- Joined
- Dec 26, 2014
Literally thisView attachment 3370375
This is what you paid up to $1,000 to a scalper for, retards. Cope.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Literally thisView attachment 3370375
This is what you paid up to $1,000 to a scalper for, retards. Cope.
It's going to be the same song and dance when it comes to steam
"it's a 2 year old game how dare they sell it for 70 dollars, I demand a discount"
The single player games being offered on PC are meant to supplement the movies and shows which are also advertisements, so people can dip their toes into an IP and if they want more they will buy a PS5.
Microsoft's strategy is similar in concept but executed differently because games are not their primary money maker, windows and it's whole ecosystem is. Xbox is treated as an entryway into that ecosystem, it's not the end goal where as for sony the PS5 is the end goal.
Considering that Playstation has always lasted a long ass time, the predictions that they'll have massive quarters in the future isn't that far fetched. The Playstation 5 will more than likely last just as long as the PS4 did since they're ensuring future systems will support older shit.
June 9th, 2022: The Last of Us Part 1, a 9-year-old game, has been announced for PS5 and PC for $70, immediately becoming a laughing stock worldwide.
MGS4 was arguably the game that killed off the "PS3 has no games lol" joke, and that came out on June 12th, 2008. Considering PS3 and PS5 both launched in November (2006 and 2020 respectively), even the ever-maligned PS3 was course-correcting by then. Plus, it never truly had literally no games, it just had games like Motorstorm and Resistance: Fall of Man, both games that were moreso "here's something for you to do with your new PS3" rather than "here's a game that makes you want to buy a PS3".Even by this point after launch, the PS3 had some games, lol.
All I know is I was finally convinced to pick up my PS3 back in the day thanks to MGS4 and Demon's Souls. And the thing that made me eventually stray from using my 360 as my mainstay console and jump ship fully to my PS3 was the fact that online play was totally free and you didn't need a service plan, unlike Xbox Live.MGS4 was arguably the game that killed off the "PS3 has no games lol" joke, and that came out on June 12th, 2008. Considering PS3 and PS5 both launched in November (2006 and 2020 respectively), even the ever-maligned PS3 was course-correcting by then. Plus, it never truly had literally no games, it just had games like Motorstorm and Resistance: Fall of Man, both games that were moreso "here's something for you to do with your new PS3" rather than "here's a game that makes you want to buy a PS3".
They should have gotten Pedro and Bella to redub the characters.it's not even a good remake.
View attachment 3370091View attachment 3370095
"Same Art Director" my left nut sack
A game conference was on so i did the thing I always did, I wait for it to be over and then i watch the trailers on youtube.You know, even I'm kind of surprised by how radio silent @Marissa Moira has been since yesterday.
Are they actually on suicide watch?
Sega would be bought for Sonic and Atlus.Honestly at this rate, Sony should buy SEGA and just call the merger the SENA corporation & hire John Cena as a spokesperson, because they're both offering entertainment factors the world as ever seen.
And they're charging $70 minimum for that. On top of two other editions. A game released from two generations ago, they're charging $70 for again. This is R* levels of greedy.A big part of this Last of US remaster is that they pretty much just swapped the character models from the original with the ones from the second game,
Shameful shit.
Yeah but Sony put up their own webstore exclusive with the $100 USD Firefly Edition and it didn't cause their webstore servers to shit themselves.And they're charging $70 minimum for that. On top of two other editions. A game released from two generations ago, they're charging $70 for again. This is R* levels of greedy.
And probably Yakuza, maybe Virtua Fighter since Sony owns EVO. I think the games list this year was pretty weak, they should bolster it if they want it to grow.Sega would be bought for Sonic and Atlus.
WHY ARE THEY CHARGING $100 FOR A NINE YEAR OLD GAME?!Yeah but Sony put up their own webstore exclusive with the $100 USD Firefly Edition and it didn't cause their webstore servers to shit themselves.
They redid the faces man! It looks totally differnet man! Ellie now shows no retarded teeth while she has the retarded open mouth. RE VO LU TIO NARYWHY ARE THEY CHARGING $100 FOR A NINE YEAR OLD GAME?!
Yeah but Sony put up their own webstore exclusive with the $100 USD Firefly Edition and it didn't cause their webstore servers to shit themselves.