Yes, they’re just contorting themselves into more ridiculous arguments as they attempt to defend themselves against normies noticing stuff.
The original non-transmed arguments were that believing yourself or declaring yourself a woman MADE you a woman due to some sort of spiritual transubstantiation, even if you still had a beard and had never taken estrogen. It was based on
gender, which was a separate spiritual sense of self entirely different from sex.
Then TERFs and normies started saying “well, I believe in sex then. It’s more important than gender.”
Now the TRAs are grasping. No no no actually gender and sex ARE the same thing. Actually we ARE biologically women and we ARE female and you must let us undress in front of young girls in changing rooms because we are physically female due to uh, estrogen working on the DNA and changing us to a female phenotype!
Of course, even if you accept this new argument (big if), that means:
1. A transwoman is not really a woman until he has taken enough estrogen and changed enough that he has a somewhat convincing feminine appearance (ie, back to transmedicalism)
2. Formerly, the distinction between cis and trans was ultimately
spiritual (although they did not call it that) and based on knowledge of one’s gendered soul. But if it’s based on a kind of pseudo sex change instead, that means that cis people with hormonal disorders or other medical problems
also experience a kind of sex change (remember, troons have defined “sex change” based on hormones and superficial secondary sexual characteristics).
Are these cis people with hormone disorders also trans? Have they also changed sex? Why not? If it’s because of some “gender” distinction, what the hell were you doing talking about biology and phenotype when it’s ultimately down to feelings after all?
View attachment 3426613