You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kevin Gibes / Kathryn Gibes / TransSalamander / RageTreb / The Green Salamander - "Am hole:" The epitomized Twitter MtF you thought was just a myth! Donate to his Transformers toy fund today!
Here's how I figure that kinda thing: Look on kindle. It has every kind of kooky sex thing, and even if a man is using a feminine nom de plume, it's obvious when it's a he rather than a she writing one of those fetish romances
I know a guy who did this, amazon and all, and his writing is actually pretty good.
I asked him why and he said 'money.' I think most of them might just assume that for romances, a female author's name is going to sell more than a male one.
I know a guy who did this, amazon and all, and his writing is actually pretty good.
I asked him why and he said 'money.' I think most of them might just assume that for romances, a female author's name is going to sell more than a male one.
I know a guy who did this, amazon and all, and his writing is actually pretty good.
I asked him why and he said 'money.' I think most of them might just assume that for romances, a female author's name is going to sell more than a male one.
I know a man who did this too. I guess churning out romance books is a good way to make money as a writer.
Of course the guy I know is a troon hobo though. He lives off of Cliff Bars, once dated gendergoblin Laurie Penny, and said that ghostwriting a romance book was the most money he ever made. He's a decent writer, but gets massively overrated cause he's a troon.
This example of troon industriousness and self sufficiency puts lazy Kevin to shame!
Is he calling his prostate a g-spot? Because not only is that stupid, but also, I thought the prostate ended up inaccessible after having AmHole surgery? I know I've seen several graphics and read several posts here explaining how you can't get to the prostate anymore after surgery, but maybe it varies on technique. I'm not an AmHole expert tho.
Let me provide some more context.
Doubling Season is a very good card. Card is fairly easy to read, but I'll still explain for non MTF fags: it's an enchantment that applies to the battlefield where you get twice the amount of permanents (creature, artifact, enchantment, land (mana sources), or planeswalker (cards that represent characters in MTG lore with strong effects)) that appear directly into the battlefield by the effect of a spell or ability if you were to create them. Permanents that are cast normally from your hand don't count. The types of permanents affected by Doubling Season are called tokens. Doubling Season also says that you get twice as many counters on your permanents if any ability were to put counters on them. The typical use case of the second properly of Doubling Season is to add double the amount of +1/+1 counters to your creatures to make your creatures have more attack and defense power. Another property of the card worth highlighting is that it's an enchantment. Cards that remove enchantments from the battlefield isnt really played in decks unless the card also removes creatures and/or artifacts as well because a player typically doesn't run that many enchantments in a deck. So if Doubling Season is cast successfully it's most likely staying around for a while. An MTG player that likes to cover all of their bases would include an enchantment removal in their sideboard to sub in for game two after they see an opponent use an enchantment heavy deck.
Considering how it's printed in the Double Masters set and runs for at least $75, this card probably is a Modern staple. Modern is the most expensive MTG format and WoTC reprinted this card in Double Masters to lower the aftermarket value of it to make it easier for people to make Modern decks and add these really good cards into other decks.
I have another MTG question. It's not like Kevin ever goes outside to WTC tournaments or anything, right? Keeping that in mind, what's stopping him from making his own MTG cards out of cardboard and crayons to play with casually? Is there something about the card itself that would justify buying it from an official store for (holy shit) $139.99? View attachment 3210043
Nothing is. He can also get it for cheaper if he didn't get the special and extended art version, but considering it was a gift I'm not gonna shit on him too hard for it. MTG cards that are $12+ are considered to be very expensive for all formats except Modern. I play Commander and will only include a $20+ card if it practically wins me the game.
First, the image he picked of her is the Secret Lair drop card, which is $46 and it's just a pretty art version. He can get her regular version for $8. If he gets the Secret Lair version he is a consoomer retard.
As mentioned above, my personal preference is that I only include a $20+ if it wins me a game of Commander. "So if Kevin here is using this $140 card in his commander deck," you ask, "it must make his board so powerful that he practically wins the game?" No it fucking doesn't, this card doesn't work with his commander.
Commander (also known as EDH) is a 3-5 player free for all variation of MTG where you play with a 100 card deck that is centered around one legendary card: the commander. Each card in your deck cannot be a color that isn't on your commander and there may be no duplicate cards except for basic lands. Your commander starts in a special area called the command zone, and you can cast it from there for the cost indicated on the card at any time the normal MTG rules allows you to do so. If your commander dies, you can choose to return it to the command zone. You can recast it from there for two extra mana for each time it was sent back to the command zone.
A novice commander deck will have an engine that the commander is the primary component of. A great commander deck will have an engine that works just well on its own but the existence of the commander on the battlefield makes it even more of a threat. Or you can go the monke route and make a deck that uses a commander so cheap in mana cost where strategy doesn't even matter to you and you just go fast.
Meren says "Whenever another creature you control dies, you get an experience counter.
At the beginning of your end step, choose target creature card in your graveyard. If that card’s mana value is less than or equal to the number of experience counters you have, return it to the battlefield. Otherwise, put it into your hand."
So her intended use case is is the more of your creatures that die, the stronger the creatures you can put directly into the battlefield become. By increasing the amount of counters you get from each creature death from 1 to 2, you can get stronger creatures out faster. But Doubling Season specifically says "if an effect would put one or more counters on a permanent you control, put twice as many on that permanent instead." The player is not a permanent, so the experience counters that Meren gives you are not affected by Doubling Season. The creatures that Meren brings back aren't affected as well because Meren returns the creatures from graveyard directly to the battlefield and does not create a token of them in any way. So unless the creatures he returns creates tokens, this thing is useless. And even if he did, he's better off getting Parallel Lives, a $50 card that only doubles the amount of tokens you get. But I still wouldn't put it in because creating tokens to overwhelm your opponents wouldn't be a good win con for this deck. You need creature tokens for sacrifice fodder only in the early and mid game and Meren can't bring back more creatures the more you sacrifice - it only increases the limit of the mana value of the creatures you can bring back.
I wish I could see his decklist to confirm that he's actually putting Doubling Season into his deck, and checking the archive of that tweet shows that he did post a link but then deleted the tweet and decklist probably because of that faggot who kept pestering him about how shit his deck was.
Meren allows you to put strong high cost creatures onto the battlefield for free. This is great, and the alternative of putting them to hand is good too because it can act as protection from cards that exile your graveyard if you think an opponent might do that. My main goal would be to sacrifice as many creatures as possible to increase the experience counters and draw as much as possible. At the end of your turn the max amount of cards you can have in hand is 7, so I'll discard the expensive cards I have no intention of casting normally into graveyard so I can put it to battlefield for free with Meren. Alternatively, I'll mill my deck (putting cards from deck directly to graveyard) but this isn't preferred because I might mill something I need or a non creature that I can't bring back with Meren. So after thinking about it for 10 mins, my deck would have these cards:
- low cost creatures that say "when this creature enters the battlefield/attacks/dies target player or it's owner draws/mills X cards"
- cards, especially lands, that allow me to sacrifice other creatures or give me a benefit for sacrificing my creatures
- spells that destroy all creatures with toughness 3 or less or gives all creatures no more than -3/-3 until end of turn (I don't want Meren to die with these effects). Just in case I'll put in a one or two destroy all creatures indiscriminately.
- any creature with the Exploit keyword (when this creature enters the battlefield, you may sacrifice another creature), Devour X keyword(when this creature enters the battlefield, you may sacrifice X creatures to add X counters to that creature), or any keyword that allows me to sacrifice creatures.
- high cost cards that swing the game in my favor that I plan to only cast with Meren
- maybe include some cards that can Proliferate (choose permanents or players with counters on them, they get an additional counter of each kind of counter that they permanent or player already has) because Meren works with that.
Is he calling his prostate a g-spot? Because not only is that stupid, but also, I thought the prostate ended up inaccessible after having AmHole surgery? I know I've seen several graphics and read several posts here explaining how you can't get to the prostate anymore after surgery, but maybe it varies on technique. I'm not an AmHole expert tho.
The amhole basically goes between the butthole and the prostate. This means the prostate is inaccessible from the butthole (and so HSTS complain anal is ruined for them - by his own admission, Kevin never even tried it) but theoretically it could be stimulated by amhole action.
I say theoretically because there's probably very few amholes where that would actually work, and certainly not Kevin's. There is some discussion about how to effectively perform prostate exams or biopsies on trans women - although the estrogen and anti-androgens should lessen the risk of prostate cancer, the risk is still there and I guess doctors are at a bit of a loss.
The amhole basically goes between the butthole and the prostate. This means the prostate is inaccessible from the butthole (and so HSTS complain anal is ruined for them - by his own admission, Kevin never even tried it) but theoretically it could be stimulated by amhole action.
I say theoretically because there's probably very few amholes where that would actually work, and certainly not Kevin's. There is some discussion about how to effectively perform prostate exams or biopsies on trans women - although the estrogen and anti-androgens should lessen the risk of prostate cancer, the risk is still there and I guess doctors are at a bit of a loss.
A question to female kiwis who feel comfortable outing themselves and/or sexologists: do women even have this kind of fetish? Does the thought ever pass their heads? Isn't this exclusively a pornsick male thing?
Think of it like this; sometimes, for some women, it comes into their minds. The thought that you can get yourself off like that could be attractive if you are especially horny and either like pussy or don’t mind the idea of your own. Very quickly, perhaps even instantaneously, you will realize that only in rare circumstances would it EVER be possible, and so you simply cast it from your mind and don’t care to think about it ever again. Why would you? Dicks are different. You don’t have to be impossibly flexible to theoretically reach your mouth to your junk, you just need to be flexible enough. Sometimes a pornsick man could get caught thinking “if only my dick were bigger, I could reach it no problem.” For women, there is no if only. For Kevin, a man who intensely misses his dick? He is caught in an if only thought process that simply does not affect women.
The amhole basically goes between the butthole and the prostate. This means the prostate is inaccessible from the butthole (and so HSTS complain anal is ruined for them - by his own admission, Kevin never even tried it) but theoretically it could be stimulated by amhole action.
I say theoretically because there's probably very few amholes where that would actually work, and certainly not Kevin's. There is some discussion about how to effectively perform prostate exams or biopsies on trans women - although the estrogen and anti-androgens should lessen the risk of prostate cancer, the risk is still there and I guess doctors are at a bit of a loss.
Think of it like this; sometimes, for some women, it comes into their minds. The thought that you can get yourself off like that could be attractive if you are especially horny and either like pussy or don’t mind the idea of your own. Very quickly, perhaps even instantaneously, you will realize that only in rare circumstances would it EVER be possible, and so you simply cast it from your mind and don’t care to think about it ever again. Why would you? Dicks are different. You don’t have to be impossibly flexible to theoretically reach your mouth to your junk, you just need to be flexible enough. Sometimes a pornsick man could get caught thinking “if only my dick were bigger, I could reach it no problem.” For women, there is no if only. For Kevin, a man who intensely misses his dick? He is caught in an if only thought process that simply does not affect women.
I think it all connects back to their incelness coupled with their AGP pornsickness. They want the aesthetics of their incredibly misogynistic porn-based version of women - HONKIN' GAZONGEROUS MOMMY MILKERINO FUN BAGS, mostly - with the comforting familiarity of their fellow "men" and the sex drive of a buck rabbit jacked on testosterone. Quite possibly the worst of both worlds - "imagine if I could suck myself off but I also was a hot gurl uwu". I can't really wrap my head around this coomer lunacy despite being a genuine male myself.
Holy shit, he's just Kevin with tattoos. I knew he was a narcissist, but Kevin simping for someone who looks just like him really brings the subtext to the forefront.
There once was a man from Nantucket,
Whose dick was so long he could suck it.
He said, with a grin,
As he wiped off his chin,
If my ear was a cunt I would fuck it.
I'm really stuck on "I will never understand why I need to be 100% of the inertia with every single one of these surgeries." Who else is it supposed to be, Kev?
I'm really stuck on "I will never understand why I need to be 100% of the inertia with every single one of these surgeries." Who else is it supposed to be, Kev?
As we somehow arrived at the question of self-bj…
Do you think of Kev got cloned and met his clone…
a) They would bang
b) Vomit instantly
c) Both pack lead in the head as brain wouldn’t be able to apply the botched self image filter?
As we somehow arrived at the question of self-bj…
Do you think of Kev got cloned and met his clone…
a) They would bang
b) Vomit instantly
c) Both pack lead in the head as brain wouldn’t be able to apply the botched self image filter?
