Their country could've been literally anything because they didn't have a country. I even showed you evidence that plenty of Zionists especially before 1914 didn't give a fuck, they just wanted a Jewish homeland. It only succeeded in Palestine because European countries made it succeed by colonizing the Ottoman Empire. That doesn't mean I think Israel should be destroyed and the Jews sent to Alaska or whatever, I'm just saying that from the perspective of an early 20th century Zionist that sending the Jews to Alaska would be a reasonable solution to the JQ.
They came from Palestine, that was their country, the one they were kicked out from and around which their entire religion and culture revolves to.
Again, there's a reason why the other proposals failed, because they had no emotional relation to them. This shit matters. Countries are not interchangeable.
You have to control EVERY GROUP in the population because people are by and large a bunch of easily led around morons and inherently need someone less moronic than them to lead them around. That doesn't mean I'm against moving Jews to Israel but if a Jew's ancestors have been around for centuries then they might as well be native to the land (albeit a different ethnic group). Just like blacks should probably go back to Africa and Marcus Garvey was right but I don't blame them if they want to stay in the place their ancestors got dragged in chains to. Jews can serve a useful function in any society, like Jewish doctors. Hell, even some Nazis thought this, that's why Erhard Milch didn't end up taking a shower at Auschwitz but got to be a Luftwaffe field marshal.
People become native when they're accepted as such, and Jews were never accepted as native, at least in Europe anyway. The treatment they got and the fact that for centuries people were literally begging them to go back to Palestine shows this. It's never been about usury, it's never been about baking matzo with Christian blood and it's never been about poisoning wells with the Plague or whatever, it's been just the fact they were foreign, and for whatever reason, they couldn't be accepted. To a degree there was a financial incentive to do so, they were kicked back and forth and often reinvited back within a decade or so, it was a vicious circle of "Let them get rich, end up in debt (not necessarily to them), expel them to seize their property, reinvite them, rinse and repeat". Here's the real reason of muh 109 countries.
In order to justify this, integration couldn't be allowed. They didn't even choose the trades they ended up with, they were forbidden from owning or working the land, this is how people integrate, this is how people traditionally developed attachments to the country that hosted them, but this was prevented with them. In absence of this, you could only end up in trade or, at best, a craftsman, and Jews made for good jewelers and carpenters.
In Europe, a similar thing happened with the Gypsies, who were always a foreign body, we just didn't know where they came from until recently (India). I also support India retaking their trash since it didn't work out with them either.
And if you need people to be controlled you really don't understand them, the best of people comes out when all impediments to them acting natural are destroyed, not when you force them to act as you want through fads, social pressure, arbitrary legislation or whatever. The West is fucked up because some people own the law, own the school, and decide social trends, and people are at the mercy of all this.
Be honest, do you think that the youth would adopt neo-pronouns if everyone around them, schools, institutions, people drawn from the former two, wouldn't be telling them they should adopt them?
