Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
You can see actual people get clawed and bit by real life giant cats and Tippi Hedrin gets her leg broken in half by a bull Elephant. It is one of the most intense movies I have EVER seen. The best writing in the world cannot match the terror some retarded hippies made by accident.
Yeah but based black man was perfectly fine in that movie. (Whole story to it is insane.)
 
Underground magazine The Realist punctured this exquisitely silly idea way back in 1967. This is how they commemorated Walt Disney's death:


But you know, what pop culture critic can be expected to be aware of one of the most famous subversive images of the 1960s, I ask you.
1653654512745.png
It's not just Disney characters either... this is from a bootleg Mario game (Mario 4: A Space Odyssey (Mario 4: Космическая Одиссея [Kosmicheskaya Odisseya]) )
 
Yeah but based black man was perfectly fine in that movie. (Whole story to it is insane.)
The whole story surrounding the movie is far more interesting than the actual story of the movie, which there basically isn't one. These crazy people thought it'd be a great idea to get 70+ giant cats together to make a movie to bring awareness of the plight of the giant cats. It boggles the mind that they went through with it and put their own children in the crosshairs to make this flick. For anyone interested in the movie but can't find or want to watch genuinely terrifying stuff of people getting attacked by untrained giant cats, here's another break down from some hack frauds from Wisconsin, time stamped for your convenience.
 
The whole story surrounding the movie is far more interesting than the actual story of the movie, which there basically isn't one. These crazy people thought it'd be a great idea to get 70+ giant cats together to make a movie to bring awareness of the plight of the giant cats. It boggles the mind that they went through with it and put their own children in the crosshairs to make this flick. For anyone interested in the movie but can't find or want to watch genuinely terrifying stuff of people getting attacked by untrained giant cats, here's another break down from some hack frauds from Wisconsin, time stamped for your convenience.
It sounds like Grizzly Man except with a happier ending. I wonder why people think dangerous, wild animals are just big dogs. I mean I still have a scar that tells me you even have to be careful around big, normally friendly dogs. I still like dogs, mind you. I can't even imagine trying to hug a lion or a bear. There's brave and then there is suicidal.
 
True appreciation for Ms. Marvel.
Best comment I can find:

“Kamala Khan is well known on the internet as the creator of the infamous Hulkichu comic. The story of how Hulk and Pikachu got fused together creating Hulkichu and how Kamala Khan was the mother of Hulkichu the entire time. Kamala Khan has an amulet of Hulkichu that she wears that when needed gives her powers. Kamala Khan’s main goal is to get Bruce Banner to be her girlfriend free boy to be her life partner.”
 


Nubile exotic waifu embiggened Bobby.
embiggen.png


I think what annoys me the most about these tweets outside of the constant usage of the word salad here is the clear favoritism toward the MCU's take of the character that is clearly being shifted to suit the upcoming film. Which again completely spits in the face of the themes from her origin story. Say what you will about her origin. Which many have in the past about how she got there, and how convoluted it is. But ultimately at its core, it's a self discovery journey and accepting Kamala and Carol will never be on the same level.

The fact that Bob once again show his complete disregard to the source material in favor of being a complete lapdog for Feige. If Done right, she could be someone akin to Spider-Man in terms of Street Level heroes. But again that would imply Feige to not force Kamala with Photon and CM because they share the same name.
 
It sounds like Grizzly Man except with a happier ending. I wonder why people think dangerous, wild animals are just big dogs. I mean I still have a scar that tells me you even have to be careful around big, normally friendly dogs. I still like dogs, mind you. I can't even imagine trying to hug a lion or a bear. There's brave and then there is suicidal.
There is slightly more sense than that. As Cecil of GBF points out it was really a big cat rescue the family was running where big cats would be picked up from drug dealers and such and they tried to run a sanctuaryfor them. It's not like they were actively bringing in the cats but trying to do some actual charity and good.

But a thousand pound lion is only as friendly as his belly. If lunchtime rolls around you are just meat to them.
 
Getting excited for next product.
willow.png

Especially since old product is problematic!
111.png
I literally just rewatched Willow in the last month. Does anybody want me to trigger my spergout circuits or will just "Bobby, even when you are close to being right it's impressive how wrong you are" suffice?
 
I literally just rewatched Willow in the last month. Does anybody want me to trigger my spergout circuits or will just "Bobby, even when you are close to being right it's impressive how wrong you are" suffice?

I always a good Bob takedown, especially when he's being eviscerated by unfeeling robot claws.
 
It sounds like Grizzly Man except with a happier ending. I wonder why people think dangerous, wild animals are just big dogs. I mean I still have a scar that tells me you even have to be careful around big, normally friendly dogs. I still like dogs, mind you. I can't even imagine trying to hug a lion or a bear. There's brave and then there is suicidal.
There is big difference though between Roar and Grizzly Man. Roar is a film that when you watch it all you think is "WTF". Grizzly Man on the other hand was the best comedy of 2005.
 
The police did not respond as promptly as people expect, let's cut the funding of those "Call of Duty cosplayers".
long.png
Fortunately MOS and his gang of rainbow perverts will make sure public schools will remain parents' first choice.
(Has @MOS_8502 been banned? Why the new account?)
No it's the same account, He just changed his name and @. The old link from the Cast of Characters redirects to this current account. Why he changed the MOS to Studio, I have no clue.
 
I always a good Bob takedown, especially when he's being eviscerated by unfeeling robot claws.
Ok, if anybody doesn't like this, direct all complaints to @Mola Ram

Having recently rewatched Willow it is still a very solid movie that holds up quite well. And yes, if I were to sum it up, I would say it is "Lord of the Rings" put through a Star Wars processor. I mean it's so obvious even MovieBob spotted it.

HOWEVER...

1653669823864.png


First of all, the "no luke" is idiotic because Willow IS LUKE. As a POP CULTURE SAVANT should know, in some of George Lucas' early drafts, Luke Skywalker was an old man and general. I mean in the movie Willow lives on a backwater farm at the edge of a major empire and is training to learn magic. And through the film, he continues to learn magic from said old wizards. In fact the only thing that really separates Willow from Luke is that Willow is older with a family already. Heck he even has a brunette friend he travels for a bit with before they are split apart. AGAIN, a pop culture person should be aware that there is a lot of overlap with this and earlier drafts of Star Wars which had Biggs Darklighter in them. This is how bad Bobby is at his damn job - the characters are alike in 90% of their respects but he apparently can't see it because of that divergent 10%.

And the whole "nifty female sort-of-"Vader"" just...

This is so dumb, BECAUSE THE MOVIE HAD A LITERAL VADER IN IT:
1653670534572.png


If anything the smoking-redhead Sorsha is a Leia stand-in only Lucas is flipping the script and starting her out on the bad guy side this time instead of being captured. In Willow, they "rescue" her from the dark side via Val Kilmer's dreamy lips rather than storming the death star.

That's what makes this so funny:
1653670688681.png


Because if you know your Lucas history, it's really debatable whether he's "subverting" anything or is just going back to the well for ideas he had before. But that's a whole other rant.

Summation: Willow is enjoyable. Check it out.

(Though it is fun to also compare it to Ewok movie 2, "Battle for Endor" - a lot of overlap between the films.)
 
Ok, if anybody doesn't like this, direct all complaints to @Mola Ram

Having recently rewatched Willow it is still a very solid movie that holds up quite well. And yes, if I were to sum it up, I would say it is "Lord of the Rings" put through a Star Wars processor. I mean it's so obvious even MovieBob spotted it.

HOWEVER...

View attachment 3326352

First of all, the "no luke" is idiotic because Willow IS LUKE. As a POP CULTURE SAVANT should know, in some of George Lucas' early drafts, Luke Skywalker was an old man and general. I mean in the movie Willow lives on a backwater farm at the edge of a major empire and is training to learn magic. And through the film, he continues to learn magic from said old wizards. In fact the only thing that really separates Willow from Luke is that Willow is older with a family already. Heck he even has a brunette friend he travels for a bit with before they are split apart. AGAIN, a pop culture person should be aware that there is a lot of overlap with this and earlier drafts of Star Wars which had Biggs Darklighter in them. This is how bad Bobby is at his damn job - the characters are alike in 90% of their respects but he apparently can't see it because of that divergent 10%.

And the whole "nifty female sort-of-"Vader"" just...

This is so dumb, BECAUSE THE MOVIE HAD A LITERAL VADER IN IT:
View attachment 3326381

If anything the smoking-redhead Sorsha is a Leia stand-in only Lucas is flipping the script and starting her out on the bad guy side this time instead of being captured. In Willow, they "rescue" her from the dark side via Val Kilmer's dreamy lips rather than storming the death star.

That's what makes this so funny:
View attachment 3326388

Because if you know your Lucas history, it's really debatable whether he's "subverting" anything or is just going back to the well for ideas he had before. But that's a whole other rant.

Summation: Willow is enjoyable. Check it out.

(Though it is fun to also compare it to Ewok movie 2, "Battle for Endor" - a lot of overlap between the films.)
I also like the fact that Willow, himself, was a bit of a Wizard of Oz style trickster. I didn't really see anything in Willow as a subversion, I just saw it as a fairly straightforward high fantasy movie and there weren't a lot of them coming out at the time.
 
No it's the same account, He just changed his name and @. The old link from the Cast of Characters redirects to this current account. Why he changed the MOS to Studio, I have no clue.
I guess he was tired of no one getting the joke. (Or perhaps getting the joke and then using it to insult him.)

What's Moviemanboob's take on the recent Texas school shooting?
"Republicans stupid! Republicans evil!", what else?

(Though the fact that he didn't seem to understand that doors could have different levels of security on each side was novel.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back