reddit General

Most of them are flat-out fucking stupid, like one which suggested the Ford badge was a bowtie like Chevrolet. As a lifelong car guy, I can assure you that was never the case and anyone who believes otherwise is a retard who probably misnamed cars all the time. There's also "Flinstones", which makes no sense since Flint is a type of rock and "Flin" is just bullshit.

But there is one that makes me think they have a point, and that's the Fruit of the Loom logo.

I can picture the label exactly, and actually remember as a child being frustrated I couldn't find an FOTL logo on the internet with the "loom", as I called it. I would have been about 10/11 at the time, a good 5 or so years before the Mandela Effect shit even existed. And I'm fully aware of the gay-op mainstream science has tried to force on the population in the past few years (i.e. "most of your childhood memories don't real!") which I'm sure they're going to use to discredit future child sex assault victims of the elite, which is why I asked my 60 year old mother, who has never used the internet for socialization purposes and wouldn't even know what Reddit is, what the logo on my school uniform she regularly ironed and the knickers she pulled down her waist every time she went to the toilet in her younger years looked like.

She told me, hand on heart "Fruit coming out of a spilled basket". And then I had to explain the whole thing to her, and what a cornucopia was.

The best explanation I've seen so far tries to reason that people are conflating the logo with an actual Thanksgiving cornucopia. The only problem is not everyone who remembers the cornucopia lives in America. It's like Hanukkah. I can tell you a couple vague things about them, like a Menorah or a Turkey, but I wouldn't be able to describe any of the customs. I certainly never saw a cornucopia of fruit/veg before.

It also doesn't explain why of all possible symbols associated with fruit, we'd all associate it with the cornucopia as opposed to a bowl or tree branch.

Here's a 1970s jazz album which directly references an FOTL logo with a cornucopia:
View attachment 3574260
IIRC, even the original album artist was surprised the logo didn't have one. Seems a fairly unlikely mistake to make, particularly during the pre-internet era. If you're going to spoof a logo, you would typically have the real one in front of you as a comparison, no?

But what really sold me on this one is if you look at FOTL's original trademark details:

"050901, 050902, 050905, 050914 - Berries. Grapes (alone or in bunches). Apples. Baskets, bowls, and other containers of fruits, including cornucopia (horn of plenty)."

It mentions a cornucopia, even though the logo never used one. In fact it explicitly mentions several types of containers, though the logo has only ever had the fruit on its own, which is really fucking strange.

My two cents.
Probably the oddest thing about the Fruit of the Loom logo is this image:
1659997453202.png

Like, that's it. That's exactly it. But apparently it's just a mockup? Okay, so, who made it? Where did it come from? Why is it exactly, to a T, what I remember, yet it's apparently fake?
 
Probably the oddest thing about the Fruit of the Loom logo is this image:
View attachment 3578478

Like, that's it. That's exactly it. But apparently it's just a mockup? Okay, so, who made it? Where did it come from? Why is it exactly, to a T, what I remember, yet it's apparently fake?
You remember it, I remember it, and a bunch of other people have stories like "I learned what a cornucopia was because it was on my underwear."
If none of the other shit turns out to be real, I wouldn't be surprised if this one was.
 
The golden wheat-ish stuff in the background of the 80s version of the logo could easily be assumed to be a cornucopia at a glance. The image of fruit coming out of a cornucopia thing is so familiar, and the mind jumps to conclusions to save time especially with small, unimportant images we aren't spending a lot of time analyzing. That's my best theory. It makes no sense that they would change it and then try to cover up the change for some reason. What possible motive could there be?
 
The golden wheat-ish stuff in the background of the 80s version of the logo could easily be assumed to be a cornucopia at a glance. The image of fruit coming out of a cornucopia thing is so familiar, and the mind jumps to conclusions to save time especially with small, unimportant images we aren't spending a lot of time analyzing. That's my best theory. It makes no sense that they would change it and then try to cover up the change for some reason. What possible motive could there be?
MKULTRA-style gaslighting experiment?
 
In general, religious reddit is an underappreciated gem of lunacy. Enjoy this sampler platter:

View attachment 3575951View attachment 3575952

There are a lot of these, they're usually about masturbation or blowjobs, if you are ever able to drag it out of the OP:
View attachment 3575953

Here is a sin more up our alley:
View attachment 3575961

Oy vey shut it down!
View attachment 3575958

Suspicious handshakes:
View attachment 3575964

Illicit arm-folding:
View attachment 3575967
Scrupulosity Central. Its probably made worse by always having access to a forum to seek reassurance.
 
Lmao
Any type of quote used to disparage, promote, or harass others based on their race or sexuality will not be tolerated and the user will be banned.
Rude. If the concern is the admins banning the subreddit for quoting the show, remove the posts with objectionable quotes, refer people back to that post to explain why, and take no further action punishing them. Hell, get a script for the show and a list of objectionable words, and you could probably automate removal of posts with the objectionable quotes without too much difficulty.
 

r/witchesvspatriarchy is one of the funniest and most pathetic subs out there. Like, 90% of them are fat trannies, and the rest are mentally unstable girls with daddy issues who couldn't launch a revoloution against a "patriarchy" if they tried, and think owning a fucking snake and some incense makes them a earthmother goddess.


So they sit in their online echo chamber and "own" men who don't even know they exist.


Really fighting the good fight, ya Hocus Pocus wannabes.
 
Today in reddit troon news, the character "bridget" from guilty gear has been retconed into being a troon and the redditors are ecstatic ( of course)

1660041281341.png

1660041550158.png

Unfortunately, when you take into account bridget's back story this makes parallels to a certain doctor.

1660041796663.png

Now if you spend any amount of time on this site you know exactly what parallel i'm going to make.
1660041977259.png
This is David Reimer, David was born as a twin but due to a botched mutilation of the penis he was transition into a girl by the doctor John Money. and uh, yeah i'm sure you all know what happened to him and his twin brother.

Really fucking awkward to transition your character with such a backstory lmao.
 
Today in reddit troon news, the character "bridget" from guilty gear has been retconed into being a troon and the redditors are ecstatic ( of course)

View attachment 3580280

View attachment 3580296

Unfortunately, when you take into account bridget's back story this makes parallels to a certain doctor.

View attachment 3580299

Now if you spend any amount of time on this site you know exactly what parallel i'm going to make.
View attachment 3580304
This is David Reimer, David was born as a twin but due to a botched mutilation of the penis he was transition into a girl by the doctor John Money. and uh, yeah i'm sure you all know what happened to him and his twin brother.

Really fucking awkward to transition your character with such a backstory lmao.
SSSHHH... They do not want to acknowledge the Reimer brothers case and John Money. If they did then they would admit their ideology is built on a foundation of lies.
 
Today in reddit troon news, the character "bridget" from guilty gear has been retconed into being a troon and the redditors are ecstatic ( of course)

View attachment 3580280

View attachment 3580296

Unfortunately, when you take into account bridget's back story this makes parallels to a certain doctor.

View attachment 3580299

Now if you spend any amount of time on this site you know exactly what parallel i'm going to make.
View attachment 3580304
This is David Reimer, David was born as a twin but due to a botched mutilation of the penis he was transition into a girl by the doctor John Money. and uh, yeah i'm sure you all know what happened to him and his twin brother.

Really fucking awkward to transition your character with such a backstory lmao.
Wait why did they retcon Bridget's gender? Is it just American translation or did they officially do it?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Nigor and Falcerer
LMAO at that “the era it was broadcast in”

Ah yes, the 2010’s… A dark time where da homos were literally thrown off buildings and trannies were bullied into 41%ing even BEFORE they came out.
To be fair it was the 2000s, when you could say nigger and fag on TV without any issues. The Sopranos movie that came like a year ago is much more progressive when compared to the series, even though it's set in the 60s. Everybody treats the Negros like equals and when not it's just the cartoonish muh racist style of scenes we're bombarded with everywhere now.
 
Apparently its in the original japanese too but I can't confirm.
Ok I looked more into this situation and bridget is only trans in the bad ending and in the good ending he is still a guy, make of that what you will. Thats pretty terrible rep, I guess trans people will take anything.
 
Last edited:
Back