Dramacow Ron Collins / Draven Azropht - Fake ninja, fake ex-MP, real pest toward teen girls, fight ducker/loser, convicted felon

[WraithofRonCollins]

I don't give a shit about any of those charges. Post a statement on your blog, Facebook or YouTube confirming that you are posting on here or you will be threadbanned.

I IM'd you and explained everything you need to know.

Yeah, it seems very likely it's just someone imitating Ron. He does a pretty good impression, though. Had me fooled. He has zeroed in on how Ron posts his opinions online and then declares them "proof" -- yet, like a 'sovereign citizen' who can't understand why he got tazed, he fails miserably at every turn.

The court already demolished Ron's appeal of his felony conviction. (We must never forget that the real Ron Collins is a convicted felon with a long rap sheet of petty and violent crimes.) They took it apart at almost the molecular level, destroying it from every angle. Ron isn't going to be able to "prove" anything to anyone other than the fact that he'll never be able to pass a background check or vote for the rest of his life.

I'd add "hold a job," but honestly, the guy hadn't had a job for over a decade or more before he went to prison. We aren't dealing with someone who'll ever contribute to society, have a family, or even so much as shit out a full sentence in English. He'll just bounce out and back in to prison for the rest of his life, howling into the wind that is the Internet for someone to notice him.

I have to tell you, the one person I kind of feel sad for is his elderly mother. She's stuck by him for years and is in poor health. Now she's got, not just an unemployed loser for a son, but an unemployed loser who's a convicted felon. And when she finally passes away he won't be able to sponge off her anymore. I would not be shocked at all if he ended up quite literally homeless.

The Appeal was based on what the Court allowed the lawyers to make. It had everything to do with APD David Bungard lying in court. The 4th Circuit sent me an order that lead to believe they would rule on the Supplemental Brief I filed but... They never did so I filed a Federal Habeas Corpus (a 2255 motion) under actual innocence and included the Supplemental Brief . That brief included transcripts proving he lied. Transcripts Ron Collins posted on his old Facebook.
However, Phil I notice you won't confirm or deny the Child Porn charge was dismissed due to "lack of evidence." Thats pretty telling.

 

[AprilRains]

I IM'd you and explained everything you need to However, Phil I notice you won't confirm or deny the Child Porn charge was dismissed due to "lack of evidence." Thats pretty telling.

I notice you don't talk about your actual guilt, only about how the charge didn't result in a conviction. That's much more telling. If you were trying to make Ron look guilty, you couldn't do a much better job.

 

[WraithofRonCollins]

I notice you don't talk about your actual guilt, only about how the charge didn't result in a conviction. That's much more telling. If you were trying to make Ron look guilty, you couldn't do a much better job.

Who cares...? Either, you believe I was guilty and slipped out of charges due to "lack of evidence" or you don't. I have starting point for proving fuckery by the Courts.

So if we can prove this fuckery, not only can I prove innocence but, I can prove a set up. So if you want me to lead you down the rabbit hole here. Lets start with that.
Because there are only two options here; 1. I wasn't convicted and should have been convicted or, 2. I wasn't convicted and shouldn't have been convicted. So which is it? Cause I can post evidence that proves 2 but, where are we starting at. Unless you don't want Phil to present that proof... In which case your attempt to avoid asking him for this proof is proof you aren't interested in facts.

Are you trying to protect dirty cops and child traffickers too?

 

[Phil Elmore]

Who cares...? Either, you believe I was guilty and slipped out of charges due to "lack of evidence" or you don't. I have starting point for proving fuckery by the Courts.

So if we can prove this fuckery, not only can I prove innocence but, I can prove a set up. So if you want me to lead you down the rabbit hole here. Lets start with that.
Because there are only two options here; 1. I wasn't convicted and should have been convicted or, 2. I wasn't convicted and shouldn't have been convicted. So which is it? Cause I can post evidence that proves 2 but, where are we starting at. Unless you don't want Phil to present that proof... In which case your attempt to avoid asking him for this proof is proof you aren't interested in facts.

Are you trying to protect dirty cops and child traffickers too?

It's cruel of you to keep making things worse for Ron. He's already completely disgraced, unemployed, and an ex-con felon who'll live the rest of his life alone. Yes, we've all long suspected he's a creep who projects his creepy guilt onto anyone who won't agree with his wild fantasies. Yes, he's a weak, sad wreck of a human being who got repeatedly and completely humiliated over and over again before he went to prison. But isn't that enough for you? You have to come here trying to make him seem even worse?

That's cold, man. Cold.

 

[WraithofRonCollins]

It's cruel of you to keep making things worse for Ron. He's already completely disgraced, unemployed, and an ex-con felon who'll live the rest of his life alone. Yes, we've all long suspected he's a creep who projects his creepy guilt onto anyone who won't agree with his wild fantasies. Yes, he's a weak, sad wreck of a human being who got repeatedly and completely humiliated over and over again before he went to prison. But isn't that enough for you? You have to come here trying to make him seem even worse?

That's cold, man. Cold.

So Phil as someone who follows Ron, as his personal fan club... Do you deny his child porn case was denied due to "lack of evidence?" How does one get charged for possession of child pornography and then not go to prison for it?

I means Phil I watches the video and listen to the Raleigh County Prosecutor say their was no 2nd Search Warrant mentioned on the arrest warrant. I read Ron's Warrant, where it cites a second Search Warrant. Why would a prosecutor lie to a Judge in Court?
Its all public record, the Black Dragon Ninjitsu Blog: Motivation: Why I am happy with a "Jacked" up Life & you aren't with a perfect life...
Hey while you are avoiding admitting that the Child Porn charges were dismissed due to "lack of evidence," (silence is admission of guilt BTW) did you notice that arrest warrant says they had the evidence.
So they arrest me for it, claim to have the evidence, then dismiss the case due to "lack of evidence" and you are too busy claiming "I'm not me", while I claim to "be me, pretending not to be me for you to prove I am me." So I can manipulate you into confirming what we already know... I move you like a pawn because I can.

 

[AprilRains]

Who cares...?

Decent human beings care if Ron is a kiddie toucher. Thanks for letting us know that you, whoever you are, do not belong to that group.

Either, you believe I was guilty and slipped out of charges due to "lack of evidence" or you don't. I have starting point for proving fuckery by the Courts.

Yes, Ron's theories about how West Virginia organized crime is in league with the judicial system to frame him. I'll be happy to discuss that with Ron, if he shows up here.

 

[Phil Elmore]

Ron tends to conflate all of his legal issues into one giant (imaginary) conspiracy, all of which is elaborately orchestrated to keep one unemployed loser from ever finding a job or a reason to exist. To hear the real Ron tell it, anyone who ever criticized him is a jealous "business competitor" (he tends to forget that to be someone's business competitor you have to first have a business and then actually be someone others would want to do business with) out to keep him down, and this is the source of literally all of his many, many problems.

The real problem is, of course, that Ron is a terribly dangerous combination of stupid, cowardly, and unable to control his own impulses. He was too afraid to step out onto a mat and spar his longtime "enemy" Don Roley, but had no problem physically attacking his own lawyer or a police officer (the latter during one of his early legal issues when he was dressed, I kid you not, like a pint-sized Guy Fieri).

Ron's impersonator seems to think that the rhetorical equivalent of "douchebag-says-what" makes some kind of point, so he at least shares Ron's inability to distinguish between his own fantasies and leaps of illogic and the rules of reality that everybody else is following.

Without a doubt, though, this can't be Ron. The real Ron would have posted a giant dump of every document he possesses by now, something he seemingly never tires of doing even though these documents neither "prove" what he thinks they do, nor help his case. The real Ron is apparently demanding that documents that were sealed for his own protection be unsealed, because he's, well, profoundly stupid.

But then, you don't get to be an unemployed incel convicted felon with a long rap sheet of misdemeanors and a failed military record if you're the sort of person who makes well-informed choices.

 

[WraithofRonCollins]

Decent human beings care if Ron is a kiddie toucher. Thanks for letting us know that you, whoever you are, do not belong to that group.


Yes, Ron's theories about how West Virginia organized crime is in league with the judicial system to frame him. I'll be happy to discuss that with Ron, if he shows up here.

So... You care but enough to ask Fat Phil to verify that the Kiddie Porn charge was dismissed due to "lack of evidence", which his avoidance to neither confirm or deny is a form of backing this up. After all if were a lie he'd denounce it outright and proven a liar...? Again? lol
The Warrant Below says;
The State Police had the arrest warrant & that they got a Second Search Warrant.

The Video linked to the blog post has the Prosecutor Pat Lamp saying the warrant doesn't mention a 2nd Search Warrant, because the police wouldn't turn it over in discovery... That means that Trooper Efrid of the West Virginia State Police lied on a sworn document, about a sworn document that doesn't exist. Why would police lie a sworn document? I mean if Ron is guilty why lie on him when you can "prove" his guilt?
Here is video if anyone wants to listen to the audio...

 

[Phil Elmore]

Our Ron impersonator certainly has learned how to harp on and obsess over irrelevant points. This is the same sovereign-citizen logic that made Ron a felon for the rest of his life.

 

[WraithofRonCollins]

Our Ron impersonator certainly has learned how to harp on and obsess over irrelevant points. This is the same sovereign-citizen logic that made Ron a felon for the rest of his life.

So it is "irrelevant" that I, Ron Collins, have a video of a Raleigh County Prosecutor telling a sitting Judge there is no 2nd Search Warrant, and an arrest warrant showing there is a mention of a second search warrant..? So while could sit here and argue that I, Ron Collins, was accused of Possessing child porn and wasn't convicted because the police lied. That I, a white, Christian, Conservative, from the south no less... have evidence and proof of the very facts that make many of the arguments of Black Lives Matter, a factual concern, (if it happened to me, why not them?) and might not be a kiddie toucher.

Here is the thing Phil, who I am is not important, what is important is that evidence proves my Public Defender lied, my direct appeal was handled by lawyers who never used the info in my Supplemental Brief. Anyone want to see the proof David Bungard my fed public defender lied. Course we know why your here Phil and why you are trying to prompt me to provide proof of who I am... You want to disrupt the federal habaes, especially after I filed to have them let me present to argue it in court. Your name is on my paperwork. You're clinging to one desperate victory because its all you'll ever have. lol

Isn't that your e-mail on the SEALED document released from Fort Dix by Ron online? Wait Phil, that means you have alternative motives, other then being Ron's (my) Manchurian Candidate Fuck Puppet Unless you work for Ron and all this is part of Ron's deranged ninja mind control games to increase the digital footprint of proving misconduct by the state and federal government. Am I really you using a span account Phil, are you working for me (Ron) as controlled opposition.

Still got your e-mails with Agent Bullard before my arrest. Dropping his name on my blog was priceless BTW. Better have a blackmail card for the dirty feds... lol

 

[Phil Elmore]

You... realize you posted Ron's social security number publicly on the Internet, right?

 

[WraithofRonCollins]

You... realize you posted Ron's social security number publicly on the Internet, right?

His life is shit as you point out continuously... and I went with what is on his blog. Some image. Public info. Right?

 

[AprilRains]

So... You care but enough to ask Fat Phil to verify that the Kiddie Porn charge was dismissed due to "lack of evidence", which his avoidance to neither confirm or deny is a form of backing this up. After all if were a lie he'd denounce it outright and proven a liar...? Again? lol

Why is it important that I ask him? Can't you speak for yourself?

Also, why do I care about the legal system's failure to jail Ron? That's something a frequent defendant cares about. The rest of us can make our own decisions.

In any case, until you have established to the satisfaction of an admin that you are Ron, your suppositions are boring.

 

[Phil Elmore]

I think the mask is slipping and our impersonator doesn't realize it's illegal to post someone else's SSN like that...

 

[WraithofRonCollins]

I think the mask is slipping and our impersonator doesn't realize it's illegal to post someone else's SSN like that...

Call the feds apparently that is what you do to shut people up... Oh will you post that court saying the state dropped the child porn charges due to lack of evidence?

Why is it important that I ask him? Can't you speak for yourself?

Also, why do I care about the legal system's failure to jail Ron? That's something a frequent defendant cares about. The rest of us can make our own decisions.

In any case, until you have established to the satisfaction of an admin that you are Ron, your suppositions are boring.

Only important in that you demand something from me and yet, as someone who claims Ron is guilty you refuse to get additional information from someone else.

You also seem to forget a) There is a recording of a court hearing where a public defender says there was no 2nd search warrant and, an arrest warrant mentioning the 2nd search warrant. You won't discuss that because your intention isn't to address where or not I am guilty or that there was a police cover up and, b) that since Ron's position has always been that I am innocent and it was set up. Proof of a set up has been presented and so...

Does that change you belief in my guilt or innocence? No... Why because your intention is declare an innocent man guilty and ignore factual material evidence of that innocence.

 

[AprilRains]

Only important in that you demand something from me and yet, as someone who claims Ron is guilty you refuse to get additional information from someone else.

I'm not demanding anything. I'm telling you what you need to do in order to be credible here. It's your choice.

Now, the admin who told you that you would be threadbanned if you didn't back your mouth with some evidence of your identity, that person made a demand and was well within his rights to do so. Me, I'm just letting you know what time of day it is. Do what you want with the information.

In any case, I don't know how much I care about the additional information that you are demanding. It's information that you could apparently supply, if you really were Ron and had all the paperwork that Ron has been posting. But I think your point is to try to make me do something for you, because one thing you have in common with Ron is that you are a petty manipulative little shit who thinks he's some kind of grand puppet master. You're not. You're an idiot.

You also seem to forget a) There is a recording of a court hearing where a public defender says there was no 2nd search warrant and, an arrest warrant mentioning the 2nd search warrant. You won't discuss that because your intention isn't to address where or not I am guilty or that there was a police cover up and, b) that since Ron's position has always been that I am innocent and it was set up. Proof of a set up has been presented and so...

Even if the prosecution committed some sort of procedural error, that doesn't make Ron not guilty. That's convict reasoning.

Does that change you belief in my guilt or innocence? No... Why because your intention is declare an innocent man guilty and ignore factual material evidence of that innocence.

That's not evidence of Ron's innocence. At all.

 

[Phil Elmore]

We don't actually need evidence of Ron's supposed innocence, because he was proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Then he lost his appeal, affirming that guilt.

Ron is guilty, period. Ron is a felon, forever, end of sentence. Ron will never vote or own a gun. Ron will never do anything except bitch that life is terribly, terribly unfair -- which is true, but it becomes much more unfair when you're stupid.

Our impersonator seems offended that someone might have seen Ron -- an unstable, prohibited person -- illegally buy a gun, and then inform the authorities of this fact. That's because our impersonator, for all that he screams about "corruption" and "child trafficking" and other projections of his fucked up desires, doesn't give a damn if Ron commits murder -- which he most certainly would have done had no one intervened.

 

[WraithofRonCollins]

Now, the admin who told you that you would be threadbanned if you didn't back your mouth with some evidence of your identity, that person made a demand and was well within his rights to do so. Me, I'm just letting you know what time of day it is. Do what you want with the information.

Even if the prosecution committed some sort of procedural error, that doesn't make Ron not guilty. That's convict reasoning.

That's not evidence of Ron's innocence. At all...

So a Prosecutor lying to judge to cover for cops falsifying evidence is a prosecutional error?
That is felony under West Virginia Law:

And under Federal law:

But, to your irrational mind... Its prosecutional error. Nor do I care if I am threadbanned. Hey you aren't a moderator so don't worry about. All I see someone trying to find an excuse for evidence of dirty cops, corrupt courts and, all tied to organized crime and child trafficking...

Your are literally trying to defend child traffickers! See here is whats important to me morally...
1) Whether Ron (me) is guilty or not doesn't matter, he wasn't found "guilty."
2) He exposed criminality and corruption on a massive level and, testified to this in the Habaes Corpus that got him out the crazy house.
3) Now if Ron (I) am guilty and I am exposing others who are guilty then the exposed evidence needs to be used to have them arrested or at least investigated or,
4) If I am not guilty, I exposed a felony by the prosecutor and, cops and, testified to expose corruption in the local courts and, mob connections involved in the human trafficking of minors.

So let me ask you, why is this evidence not important. Everyone here claiming to hate Chomos, even if you think I am guilty, should be asking; "Why aren't outraged over what Ron exposed?"

I'll tell you why... Because all that I have child molester shit you claim online, is about making you look good and actually checking on something that might do everyone some good.
As you said "because one thing you have in common with Ron is that you are a petty manipulative little shit who thinks he's some kind of grand puppet master. You're not. You're an idiot." While you are still crying about me exposing you as some with anterior motives.

 

[AprilRains]

So a Prosecutor lying to judge to cover for cops falsifying evidence is a prosecutional error?

So prove there's a lie. An actual lie, not an immaterial error. But demanding that I ask Phil for the proof? You don't have standing to ask me a damn thing. You won't even demonstrate you're Ron Collins, or at least no admin has confirmed that you have.=

Nor do I care if I am threadbanned. Hey you aren't a moderator so don't worry about.

I'll express any concerns I like. What can you do about it? Absolutely nothing.

All I see someone trying to find an excuse for evidence of dirty cops, corrupt courts and, all tied to organized crime and child trafficking...

No, you're trying to find an excuse for Ron having been found guilty of a felony. A felony he indisputably committed. Every shit-apple jailhouse lawyer has a bullshit litany of how the law done him wrong. Whether you're Ron or not, you fit the profile.

Stop demanding that others prove Ron's case. Stop demanding that people believe Ron was done wrong without presenting clean and convincing proof and a narrative to support it. And stop pretending to be Ron until you prove to an admin that you are he.

As you said "because one thing you have in common with Ron is that you are a petty manipulative little shit who thinks he's some kind of grand puppet master. You're not. You're an idiot." While you are still crying about me exposing you as some with anterior motives.

LOL, "anterior motives"! You are as illiterate as Ron, or you're doing a good job of faking it.

I don't have ulterior motives. I'll tell you up front: My motive is to point and laugh at Ron Collins. That's what we do here.

 

[Phil Elmore]

Ron's impersonator seems to believe that simply not believing him constitutes some devastating proof of something or other. It doesn't.

Ron broke the law. Ron got convicted. Ron is a felon.

Simple.