Monkeypox General 🐒🦠 - Authorities are calling it Monkeypox. The UK has begun a rapid deployment of Smallpox vaccines to first responders.

Hungarian anti government paper on state info:

They do not contend with the Hungarian SCIENCE that it isn't airborn.

Tl,dr , this is a glorified fag boils std. Not even lethal. It isn't fake nor manufactured, but it is mostly something that spreads from faggot to faggot by buttfucking.
This is just the same as tripper and clap and the gonorrea.

Not a public safety issue unless your country is full of fags... sucks for the west.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Clarence Big Boss, Justa Grata Honoria, Feline Supremacist and 5 others
Some speculation about airborne monkeypox.

(Archive)

Officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Friday pushed back against the idea that the monkeypox virus can spread through the air, saying the virus is usually transmitted through direct physical contact with sores or contaminated materials from a patient.

The virus may also be transmitted by respiratory droplets expelled by an infected patient who comes into physical contact with another person, they said. But it cannot linger in the air over long distances.

Experts on airborne transmission of viruses did not disagree, but some said the agency had not fully considered the possibility that respiratory droplets, large or small, could be inhaled at a shorter distance from a patient.

The World Health Organization and several experts have said that although “short-range” airborne transmission of monkeypox appears to be uncommon, it is possible and warrants precautions. Britain also includes monkeypox on its list of “high-consequence infectious diseases” that can spread through the air.

“Airborne transmission may not be the dominant route of transmission, nor very efficient, but it could still occur,” said Linsey Marr, an expert on airborne viruses at Virginia Tech.

“I think the WHO has it right, and the CDC’s message is misleading,” she added.

In the United States, the monkeypox outbreak has swelled to 45 cases in 15 states and the District of Columbia, CDC officials said at a news conference. The global tally has risen swiftly since May 13, when the first case was reported, to more than 1,450. At least 1,500 cases are still under investigation.
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Bread, SCSI, Puff and 1 other person
Screenshot_20220613-143719_DuckDuckGo.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Clarence Big Boss, AnonAutismo, Daddy's Little Kitten and 4 others
Well boyos it looks like alex joneses of the internet were right all along the giy who makes vaccines and went on joe Rogan to explain why its a bad idea to vaxx people with genetic treatment that hasn't been tested properly went through a paper about monkey pox and its gene sequence . Apparently is more sussy than nick with catboys


At the end he explains in plain English what it means for us illiterates

Paging @Drain Todger
Get your sleuthing lucky underwear buddy he has them linked in his post

The part that matters for us plebes

- Looks like the Monkeypox outbreak comes from a single original virus source. Following the teachings of the “Multiple working hypothesis” model for arriving at scientific “truth” (which was a core part of my education as a young scientist), a) this could be (for example) a “natural” single jump event from some infected animal into a single human somewhere in the world (who presumably had some relationship to the Maspalomas Gay Pride event). Or b) it could have come from an intentional release of a viral isolate. Mixed news - could be good or bad
- The authors have confirmed that this new outbreak virus maps to the "(less disease-causing) West African group (clade) of Monkeypox viruses. Good news
- This single source virus could have come from West Africa or could have come from United Kingdom, Israel or Singapore (consistent with either hypothesis a or b). Mixed news - could be good or bad
- Despite the sequences indicating that the virus is most closely related to those isolated in 2018-2019, it is significantly different. This could be due to natural evolution or due to laboratory engineering/gain of function “research” (consistent with hypotheses a) and b). Generally bad news. Basically, the authors are indicating that they believe that genome of this virus is either evolving more rapidly than one would expect from a double stranded DNA poxvirus, (left unsaid, or somebody has been messing around with it).
- The authors speculate that the pattern of mutations are consistent with the effects of a natural cellular protein with the abbreviated name of APOBEC3. For those who want to dive into the molecular virology of APOBEC3, here is a nice 2015 J Immunology review. For those seeking the “Cliff Notes” abridged version, see Wikipedia. For the obsessives or aficionados, note that APOBEC3 is associated with specific pattern of base changes- (C→ U). On the basis of their hypothesis regarding the potential role for APOBEC3, I infer that the authors must have detected a statistically significant fraction of C→ U changes in the current isolates relative to the 2018-2019 isolates. Mixed news - could be good or bad. Still does not differentiate between hypothesis a) or hypothesis b).
- Here is the rub. While APOBEC3 is associated with cellular resistance (yet another form of “innate immunity” - isn’t molecular virology and cell biology amazing!) to HIV (and presumably other retroviruses), a quick pubmed search reveals that Poxviruses are resistant to the mutational effects of APOBEC3! For example, see this 2006 paper published in “Virology”. Frankly, whether through lack of curiosity or fear of attack from government controlled media and journals, the failure of the authors to even mention this Virology article is a major oversight at best. My inference and interpretation? On the basis of this sequence analysis report from the INSA team cited above, to me this is looking more like a laboratory manipulated strain than a naturally evolved strain. Bad news.
- Furthermore, this double stranded DNA virus, infections by which have historically been self-limiting, appears to be evolving (during the last few days!) to a form that is more readily transmitted from human to human. Bad news.

In conclusion, the preponderance of current evidence is pointing towards a hypothesis for the origin of this outbreak which is increasingly consistent with prior “war game” scenario planning, remarkably akin to that which occurred during Event 201, which posits emergence of an engineered Monkeypox virus into the human population during mid-May of 2022.

🤣
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Lichen Bark, AnonAutismo, WrenchWring and 11 others
MasterBaiter said:
- Here is the rub. While APOBEC3 is associated with cellular resistance (yet another form of “innate immunity” - isn’t molecular virology and cell biology amazing!) to HIV (and presumably other retroviruses), a quick pubmed search reveals that Poxviruses are resistant to the mutational effects of APOBEC3! For example, see this 2006 paper published in “Virology”. Frankly, whether through lack of curiosity or fear of attack from government controlled media and journals, the failure of the authors to even mention this Virology article is a major oversight at best. My inference and interpretation? On the basis of this sequence analysis report from the INSA team cited above, to me this is looking more like a laboratory manipulated strain than a naturally evolved strain. Bad news.
Click to expand...
Serial passage, probably.

Serial passage - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

You can force pathogens to "evolve" faster by growing them in a cell culture and treating them like a horticulturist might treat plant cultivars, selecting the ideal strains, running them through another culture, and so on, cycling them through multiple generations very rapidly.

The advantage of this technique is that it doesn't leave any of the telltale marks of genetic tampering. It produces what looks like a "natural" virus.

Same thing with SARS-CoV-2.


The origin of the PCS is interesting, given that recombination occurs only moderately in human coronaviruses (Pollett et al. 2021). The possibility has been raised that the PCS was artificially inserted into the spike protein in a gain of function (GOF) experiment, prior to entry of the virus into the human population (Segreto and Deigin 2020). Indeed, SARS-CoV-1 spike protein has had a PCS inserted in a GOF experiment, albeit in pseudotyped lentiviruses which are safer to use (Follis et al. 2006). With SARS-CoV-2, the GOF scenario is difficult to examine from sequence analysis alone given the short length of the PCS, which means that it effectively 'blends' into the much longer spike protein backbone sequence. Whether introduced by human agency or natural selection, this sequence conformity would act to enhance functional compatibility with the rest of the spike protein. ‘No-see-um' approaches leave no trace of artificial ligation as the restriction sites do not remain in the final sequence after ligation; this approach has been used previously for altering the SARS-CoV-1 genome (Baric and Sims 2005). The rationale for using 'no-see-um' approaches for coronavirus genome manipulation are unclear. If the PCS was inserted for malign purposes, this blending effect would have a deceptive role in obscuring its engineered origin, representing a form of deceptive cue mimicry.

In addition to direct genetic manipulation of the virus, another potential GOF scenario is that of serial passage of the virus ancestor through humanized mice (Sirotkin and Sirotkin 2020). One purpose of serial passage experiments is to observe how pathogens might adapt to a new host after an initial zoonotic host jump (Ebert 1998), while the use of humanized mice allows mutations that might lead enhanced infectivity in humans to be identified. For example, in serial passage experiments in humanized mice, simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) was evolved into HIV (Schmitt et al. 2018). Escape of such an enhanced pathogen has the potential to cause an epidemic, although HIV is less contagious than a respiratory virus.
Click to expand...

Ralph Baric is an expert in these techniques, at least with SARS-like viruses. I have no idea who the major Monkeypox manipulation experts are.

MasterBaiter said:
In conclusion, the preponderance of current evidence is pointing towards a hypothesis for the origin of this outbreak which is increasingly consistent with prior “war game” scenario planning, remarkably akin to that which occurred during Event 201, which posits emergence of an engineered Monkeypox virus into the human population during mid-May of 2022.
Click to expand...
They always wargame it.

You know who one of the major figures at Event 201 was? George Fu Gao. You know who was also directly involved in the Global Virome Project sponsored by USAID and actualized by DTRA and NIH funding? George Fu Gao.


Look at the list of authors.

DENNIS CARROLL, PETER DASZAK, NATHAN D. WOLFE, GEORGE F. GAO, CARLOS M. MOREL, SUBHASH MORZARIA, ARIEL PABLOS-MÉNDEZ, OYEWALE TOMORI
Click to expand...

Dennis Carroll is a USAID guy and possible CIA asset. Peter Daszak is definitely a CIA asset. Nathan Wolfe was involved with both EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA, and was a close associate of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. George Fu Gao is a commie apparatchik. They were all working together on the same project to "catalog" viruses.

Now, here's an analysis of the 2021 Monkeypox report:


NTI was founded by Sam Nunn and Ted Turner.


The same Sam Nunn for which the Nunn-Lugar act is named.

The same Nunn-Lugar act that put DTRA's tendrils in foreign biolabs, like the ones in Ukraine funded by Metabiota, Nathan Wolfe's company.


The precursor to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency’s Cooperative Biological Engagement Program, or CBEP, began in November 1991 after the fall of the Soviet Union as a U.S. threat reduction and nonproliferation effort.

The Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program initially sought to protect dissolving Soviet countries’ nuclear infrastructure from rogue nations and terrorist groups, according to a 2014 Congressional Research Service report.

By 1996, Congress had expanded the program to include protection from chemical, biological and radiological materials and weapons, and later to include broadening the program to countries beyond the original 15 that emerged from the Soviet Union’s dissolution.
Click to expand...


Now, any way one slices it, "biological research facilities" in the hands of governments give me pause, particularly as a narrative seems to be being prepared that Russia will use chemical or biological weapons in the Ukraine, particularly after Victoria "F the EU" Nuland mentions this in the context of "those research materials" falling "into the hands of Russian forces."

Now, wait a minute. I thought the Ukraine's "biological research facilities" were supposedly fairly benign; that certainly is the intent of her words. And besides, the Soviet Union collapsed some time ago, and the 2005 agreement to prevent proliferation of biotechnology related to pathogens and expertise surely was long enough ago that these labs and anything dangerous or potentially dangerous could have been shut down by now. If all that's fairly benign (it sort of reminds you of the benign non-gain-of-function gain of function research the National Institute of Health was conducting in Wuhan, doesn't it?), then why be the slightest bit concerned that Russian forces would get their hands on it?
Click to expand...


In a dusty suburb near Almaty, Kazakhstan, where the Soviet-era buildings still hint at a different time, a slice of high-tech modernity has arrived—in the form of a $102 million biosecurity laboratory.

The Central Reference Laboratory (CRL) will open in 2015 and offer high-security lab space for scientists to study dangerous diseases and provide early warning of potential outbreaks. (Read about the global war on disease.)

The facility, funded by the United States Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) and the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, will have the additional benefit of giving stable employment to scientists who might otherwise be tempted to sell their high-level and potentially destructive knowledge to hostile groups, said Lt. Col. Charles Carlton, director of the DTRA offices in Kazakhstan.
Click to expand...

They used nuclear, biological, and chemical disarmament initiatives and "biosurveillance" as a pretense and a cover for secret rearmament. The target? Civilians. Everywhere. Ordinary people. Population reduction and intentional democide by way of viruses.

Do people even vaguely understand what is happening, here? This is glowie shit from top to bottom. It all points straight back at the United States Agency for International Development, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and the US Central Intelligence Agency, and you know what? Every one of the sons of bitches involved in this is guilty of motherfucking treason.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ／Ｏｕｒ Ｌａｄｄｉｅ／, Nate Higgers, Shiny Shroodle and 9 others
As re-naming Monkeypox is afoot, because of the monkey fee-fees, i suggest POX-201 to the WHO. Game it and name it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: valis
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back