Callum Nathan Thomas Edmunds / MauLer93 / MauLer and the EFAPshere - Objective discussion about not-Channel Awesome featuring Rags, Southpaw and more!

[Clorox Cowboy]

Correct me if I am wrong, but when I was lurking on this thread a few years ago I thought Rags tried to kill himself? Or went missing or something. Might be thinking of wrong furry, but I thought it was rags.

I thought that was Wolf?

 

[Shieldman]

Wolf freaked out and quit not once, but twice. The first time people got really scared because it legit read like a suicide note.

 

[reptile101]

Wolf freaked out and quit not once, but twice. The first time people got really scared because it legit read like a suicide note.

dident he himself just say it was to much stress and being online all the time made him super depressed

 

[Gloria From Pokemon Sword]

The movies do stand on their own. They're an obviously separate continuity and aren't intended to be proper adaptations. Why? Because comics are infinitely more retarded and no self-respecting person enjoys them.

Ya had me and then you lost me. However, I think there's something about @Aaron McIntyre comment getting lost here.

The "They Stand On Their Own" joke is primarily aimed at MCU Spider-Man, who has strictly been a vehicle for other ideas in the MCU. Think about it: Homecoming had him nicknamed "Iron-Boy" for a reason. Far From Home had a lot of shilling for Captain Marvel on top of selling Tony's death, and No Way Home set up the multi-verse because let's face it, the MCU played its best card(s) but wants to keep going. MauLer's defense of the MCU Spider-Man films proves that he has no objective standards. Not because they are or aren't objectively good/bad movies, but because he defends them out of enjoyment instead of "merit" but has to give a reason they aren't picked apart like the "bad" MCU media is.

 

[Idiotron]

I agree that it's Rags.
Wolf and MauLer alone had some good stuff.
Rags can be funny when they are making fun of Jared Genesis or some shit but he's a moron narcissist.
He's a slightly smarter Ethan Ralph.
I honestly think Wolf left because Rags was constantly humiliating him on stream in front of thousands of people.

At some point in the future, you know it's coming, Rags will be found out to have done some sick shit with animals, then he will be exiled and everyone will pretend like they were always against him from the start.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

At some point in the future, you know it's coming, Rags will be found out to have done some sick shit with animals, then he will be exiled and everyone will pretend like they were always against him from the start.

Oh, I can't wait.

 

[Valentinian II]

At some point in the future, you know it's coming, Rags will be found out to have done some sick shit with animals, then he will be exiled and everyone will pretend like they were always against him from the start.

I think it's unlikely, for all the time Rags was on the internet, nothing absolutely undefendable about him came out, whereas some of Wolf's dirt surfaced a few years ago. Not that I don't believe Rags does really repulsive stuff (aside from all his furry shit), but I think he knows how to cover his tracks so that nothing will ever come out.

 

[sheppydepp]

I think it's unlikely, for all the time Rags was on the internet, nothing absolutely undefendable about him came out, whereas some of Wolf's dirt surfaced a few years ago. Not that I don't believe Rags does really repulsive stuff (aside from all his furry shit), but I think he knows how to cover his tracks so that nothing will ever come out.

Thoughts on Wolf’s defense?

https://youtu.be/VgZaFBErtlw

 

[reptile101]

I think it's unlikely, for all the time Rags was on the internet, nothing absolutely undefendable about him came out, whereas some of Wolf's dirt surfaced a few years ago. Not that I don't believe Rags does really repulsive stuff (aside from all his furry shit), but I think he knows how to cover his tracks so that nothing will ever come out.

*wolfs dirt*

did that not boil down to some chick lied about her age on discord and nothing physical ever even happened

 

[Valentinian II]

Thoughts on Wolf’s defense?

https://youtu.be/VgZaFBErtlw

I think it's as good as he could have done it. Honestly, most people don't find themselves in such a situation, so it's hard to explain what happened without making yourself look worse. Good for him.

*wolfs dirt*

did that not boil down to some chick lied about her age on discord and nothing physical ever even happened

Yeah, that's pretty much nothing, but many people on the Internet would want you dead if you made any kind of sexual advance towards someone on fucking Discord without knowing they were underaged. It doesn't really matter if it's really repulsive or not, what matters is if it makes people mad or not. People don't seem that enraged by furry porn, so unless something really vile comes out, Rags will go on being an arrogant obnoxious faggot unscathed. And as I said, the fact that he's been around long enough, and pissed off enough people already, without anything of the sort ever surfacing, tells me that he knows to hide his activities.

 

[░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓ด้้้้้็็็็็้้]

*wolfs dirt*

did that not boil down to some chick lied about her age on discord and nothing physical ever even happened

There was also another girl that Wolf was sending lewd photos to. He knew she was 15 at the time he was contacting her. Here's the post with the messages and Wolf's admission.

 

[reptile101]

There was also another girl that Wolf was sending lewd photos to. He knew she was 15 at the time he was contacting her. Here's the post with the messages and Wolf's admission.

*i was 18*

eh i dont really see it weird with teens exchanging nudes i just know its illegal for both parties cause its considered cp

but teens are dumb teens and most dont really know that

 

[Gloria From Pokemon Sword]

*i was 18*

eh i dont really see it weird with teens exchanging nudes i just know its illegal for both parties cause its considered cp

but teens are dumb teens and most dont really know that

The fact that he was pressuring her when she clearly wasn't comfortable with it is far more damning. Because you're not entirely wrong: turning 18 means you're a teenager who can legally make more bad decisions. And being a teenager is not an excuse: You can be a teenager who isn't a total slave to hormones. And when someone says "I'm underaged and it's wrong" but you still persist because you're thinking with the wrong head, you lose that vote of innocence.

I have respect for Wolf actually leaving the internet to try and focus on his mental health, but that respect is greatly limited when he wasn't even willing to say what he did was wrong. Half of his apology was him saying the woman who revealed the texts was a psychopath. Maybe she was, but that doesn't take away what he did, nor does the fact he was out of an abusive relationship. He claims she was never going to give the context, but also never gave it himself. He was more concerned with making sure he was seen in a good light than giving people an idea of what actually happened, ironically putting him in a really bad light.

 

[crab fucker]

As far as Rags getting exiled for doing sick shit, wasn't there already a post about how his personal discord server is filled with furries and that some of the shit is dangerously close to zoophilia? Dunno if that's true but honestly, just being the owner or even admin of a server filled with zoophiles could be a problem. Even if he had nothing to do with the content in the server, it's just plain bad optics.

I've stopped giving furries the benefit of the doubt awhile ago so it's probably just a matter of time before his kinks become more depraved and harder to hide.

 

[Clorox Cowboy]

As far as Rags getting exiled for doing sick shit, wasn't there already a post about how his personal discord server is filled with furries and that some of the shit is dangerously close to zoophilia? Dunno if that's true but honestly, just being the owner or even admin of a server filled with zoophiles could be a problem. Even if he had nothing to do with the content in the server, it's just plain bad optics.

I've stopped giving furries the benefit of the doubt awhile ago so it's probably just a matter of time before his kinks become more depraved and harder to hide.

If you consider feral artwork zoophilia then yes the server is flooded with it and Rags himself is perpetuating the spread of content as he used to regularly commission artwork of his feral fursona. As far as I'm aware there have been no allegations or hints of him or anyone in his immediate social circle being skeevy towards real animals.

Not that this is something that should come as a shock, his fursona has a visible sheath, something nobody who doesn't want to fuck cartoon dogs would include consciously in a design.

 

[Shieldman]

Quite the cast including our boy Mauler.
Destiny is trashing the prequels in front of him, lmao

 

[DEBIRU MAN]

Quite the cast including our boy Mauler.
Destiny is trashing the prequels in front of him, lmao

Wow, Mauler is kinda losing his shit at Destiny thinking TLJ is decent. Not really in a autistic way, but in a clearly offended way.

 

[Passing Through Town]

Ya had me and then you lost me. However, I think there's something about @Aaron McIntyre comment getting lost here.

The "They Stand On Their Own" joke is primarily aimed at MCU Spider-Man, who has strictly been a vehicle for other ideas in the MCU.

He said "MauLer can't be bothered to read some comics". How does that translate to anything you said in this post? You're welcome to be upset about the way Spider-Man has been portrayed in these films, but I don't really see how any of these complaints serve as a criticism of the EFAP crew. When they say the films stand on their own, they mean the MCU is largely independent of the comics, which is true.

MauLer's defense of the MCU Spider-Man films proves that he has no objective standards.

No, it proves that he's willing to overlook something's flaws if he enjoys it, which is something he's been open about.

Not because they are or aren't objectively good/bad movies, but because he defends them out of enjoyment instead of "merit" but has to give a reason they aren't picked apart like the "bad" MCU media is.

Why put merit in quotation marks? Can a movie not have merit? The most irritating thing I see in this thread is people acting as though something can't have objective flaws and/or claiming that the EFAP crew is somehow hypocritical with their criticism. I disagree with that notion. Standards have to be clearly defined and agreed upon. You're welcome to disagree with the standards that EFAP has (I certainly do) but it's dishonest to act as though they're hypocritical for enjoying something that's flawed or for choosing not to discuss the flaws of something they enjoy. The issue with EFAP isn't hypocrisy, it's their incredibly reductive approach to media, their pretentiousness, and their stupidity.

Spoiler: Disagreement with your given criticisms of the Spider-Man movies

Homecoming had him nicknamed "Iron-Boy" for a reason

By who? Certainly not the general audience. This is just as reductive as EFAP shit. How does the presence of Iron Man and his influence detract from the movie's themes? How does it detract from its quality? It doesn't in either case.

Far From Home had a lot of shilling for Captain Marvel on top of selling Tony's death

Just as reductive as before. I didn't see Captain Marvel being marketed at all in that one. And "selling Tony's death"? What exactly do you mean by that? If your goal is to argue that MauLer has no objective standards for ignoring the flaws of these movies, why not bring up actual flaws? For instance, in FFH, the notion that Mysterio's story about Spider-Man doing anything wrong would be believed is ridiculous because of the mountains of evidence proving the contrary. And iirc, the footage of Mysterio at the end contradicts what we saw in the scene where it was supposedly recorded. There's many more issues, but it's connection to other MCU products isn't one of them.

No Way Home set up the multi-verse because let's face it, the MCU played its best card(s) but wants to keep going

Again, thoroughly reductive, and even just untrue. Loki set up the multi-verse, No Way Home was the first movie to make use of it. From a meta perspective it was probably done just to bring in Toby and Andrew, sure, but that's not inherently a problem. How it goes about bringing them into the film and making use of the multi-verse idea is where the problem comes from.

 

[reptile101]

Wow, Mauler is kinda losing his shit at Destiny thinking TLJ is decent. Not really in a autistic way, but in a clearly offended way.

dang they even got that darkmatter atheist faggot

 

[BroFist28]

Wow, Mauler is kinda losing his shit at Destiny thinking TLJ is decent. Not really in a autistic way, but in a clearly offended way.

He literally searches up his name to look up anyone talking shit about him in Twitter, it's not suprising he's insanely insecure about any opinions that goes against him.