Debate Vtuber simps about being pedophiles

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Big Scumfuck said:
I don't even fucking like loli. It's not sexy and I think the people who like GENUINE loli are sick.
I'm just tired of fucking morons being genuinely diagnosably schizo about art.
You can get mad all you want but most lawyers disagree with you, science disagrees with you
facts do not care about your morals or feelings.
V-Tubers are played by mostly 18+ year old women,
Fiction is not reality

Stop siding with underaged k-pop twitter stans.
Click to expand...
We need to trust the science guys so Big Scumfuck can jerk off to dipictions of cartoon children that came from the imaginations of middle aged japanese men lmao.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Eadred, ñññ, Xenomorph and 5 others
Big Scumfuck said:
Again, I see no need to side with moralniggers and antis who want to ruin fiction.

Art is speech, you are on a free speech website.
Click to expand...
var-mancityveteran (1).gif
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Homostand, Product Placement, Xenomorph and 6 others
Disheveled Human said:
We need to trust the science guys so Big Scumfuck can jerk off to dipictions of cartoon children that came from the imaginations of middle aged japanese men lmao.
Click to expand...
There's a difference between a blatantly pozzed scientist and a reasonable study.
Also literally said I'm not into loli in the message you replied to, stop trying to Kafka Trap people because you can't understand that it's victimless
 
Last edited:
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
Reactions: Product Placement, ñññ, sniggered and 3 others
Disheveled Human said:
While the artists are fucked up in their own right could just be commissioning work for profit like they are not even interested in the material they just draw it. The people who buy and consume this stuff are the 100% fucked up ones who like to whack it to kids.
Click to expand...
People draw a lot of fucked up fetishes online for money, but the main thing is that they mostly involve fictional characters and not real people. So if they want to commission an artist to draw all of their degenerate fetishes in a picture, what laws are they breaking?
 
Saffronette said:
People draw a lot of fucked up fetishes online for money, but the main thing is that they mostly involve fictional characters and not real people. So if they want to commission an artist to draw all of their degenerate fetishes in a picture, what laws are they breaking?
Click to expand...
I mean im not making a legal argument so much as im just laughing at peoples weird fetishes that they choose to talk openly about on kiwi farms of all places. Even if the governments globally legalized this stuff society would still find you folks weird creepy sex pests just like a lot of people find trannies weird creepy sex pests. Then there would be anti-hate groups spearheaded by you weirdos trying to stop people from making fun and harrassing you.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Admiral Piett, Creep3r and WebLurker
Saffronette said:
Most of the Vtubers are 99% adults. Trying to link pedophilia to it makes no sense to me even if they use loli or shota avatars. Also a lot of the Vtubers in Japan are open lolicons/shotacons and don't mind porn being made of their avatars either.
Click to expand...
People are jerking off to the avatar, not pictures of the voice actors, so yes, it does matter if the avatar looks like a child. The fact that Japan is full of pedophiles is not really a great defense imo.
Big Scumfuck said:
If you guys actually want to learn and not shit your pants over things here's a scientific study that goes over Lolicon and if it should be considered pedophilia or not..
The short answer says no and that by saying it is you actually harm people's imagination.
Click to expand...
lmao
Big Scumfuck said:
moralniggers and antis

Art is speech, you are on a free speech website.
Click to expand...
So you are totally not a pedo, but you are using their talking points and their language, very curious. The only people I have ever seen use the word "antis" are pedos who use it to describe people who think whacking it to kids is bad. Also porn is not speech, I don't care what anyone says about it. It's not art either.
ThatDarnIrishMan said:
Yeah, pretty much.

I came expecting a really funny shitshow and full blown sperg out battle, but it's basically just people sitting in a circlejerk and crying about anime avatars and like 1 Vtuber guy arguing with Null. People are so desperate I can see them literally tagging random people in the Vtuber thread to try and ask them to come and talk here but no one is interested lol

Cringe thread. Both too much and too little autism all at once. I'm disappointed.

inb4 (anime profile u must be pedo)
Click to expand...
You whine about there being no debate and then you whine about me trying to tag some people who have said things about liking loli vtubers in here to get a debate started in the same post. It's not my fault they are too afraid to leave their safespace and don't venture outside their thread to other parts of the site. Since we are not allowed to invade their safespace and "infight" with them, we should at least get a place to make fun of how degenerate and autistic they are. Also you got your wish, looks like theres several pages of fighting after your post.
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Homostand, ñññ, Creep3r and 5 others
Disheveled Human said:
I mean im not making a legal argument so much as im just laughing at peoples weird fetishes that they choose to talk openly about on kiwi farms of all places. Even if the governments globally legalized this stuff society would still find you folks weird creepy sex pests just like a lot of people find trannies weird creepy sex pests. Then there would be anti-hate groups spearheaded by you weirdos trying to stop people from making fun and harrassing you.
Click to expand...
I mean people talk about their weird fetishes on KF anyways because there's no repercussions really. Sure you can call them freaks, sex pests, degenerates or whatever. But at the end of they day they aren't hurting anyone especially if it's fictional. I'd rather have people be honest about what they like than some moral grandstanders who are desperately trying their best to not become what they despise. Seems like it happens way more often than it should on this site.
 
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Homostand, ñññ, Kill Your Idols and 5 others
3322 said:
So you are totally not a pedo, but you are using their talking points and their language, very curious. The only people I have ever seen use the word "antis" are pedos who use it to describe people who think whacking it to kids is bad. Also porn is not speech, I don't care what anyone says about it. It's not art either.

You whine about there being no debate and then you whine about me trying to tag some people who have said things about liking loli vtubers in here to get a debate started in the same post. It's not my fault they are too afraid to leave their safespace and don't venture outside their thread to other parts of the site. Since we are not allowed to invade their safespace and "infight" with them, we should at least get a place to make fun of how degenerate and autistic they are. Also you got your wish, looks like theres several pages of fighting after your post.
Click to expand...
I use "anti" as a catch all for moralistic dumbfucks who think fiction should be policed and you have been literally gaslit by children and k-pop stan types into thinking it's solely used by lolitards. Plus art is speech and art is a victimless crime.
The same people who want to put trigger warnings in front of your animated movies are the same ones screeching about lolicon not being victimless. You are working with the enemy of free speech.

Saffronette said:
I mean people talk about their weird fetishes on KF anyways because there's no repercussions really. Sure you can call them freaks, sex pests, degenerates or whatever. But at the end of they day they aren't hurting anyone especially if it's fictional. I'd rather have people be honest about what they like than some moral grandstanders who are desperately trying their best to not become what they despise. Seems like it happens way more often than it should on this site.
Click to expand...

Agreed with this. Whatever happened to "I don't like what you say, but I will defend your right to say it"?
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Product Placement, ñññ, Gravemind and 2 others
Big Scumfuck said:
I use "anti" as a catch all for moralistic dumbfucks who think fiction should be policed and you have been literally gaslit by children and k-pop stan types into thinking it's solely used by lolitards. Plus art is speech and art is a victimless crime.
The same people who want to put trigger warnings in front of your animated movies are the same ones screeching about lolicon not being victimless. You are working with the enemy of free speech.
Click to expand...
I don't talk to any children on the internet so I don't see how I am being "gaslit". Can you say the same? I don't think porn is speech and I don't think porn is art so I don't think by censoring lolicon and porn you are censoring free speech. Also most lolbertarians who use these talking points while also saying "of course I don't look at it! I am just a warrior for free speech!" are full of shit and also want to lower the age of consent. I don't think anyone choses sexual drawings of children as their hill to die on unless they jerk off to them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Xenomorph, The Foxtrot and WebLurker
3322 said:
I don't talk to any children on the internet so I don't see how I am being "gaslit". Can you say the same? I don't think porn is speech and I don't think porn is art so I don't think by censoring lolicon and porn you are censoring free speech. Also most lolbertarians who use these talking points while also saying "of course I don't look at it! I am just a warrior for free speech!" are full of shit and also want to lower the age of consent. I don't think anyone choses sexual drawings of children as their hill to die on unless they jerk off to them.
Click to expand...
I am completely against lowering the age of consent, that's gross, pedos who actually touch and jerk off to real children genuinely belong in a woodchipper because there are victims there. So your argument is ad-hom at best
But hey, I guess Jack Thompson and Tipper Gore were right about video games and music if you're right about drawings on paper...
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: ñññ
Big Scumfuck said:
I am completely against lowering the age of consent, that's gross, pedos genuinely belong in a woodchipper because there are victims there.
But hey, I guess Jack Thompson and Tipper Gore were right about video games and music if you're right about drawings on paper...
Click to expand...
No, because video games and music are art. Porn is not.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: Xenomorph and Big Scumfuck
So I have no idea of the metrics for the vtuber shit, like how many of this gura "chick" (assuming its not a dude with a voice changer) fans are minors/teens? how many are actually older guys/pedos?
 
Eh, there's artists that have work that's pretty incredible, subject be damned.
Even the Galko guy, his unique coloring and etch style would have made for incredible fantasy art, if he wasn't a fat lover nonce.
That being said, there'll always be people who are contrarian about that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back