Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[Muh Pez Dispenser]

 

[Wertmueller]

Well I guess nobody mentioned this but Veondre Mitchell (the passable troon known for making cringe tik toks and dressing like a slut on social media) is no longer a minor. He turned 18 two weeks ago or so and already I see signs that he is hitting a wall in his transition. Basically what I am trying to say is that this troon is starting to not look as feminine as he used to, like I see signs of baldness and his face changing.

The impression probably comes only from his wig. He was already chemically castrated at 11 or 12. That and the later HRT should actually help against baldness.
Unfortunately for him, his penis is now probably so small that there is not enough skin for a "neovagina". He has also lost his sexual sensation. To compensate, he can be a bimbo on Tiktok - at least that's something.
https://www.mydigitalpublication.co...icle_id=3968690&view=articleBrowser&ver=html5 | https://archive.ph/R74sv

 

[I am the Muffin Maker]

"I spend so much time. . .being tuned in to other peoples needs but people just ignore mine[.]" Ignoring the stupidity of this, just think about that statement. What "needs" does this man want to satisfy by massaging women? I'm sure we all know the answer, but it's still rather telling that he massages not to earn money or even give a sense of relaxation to his clients. It's about what he "needs."

There's also an update posted about the same time:

View attachment 3243346
More of the same sense of narcissism. It's really not surprising, but still interesting to see, in a way.

Here are some of the choice responses, as well as replies from the masseur himself:
View attachment 3243358

View attachment 3243363
I'm just thankful there's still some users of Reddit that are more level-headed than the rest.

Here's an image of the e-mail the client sent to the massage-parlor manager. I'll spoiler it, though, as it's somewhat long.

Spoiler: E-mail

View attachment 3243373

I refuse to buy into this idea that trauma is the thing that finally gets to trump Trans ideology. If body autonomy is to have any meaning then (forgive me) "no" means "no."

It should mean I don't have to offer any explanation as to why, I don't want it. I don't want someone touching me. Maybe she had a vision of a man in an ugly dress killing her, maybe she's of a religious sect that says only her husband may touch her fair flesh, maybe she is a bigot - it isn't the other person's business. More importantly she doesn't owe anyone, man, women, dog, an explanation.

 

[pr3nt177]

 

[Starved Artist]

Well I guess nobody mentioned this but Veondre Mitchell (the passable troon known for making cringe tik toks and dressing like a slut on social media) is no longer a minor. He turned 18 two weeks ago or so and already I see signs that he is hitting a wall in his transition. Basically what I am trying to say is that this troon is starting to not look as feminine as he used to, like I see signs of baldness and his face changing.
Before
View attachment 3243220
After
View attachment 3243228
View attachment 3243232
View attachment 3243234

What is with that look? You see it on pornstars and girls trying to break into hiphop.

 

[Rotter]

This is actually a really conservative estimate of SRS costs. Probably with the assumption of no complications, revisions and associative costs.
For example, one of the TiFs on the SRS Horrors thread has racked up $929K so far and isn't even finished with her surgeries. Most people I've seen on Reddit who have mentioned costs after they've had the surgeries seem to be in the 6 figures.

You don't need a lot of those patients before you have a black 2022 Toyota Century in your garage. I thought Scott Newgent was an outlier with his 900.000$+ neophaloplasty. I guess not

 

[gcthrowaway2019]

Black lipstick is literally hideous on anyone who doesn’t have either full lips or a full face of makeup and the fact that it’s a crooked mess doesn’t make it look any better on him.

I've worn black lipstick having both but ever since someone on here said "doglips" I tossed it. I tossed out the other crazy colors (teal, Sonic blue) too bc the wokies ruined it for me.

Jfc, the game is rigged and you can never win. Unless there is context missing here, how is this transphobic? OP didn’t even say men, just “anyone with a dick”. Isn’t this what they were fighting for? Genitals don’t equal sex?

Edit: “Not all dicks are bad”
View attachment 3243040

They literally said "people with penises" which is the preferred verbage right? Is it bc the context rules out Aiden's arm sausage? Is it bc it lumps TIMs with men? Who was offended here?!

 

[Fartificial Insmelligence]

What is with that look? You see it on pornstars and girls trying to break into hiphop.

View attachment 3243701

That's the "I'll suck your balls like a Hoover vacuum for some handbag money" stare.

 

[InteracialBowelSyndrome]

This is a great time to troll the troons.

"Omg Nancy Pelosi didnt say 'birthing people'! Chuck Jewmer didnt say 'menstruating folks'! We need to fight this!"

Predator troons will naturally cause a divide between them and anyone who isn't a mentally ill leftist or groomer, but I'm all for throwing a wedge of cheese between these fighting hobos.

 

[Rotter]

Well I guess nobody mentioned this but Veondre Mitchell (the passable troon known for making cringe tik toks and dressing like a slut on social media) is no longer a minor. He turned 18 two weeks ago or so and already I see signs that he is hitting a wall in his transition. Basically what I am trying to say is that this troon is starting to not look as feminine as he used to, like I see signs of baldness and his face changing.
Before
View attachment 3243220
After
View attachment 3243228
View attachment 3243232
View attachment 3243234

You rid yourself of them pesky bollocks - those testosterone-producing bastards. The problem is, you still have those glands, called 'the adrenals'. Those glands sit on top of each kidney, and they just steadily keep pumping out tiny amounts of testosterone. There is nothing you can do to stop it either.

You could say that mother nature is a bit of a TERF.

 

[ScooterL]

what the...
i thought it was just the ones with the weak jawline that troon out. look at this guys chin game, what are you doing dude?!?

Very asymmetrical. Looks like he's been stung by a bee on his right side.

Based women. Cope, seethe, dilate, etc. I hope she wins. To quote trannies: rights aren't like pie. Women getting a group of their own doesn't take away the mixed-sex and male only groups.



Possibly, yes. These are other cases Alito claimed had no solid roots in history, which is his main claim as to why abortion is bad mmmkay? One tweet I read said he included the law on crosdressing, although I haven't seen that (I admit to being too sad/angry to have read the brief, I don't enjoy being MATI), for the same reason. I do find that to be likely as it fits the theme as shown here, but as of now it's hearsay.

That would make "being trans" illegal, in theory, even in the privacy of your home. However, like sodamy laws, how do they enforce that?

Even if you're against abortion, this is a legitimate terrifying precedent to set. It could have tremendous ripple affects that genuinely set back freedoms that people, mostly women and other minority, today take for granted. Like the ability to own property and our own bank accounts. I don't think the right to vote will be taken away, but I'm not 100% sure.

Edit: and before you vote me retarded for fear-mongering, remember as recently as less than six years ago practically everyone was saying to women and some men "stop being retarded, they will never overturn roe v Wade". If you still think I'm a retard, well, I can't stop you.

View attachment 3243219View attachment 3243222
View attachment 3243224

The important word that isn't highlighted is "distinguishes". It's setting out why abortion isn't like those examples. The tweeter is being dishonest by just waving that fact away, it's the whole point of the passage.

 

[autoerotic bus accident]

/r/corsets is now 75% male trannies looking for help. A typical post will look like this:

Surely this is a person with real dysphoria trying to help their mental illness and not a deranged autogynophilic fetishis - oh. Oh. Ooops.

Well, here's another fetish I wish I didn't know existed. r/bellyinflation is for people who literally fetishize inflated women. Why are they ALL like this? At least his fetishes will probably go away once he gets his nuts cut off.

 

[Inebriated Raccoon]

I think if you try to opt out of being a woman, you opt out of getting cared about when women's rights are threatened. Oh no the Aidens might not be able to get their fucked up cross hormone pregnancies terminated? You cast your lot, get fucked.

What they are witnessing is reality-the reality of respectability politics. Note how these politicians and celebs drop the pretense of not knowing what a woman is when faced with a problem that specifically targets women.

None of them are using “birthing people”, “uterus owners”, etc. No one believes that a biological male becomes a biological female or a biological female becomes a biological male simply because someone says so. They know that only biological females can get pregnant and this is a serious issue. So, they are not playing the pronoun game right now.

 

[Rotter]

At least his fetishes will probably go away once he gets his nuts cut off.

It would be nice, but I also want to press X, to doubt.

 

[autoerotic bus accident]

It would be nice, but I also want to press X, to doubt.

It happens to quite a few of them, apparently. "Being a woman"/castration/emasculation is a part of the fetish for these types. The ones who are "transitioning" because they're fetishists sometimes go through with the orchiectomy and then find, disappointingly, that a) they have no further fetish goal to pursue and b) they now lack the natural hormonal fluctuations that influence a normal libido. A lot of trannies find their autogynephilia, and sometimes all sexual desire, evaporates after the nutectomy.

Example:

It seems like it happens less to people getting SRS because of actual dysphoria, but there are a lot more guys transitioning because of fetishes nowadays, so there's also more of this shit.

 

[Notorious AGP]

"We got to rub our cocks together and frot and it was just so nice.":

 

[autoerotic bus accident]

What they are witnessing is reality-the reality of respectability politics. Note how these politicians and celebs drop the pretense of not knowing what a woman is when faced with a problem that specifically targets women.

None of them are using “birthing people”, “uterus owners”, etc. No one believes that a biological male becomes a biological female or a biological female becomes a biological male simply because someone says so. They know that only biological females can get pregnant and this is a serious issue. So, they are not playing the pronoun game right now.

I wish this was more widely true, but there's still lots of people deluding themselves. Here's NARAL, one of the largest abortion advocacy organizations in the world, digging in and desperately pretending pregnancy somehow affects people other than women. (This is from the last time there was abortion furor, a few months ago.)

 

[Rotter]

It happens to quite a few of them, apparently. "Being a woman"/castration/emasculation is a part of the fetish for these types. The ones who are "transitioning" because they're fetishists sometimes go through with the orchiectomy and then find, disappointingly, that a) they have no further fetish goal to pursue and b) they now lack the natural hormonal fluctuations that influence a normal libido. A lot of trannies find their autogynephilia, and sometimes all sexual desire, evaporates after the nutectomy.

Example:


View attachment 3244103

It seems like it happens less to people getting SRS because of actual dysphoria, but there are a lot more guys transitioning because of fetishes nowadays, so there's also more of this shit.

That's interesting. If it makes society a safer place tho, I'm all for it.

 

[autoerotic bus accident]

"We got to rub our cocks together and frot and it was just so nice.":

it's so icky to think about rubbing two surgically created, numb tubes of scar tissue together and pretending it's sexually pleasurable, but I do think it's funny that the wimmins had to eventually make a "gaytransguys" sub because the gay guys in the gay subs consistently emphasize that they aren't wanted there.

 

[Marvin]

Possibly, yes. These are other cases Alito claimed had no solid roots in history, which is his main claim as to why abortion is bad mmmkay? One tweet I read said he included the law on crosdressing, although I haven't seen that (I admit to being too sad/angry to have read the brief, I don't enjoy being MATI), for the same reason. I do find that to be likely as it fits the theme as shown here, but as of now it's hearsay.

That would make "being trans" illegal, in theory, even in the privacy of your home. However, like sodamy laws, how do they enforce that?

Even if you're against abortion, this is a legitimate terrifying precedent to set. It could have tremendous ripple affects that genuinely set back freedoms that people, mostly women and other minority, today take for granted. Like the ability to own property and our own bank accounts. I don't think the right to vote will be taken away, but I'm not 100% sure.

Edit: and before you vote me retarded for fear-mongering, remember as recently as less than six years ago practically everyone was saying to women and some men "stop being retarded, they will never overturn roe v Wade". If you still think I'm a retard, well, I can't stop you.

Roe v Wade was really a terrible decision reasoning-wise.

Privacy has never been a blank check for anything, other than specific protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.

There's never been any other alleged crime that you can perpetrate privately and then claim privacy as to why prosecution would be outright unconstitutional. Drug use, consensual incest, self harm, certain body modifications, laws restricting them have all been held up, time and time again, as constitutional, no matter how privately they're executed. (I know people can nitpick about these, like "what if the incest couple procreates", or "self harm is a mental illness, you can't consent to that" but you can see my general point.)

(In fact, while we're on this point, I think Lawrence v Texas was also wrongly decided.)

And in the Roe decision, they really didn't try very hard to even elaborate why the privacy thing applied. It was just kinda handwavy and "uh... uh... privacy?"

Legal scholars have remarked on how vague the justification was. I think anyone who's been paying attention knew that, on its merits, Roe deserved to be overturned, and if it stayed up, it is only because of a sort of an attitude of "honor" in the Supreme Court where they respect past judgments until circumstances change.

I'm actually very pro-choice. I think this is horrendous and is going to fuck a lot of people's lives up. But I think betting the farm on Roe v Wade was a bad approach. I think activists should've been treating Roe v Wade solely as a stopgap, while agitating to pass better laws on the state level. (Some have done this, there are laws protecting abortion in like 16 states.)