessa shores. Also, no body, no compensation pay for you.

View attachment 3191870
The lifeboats are missing at least on the port side, in the pics of the ship burning. I would assume a lot of people went over the side. And while they are most likely dead. They are not yet certainly dead.
 
Tactical Pink Ford Transit.

The fucking state of the Russians by this point :story:

Have you ever heard that Phil Hendrie bit where he pretends to be a US trooper in Afghanistan, and he talks about how their uniform boots are mismatched Keds sneakers, their long range patrol equipment is made up of kiddie blankets, and so on? One of the jokes is him saying "We don't have any tanks! They won't issue them to us, no, we have to drive vans into combat!"

Well holy shit, it looks like truth is just as strange as fiction.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Pocket Dragoon
What if I told that its possible to oppose trannies & globohomo AND also oppose Putin's invasion of Ukraine?

I mean i dont disagree with that, This is just tactical difference, and unfortunately Putin like the idiot he is fucked up fight against globohomo so speeding the hard times create hard men by creating preassure for West to turn away from this progresive globohomo in name of survival via using nukes (preferably tactical, provides the scare without nuclear winter) seems like only move that doesnt strenghten globohomo. Im not Putin Cheerleader i just hate globohomo to the ceasation of humanity. Putin fucked up, everyone unfortunately.
 
I mean i dont disagree with that, This is just tactical difference, and unfortunately Putin like the idiot he is fucked up fight against globohomo so speeding the hard times create hard men by creating preassure for West to turn away from this progresive globohomo in name of survival via using nukes (preferably tactical, provides the scare without nuclear winter) seems like only move that doesnt strenghten globohomo. Im not Putin Cheerleader i just hate globohomo to the ceasation of humanity. Putin fucked up, everyone unfortunately.

Did you miss security guard dude raped to death? Russia is Homo-globo and also Pedo-globo among Rapo-globo and Looto-globo, just to name a few.


VLADIMIR Putin has honoured an army unit accused of war crimes and genocide in the Russian town of Bucha, reports suggest.

A decree signed by the Russian tyrant gave the 64th Motor Rifle Brigade the title of guards – scandalously praising them for "mass heroism and valour, tenacity and courage."

Vlad obviously likes what he sees and wants more of it.
 
I mean i dont disagree with that, This is just tactical difference, and unfortunately Putin like the idiot he is fucked up fight against globohomo so speeding the hard times create hard men by creating preassure for West to turn away from this progresive globohomo in name of survival via using nukes (preferably tactical, provides the scare without nuclear winter) seems like only move that doesnt strenghten globohomo. Im not Putin Cheerleader i just hate globohomo to the ceasation of humanity. Putin fucked up, everyone unfortunately.

The penguin might peck you, but the shoggoth will eat you and rend your soul, scattering your essence on the back winds of eternal madness. But at least it might eat that penguin.
 
Demolition Ranch ... hold my vodka

A couple of shots from a camera of a dead RF trooper.

1650316840556.png


1650316878171.png

supposedly Russia has started the major offensive in donbass. not much info so far

apparently not only in Donbas but also from south going North as well and slightly west, shelling from Kherson toward Mykolayiv. Major shelling and attacks along all fronts.
 
Holy Shit! Coach Red Pill was right about the killing power of toothpicks.
Oh, that's nothing. In WW2 when it came to forest battles both the Germans and Russians would set their artillery fuses to maximum sensitivity. That way they'd go off when they either hit branches or shortly after, not merely airbursting but also turning the treetop and any nearby branches into lethal wooden shrapnel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back