Poa.st / Chudbuds.lol General Discussion Thread - !! Poa.st and Bae.st have been compromised, all direct messages have been leaked. !!

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Instead of arguing this dumb shit I'll just post a quote from Neil Gaiman.
"There's never been a true war that wasn't fought between two sets of people who were certain they were in the right. The really dangerous people believe they are doing whatever they are doing solely and only because it is without question the right thing to do. And that is what makes them dangerous."
Make of that what you will.
If you don't believe that your views are right then wtf do you believe in? Of course everyone believes what they are doing is right, that's part of the human experience. You just sit there and go "hmm I dunno I guess" on every issue? We wouldn't get anything done in this world if people didn't make decisions. Sometimes they are right, sometimes they are wrong. But part of being an adult is building a belief system that you believe is right.
 
Instead of arguing this dumb shit I'll just post a quote from Neil Gaiman.
"There's never been a true war that wasn't fought between two sets of people who were certain they were in the right. The really dangerous people believe they are doing whatever they are doing solely and only because it is without question the right thing to do. And that is what makes them dangerous."
Make of that what you will.
LOL, you think you're smart or something, don't you?
 
FSE doesn't, albeit it lands on side of legal issues rather than being a nanny and keeping the timelines clean.
https://blog.freespeechextremist.com/blog/the-loli-question.html (https://archive.ph/VGJPp)
NAS boomers likely won't tolerate it either.
You're pretty outdated on that. p is now allowing the posting of lolicon imagery on (formerly) his instance.
If you don't believe that your views are right then wtf do you believe in? Of course everyone believes what they are doing is right, that's part of the human experience. You just sit there and go "hmm I dunno I guess" on every issue? We wouldn't get anything done in this world if people didn't make decisions. Sometimes they are right, sometimes they are wrong. But part of being an adult is building a belief system that you believe is right.
Look, if you want to hate on loli porn and the like and not want it on the site, just like Josh does - be my guest. But to equate it to actual child porn, like in your previous posts, I just can't get behind. Advocating for jailing people for expressing themselves is just a "no" in my books.
 
Last edited:
You're pretty outdated on that. p is now allowing the posting of lolicon imagery on (formerly) his instance.

Look, if you want to hate on loli porn and the like and not want it on the site, just like Josh does - be my guest. But to equate it to actual child porn, like in your previous posts, I just can't get behind. Advocating for jailing people for expressing themselves is just a "no" in my books.
We're on a site that was literally created to make fun of people for 'expressing' themselves in many retarded ways. No, I don't think imprisoning people for drawing lolis is the right way to go, because drawings are not as bad as actual porn... BUT at the same time, they're not THAT far below CP, so people who produce and consume such 'art' deserve to be ridiculed and made fun of to hell and back wherever they show up.
 
We're on a site that was literally created to make fun of people for 'expressing' themselves in many retarded ways. No, I don't think imprisoning people for drawing lolis is the right way to go, because drawings are not as bad as actual porn... BUT at the same time, they're not THAT far below CP, so people who produce and consume such 'art' deserve to be ridiculed and made fun of to hell and back wherever they show up.
Oh yeah, for sure. I'm all for ridiculing people who enjoy these kind of content. I just vehemently disagree on locking people up for art that's not sourced from CSAM.
 
Look, if you want to hate on loli porn and the like and not want it on the site, just like Josh does - be my guest. But to equate it to actual child porn, like in your previous posts, I just can't get behind. Advocating for jailing people for expressing themselves is just a "no" in my books.
That's okay, you don't have to agree with me. I think adults who are into lolicon are pedophiles and they can't be cured, so they should be killed because pedophiles can not co-exist with normal people in society and are a danger to kids. I don't think porn is in any way or sense "expressing yourself" unless you mean it in the most disgusting literal way. I think most libertarian types who are all "live and let live, there are totally non-offending pedos and they can't help how they were born" aren't parents and just don't feel the same level of disgust for these sick freaks.
 
You're pretty outdated on that. p is now allowing the posting of lolicon imagery on (formerly) his instance.

Look, if you want to hate on loli porn and the like and not want it on the site, just like Josh does - be my guest. But to equate it to actual child porn, like in your previous posts, I just can't get behind. Advocating for jailing people for expressing themselves is just a "no" in my books.
I don't want to jail pedophiles. It's a waste of money feeding and housing them.
I want them roped.
ALL of them. I dont care if it's just drawings.
All child molesters started just looking at images. They cant be cured, it's not worth the risk keeping them alive. If only one in 100,000 ever went on to harm a child it would be worth it because they are all sick and they serve no purpose.
And I don't want the government to ban lolishit. I want them to fix the roads, keep the power running etc and other then that get out the way and let the sick fucks and wastes of life in society get Gary Plauche'd.
That's the last I'll say on the subject in this thread.
I've used Poa.st to keep up with news about the site the past 3 days and link Indie Films because they need more recognition. I avoid the main Timeline so I havent seen any lolifilth. I went on it once and was confronted by a wall of Elf Gunts. Those people are fucking weird.
Once the site is stable I doubt I'll go back there.
If I see any of that shit I'll mock the shit out of whoever posted it until they're forced to ban me.

Null is in a hell of a fucking knife fight right now with some of the weirdest and most obsessive "people" (and I use the term extremely loosely) on the Internet and they want him and by extension us silenced or dead.
The dude is limited in his options at the minute. I'm not gonna blame him for using whatever methods he can to keep us informed of what the fuck is going on.
It is what it is.
 
CP has a victim, CP consumption increases the demand for CP.
Claiming CP and lolicon is the same is incorrect.

There is probably a big overlap between lolicon and CP consumers so if graf wants to deal with that moderation nightmare it's up to him.

I am very proud of all the members of the "feet first caucas" demonstrating their conviction to the cause, but this is not the wood-chipper thread.

make a separate thread and call it "is graf a pedo enabler and Josh a graf enabler?" this one is called "Poast vs Ralph".
 
Did Ralph win?

ralphwon.png


Don't worry Ralph never wins.

poastwon.png
 
The issue isn't the legality or the hurtfulness, the issue is that that only a pedophile would consume either of those and all pedophiles deserve death.
This argument is older than dinosaur bones & like most dinosaurs the people who insist upon it have little walnut-sized brains. Here is an underage cartoon character:
632-6323449_yoko-littner-body-pillow-png-gurren-lagann-yoko.png

Here is a cartoon character who is canonically legal age to fuck:
Konata-san.gif

So are people supposed to find the flat shapeless character attractive because she's 18? Or are they supposed to find the 14 year-old character with swinging honkers attractive? This paradox of finding a character too youthful-looking is based in subjectivity and normalfaggotry & because of this there's no way to express it without looking like an overly-opinionated sperg who posts chad edits. All of this also comes on the back of @Null trying to find a place where he can post things without being doxed or taken down as well which is worse than retarded, it's actively unhelpful.
 
This argument is older than dinosaur bones & like most dinosaurs the people who insist upon it have little walnut-sized brains. Here is an underage cartoon character:
View attachment 3690425
Here is a cartoon character who is canonically legal age to fuck:
View attachment 3690426
So are people supposed to find the flat shapeless character attractive because she's 18? Or are they supposed to find the 14 year-old character with swinging honkers attractive? This paradox of finding a character too youthful-looking is based in subjectivity and normalfaggotry & because of this there's no way to express it without looking like an overly-opinionated sperg who posts chad edits. All of this also comes on the back of @Null trying to find a place where he can post things without being doxed or taken down as well which is worse than retarded, it's actively unhelpful.
Nobody gives a fuck about "but the creator said she is 18!!!" or "she is actually a 9000 year old demon!!". Everyone who isn't fucking blind knows what a child looks like. I don't give a fuck if the pedophile who drew the child says she is actually 45. It has zero impact on the drawing itself. Idk why anime avatar retards always bring this up as an argument like people are too fucking stupid to know it when they see it. But just looking at your disgusting avatar I can tell you got major coombrain that impacts your reasoning skills.
 
"Any port in a storm" is complete cope. There are other fediverse instances besides poast. I lost significant respect for him because of this.
you're an anti-porn TERF with an account less than a year old, one clearly not a sock.

But the worst part about being such a newbie is that you clearly haven't done your research on josh if this is what made you of all people lose respect for him.
 
you're an anti-porn TERF with an account less than a year old
And you're a limp-dick death grip victim. Don't make me smack the fuck out of you again.
So are people supposed to find the flat shapeless character attractive because she's 18? Or are they supposed to find the 14 year-old character with swinging honkers attractive?
This is the hands down most retarded thing I've read since KF has been on Tor. And creepy, too. I haven't had occasion to call any poster in this thread here a pedo, but you're making that hard.
 
Back