- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
He'll run against Sanders for violating campaign promises. Like Cindy Sheehan did against Nancy Pelosi when Pelosi didn't impeach Bush.
Horrorcow Lucas Werner - A man of Spokane, Washington who is obsessed with millennial and Gen Z chicks
- Thread starter SpacePanther
- Start date
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2013
I suppose he thinks that, just as Herbert Hoover once promised "a chicken in every pot," Sanders can somehow guarantee an 18 YO hottie for every neckbeard incel autist.
Seriously, though... as with so many other lolcows here, if he just made a few minor changes -- dressed better, got some exercise, worked a day job, and stopped seeing women as exotic beasts to be worshipped/feared -- he'd probably be a lot happier. Ot at least, get laid as often as your average 36yo American male.
But then, if lolcows had self-awareness and common sense, they wouldn't be lolcows.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
If they developed any self-awareness after all their shenanigans, they'd probably end up taking their own lives.
W
WW 635
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Women in their 30s don't want to bang this guy either.
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2015
"The government should give people girlfriends" is, if anything, a philosophy on relationships even MORE worrying than OPL's.
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2013
From the sound of it the only action he's ever gotten was from women his age or older and this includes when he was younger.
So really his entire sexual life has been from cougars. It's cool when you're younger but not so cool when you get older.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2016
Well, nobody (at least in their right mind) wants to bang this guy.
I mean, the best accomplishment this guy achieved was making a damn design for a shirt.
Odnovo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
My father wanted to date a younger woman (don't know how young) not even a year after my mother died. He was around 60 back then.
It is just so creepy. I really don't think that age makes too much of a difference when it comes to how good-looking a woman is (assuming that they are an adult; I am not talking about those under 1
. And besides, most girls from the ages of 18 to 24 are sort of immature these days. Why would you want to be with someone who grew up thinking that the world revolved around them? Then again, that is the way my father thinks, too. Even I was like that for a few years.
It is just so creepy. I really don't think that age makes too much of a difference when it comes to how good-looking a woman is (assuming that they are an adult; I am not talking about those under 1
. And besides, most girls from the ages of 18 to 24 are sort of immature these days. Why would you want to be with someone who grew up thinking that the world revolved around them? Then again, that is the way my father thinks, too. Even I was like that for a few years.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
I know he's on EBT, but is he on a tugboat? How is he getting money? I'm assuming he's not homeless (big assumption I know). How's he putting a roof over his head?
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2016
That's a good question, how IS he putting a roof over his head?
He doesn't seem to have any information listed under the "home" tab on the couchsurfing profile (which was linked earlier in the thread). He does, however, have some pictures. Unfortunately, you must have an account to check any of these tabs. I might make a throwaway later and see what he's got in there.
Also, it's worth noting that he hasn't logged in recently.
I looked at some of the pictures posted to the thread, and they don't seem to be taken in a house.
Most homes don't have sprinklers and fluorescent lighting.
I also looked through the youtube video posted early in the thread, but it's so dark that it's hard to see any details.
So basically, given the limited information we have, I wouldn't be surprised if he's homeless, and if he was trying to use his couchsurfing profile purely as a way to get a roof over his head. If that's true, wow
Last edited:
Odnovo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
I'd reckon that if he is on EBT, and supposedly SSI, he likely is homeless despite government benefits. If you lived in the middle of nowhere, those two resources would be enough to survive on, but the more populated areas have higher costs of living and as such EBT and SSI just wouldn't add up.
Scampers
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2015
I'd like to assemble a 10 cm tellurite cube filled with Caesium vapor running a 1.9 Hz pulse with a 3.5 * 10^14 MHz propagation current at a 330 (+ or - 30) gain assist rate connected to a 4 second / RBG optical pumping sequence in order to send a message back in time by breaking the speed of light. I'd like to replicate an experiment done 13 years ago at Princeton.
My thought is that a sustained beam of 24 seconds will warp the space-time continuum #backwards in time 2 hours. Should it work, I've essentially built a "faster than light" communications device and by way of the theory of general relativity, a "time machine".
He refers to some experiments that were done a few years back which were misinterpreted by journalists as having created "faster than light communication". The experiments involved sending microwaves through wave conductor tubes of a certain geometry which caused the propagation velocity of some individual waves making up the wave packets [any signal sent in the form of waves -- electromagnetic, acoustic -- consists of wave packets which are made up of superpositions of individual sine waves, the mathematics of this process is called Fourier Transform] to exceed "light speed" c ~ 3e8 m/s. But this didn't enable superluminal communication because the entire wave packet still traveled at c...
...actually, the wave conductors can be designed to make the entire wave packet exceed c! So, have we cucked Einstein and can send messages into the past, thus getting easily rich by winning the lottery? NO. In order to do that we'd need to send information faster than c (and thus, according to relativity, into the past). While a wave packet can indeed be made to go faster than c, the wave packet's "nose", that is, it's front part where the intensity of the electromagnetic field rises from zero to some value given by the wave packet's amplitude, can never exceed c. If you want to state Special Relativity really really autistically precise, you should say: "A change in field intensity sufficient to transmit one bit of information can never exceed the velocity of c ~ 3e8 m/s".
Note that nearly all experimental physicists get this wrong. They usually say: "Individual frequencies can go faster than c, but the wave packet cannot." Wrong. Individual waves can exceed c, wave packets can as well -- but the packet's front part, where intensity changes and thus information is transmitted, can never exceed c. A professor of theoretical physics once explained this to me over lunch.
TL;DR: This project of Open Mouth Guy has the same chance of succeeding as Taxman's Interdimensional Pony Portal.
I'm going to take a guess and say he watched Steins;Gate and now thinks he's a smart animu scientist.
Another thing on this dude is he just seems...so fake! Just looking on his OKCupid profile it's like "Here's a random science fact. Look at me, I'm smart! Smart science smart." Most women can see right through that bullshit, because real scientists don't just brag about their knowledge all day; they have interests outside their field. He offers nothing and has the personality of an unsalted cracker.
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
It would take more than a menial low paying job to make that douchebro attractive..he's just a lost cause that will eventually settle for a heavy set woman 10 to 20 years older, who weighs about 200 more lbs than him
A stale one at that
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
"Fucking ageist bitches. Won't fuck a guy just because he's old, poor, and sneaks into a public library for shelter."
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2015
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2015
I'd like to assemble a 10 cm tellurite cube filled with Caesium vapor running a 1.9 Hz pulse with a 3.5 * 10^14 MHz propagation current at a 330 (+ or - 30) gain assist rate connected to a 4 second / RBG optical pumping sequence in order to send a message back in time by breaking the speed of light. I'd like to replicate an experiment done 13 years ago at Princeton.
My thought is that a sustained beam of 24 seconds will warp the space-time continuum #backwards in time 2 hours. Should it work, I've essentially built a "faster than light" communications device and by way of the theory of general relativity, a "time machine".
He refers to some experiments that were done a few years back which were misinterpreted by journalists as having created "faster than light communication". The experiments involved sending microwaves through wave conductor tubes of a certain geometry which caused the propagation velocity of some individual waves making up the wave packets [any signal sent in the form of waves -- electromagnetic, acoustic -- consists of wave packets which are made up of superpositions of individual sine waves, the mathematics of this process is called Fourier Transform] to exceed "light speed" c ~ 3e8 m/s. But this didn't enable superluminal communication because the entire wave packet still traveled at c...
...actually, the wave conductors can be designed to make the entire wave packet exceed c! So, have we cucked Einstein and can send messages into the past, thus getting easily rich by winning the lottery? NO. In order to do that we'd need to send information faster than c (and thus, according to relativity, into the past). While a wave packet can indeed be made to go faster than c, the wave packet's "nose", that is, it's front part where the intensity of the electromagnetic field rises from zero to some value given by the wave packet's amplitude, can never exceed c. If you want to state Special Relativity really really autistically precise, you should say: "A change in field intensity sufficient to transmit one bit of information can never exceed the velocity of c ~ 3e8 m/s".
Note that nearly all experimental physicists get this wrong. They usually say: "Individual frequencies can go faster than c, but the wave packet cannot." Wrong. Individual waves can exceed c, wave packets can as well -- but the packet's front part, where intensity changes and thus information is transmitted, can never exceed c. A professor of theoretical physics once explained this to me over lunch.
TL;DR: This project of Open Mouth Guy has the same chance of succeeding as Taxman's Interdimensional Pony Portal.
I want to weigh in here as well. I am not a physicist. I know nothing about the field. But I do have a rough idea of how to science. A bit over a century ago, scientific knowledge went kaboom. All over the world, fiendish people were lurking in basements, prodding the universe with pipettes and scalpels and exquisite high accuracy timepieces. It was fucking amazing what they did with such primitive tools. But the operative word here is 'primitive'. When you have primitive tools, there is a limt to what you can do. So armed with the knowledge that they needed more advanced tools to continue their studies, those fiendish people in basements looked at their primitive tools and made them better. And they learned even more, but then they hit a wall and they found that they needed to make their tools better. And thus an arms race was born. If I walked back into a laboratory that I worked in ten years ago- hell, even five years ago- unless I was looking at something called physical properties, I'd be fundamentally useless. It'd be almost like I'd never even heard of the lab in the first place.
The point I'm making here is that the tools science needs now are so insanely complicated that the age of basement science is effectively over. You still have fiendish people in basements, but in order to complete their experiments, they need incredibility complex equipment and the chances that they can build that equipment cheaply, accurately and safely by themselves is very low. So they have to take it to a laboratory at some point in order to prove that their time in the basement wasn't wasted. There's really no getting around it.
Basically, what I'm saying is that until this man can get to a physics laboratory in order to 'create', test and prove that his improbable device works, all he has is a theory. And if he actually knew how scienctific process works, he'd have enough wits to publish a paper, get his theory out there, make sure his name is attached to this fantastic invention so that he takes the credit when the Nobel prize nominations start coming in.
Tl;Dr The man's an idiot and a wannabe, and the only thing he's ever created are his own faeces.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
None of what he wrote is anything other than Star Trek style technobabble. You are giving random homeless crazy dude too much credit.
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
It's common in the Loveshy Therapy Center. Quite a few of them believe they should be given a girl like in Chris' Christmas video. What's kind of frightening is that they're more hateful about it than childish/spiteful.
- Joined
- May 18, 2014
The OKCupid profile makes me think troll. It's just too cute to be real.
- Joined
- May 26, 2013
Does he not realize that Sanders is pro-woman and that his biggest support group is millennials? And how is it that young women are ageist for wanting to date men their own age, but he's not ageist for only wanting to fuck date younger women?
And I think that his previous girlfriend was 18 years older than him is fascinating, especially with his current fixation on younger women.
And I think that his previous girlfriend was 18 years older than him is fascinating, especially with his current fixation on younger women.