Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

Who is the real criminal in this trial?

  • Amber Heard

    Votes: 767 72.0%

  • Johnny Depp

    Votes: 43 4.0%

  • Both

    Votes: 256 24.0%
  • Total voters
    1,066
  • Poll closed .
Dolphin Lundgren said:
The ONTD thread is now 62 pages of whining and crying and salt. It's an entire salt mine.


View attachment 3344722View attachment 3344723View attachment 3344725

"Crying at work and can't do my job because Amber Heard lost, wah."

View attachment 3344728View attachment 3344729

People threatening suicide.

ONTD is a joke, lol.

Bonus:

View attachment 3344730

"Women who don't support Amber Heard are threatened by her."

Another threatening suicide.

View attachment 3344734
Click to expand...
ONTD could have its own Community Watch thread. Batshit femcels falling over themselves to be as woke as possible while finding "safe" reasons to hate celebrities. Doesn't even have any terfs anymore :heart-empty:
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Dolphin Lundgren, Associate Rick, lukewarm coffee and 2 others
EAT SHIT, TURD!
Eva Supports Johnny.png


Bless my favorite Mischling.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Loony Tunes, Cactuar King, Dolphin Lundgren and 6 others
The reason why the MSM is so horribly out of touch is because they only check Twitter. That's not a place where you go to put your finger on the pulse of America any more. So many ordinary people have been banned, left in disgust, or simply had their opinions drowned out by louder and prouder fringe weirdos that you only get echoes of the narrative and bots. MSM is too lazy to try a little harder, go to Rumble or Twitch or other off-brand sites, and they might be exposed to non-PC content or opinions that might offend their eyes, so they don't bother.

James O'Keefe taught us that the MSM circle-jerks their citations and sources, listing each other as references in a circular pattern. Mollusk taught us that Twitter is estimated 40% bots, rented out to the highest bidder. And gamergate taught us that journalists have their secret, invite-only chatrooms and discords where they all agree upon the narrative before writing their stories.

Your average MSM reporter checks his reference circle-jerk, goes to Twitter to hear what the bots are screaming, maybe checks Wikipedia for some background details, and shits out a story. This is the state of journalism today.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Loony Tunes, greenthrowaway, Cranky Old Broad and 24 others
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius, InteracialBowelSyndrome and LawTwitter is Dumb
Listening to the verdict, I found it weird how they read all the positive claims (3 for Depp, 1 for Heard) in their entirety, but for the two denied claims they just said "lol no".

You'd think it would be the opposite. To win defamation you need to score on all elements, so if the jury rules in favor, it logically follows that they found for all elements of defamation. To lose on defamation the jury just had to find one deficiency. For example, on a denied claim they could find almost all elements, but could find that Depp's false statement didn't harm Heard. That would be where you'd think they'd go through all elements until they found a negative.

Make Anime Illegal said:
Could be a compromise between jurors or the jury went with a hyper-literal reading of the jury instructions and thought that one particular statement wasn't backed up by the evidence in the record.
Click to expand...
I'm leaning towards compromise.

Some Heard hardliner refused to agree without at least throwing Heard a bone, and the others were so tired of 6 weeks of $30/day that they just said fuck it.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: BBChannel, Whatthefuck, Rezza and 5 others
Glenallen Mixon said:
Still not sure Johnny is gonna come out of this "un-canceled". Sure, he won, but I don't think Disney's hiring him back to dress up as a pirate any time soon.

I mean, just look at the media. They're pretty much all staunchly Team Amber cause "believe all women." He may have won back the comments sections, but he hasn't won back the articles.

Expect a deluge of pieces from sites like Vox and Vice where they still side with her.
Click to expand...
You're not wrong, but this was a major counter back against all of the "believe all wahmyn" horseshit. If there was an event that defined the 2020s, this would be one of them, at least in American history.

Also, good news, everyone! I just created a thread where you can post all of your screencaps and archives of butthurt Amber Turd wankers angry and asshurt that she didn't win the lawsuit. https://kiwifarms.net/threads/the-j...awsuit-lolcow-butthurt-archive-thread.120552/ Have fun!
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: Loony Tunes, CYKA RUSH B, frozenrunner and 9 others
Foghorns at a Funeral said:
Am i getting this right that with malice part of the judgement is is like a golden goose in cases as this? Like the hardest thing to prove?
Click to expand...
Yes, because it was literally invented by SCOTUS to protect the NYT's ability to defame people without retribution. Specifically in NYT v Sullivan. Now if someone is determined to be a "public figure" it is necessary to show actual malice. And of course, what constitutes a "public figure" has expanded so much it no longer resembles what it once meant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Water-T, BBChannel and 9 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back