Last edited:
US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians
- Thread starter SeniorFuckFace
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
I despise Twatter types
The DoJ is going after the cops not for shooting Taylor but for falsifying the information they gave the judge to get the no knock warrant. Cuz the judge sure as hell isn't going to take the rap for this so they're going after the cops.
Now I actually have no problem with this. The two cops deliberately lied to the judge to get the warrant which is a clear breach of ethics and well the rest of what happened is a mess of stupid cops and dumb ass criminals.
The cops should be charged with falsification of legal documents because that's what they already (stupidly) admitted too.
The DoJ is going after the cops not for shooting Taylor but for falsifying the information they gave the judge to get the no knock warrant. Cuz the judge sure as hell isn't going to take the rap for this so they're going after the cops.
Now I actually have no problem with this. The two cops deliberately lied to the judge to get the warrant which is a clear breach of ethics and well the rest of what happened is a mess of stupid cops and dumb ass criminals.
The cops should be charged with falsification of legal documents because that's what they already (stupidly) admitted too.
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
Didn't the FBI lie to the judge to get a warrant to spy on Trump?
mandatorylurk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
You can see the warmongering in his eyes even as he's 81 years old. Pro Gamer tip for you swamp faggots, when you say Trump is the greatest threat ever people don't believe it and won't believe what you'll say after:
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
They prefer to call them "Freedom Fibs"
Garm
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2019
Oh good. A legion of Florida Men will be leading the charge in Civil War 2.
That... Is the problem. I don't think dementia patients can give consent. So in Biden's five minutes of lucidity he has each day that have to explain to him that he has to resign as president only for him to start demanding ice cream.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
A neocon warmonger calling a 90s democrat who successfully snuffed out the leader of ISIS, blew up a band of Russian mercenaries making an incursion into Syria, and assassinating Iran's top glowie while the Mullahs flailed impotently the "biggest threat of our existence." IMAX-level projection.
This nigga and Dubya couldn't even so much as put down Osama Bin Laden during their eight-year joke of a presidency. He can go join McCain in a nice deep ring of Dante's Inferno.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
If the 2nd American civil war doesn't have a gator cavalry charge, I'll be disappoint and will refuse to acknowledge it as a civil war until it happens.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
The fact that Dick Cheney of all people has the balls to talk about existential threats given the fuckery he was responsible for...
Sadly gators are just too low to the ground for proper use as cavalry. Would gator-drawn tachankas suffice? Because it ain't Florida unless its got guns.
- Joined
- May 25, 2020
Sekirodiealot
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
He hasn't taken having a recession start during his residency very well.
All those show trials are telling me is that the politicians deserve to be far more than scared. You don't get that kind of primal fear for people showing up if there isn't a miniscule part of that shriveled husk that they call a conscience realizing how they've raped the American Dream for the past forty years.
I want Texas to get real republicans that are willing to slap down the califaggots in their major cities. You're the Lone Star Republic? Act like it. You're getting shown up by Florida Man in telling the government to fuck off.
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2021
Good to see Satan is still around to give Halliburton record profits.
Sekirodiealot
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
I hope so. Imma a texan and think abbots okay, but it's starting to get annoying seeing him get blamed for shit that's not his fault like the ulvade shooting, covid, and the winter storm.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
The man cannot even retire in peace (because he deserves none). Eyes don't lie: He fucking hates you.
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
Lmao I fucking hate Reagan so much for the untold damage he did to California.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
Sure buddy. Chris is gonna beat his charges. And I'm gonna win the next Billion dollar mega millions.
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2019
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds No-Excuse Mail-In Voting Law | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds No-Excuse Mail-In Voting Law | Zer…
archived 4 Aug 2022 23:15:32 UTC
A Supreme Court of Pennsylvania divided along partisan lines upheld the state’s 2019 mail-in voting law in a 5-2 decision on August 2, which means that current mail-in balloting rules will probably remain in place for the upcoming November 8 elections for Congress and for state offices such as governor.
Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf speaking in Allentown, Penn., on Nov. 4, 2021 (Commonwealth Media Service)
The decision overturned a lower court ruling that had found the mail-in voting law ran afoul of the Pennsylvania Constitution.
All five Democratic justices supported the new ruling; both Republican justices dissented.
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, hailed the ruling which he said “definitively asserts that mail-in voting is a legal and constitutional method for Pennsylvania voters.”
“Voting is a fundamental right—a right that we should ensure is accessible for all voters,” Wolf said in a statement.
“Mail-in voting is a safe, secure, and legal option for Pennsylvania voters to exercise that right. I will continue to advocate for voting reforms that remove barriers and increase access to voting.”
Mail-in voting in Pennsylvania has been questioned by former President Donald Trump and Pennsylvania Republicans who say it opens the door to voter fraud and chaos in the vote-counting process. According to official results, Trump beat Democrat Hillary Clinton in the state in 2016 but lost to Joe Biden in 2020. Some Republicans say election irregularities in Pennsylvania cost Trump the state in 2020.
The case goes back to 2019 when the Pennsylvania General Assembly passed Act 77, which, among other things, amended the state’s election code to create universal no-excuse mail-in voting statewide. Before the act, voters had to establish they fit the criteria of an absentee voter before being able to cast a ballot by mail. The legislation easily passed the state House of Representatives 138-61 and the state Senate 35-14.
When the COVID-19 pandemic arrived in Pennsylvania months later, voters, especially Democrats, took advantage of the law’s stay-at-home voting provisions. In the 2020 presidential election, Democrat Joe Biden beat Republican Donald Trump by more than 3-1 among mail-in ballots, while Trump prevailed over Biden by 2-1 in votes cast in person on Election Day, according to a summary in the new court opinion.
Two weeks after the election, Republican candidates filed a petition for review in the state’s Commonwealth Court seeking to halt the certification of the Nov. 3, 2020, General Election. They argued the Pennsylvania Constitution requires voters to vote in person on Election Day unless they qualified for absentee voting and asked the Commonwealth Court to block certification of the election results. That court preliminarily enjoined certification.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania stepped in and found that the challengers had waited too long to bring their lawsuit and threw out the lower court’s injunction. The candidates then asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene, and it refused to do so. The case returned to Commonwealth Court which ruled 3-2 that the mail-in voting provision violated the state constitution.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania heard oral arguments in the case on March 8 and issued its ruling August 2, reversing the lower court.
Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf speaking in Allentown, Penn., on Nov. 4, 2021 (Commonwealth Media Service)The decision overturned a lower court ruling that had found the mail-in voting law ran afoul of the Pennsylvania Constitution.
All five Democratic justices supported the new ruling; both Republican justices dissented.
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, hailed the ruling which he said “definitively asserts that mail-in voting is a legal and constitutional method for Pennsylvania voters.”
“Voting is a fundamental right—a right that we should ensure is accessible for all voters,” Wolf said in a statement.
“Mail-in voting is a safe, secure, and legal option for Pennsylvania voters to exercise that right. I will continue to advocate for voting reforms that remove barriers and increase access to voting.”
Mail-in voting in Pennsylvania has been questioned by former President Donald Trump and Pennsylvania Republicans who say it opens the door to voter fraud and chaos in the vote-counting process. According to official results, Trump beat Democrat Hillary Clinton in the state in 2016 but lost to Joe Biden in 2020. Some Republicans say election irregularities in Pennsylvania cost Trump the state in 2020.
The case goes back to 2019 when the Pennsylvania General Assembly passed Act 77, which, among other things, amended the state’s election code to create universal no-excuse mail-in voting statewide. Before the act, voters had to establish they fit the criteria of an absentee voter before being able to cast a ballot by mail. The legislation easily passed the state House of Representatives 138-61 and the state Senate 35-14.
When the COVID-19 pandemic arrived in Pennsylvania months later, voters, especially Democrats, took advantage of the law’s stay-at-home voting provisions. In the 2020 presidential election, Democrat Joe Biden beat Republican Donald Trump by more than 3-1 among mail-in ballots, while Trump prevailed over Biden by 2-1 in votes cast in person on Election Day, according to a summary in the new court opinion.
Two weeks after the election, Republican candidates filed a petition for review in the state’s Commonwealth Court seeking to halt the certification of the Nov. 3, 2020, General Election. They argued the Pennsylvania Constitution requires voters to vote in person on Election Day unless they qualified for absentee voting and asked the Commonwealth Court to block certification of the election results. That court preliminarily enjoined certification.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania stepped in and found that the challengers had waited too long to bring their lawsuit and threw out the lower court’s injunction. The candidates then asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene, and it refused to do so. The case returned to Commonwealth Court which ruled 3-2 that the mail-in voting provision violated the state constitution.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania heard oral arguments in the case on March 8 and issued its ruling August 2, reversing the lower court.
Pennsylvania bros, y'all got robbed
Hallucinogenic Penguin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2022
Living here there are honestly still quite a lot of Neocon Boomer Country club faggots(I would say Texas is one of their last refuges) and lots of California transplants coming into play. I honestly don’t know where this whole “baste” Hispanic thing is coming from since they’ll just vote blue the moment a spokesperson of their race tells them Voting red will bring about right wing death squads for minorities. If Hispanics are swinging more right I have yet to see any inkling of it.
Beto will likely loose but it will be closer then we think.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
Reagan put the CA GOP on life support, Arnold pulled the plug and made it 1 party rule for the forseeable future.
- Status