The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

gang weeder said:
(I'm not sure if this type of situation ever actually occurs in reality--certainly I haven't seen or been shown any specific examples of it). An impossible situation in which at least one death is guaranteed
Click to expand...
This is your delusion. Pregnancy is a regular matter of life and death. Even in intentional pregnancies, 20% of them are miscarriages. Many of these mothers need abortions to preserve their fertility or their lives.

It's not wrong to be prosperous and sheltered, but you take for granted why the cry of a neonate is a miracle. We cry when they do for all the infants that never do.

Our low infant mortality rates are extensively engineered, and a big portion of that is because of women terminating pregnancies that are not compatible with life. Conjoined twins with one heart, babies with tooth buds in their mid brain, embryos developing with two copies of an autosomal recessive gene.

Even if they are the minority of people receiving abortions, I don't think we should fuck them over like this. Just in a pointless bid to save the souls of sluts?

Either way, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. But if you truly value posterity, then you must practice triage. And I'm genuinely sorry that you have so few woman in your life that you know so little about husbandry.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Hitman One, Goth Commie, Kiwi & Cow and 1 other person
grimacefetishist said:
This is your delusion. Pregnancy is a regular matter of life and death. Even in intentional pregnancies, 20% of them are miscarriages. Many of these mothers need abortions to preserve their fertility or their lives.

It's not wrong to be prosperous and sheltered, but you take for granted why the cry of a neonate is a miracle. We cry when they do for all the infants that never do.

Our low infant mortality rates are extensively engineered, and a big portion of that is because of women terminating pregnancies that are not compatible with life. Conjoined twins with one heart, babies with tooth buds in their mid brain, embryos developing with two copies of an autosomal recessive gene.

Even if they are the minority of people receiving abortions, I don't think we should fuck them over like this. Just in a pointless bid to save the souls of sluts?

Either way, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. But if you truly value posterity, then you must practice triage. And I'm genuinely sorry that you have so few woman in your life that you know so little about husbandry.
Click to expand...
Our infant and maternal mortality rates are "engineered" but it has almost nothing at all to do with elective abortion, period.

It's in this order:

1. Massive transfusion protocols/safe blood supply.
2. Clean ORs and fast emergent c-sections with fine-tuned anesthesia.
3. Artificial surfactant and antibiotics. Until surfactant was developed we regularly lost 32 weekers, even, like JFK's dead son. Now if a gal goes into labor at 32 weeks no effort will be made to stop or stall it, because that kid has a 98%+ odds of surviving with zero long-term damage.
4. Supplemental oxygen
5. Various specialized innovations in the NICU like cooling for neuro preservation, bili lights, immune globulins.

And then maybe 0.0001% due to people just preemptively killing ones who wouldn't make it, but no sane accounting of neonatal survival counts any dead bodies as a win, because why would it?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Kiwi & Cow and Daily Affirmation
Larry David's Opera Cape said:
Our infant and maternal mortality rates are "engineered" but it has almost nothing at all to do with elective abortion, period.

It's in this order:

1. Massive transfusion protocols/safe blood supply.
2. Clean ORs and fast emergent c-sections with fine-tuned anesthesia.
3. Artificial surfactant and antibiotics. Until surfactant was developed we regularly lost 32 weekers, even, like JFK's dead son. Now if a gal goes into labor at 32 weeks no effort will be made to stop or stall it, because that kid has a 98%+ odds of surviving with zero long-term damage.
4. Supplemental oxygen
5. Various specialized innovations in the NICU like cooling for neuro preservation, bili lights, immune globulins.

And then maybe 0.0001% due to people just preemptively killing ones who wouldn't make it, but no sane accounting of neonatal survival counts any dead bodies as a win, because why would it?
Click to expand...
Hell yeah to the NICU and the IGs, I love those

You are still low balling the amount of preemptive terminations, and also ignoring the point- LOSS IS INEVITIBLE, BUT REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF CORPSES IS A WIN

and you are still in denial of the amount of fatal pregnancies. Have you never done missionary work? Worked inpatient care in a hospital or palliative center? Lost friends or coworkers from complications of pregnancy? Are you twelve?
 
  • Like
Reactions: lol rascal
grimacefetishist said:
Hell yeah to the NICU and the IGs, I love those

You are still low balling the amount of preemptive terminations, and also ignoring the point- LOSS IS INEVITIBLE, BUT REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF CORPSES IS A WIN

and you are still in denial of the amount of fatal pregnancies. Have you never done missionary work? Worked inpatient care in a hospital or palliative center? Lost friends or coworkers from complications of pregnancy? Are you twelve?
Click to expand...
You are not reducing the number of corpses by killing the deceased a couple weeks before they would have died.

If that was the case, Cuomo would be a great hero of the people for culling boomers. "He reduced mortality in 2021 by pumping it up in 2020!"

I'm very aware of the costliness of human reproduction. I have professional and personal stakes in keeping the details to myself, and no particular need or desire to peacock about it. You do what you need for yourself, of course.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Goth Commie, Kiwi & Cow and grimacefetishist
Larry David's Opera Cape said:
You are not reducing the number of corpses by killing the deceased a couple weeks before they would have died.

If that was the case, Cuomo would be a great hero of the people for culling boomers. "He reduced mortality in 2021 by pumping it up in 2020!"

I'm very aware of the costliness of human reproduction. I have professional and personal stakes in keeping the details to myself, and no particular need or desire to peacock about it. You do what you need for yourself, of course.
Click to expand...
I didn't mean to imply I do all of those things, just that those are situations where one would be exposed to that trauma that I could think of

But again, I don't see the point in criminalizing abortion just because a lot of criminals peruse it. It will alienate women from prenatal care and lead to deaths that would otherwise be preventable.

The criminalization of abortion is also the criminalization of miscarriage. Because of people like that weed guy who think that natural miscarriage is a statistical outlier.
 
snailslime said:
2) learn how contraception works, dumbass.
Click to expand...
Educate all of us dumb virgins how it works then, go on.
snailslime said:
do you believe that young daughters should be forced to carry their fathers' incest rape fetuses.
Click to expand...
Why are you using such a small minority of tragic abortion cases as justification of your degenerate sexual behavior?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Space_Dandy and NoTimeToLose
Hey guys, it's a little bit dark, but @gang weeder admitted to me in private that he thinks about raping and eating little bitty babies.
1652773057359.png
I wonder if maybe that's why he dislikes abortion so much, because then there are fewer little bitty babies for him to hunt? It seems pretty sick tbh. I was wondering what everyone's thoughts were about it.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Lurker, veri, gang weeder and 2 others
Uberpenguin said:
Hey guys, it's a little bit dark, but @gang weeder admitted to me in private that he thinks about raping and eating little bitty babies.
View attachment 3291370
I wonder if maybe that's why he dislikes abortion so much, because then there are fewer little bitty babies for him to hunt? It seems pretty sick tbh. I was wondering what everyone's thoughts were about it.
Click to expand...
In his defence this is also my sole reservation on the abortion question. How can I approve of them when they deprive me of drama, rape and fresh meat?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gang weeder
grimacefetishist said:
This is your delusion. Pregnancy is a regular matter of life and death. Even in intentional pregnancies, 20% of them are miscarriages. Many of these mothers need abortions to preserve their fertility or their lives.

It's not wrong to be prosperous and sheltered, but you take for granted why the cry of a neonate is a miracle. We cry when they do for all the infants that never do.

Our low infant mortality rates are extensively engineered, and a big portion of that is because of women terminating pregnancies that are not compatible with life. Conjoined twins with one heart, babies with tooth buds in their mid brain, embryos developing with two copies of an autosomal recessive gene.

Even if they are the minority of people receiving abortions, I don't think we should fuck them over like this. Just in a pointless bid to save the souls of sluts?

Either way, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. But if you truly value posterity, then you must practice triage. And I'm genuinely sorry that you have so few woman in your life that you know so little about husbandry.
Click to expand...

None of that is comparable to the situation you posed where some kind of choice is to be made between two lives. Tiresome and dishonest. And if you think pregnancy is a "matter of life and death" because many of them end in miscarriages, that is an implicit admission that a miscarriage is a death, is it not? Hence to intentionally induce a miscarriage (i.e. abortion) would be murder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark Antony
HeroicIdealism said:
Educate all of us dumb virgins how it works then, go on.
Click to expand...
it doesn't work 100% of the time and that's just common sense.
HeroicIdealism said:
Why are you using such a small minority of tragic abortion cases as justification of your degenerate sexual behavior?
Click to expand...
because it's still a reason to get an abortion and if you think all abortion is wrong no matter what, you're a psycho.
 
gang weeder said:
None of that is comparable to the situation you posed where some kind of choice is to be made between two lives. Tiresome and dishonest. And if you think pregnancy is a "matter of life and death" because many of them end in miscarriages, that is an implicit admission that a miscarriage is a death, is it not? Hence to intentionally induce a miscarriage (i.e. abortion) would be murder.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I agree that abortion can be the termination of life, but I disagree that that's inherently murder.

If that were the case (killing=murder), then many men I know would be murderers. But we look at the circumstances and realize that it would be batshit unfair, and any legislative follow through on that would lead to more poverty and ergo, suffering and death. Instead they just get a slap on the wrist and told to look where they're going, and not to do it again!

I think that creating a system that judges all miscarriages as potential crimes is a waste of resources. And also culpably weird. If someone knocked me up knowing that I most likely can't have live babies, would he be a murderer as well? (I say no.)

But if I went to the ER for it, it wouldn't be clear that that's the case. They wouldn't know my medical history and it would have to be seen as a potential crime and be investigated as such. And because of how common miscarriage is, that is going to be a lot of time wasted.
 
grimacefetishist said:
Yeah, I agree that abortion can be the termination of life, but I disagree that that's inherently murder.
Click to expand...

How is termination of a human life not murder when it is done purely for the sake of convenience? I.e., the 90+% of cases where the woman just gets an abortion because she doesn't want a kid, not because she was raped or the pregnancy is somehow going to kill her or any other fringe scenario like that. Address the central issue.

grimacefetishist said:
I think that creating a system that judges all miscarriages as potential crimes is a waste of resources. And also culpably weird. If someone knocked me up knowing that I most likely can't have live babies, would he be a murderer as well? (I say no.)
Click to expand...

I have yet to see a single pro-lifer who has even remotely suggested that natural miscarriages should be somehow criminalized. How many times does this have to be said?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back