Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Honestly i couldn't care less about any of this gay shit but goddamn theres nothing i love more than seeing retarded fags screeching impotently at randos thinking their opinion on anything matters

images (4).jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
Reactions: SCSI, deeplyhigh, spiritofamermaid and 10 others
HARSH NOISE said:
/r/femaledatingstrategies will see a massive uptick in users as they wonder why men want nothing to do them when they withhold sex after decades of rampant oversexualization.
Click to expand...
hey isn't that the whole point of it though?
most of the prolife moralfags don't like the concept of prematiral sex.
you can't have your cake and eat it too, want to ban bodily and reproductive autonomy? fine whats the point in sex with a man 10 minutes of maybe sort of kinda pleasure versus not being able to nope out of a pregnancy if all else fails.

also its mans fault for the rapid female sexualization, for decades. if you watch porn then congrats your a part of it.
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
  • Winner
Reactions: StevieLasVegas, Jacknife, FeatherPlucker and 3 others
thegooddoctor said:
Well your country has officially exploded beyond any chance of recovering, have fun in the ensuing political apocalypse.
Click to expand...
Nah. Contrary to popular belief, most people don't actually give a shit about abortion. Especially not when there are more pressing concerns, like, say, putting food on the table.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: make_it_so, spiritofamermaid, Knight of the Rope and 3 others
Getting tard comed said:
Wouldn't there need to be a federal law passed in order for that to work... and if it did pass(which might be unconstitutional due to the 10th) wouldn't that eliminate the problem anyway so they wouldn't need to be performed on federal property?
Click to expand...
I think you'd only really need a bill passed to fund it, I don't see any reason they couldn't handle everything else through executive branches. They'd get immediately sued by the red states involved, obviously, but it's hard to guess what arguments they'd use against it and how well they'd hold up.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • DRINK!
Reactions: secret watcher, spiritofamermaid and Getting tard comed
Vyse Inglebard said:
Nah. Contrary to popular belief, most people don't actually give a shit about abortion. Especially not when there are more pressing concerns, like, say, putting food on the table.
Click to expand...
Honestly a point that a lot of people are missing. Even the upper middle class is starting to worry about the price of fuel of food. Getting the average American on board for a massive shitstorm over some whores that can't keep their legs shut is a long shot if they can barely afford the car ride to Designated Boogaloo Area #1488.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: make_it_so, Exterminatus, Sig and 4 others
Dyn said:
I think you'd only really need a bill passed to fund it, I don't see any reason they couldn't handle everything else through executive branches. They'd get immediately sued by the red states involved, obviously, but it's hard to guess what arguments they'd use against it and how well they'd hold up.
Click to expand...
Residents of the States in question could also be arrested. While it is unconstitutional for a State to prosecute someone who goes to another State for a procedure legal in one and not the other, it's a whole different deal of they stay within the State and do it at a Federal Building also within the State. Ditto for people performing the procedure.

At a minimum if Biden did this he would be triggering a constitutional argument that would be endlessly litigated. Worst case scenario is a State like Texas raiding a federal facility because it's being used to contravene Texas law.
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
Reactions: make_it_so, Johnny Salami, spiritofamermaid and 2 others
Vyse Inglebard said:
Nah. Contrary to popular belief, most people don't actually give a shit about abortion. Especially not when there are more pressing concerns, like, say, putting food on the table.
Click to expand...
65-70% of people are against the recent decision

If more laws or court decisions are placed similar to this, it'd require an authoritarian state hostile to its people

but failed democracies are actually common, which we'll come to learn if the MAGA crowd keeps pushing
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: St.Davis, Autistic Joe, Zaryiu2 and 12 others
mindlessobserver said:
Residents of the States in question could also be arrested. While it is unconstitutional for a State to prosecute someone who goes to another State for a procedure legal in one and not the other, it's a whole different deal of they stay within the State and do it at a Federal Building also within the State. Ditto for people performing the procedure.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I imagine it'd be difficult to get past HIPA protections to prosecute it if people kept their head down and didn't broadcast what they were doing there, but you'd still have to be dumb as fuck to put yourself in that position. If you want an abortion in a red state just go to a blue state for "tourism" and then decide to get an abortion while you're there, and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: SCSI, secret watcher, spiritofamermaid and 7 others
jenstark101 said:
65-70% of people are against the recent decision

If more laws are placed similar to this, it'd require an authoritarian state hostile to its people

but failed democracies are actually common, which we'll come to learn if the MAGA crowd keeps pushing
Click to expand...
Abortion is consistently among the least important issues in polling

And do you know how laws come into being in the United States?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, StevieLasVegas, Potatoherder and 6 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back