Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

Who is the real criminal in this trial?

  • Amber Heard

    Votes: 767 72.0%
  • Johnny Depp

    Votes: 43 4.0%
  • Both

    Votes: 256 24.0%

  • Total voters
    1,066
  • Poll closed .
Britney was abused and probably shaved her head as a cry for help that went ignored. Amber is an abuser. If you're going to say Amber is gonna get a redemption arc, at least pick some abuser who got a redemption arc, not a victim. Britney was never proven in court to have lied about being abused, especially not with the implication of her actually perpetuating the abuse. They are not the same.

Also, Britney is not a 'comparable' actress to Amber. Amber wishes, in her wildest dreams, to be as popular as Britney Spears was at any point in her career.
Britney Spears spoke of maids and backup dancers conspiring against her. Also a lot of the court proceedings were kept secret, so I'm not sure any rebuttals to her accusations were allowed to be made public. She's been suing her father currently and labeling document requests or doing a deposition as abuse (while also demanding her father do a deposition).

So there is a little bit of crossover as far as them all being nuts.
 

I've gotta say, seeing all the reactions is almost as entertaining as the trial itself. Especially now Elaine is doing the rounds making a twat of herself.
She is already working on an appeal. In an interview, she claimed there were many things that weren't brought up, but couldn't cite one. Bitch had the nerve to accuse that TMZ dude of 15 minutes of fame, yet, she is milking this attention for all it is worth.
 
I don't get why people single out murdoch, as if the other media entities arent vindictive lying scum as well for their interests.

Almost all news media is in the hands of 4 companies and the others are as bad as murdoch's news corp.
I'm not singling him out for any reason other than JD suing The Sun triggered him to let all of his outlets go after JD. I know this isn't an isolated case with the media at large, but Murdoch is directly involved in a very obvious way and I think it's an interesting insight for normies who haven't really seen a clear peek into how this shit works. Perhaps it will help them be more careful in what and who they take seriously.
 
the fact anyone thinks this celebrity bullshit will have major impacts to women's rights is just laughable
That's how self-absorbed they are. That's how invested in these people they are. I got invested because I had the time and to me it was a clear case of a man being wrongly accused and destroyed and continuing to be abused that finally told his abuser to fuck off.

I wanted to see how that played out. I think every single one of us has known an Amber. We all want to see that Amber get stitched up for once. This case is an anomaly and has nothing to do with DV towards women. It had everything to do with a scummy piece of shit fabricating "evidence" and essentially mocking actual victims for attention and to make JD pay. If you can identify with being abused, you see her for what she is and you almost put your experience in this place and really wanted vindication for a man who was discarded like a fucking kleenex simply because of what she said.

No evidence, no corroboration, no medical records, no police reports, but plenty of pics of some bullshit. They'd have these great big fights where he supposedly beat her to a pulp yet the only pics from those incidents are property damage. Nothing about her supposed injuries. That's fucking unbelievable and when you see someone insulting your intelligence to the extent she tried it, you want to see them get put in their place.

I'm hoping this has a major impact on this culture we have of jumping the gun before we know what's going on.
 
All she had to do was take the 7 million dollars and shut the hell up after the divorce. Congrats, Amber Turd, you played yourself.

Incidentally, Depp could have pursued her for violation of the post-divorce NDA instead of defamation and easily won, but then he wouldn't have gotten to tell his side of the story and everyone who's whining about him silencing Amber Turd would have a point. She did sign her name on the line and collected the 7 million though, she AGREED to those terms. And broke the agreement.
Greedy attention whores like her just can't help themselves. It wasn't enough to get that $7 million divorce settlement. No, she had to squeeze more cash from Johnny, and serve him up on the #MeToo altar so she can elevate herself to Top Victim
 
She is already working on an appeal. In an interview, she claimed there were many things that weren't brought up, but couldn't cite one. Bitch had the nerve to accuse that TMZ dude of 15 minutes of fame, yet, she is milking this attention for all it is worth.

Screenshot_20220603_182956.jpg
Edit- surely her going on TV and saying all this is exactly the same as Waldman saying shit, no?
People have been asking if AHs statement was defamatory and I've seen lawyers say no, it's borderline but it's on her personal socials, not in a publication or anything. But her lawyer going on national TV must tick the boxes?
 
View attachment 3349804
Edit- surely her going on TV and saying all this is exactly the same as Waldman saying shit, no?
People have been asking if AHs statement was defamatory and I've seen lawyers say no, it's borderline but it's on her personal socials, not in a publication or anything. But her lawyer going on national TV must tick the boxes?
It won't be defamation in a legal sense, because almost nobody takes this woman seriously now and therefor you won't be able to prove financial damage of the defamatory statement.

I'm not singling him out for any reason other than JD suing The Sun triggered him to let all of his outlets go after JD. I know this isn't an isolated case with the media at large, but Murdoch is directly involved in a very obvious way and I think it's an interesting insight for normies who haven't really seen a clear peek into how this shit works. Perhaps it will help them be more careful in what and who they take seriously.

Yeah, it's just a pet peeve of mine. It's like that edit of "this is extremely dangerous to our democracy", which lists only murdoch properties. That edit is fantastic, but it was created by CNN when they were absolute bottom in how little people trusted them, and after their failed "this is an apple" campaign. They realized mud flinging works better, and made that edit. But people are stupid when they think the news org that is being put on blast is the bad one. It just means it's the smaller/weaker one compared to the others, like harvey weinstein compared to general hollywood producers doing sick shit. He was the niveau riche so to speak.
 
Last edited:
Greedy attention whores like her just can't help themselves. It wasn't enough to get that $7 million divorce settlement. No, she had to squeeze more cash from Johnny, and serve him up on the #MeToo altar so she can elevate herself to Top Victim
Also she is gleefully sharing “evidence” that was rejected in trial “text messages form his staff that he kicked her and he cried when he learned of it”.
 

'I Testified in the Heard vs. Depp Trial. The Backlash Has Been Horrific'​



I was asked to be an expert witness on this case in 2019, so I've actually been on the case for about three years and had been privy to every single detail of what's been happening for that period of time.

Sure you have you weirdo lol

I don't think I was paranoid to the point that I was shutting the blinds, but my eldest daughter is still in my house in Virginia, and, as ridiculous as it sounds, I have a Pitbull. I love my dog, she's a great dog, but she's still a Pitbull at heart. This was probably the first time I ever thought in my life: Thank god I have a Pitbull. Am I glad that my Pitbull is there with my daughter? Yes I am. I don't think my dog would harm anybody, but she should be intimidating.
He's got a pitty guys lol




 
Something I was wondering was why was this case tried in Virginia as opposed to California?
The Washington Post, where the defamatory article was posted/printed, has their home offices in Virginia, giving the Virginia court jurisdiction over the case. You can't just pick and choose what state you want to have your lolsuit in, the courts have to have jurisdiction. If there are multiple states involved, then you can pick and choose between those states. The court also has to find that they DO have jurisdiction over the case as well. You can't just say "I don't like California's laws, let's file suit in Florida" unless there's some sort of Florida connection in the case already. And if the judge says "Sorry, we don't have jurisdiction here," you'll have to file the suit somewhere else.
 
Oh no! People might *gasp* seek due process of law instead of meekly bowing to the rage mob!

View attachment 3349487
I'm no stickler for the current abomination of the legal process in America, but imagine wanting American men or women to have the merit of their case determined by one flawed nigger (Judge).

Do they really think accusing someone of being a pedophile in prison or a predominately religious neighborhood isn't a malicious intent to cause harm? No. These niggers know if these people decide to hold the accusations in front of normal people instead of terminally online le Redditors they won't get their knee jerk reaction of "killing the suspected pedophile." You will always need a jury that are willing to debate instead of one person who isn't beholden by another person at current time.


Remember, UK, 'the bastions of ethics'. send people to jail for speech that offends and has a legal process that is 100% at the mercy of the people deciding the case... These niggers want a UK decision to prejudice a party IN AMERICA in order to show "guilt" from A LEGAL SYSTEM THAT IS MORE FLAWED THAN MEXICO'S LEGAL SYSTEM.
 
She won in the UK because she only had to convince one retard britbong judge. Depp won in the US because the decision was made by 12 normal people. That, despite having a significantly higher burden of proof.

Most of the people I've seen defending Amber seem like snobs in their reactions, when you write it this way. They talk about Britain being superior while saying the American jurors are stupid.

Really makes you think.

:thinking:

Bit behind but had to stop and comment on this one.

That twitter account is fucking batshit. John Waters worked with Depp at lot BITD as well...they don't fucking know this? I'm not a Depp fan as such, but even I fucking know that, fucking hell
🤦🏻‍♀️

This reminds me of the people who were saying the singer from Motorhead was a Nazi because he collected WW2 memorabilia and Nazi stuff. Just because someone collects something doesn't make them evil. I'd say the same thing about the serial killer painting. Like it or not, John Wayne Gacy was infamous, and made paintings. Just because a person owns a painting made by a killer doesn't mean they're shitty.

Those paintings are infamous, rare, and worth a lot of money probably. It's a part of history.


Hey check it out, Eliane is trying to do that “turn and talk to the crowd” thing Amber was doing, only she keeps changing her mind.

I saw countless tweets and comments from people saying they want Johnny to die, to drink himself to death, etc. But lol, who cares about that, I guess.
 
Last edited:
Back