Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

Who is the real criminal in this trial?

  • Amber Heard

    Votes: 767 72.0%
  • Johnny Depp

    Votes: 43 4.0%
  • Both

    Votes: 256 24.0%

  • Total voters
    1,066
  • Poll closed .
Can someone post some links to the UK case information which links the judge to Murdoch? I haven’t seen any of that and it would be interesting to read it. I remember going down a YouTube rabbit hole prior to the UK case which had tonnes of the evidence which was used in the US case so when the UK result was announced I didn’t understand how Depp lost.
 
Can someone post some links to the UK case information which links the judge to Murdoch? I haven’t seen any of that and it would be interesting to read it. I remember going down a YouTube rabbit hole prior to the UK case which had tonnes of the evidence which was used in the US case so when the UK result was announced I didn’t understand how Depp lost.
Found it.
Here's a breakdown of the conflict of interests that abounded in the UK trial. Dinner during the trial hosted by the judge's friend.
DC10A517-CF21-4D30-91D9-BBD53A76D957.jpeg
 
Or amber is so clearly unlikable and literal representation of all the things wrong with women, it's hard even for soybois to side with this one.
From what I'm seeing on Twitter, lots of women were at first supported the Turd. But as the trial continued and more damning evidences presented to the court (particularly the recording), these women went "Fuck, this bitch is crazy!" and switched side to Depp's camp

After all, women can recognize better the crazies among them
 
Actually, I saw the opposite. Some batshit insane women were up in arms about supporting Johnny. They argued that their form of crazy does not constitute the degree of vile behavior Amber perpetrated or lied about. Of course, fanboyism comes into play with Johnny and Amber.
Bit of both.

But what I noticed was that the Johnny fans just wanted him to be innocent because they think he's hot and he's a fairly beloved actor that a lot of people associate with their fav movies (unlike amber.]

The amber stans seemed to be more worried that bpd was even mentioned, and decided to screech about "I'm bpd and IM not an abuser" while pretending to be defending women. It seemed more like they were just worried that the media attention would make people educate themselves about cluster B disorders and be less susceptible to their abuse
 
I just want to add on the UK case front, The Sun isn't exactly considered a reputable tabloid in comparison to others. Even the daily mail is considered better. It's best known for having it's "page 3 girls" where the first thing you see (page 1 being the front cover) is a woman in a bathing suit doing some sexy pose for the readers. Idk if they still print it, there was some backlash about it a few years back from people saying it was distasteful and sexualising women is bad.

Murdoch's other paper here, news of the world, no longer prints because of exposed phone hacking and police bribery (which I can't link rn cause phonefag).

I'm a simple person, I hear the name Murdoch, I disregard everything said .
 
I just want to add on the UK case front, The Sun isn't exactly considered a reputable tabloid in comparison to others. Even the daily mail is considered better. It's best known for having it's "page 3 girls" where the first thing you see (page 1 being the front cover) is a woman in a bathing suit doing some sexy pose for the readers. Idk if they still print it, there was some backlash about it a few years back from people saying it was distasteful and sexualising women is bad.

Murdoch's other paper here, news of the world, no longer prints because of exposed phone hacking and police bribery (which I can't link rn cause phonefag).

I'm a simple person, I hear the name Murdoch, I disregard everything said .
The Sun's page 3 girls were topless and even had girls as young as 16 and did all the way up to the Sexual Offences Act in 2003
 
This is a thing I've seen going around today, apparently it might be legit but not 100% sure. (Ignore the gay O-face thumbnail it's only 5 minutes long and gets right to the point)

This was brought up on Nick's stream tonight, and the consensus was that per the lawyers that were watching from the gallery and going on the various youtube channels this guy was not a juror and is just trolling. Not sure.

She won in the UK because she only had to convince one retard britbong judge. Depp won in the US because the decision was made by 12 normal people. That, despite having a significantly higher burden of proof.
She didn't win in the UK. The Sun newspaper, owned by Murdoch (the Fox News slimeball), won.

The judge supposedly refused to allow Depp to submit any evidence.

The judge supposedly allowed Heard to testify in secret without any cross examination.

The judge's son works for The Sun, or somesuch.

The UK is not a serious nation and hasn't been for a significant length of time.
 
lEdit - I've just heard that if she appeals, she has to post a bond for the entire amount of damages. Anyone know if this is true? @Useful_Mistake, you know your stuff...is this right?
It’s possible, depending on the rules in VA [they do appear to have a bond requirement; https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title16.1/chapter6/section16.1-107/]. California has such a provision, which OJ claims is the reason he didn’t appeal the civil verdict in his little pickle.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Narr Then
View attachment 3348477

Why exactly is this kind of information coming about now? Oh yeah, because her stans and PR people are attempting to save what little image she has left by bringing up small instances where she put on a fake ass demeanor. That is why she was pleasant on set; she saved the crazy for home like a doggybag heaping amount of BPD. Dolph probably intimidated the fuck out of her enough to be nicer because, on top of holding like two master degrees, he could probably cunt kick her back to the Soviet Union.
She gave the worst job interview ever during her trial which, on top of everything else, will inhibit her from working. Nobody wants to deal with an actor, much less an actress, who needs special rules on how to be talked to, worked with, or touched. Especially now. This is trying to roll that back.
 
View attachment 3348477

Why exactly is this kind of information coming about now? Oh yeah, because her stans and PR people are attempting to save what little image she has left by bringing up small instances where she put on a fake ass demeanor. That is why she was pleasant on set; she saved the crazy for home like a doggybag heaping amount of BPD. Dolph probably intimidated the fuck out of her enough to be nicer because, on top of holding like two master degrees, he could probably cunt kick her back to the Soviet Union.
Allegedly they're about to reshoot her out of Aquaman 2 😎
 
Gotta love the ritardos entering this thread that they dont care about, multiple times even, about a thing they dont care about, just to say that they dont care about it, and insulting everyone who felt this outcome could mean a somewhat meaningful change lmao
I guess playing the Enlightened Nihilist is easier than stopping leaving knuckle shaped dents in the mirror

Imagine making fun of people laughing at a Lolcow in a Lolcow thread on a web forum dedicate to laughing at Lolcows, when you yourself also post in other Lolcow threads.
 
Back