Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

[HenryKissiger]

Spoiler: Fucking grim

View attachment 3346254

Thanks for reminding me of un-clit

 

[DumbDude42]

a dedicated trolling group with a handful of sock accounts could probably escalate this hashtag to something like #KillYourselfForAmber and at least one deluded feminist would follow through and off herself for the cause lol

 

[Dolphin Lundgren]

So does John Waters. How does this prove anything?

Edit:



This took less than a minute to find. They can write all that shit but can't Google the story?

 

[Thomas Talus]

I have to say, one thing that's amused me after this jury verdict is seeing all the snobby
"Britain is smarter than America" because, in the UK trial, Amber won.

Wasn't the UK case against a media company who were in a very different position to Amber Heard re: personal knowledge of the facts? It's an apples to oranges comparison.

 

[Starved Artist]

a dedicated trolling group with a handful of sock accounts could probably escalate this hashtag to something like #KillYourselfForAmber and at least one deluded feminist would follow through and off herself for the cause lol

Who had Dethklok becomes reality on their 2022 bingo card?

 

[Techno-primitivist]

Wasn't the UK case against a media company who were in a very different position to Amber Heard re: personal knowledge of the facts? It's an apples to oranges comparison.

Yes.

 

[Allanon]

Elaine has a responsibility to her client to maintain that Amber is innocent and continue to fight to her best ability to say Amber was innocent and the jury found wrongly. Especially if Amber is appealing. Still seems like a bad choice to go for things like 'the jury was unduly influenced', but she's probably still stuck walking to the tune of whatever Amber demands with the pledge of getting money if only Amber gets her 100m

But quite clearly this is the real reason they sealed the jurors. They pretended it was to 'protect them' to allow them to find in favor of Amber, and probably thought that them doing this would curry favor with the jury, but it's really so they can make outrageous claims like 'the jury went home and read social media and was influenced by it' with the expectation that no one can fact check them, because until a juror comes forward there's no way to ask them their experience.

I don't believe the jury was influenced by social media, though. Because first they'd need to get through MSM, and MSM was overwhelmingly trying to manipulate things in Amber's favor, including photoshopping tears where there were none. And then, after they got through pro-Amber media, they'd have to go to social media to look through the pro-Johnny media. If they did that, they would not have taken 13 hours to find in favor of Depp and they would not have felt Waldmann was lying about Amber setting up her apartment. People said repeatedly the jury looked to be taking the case extremely seriously, and I think that likely also means they didn't break the rules.

But also, Amber doesn't deserve to have a sequestered jury. She's not accused of murder, she's accused of defamation. Deal with it.

I've been seeing this circulated around. Is any of this remotely true or did she completely make this up whole cloth?
View attachment 3345576

There's plenty of truth in those accusations. In that Amber truthfully made them. None of them happened, though.

View attachment 3346969

So does John Waters. How does this prove anything?

The account has an accurate name though. You gotta give them that.

 

[Laughing Jackass]

Funni.
People saying women lost something here are dumb.

No one needs to believed for random unverified shit.

But sure, the pirates bedshitter getting exposed as a liar will 'really' have any effect on poor not famous women...

Same reason I should not say "nuh uh" to a woman claiming rape and shit is the same reason we shouldn't say "uh huh" right away.

 

[Dolphin Lundgren]

Elaine has a responsibility to her client to maintain that Amber is innocent and continue to fight to her best ability to say Amber was innocent and the jury found wrongly. Especially if Amber is appealing. Still seems like a bad choice to go for things like 'the jury was unduly influenced', but she's probably still stuck walking to the tune of whatever Amber demands with the pledge of getting money if only Amber gets her 100m

But quite clearly this is the real reason they sealed the jurors. They pretended it was to 'protect them' to allow them to find in favor of Amber, and probably thought that them doing this would curry favor with the jury, but it's really so they can make outrageous claims like 'the jury went home and read social media and was influenced by it' with the expectation that no one can fact check them, because until a juror comes forward there's no way to ask them their experience.

I don't believe the jury was influenced by social media, though. Because first they'd need to get through MSM, and MSM was overwhelmingly trying to manipulate things in Amber's favor, including photoshopping tears where there were none. And then, after they got through pro-Amber media, they'd have to go to social media to look through the pro-Johnny media. If they did that, they would not have taken 13 hours to find in favor of Depp and they would not have felt Waldmann was lying about Amber setting up her apartment. People said repeatedly the jury looked to be taking the case extremely seriously, and I think that likely also means they didn't break the rules.

But also, Amber doesn't deserve to have a sequestered jury. She's not accused of murder, she's accused of defamation. Deal with it.


There's plenty of truth in those accusations. In that Amber truthfully made them. None of them happened, though.

The account has an accurate name though. You gotta give them that.

Edited it, but it's not even true. He sold it when he found out the victim's family members didn't get the funds from it. I don't know what's more embarrassing. Them spreading the story to get more people to jump against him, or the fact that they couldn't even bother to look up the story.

 

[Pissmaster]

Who had Dethklok becomes reality on their 2022 bingo card?

View attachment 3346981

I didn't, but I really should have. Shit, I should put "group of people commits mass suicide by way of a giant vat of hotter-than-lava coffee poured on them" on my Before 2030 card

 

[Allanon]

Edited it, but it's not even true. He sold it when he found out the victim's family members didn't get the funds from it. I don't know what's more embarrassing. Them spreading the story to get more people to jump against him, or the fact that they couldn't even bother to look up the story.

You think they didn't look it up, but the truth is more likely that they expected you not to look it up.

 

[Dolphin Lundgren]

You think they didn't look it up, but the truth is more likely that they expected you not to look it up.

Yeah, well, they could have also looked up that John Frusciante was the one to give River Phoenix the spiked drugs, not Johnny Depp. But Googling that is too hard too I guess.

 

[namelesstacotruck]

It depends on Johnny. In theory the debt shouldn't be dischargeable under US code Title 11 523(a)(6)


However this would require Johnny to sue if she tried to go the bankruptcy route. Given he ain't getting paid anyway since she's a broke ass cunt with zero job prospects, and given he likely wants to put this shit behind him now he's cleared his name, he may well opt not to.

He can sell the owed money to another party and let them do all the work of hounding her for money.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Wasn't the UK case against a media company who were in a very different position to Amber Heard re: personal knowledge of the facts? It's an apples to oranges comparison.

It was against The Sun newspaper, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch. There were some interesting connections between the newspaper, amber heard, and the judge who presided over the trial. This is why most of the Murdoch press are still going to bat for her, even after all the evidence contradicting them has become widely distributed.

 

[Rekkington]

The reaction to this trial will stand as another black mark upon the female race.

 

[Neil]

I don't know if anyone capped Kat Tenbarge's meltdown over this:
(caps stolen)

Look at this cope. Look at it, throw your head back, and laugh.

This bitch is out of her mind if she thinks Amber Heard is even remotely like Brittney Spears. Spears' case was about her conservator ship brought about by years of her family turning her into a pop idol from a very young age and forbidding her from living a normal life.

Amber's a bedshitting, soon-to-be-bankrupt BPD psychopath who tried to bring down her more famous ex-husband as petty revenge. You'll be waiting a long time until you're "on the right side of history".

ewww why did she get a single cent

It's a minor discount. She's ruined, her net worth is varies between 2.5 million to 7 million. I have no clue how she's going to pay all it off, no one in hollywood is gonna hire her after this, not even Lifetime.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Monica Lewinsky had her own Sarkeesian moment and I could only skim through her crappy ass article, but for anyone wanting to see how full of shit she is, and how much she probably sucks on Satkeesian's unused milk bags, here you go. Some of what she says is accurate, but it drips of agenda driven feminism.

Oh, look, a jew telling us we are all guilty. How unusual.

With that said, she does have a way with words and cultural awareness that goes beyond regular journalists.

 

[Coily the Spring Sprite]

 

[SteelPlatedHeart]

 

[WelfareNiggerQueen]

I don't know if anyone capped Kat Tenbarge's meltdown over this:
(caps stolen)
View attachment 3347174View attachment 3347180View attachment 3347181View attachment 3347186
View attachment 3347188
Look at this cope. Look at it, throw your head back, and laugh.

This bitch is out of her mind if she thinks Amber Heard is even remotely like Brittney Spears. Spears' case was about her conservator ship brought about by years of her family turning her into a pop idol from a very young age and forbidding her from living a normal life.

Amber's a bedshitting, soon-to-be-bankrupt BPD psychopath who tried to bring down her more famous ex-husband as petty revenge. You'll be waiting a long time until you're "on the right side of history".

It's a minor discount. She's ruined, her net worth is varies between 2.5 million to 7 million. I have no clue how she's going to pay all it off, no one in hollywood is gonna hire her after this, not even Lifetime.

>Right side of history
Everyone on the wrong side of history has a weird obsession with "being on the right side of history" and destroying everything to "make history" and to brag about the historical event in the making for virtue signal points and when something doesn't go their way they get physically violent to the point innocent people just trying to live their lives get beat into retardation or to death

>just like Britany Spears
What you can make out from the testimony's from this trial shows that Amber and her squad of termites treated Johnny like a walking ATM almost like how Britany's family groomed and treated her like one.