The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Not coming back to this thread, but reposting here for a final reply to someone in the Supreme Court thread. I accidentally posted to the closed thread, so whatever.

That's absolute nonsense. It depends where the 66% are. Most legislatures are majority Republican right now. Do you understand anything about how any of this works at all and that much of that 66% are in states like California and New York, and have no influence whatsoever out of their states?
I am extremely disappointed in you. In every other thread you are an extremely high quality poster. A 66% national majority transcends politics. The implication is that 220 million Americans agree with something, and you can't paint 220 million people into any specific corner.
That's actually a feature, not a bug.
 
The fact that just a handful can make a massive decision like this puts into question what else they will change and when. Especially when the circumstances are cases made for the sake of understanding the plight of another's burden; essentially V. cases.
I mean this is true for the original roe v. wade. Everything about that case was odd. The legal arguments used were strange.

I'm not saying that this isn't a choice being made "For the people" but lets be honest, why would there be a need to overturn a right that benefitted everyone?
I mean, not the dead babies, but they don't vote, so who cares?
 
I am generally a huge fan of Devon Stack. Real hard right commentary and analysis but this shit is insane. Women have the eggs...., The key to fertility....
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220701-022425_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20220701-022425_Chrome.jpg
    179.5 KB · Views: 73
Not sure if it's been posted yet, but this is my new absolute favorite abortion protest image evar:

View attachment 3444528

All credit is of course due to the brave Amanda Herring - Director of Jewish Life and Learning at Edlavitch DC Jewish Community Center.

This brave young woman who took time away from developing the Jewish Planner, shows us that 8 1/2 months of cell clumps in her belly Is Not Yet A Human, so there is no reason to get worked up about aborting them.

Such an iconic photo, may it never be lost to history.
>Jewish
Every single time. I'm pretty sure the "Not Yet A Human" paint isn't for the baby but for her. She hasn't eaten enough foreskins to be considered human.
Can't wait to have a lot more incest babies to raise on societies dime.
Antifastan isn't doing anything to abortion. I believe the the Democratic Republic Oregon commonwealth for the people is pushing to expand abortion.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Muh Vagina
If we leave you in the rainforest you won't turn into a senior either.

Any human put outside a survivable enviroment will die. Leave a toddler in the woods and it will never turn into a teen. Does that mean toddlers aren't human?
Toddlers don't require a womb to feed them. They can eat and digest food on their own.

Look up "fetus viability outside the womb". It's really not a hard concept

Since you think a fetus has more rights than a person, do you think a welfare recipient should receive more money just for being pregnant? Should a pregnant woman be able to drive in a carpool lane alone?
 
Is it simply the act of killing a child, you haven't given your opinion on children who are the result of sexual abuse or worse? Do you really want people to go through the pains of labour and seeing their child born as a teen only to give it way because they were ill equipped being the victim of a crime? Isn't that just horrible? I know people will say its a tiny minority, but even so your still encouraging them to go through the pains of child birth when children are involved. i'll admit if your acting promiscuous acting like Trailer Park Level Florida white trash stereotypes slutting around getting pregnant for no reason, than yeah the Onus is on you. But in actual cases of sexual abuse, shouldn't we make an exception? this is like Early 20th century Protestant fundamentalist levels of cruelty.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Squid Diddler
Toddlers don't require a womb to feed them. They can eat and digest food on their own.
Toddlers need parents to feed them. If you leave a toddler alone its literally going to starve to death.

If we leave you alone in the middle of the sahara desert you're also going to starve to death because you need someone else to provide your food for you. Does that mean you aren't human?

Look up "fetus viability outside the womb". It's really not a hard concept
Intresting how you would bring that up, considering how it throws a wrench in your entire retarded position.

Viability outside the womb literally varies by region, class and era. A rich upper class baby in the US is gonna survive outside the womb way sooner than a poor baby from somalia will.

In fact, considering how the majority african countries viability outside the womb is considerably lower than most developed countries, if we follow this retarded line of thought, it literally implies that africans are less human than everyone else.

Considering how technology moves forward, does that mean people are less "human" in the past and "more human" in the future? What happens when technology advances enough to gestate zygotes?

Are people "less human" in areas without access to incubators?
Since you think a fetus has more rights than a person, do you think a welfare recipient should receive more money just for being pregnant? Should a pregnant woman be able to drive in a carpool lane alone?
A fetus has the exact same rights as a person. Not being murdered is a right.

Married couples that are expecting should receive financial support from the government.

Carpooling I don't care about because its just a petty legal distinction that can just change on a whim.
 
Toddlers don't require a womb to feed them. They can eat and digest food on their own.

Look up "fetus viability outside the womb". It's really not a hard concept

Since you think a fetus has more rights than a person, do you think a welfare recipient should receive more money just for being pregnant? Should a pregnant woman be able to drive in a carpool lane alone?
you suck at strawmanning
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ndnd
Toddlers need parents to feed them. If you leave a toddler alone its literally going to starve to death.

If we leave you alone in the middle of the sahara desert you're also going to starve to death because you need someone else to provide your food for you. Does that mean you aren't human?
Again, look up with viability outside the womb is. I understand you have autism and thus can't handle context, but it's important here. A fetus, before it's viable, will die outside the womb. A toddler can survive just fine outside the womb.

you suck at strawmanning
And you suck at dog whistling
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCSI and Muh Vagina
Again, look up with viability outside the womb is. I understand you have autism and thus can't handle context, but it's important here. A fetus, before it's viable, will die outside the womb. A toddler can survive just fine outside the womb.


And you suck at dog whistling
Thank you for posting Hulk Hogan, so glad someone here actually has a brain on this forum.
 
Again, look up with viability outside the womb is. I understand you have autism and thus can't handle context, but it's important here. A fetus, before it's viable, will die outside the womb. A toddler can survive just fine outside the womb.
Except that toddlers can't feed themselves and will still readily swallow small objects they can choke on like coins or batteries as well as start poking their fingers into electrical outlets or start playing with knives and other things that can cut or stab them.
And you suck at dog whistling
I understand you have autism but nobody here is dog whistling.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Muh Vagina
Again, look up with viability outside the womb is. I understand you have autism and thus can't handle context, but it's important here. A fetus, before it's viable, will die outside the womb. A toddler can survive just fine outside the womb.
Intresting how you would bring that up, considering how it throws a wrench in your entire retarded position.

Viability outside the womb literally varies by region, class and era. A rich upper class baby in the US is gonna survive outside the womb way sooner than a poor baby from somalia will.

In fact, considering how the majority african countries viability outside the womb is considerably lower than most developed countries, if we follow this retarded line of thought, it literally implies that africans are less human than everyone else.

Considering how technology moves forward, does that mean people are less "human" in the past and "more human" in the future? What happens when technology advances enough to gestate zygotes?

Are people "less human" in areas without access to incubators?
 
Back