Jim Sterling / James "Stephanie" Sterling / James Stanton/Sexton & in memoriam TotalBiscuit (John Bain) - One Gaming Lolcow Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Arthur Morgan said:
He needs the dead name. It's part of the brand he's built around himself for the last decade.
Click to expand...
Yeah, changing his brand from the "Jimquistion" to something like the "Stephquistion" would nuke whatever discoverability his brand has left. Jim can't afford to abandon it for this reason.
Hyro said:
View attachment 3441976
Nice clown shoes Jim, very fitting for your new identity, can't imagine why you're getting funny looks from people outside.
Click to expand...
This picture sums a Jim perfectly. A fat bugman, pumped up with tranny hormones. Hideous sight.
James Rofl said:
Trans people outside the binary
What does this even mean?? Trans, but also non-binary?
Click to expand...
These are the same people that think that a man getting his dick mutilated and pump himself with estrogen can make him a woman. There's no point in trying to understand tranny logic.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Digital Thunder, Moja Zemlja and Oliver Onions
James Rofl said:
Trans people outside the binary
What does this even mean?? Trans, but also non-binary?
Click to expand...
Ok serious answer to highlight the stupid, and show how far from the original theory we are that actually provides some support for transpeople.

The theory is that there's the gender spectrum. On one side you got the most feminine of feminine women, on the other side the most masculine of masculine women. As it was actually proposed, these two extremes would be dysfunctional in even the most conservative of societies. Moving in slightly more we got about 20% on each end other than those sliver thin dysfunctional zones that contain the majority of cis people, and where those who are properly gender dysphoric can be found. Moving inward more we got another 10% that's everything that's a little bit non-conforming, but would still be something that you could call male or female. This is the zone where the cis man who wears dresses is, or the cis woman who dresses like a man is, as well as their trans counterparts, this is where the majority of transpeople would be, but they'd be arriving from the far side. The vast majority of troons occupy this space though, on their "native" side.

The middle 40% is the big window of "you don't really fit either side enough to be called masculine or feminine, but you're maybe slightly more one or the other". This is where all the non-binary are. In theory, if you were born male, but identified as somewhere in the middle, but we're slightly more on the feminine side, you could be considered trans non-binary. That said, anyone actually in zone wouldn't give a fuck about transitioning, as they'd lack a desire for the characteristics of the other side, they'd just kinda exist in this space. They might drop any distinctly gendered identifiers, dressing in a sort of neutral manner, probably wouldn't care about pronouns unless convinced they should be, and otherwise you wouldn't notice they exist. It's really a zone of gender apathy. To be trans means you were born on one side, and identify most strongly with some point on the other side of the halfway point.

The theory providing support for trans people is "if a cis man can still be varying levels of feminine, could he eventually cross the middle, therefore being more feminine than masculine and that makes him a her, and she's a trans woman." See how it relies on the idea of there being a massive zone of cis, and a no man's land after that, before we hit trans? That's the baseline theory this all comes from. The big thing it shows is "even if your son plays with dolls over transformers, he's still not necessarily gay or trans. He's still a dude, and it's ok for dudes to occasionally do feminine things." It's basically saying "stop trying to make all men act one way and all woman another."

The vast majority of people, even if they got one or two seriously noticeable non-conforming traits, would never cross to the far side. In fact the vast majority of people are in the first 20% from their end, with the majority of the remainder being in the next 10%. However, trans people have claimed the entire middle 60% as "if you're anywhere here, you're trans, even if you are still on your native side". It's an active erasure of anything other than pushing to for either absolute conformity or you're trans. It's basically hardcore gender binary enforcement. This is because they need to parasitize all slightly non-conforming groups to inflate their microscopic numbers. Trans people are rare, their success as a movement mostly came from parasitizing the more successful Same Sex Couples Rights and Feminist Rights movements, as well as they are the current "punks". Every generation has its way that kids rebel against their parents, that's not an issue it's the natural course. Just the issue is this one has long term damage and regret.

If you tried to argue you're trans non-binary, you're arguing you belong in the middle of the gender spectrum, but you don't strongly identify with either side. Sure, they absolutely exist, but they are in the zone of apathy, as non-binary means you have gender apathy more than anything, while trans means you identify as the other side of the binary. At least per spectrum theory, as at the end of the day it leaves "male or female", the only revolution to it is degrees of masculinity or feminity.

Note, I am all for trans people to get the treatment they need for their dysphoria, but I also know it's rare as fuck, most people are cis, and transitioning shouldn't be a starting point, it's what you do when other treatment fails, and even then any form of medical transition should be done slowly and under the careful oversight of medical and psychological professionals. Troons however can get fucked. They are fetishists making a fetish their identity, or attention whores seeking attention. I don't think actual trans kids are just rebelling against their parents, but troons are encouraging many non-trans kids to do so, thus creating more troons.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Adr1anD, Watamelon, MediumHatPin and 8 others
Neko GF said:
Jim gives full confirmation that it's ok for people to deadname him:

>"Oops! Looks like they couldn’t handle less than an hour of what a trans person gets all day every day"

It's amazing how Jim manages to constantly sound like such a whinny faggot.
Click to expand...
Or maybe, just maybe, the they/them shit is annoying as all hell and a fucking pain to deal with. Any articles, text bites and the like become confusing once you introduce anything other than the subject at hand with these pronoums. Same shit for using an x and the like instead of simply sticking with him, her and it. Most people don't do this to be an asshole, it's simply a habit considering how unlikely one is to be talking about trans stuff outside of the topic, and it doesn't really help that some trans people choose to keep traits from their birth gender!

Either way, I couldn't care less about this fucking asshole's opinion. Jim is a stellar example of a guy who lives a very comfortable life and can't help but fucking bitch about everything and make a victim of himself, while he bitches about how he feels like he walked down Berlin during Nazi rule for seeing some U.K. flag pennants on the street there are guys trying to figure out how the fuck they are going to pay their bills, feed their children and deal with the stress of it all with the surge of inflation really fucking up their already small wages. Jim makes more than guys who work themselves to the bone every day for making some videos about him bitching over shit that doesn't even affect him and still thinks he is a fucking victim, the entitlement on this tub of lard with a dress is fucking bonkers!

Gloria From Pokemon Sword said:
I forgot where I read this, but someone observed that those who are anti-abortion tend to be much nicer and less prone to angry outbursts, while those who are pro-abortion tend to be easily agitated and very aggressive. Jim is really good at proving negative stereotypes to be well-founded.
Click to expand...
Not so much, there are assholes and idiots on both sides. Two good examples are the guys who treat something serious like this as if it were something banal and the guys who decide to make a fuss over perfectly legitimate cases, such as procedures regarding minors who got pregnant out of molestation. Not sperging, but just because some assholes are more vocal it doesn't mean there are any less assholes on one side or the other lol!
Arthur Morgan said:
He needs the dead name. It's part of the brand he's built around himself for the last decade.
Click to expand...
Precisely, knowing how much of a narcissist this lardass is, if he could change his name to Stephanie he would do it in a heartbeat. He isn't stupid enough to burn the one bridge he can't live without, albeit he does drag his own name through the mud by being the egotistical, whiny asshole he is every fucking day!
 
  • Winner
Reactions: eDove
All this talk of dead name sounds kinda surreal to me because Jim doesn't even have a dead name. And I obviously don't mean that in some stupid "he was always Stephanie" way, I mean it in the "he never actually transitioned away from a name" way.

Like, think about his "try harder at dead-naming me" taunt: How would you ?

His old name is still part of his current name, he just added sh#t on top of it; It's not that calling him Jim is a poor attempt at dead-naming him, it is the only way to dead-name someone, calling them by their pre-transition name, except he never abandoned it for there to be a possibility of dead-naming him in the first place.

All this highlights is that Jim's transition is extremely half-#ssed (in basically every way possible) and what should work against actual trans' people doesn't against him because, at the end of the day, he isn't "fully" trans', not because his would-be offenders aren't trying hard enough.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: TheBeanz, Shotgun Badger, PozzedByCoronachan and 4 others
Nixxit said:
All this talk of dead name sounds kinda surreal to me because Jim doesn't even have a dead name. And I obviously don't mean that in some stupid "he was always Stephanie" way, I mean it in the "he never actually transitioned away from a name" way.

Like, think about his "try harder at dead-naming me" taunt: How would you ?

His old name is still part of his current name, he just added sh#t on top of it; It's not that calling him Jim is a poor attempt at dead-naming him, it is the only way to dead-name someone, calling them by their pre-transition name, except he never abandoned it for there to be a possibility of dead-naming him in the first place.

All this highlights is that Jim's transition is extremely half-#ssed (in basically every way possible) and what should work against actual trans' people doesn't against him because, at the end of the day, he isn't "fully" trans', not because his would-be offenders aren't trying hard enough.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't dead-naming him just be calling him James?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Open Window Maniac, Lorgar and Retink
Excited for July 1st! Thats the monthly Jim paycut day!

1656596312817.png

I love watching the Jim thread mainly for it's consistency. Every week you pop in to see the -1k plus sub loss. He babbles about stupid shit, and next week another 1k is lost. I assume next week Jim will shove in some "Happy 4th to the the most racist, transphobic country in the world!" It's always funny to see some giant blob cries about America and britbong while he makes a living shrieking about mundane shit at these places. Null always points out how Ethan Ralph leaves the country, gets his fucking face decked in, and then goes back to do the same. The same shit would happen to Jim. Picture Jim waddling down the streets of mexico, getting his shit wrecked, and screaming "policia! policia!" as everyone ignores him. Jim is so privileged to have "nonbinary transphobic twitter attacks" be his daily struggles.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: TheBeanz, DNA_JACKED, manlikebigp and 3 others
James Rofl said:
Trans people outside the binary
What does this even mean?? Trans, but also non-binary?
Click to expand...
He means outside the binary of male and female as that obviously fails to describe all cases but inside the binary of binary or non-binary which all cases fit into. It's very complex and requires intellectual thinking so a simpleton like yourself couldn't understand even if you studied the academic literature like Jim has.
 
The Penultimate Warrior said:
Back when you could buy magazines or the early days of the internet. Yes there were many that were barely disguised adverts which played the game for 30 minutes then gave it 80%, but there were also some great ones, and none of them spent the article talking about their political or social views.
Click to expand...
I miss late '90s/early '00s EGM so bad. Just a bunch of young guys who liked games and were surprisingly high-quality writers.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Open Window Maniac, Watamelon, manlikebigp and 4 others
Matt Damon said:
I miss late '90s/early '00s EGM so bad. Just a bunch of young guys who liked games and were surprisingly high-quality writers.
Click to expand...
I had a game reviewing gig once. Hated the people, the work was enjoyable. Most people would hate it though, it's not what you'd think, as you can't just enjoy the game. You got to analyze why you do or do not enjoy it. Only met one guy during that who liked games enough to have passion. We both finished the job we were on, then quit. Nothing worse than working around miserable people in a job you have some passion for. Game journalists are all failed journalists who want to work in "real news" it seems. Glorified bloggers.
 
  • Informative
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Open Window Maniac, manlikebigp, eDove and 4 others
Essentially, Jim wants to be a being superior to all women and men, but still deigns to take advantage of women’s health resources, spaces, and pretty much anything else he covets. It’s like a little kid playing superheroes and declaring he has athe power to have every superpower. Of course Jim is basically Rogue from X-Men, except he doesn’t actually get any actual quality from the people he sucks the life out of, and doesn’t have the decency to wear gloves.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Open Window Maniac, Juno, CT 05 and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back