OgreSan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
Can't wait to have a lot more incest babies to raise on societies dime.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am extremely disappointed in you. In every other thread you are an extremely high quality poster. A 66% national majority transcends politics. The implication is that 220 million Americans agree with something, and you can't paint 220 million people into any specific corner.Not coming back to this thread, but reposting here for a final reply to someone in the Supreme Court thread. I accidentally posted to the closed thread, so whatever.
That's absolute nonsense. It depends where the 66% are. Most legislatures are majority Republican right now. Do you understand anything about how any of this works at all and that much of that 66% are in states like California and New York, and have no influence whatsoever out of their states?
That's actually a feature, not a bug.
I mean this is true for the original roe v. wade. Everything about that case was odd. The legal arguments used were strange.The fact that just a handful can make a massive decision like this puts into question what else they will change and when. Especially when the circumstances are cases made for the sake of understanding the plight of another's burden; essentially V. cases.
I mean, not the dead babies, but they don't vote, so who cares?I'm not saying that this isn't a choice being made "For the people" but lets be honest, why would there be a need to overturn a right that benefitted everyone?
They vote in 20 years...I mean this is true for the original roe v. wade. Everything about that case was odd. The legal arguments used were strange.
I mean, not the dead babies, but they don't vote, so who cares?
>JewishNot sure if it's been posted yet, but this is my new absolute favorite abortion protest image evar:
View attachment 3444528
All credit is of course due to the brave Amanda Herring - Director of Jewish Life and Learning at Edlavitch DC Jewish Community Center.
This brave young woman who took time away from developing the Jewish Planner, shows us that 8 1/2 months of cell clumps in her belly Is Not Yet A Human, so there is no reason to get worked up about aborting them.
Such an iconic photo, may it never be lost to history.
Antifastan isn't doing anything to abortion. I believe the the Democratic Republic Oregon commonwealth for the people is pushing to expand abortion.Can't wait to have a lot more incest babies to raise on societies dime.
What do you bet that women has never had an abortion and never will?>Jewish
Every single time. I'm pretty sure the "Not Yet A Human" paint isn't for the baby but for her. She hasn't eaten enough foreskins to be considered human.
20 doll hairs. She's definitely just there to farm for internet points. Narcissa'ism, not even ounce.What do you bet that women has never had an abortion and never will?
Can you link the page?I was just thinking about how this weekend the terfs in here actually thought a fucked up baby alpaca was a fucked up baby human, and I started laughing again.
But yes do carry on about how it's best to kill retards, sorry to interrupt.
Thoughts on how buck bucking impacted the abortion situation?Left winger against abortion AMA
View attachment 3443981
If we leave you in the rainforest you won't turn into a senior either.A fetus on its own won't turn into a baby, either. It'll die outside the womb.
Toddlers don't require a womb to feed them. They can eat and digest food on their own.If we leave you in the rainforest you won't turn into a senior either.
Any human put outside a survivable enviroment will die. Leave a toddler in the woods and it will never turn into a teen. Does that mean toddlers aren't human?
Toddlers need parents to feed them. If you leave a toddler alone its literally going to starve to death.Toddlers don't require a womb to feed them. They can eat and digest food on their own.
Intresting how you would bring that up, considering how it throws a wrench in your entire retarded position.Look up "fetus viability outside the womb". It's really not a hard concept
A fetus has the exact same rights as a person. Not being murdered is a right.Since you think a fetus has more rights than a person, do you think a welfare recipient should receive more money just for being pregnant? Should a pregnant woman be able to drive in a carpool lane alone?
Nicolae Ceaușescu and Jospeh Stalin are proud of you.Left winger against abortion AMA
View attachment 3443981
you suck at strawmanningToddlers don't require a womb to feed them. They can eat and digest food on their own.
Look up "fetus viability outside the womb". It's really not a hard concept
Since you think a fetus has more rights than a person, do you think a welfare recipient should receive more money just for being pregnant? Should a pregnant woman be able to drive in a carpool lane alone?
Again, look up with viability outside the womb is. I understand you have autism and thus can't handle context, but it's important here. A fetus, before it's viable, will die outside the womb. A toddler can survive just fine outside the womb.Toddlers need parents to feed them. If you leave a toddler alone its literally going to starve to death.
If we leave you alone in the middle of the sahara desert you're also going to starve to death because you need someone else to provide your food for you. Does that mean you aren't human?
And you suck at dog whistlingyou suck at strawmanning
Thank you for posting Hulk Hogan, so glad someone here actually has a brain on this forum.Again, look up with viability outside the womb is. I understand you have autism and thus can't handle context, but it's important here. A fetus, before it's viable, will die outside the womb. A toddler can survive just fine outside the womb.
And you suck at dog whistling
Except that toddlers can't feed themselves and will still readily swallow small objects they can choke on like coins or batteries as well as start poking their fingers into electrical outlets or start playing with knives and other things that can cut or stab them.Again, look up with viability outside the womb is. I understand you have autism and thus can't handle context, but it's important here. A fetus, before it's viable, will die outside the womb. A toddler can survive just fine outside the womb.
I understand you have autism but nobody here is dog whistling.And you suck at dog whistling
Again, look up with viability outside the womb is. I understand you have autism and thus can't handle context, but it's important here. A fetus, before it's viable, will die outside the womb. A toddler can survive just fine outside the womb.
Intresting how you would bring that up, considering how it throws a wrench in your entire retarded position.
Viability outside the womb literally varies by region, class and era. A rich upper class baby in the US is gonna survive outside the womb way sooner than a poor baby from somalia will.
In fact, considering how the majority african countries viability outside the womb is considerably lower than most developed countries, if we follow this retarded line of thought, it literally implies that africans are less human than everyone else.
Considering how technology moves forward, does that mean people are less "human" in the past and "more human" in the future? What happens when technology advances enough to gestate zygotes?
Are people "less human" in areas without access to incubators?