- Joined
- May 3, 2015
What the hell kind of thread have I walked into
Inactive Alison Rapp / Maria Mint / 123grapeman - Pedo Defense Force, CP Advocate, Whore. Husband Jake Rapp found his balls and divorced her.
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Status
DrChristianTroy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Looking at the initial tweets what gets me is that it starts out reasonable enough. Modern progressive America can be wack, totally agree. Saying you only listen to rap with a message has some racist connotations? Agreed. Don't hate on sex workers, fair enough. Furries, whatevs. People who like pop music, I'm down.
Adults that wanna fuck kids? Hold the fuck up.
Adults that wanna fuck kids? Hold the fuck up.
Mr Pizza
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2016
See, this has enraged group of mothers written all over it. Nintendo doesn't give a shit about GG or anything but they have to be scared of concerned parents. No one can bitch and complain like those people can.
They also have money, more money than most SJWs or GGers.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
I just saw @Spectator having to deal with a ton of bullshit on Twitter related to this shitstorm, so if it helps make any sense of that chaos, I don't mind this thread. Might be best to have that shitstorm as the focus rather than just on one person though.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
Ha! Now that's a well-deserved thread I'll need to check out later. Well-played, Sneasel.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
So far as I can tell, the only person who has actually done anything about this in terms of a call to action is Jamie Walton, who is not a gamergater by the remotest stretch of the imagination. It's her fucking vocation to go after people who victimize children, which would certainly include child pornographers.
This could easily have been stopped by a simple clarification if there was anything to clarify, instead Rapp has doubled down and is currently chimping, hard. I suspect the actually entertaining part of this will be when and if something concrete happens as a result of this bizarre behavior, which is the definition of a PR catastrophe. You're a company in the business of selling things to kids and you have a vocal CP advocate not just working for you but doing your PR.
Short of showing up to work in Klan robes I seriously doubt you could do much worse a job as a PR flak, that is, someone whose job it is to make you look good, not publicly associate you with pedophiles.
As fewer and fewer people have heard of or remember GG at all, except as some bullshit net thing that happened years ago, "Gamergate" may only ultimately be remembered as some weird thing that pedophiles yell when they get caught.
MiloWuCollusion
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2015
I also understand that to an extent, but her job being fucking PR and the fact that many anti-SJW love to throw the "you are a pedo if you bitch about localization" is what makes me not caring if she gets fired or not.
Is also disturbing reading how many people don't want notice the difference between fictional depictions of minors and people raping real kids to make actual CP. More vile is the fact that Alison is trying to not make the distinction herself with her rethoric.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
See, that's another thing. By all accounts, Gamergate itself ended.
The activist component of it shut down almost seven months ago now, and the main reason it keeps being brought up, other than the watchdog components of the internet autism machine that is GG, is by the Antis, who seem to have centered their entire careers around the opposition to it.
These people keep trying to drum up the terror scale, and it works less each time because increasingly, nobody knows what the fuck they're talking about because Gamergate's barely a blip on the radar unless something big's going down. It's sort of hilarious that so many have pinned it as being their next bogeyman, because increasingly it makes those crowing about it look like absolute fucking loons.
You'd think they'd pick up that diminishing returns kicked in ages ago, but here we fucking are.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2013
I don't understand how someone can go to college and write a paper about the subject and not realize owning child porn required there to be a victim first, it'd be different if she was just for fictional stuff but she thinks it's okay to have actual child porn, it's baffling!
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2014
She operates in a different sphere than your average sjw and is well connected with the sorts of people they pretend to be so hopefully it won't hurt her work.
Yes but some states like California have laws protecting legal behavior outside of work. She might not have a leg to stand on if her outside behavior affects her ability to do her job of promoting Nintendo though.
Wus chimping is the smallest part of her lolcow status. The funny part of wu is her life and career. If all Chris did was make awful comics and record her extensive collection of semen samples she would still be funny.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2015
Does this mean that Izzy Galvez is officially the dumbest #GamerGhazi member alive? Or does Jonathan McIntosh still hold that honor?
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
She does worse if you read the article, actually. She equivocates throughout the article, arguing that merely simulated CP like loli stuff doesn't directly harm any actual children and should be considered less bad than material that actually does cause direct harm. That's reasonable, and while some would still disagree with that and it might be "controversial," it is in fact the prevailing legal opinion even in the evil imperialistic United States that Rapp is claiming is victimizing the poor PoCs of Japan.
Generally, laws that punish fictional or simulated material like this as if it were actual child pornography fail to pass constitutional muster (under some circumstances such material might fail to be constitutionally protected under the obscenity exception but a blanket ban does not stand).
Okay, that's well enough. And I would bet that's where Rapp retreats to if this has actual consequences, as part of the motte-and-bailey argument strategy.
However, the article in question then essentially discards the very distinction it made between the two kinds of material and argues for relaxing legislation against even the kind of material she distinguished from simulation on the basis that simulation is not directly harmful.
It is quite disingenuous and that's the motte-and-bailey part of the argument strategy. That is, lay out one, reasonable position, argue for that in a way that the audience is likely to buy, then sneakily substitute your extremist position in its guise as if you have proven both.
When you take heat for the fact that you have actually made out an absurd, extremist argument that few would agree with, you retreat to your more modest claims, and claim the opponent is unreasonable for opposing those.
Once this is over and you can claim you won the argument, you go right back to making your original extreme claims.
In this case, Rapp's "sin" isn't having made such an argument so much as it is having made such an argument on behalf of something utterly repugnant that is pretty inconsistent with having a job as the public face of a corporation that sells things to children, and doing so in a time and context where people already out to get you are obviously going to go after it like red meat.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2015
I would say I'm shocked anyone would defend this woman given her views.
But recall in the first thread when I mentioned several of my friends agreed with her. Specifically her support for "artificial" CP (hentai and shit) and her criticism of Age of Consent law.
But recall in the first thread when I mentioned several of my friends agreed with her. Specifically her support for "artificial" CP (hentai and shit) and her criticism of Age of Consent law.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2015
I can already mentally play the Mr. Metokur video about her in my head.
Which is nice, because with every day that I see him support Trump, I like him substantially less.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2016
That's a fiercely contested title and they are definitely two of the finalists.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
See, the issue with Rapp currently is that if she had actually clarified that she saw a difference between loli/shota and CP, she'd have a fucking point, much as @AnOminous said.
It's one thing to have not made that distinction and been called out for it. Thing is, that's not what she did.
Not only did she not do this, but she went out of her way to make patently fucking clear that she saw no demarcation between CP and loli/shota whatsoever, both in her deposition to follow and in her defense of an honest-to-god CP-trafficking pedophile who had gotten caught by the police.
I would argue this guy is a contender.
UPDATE: From the GG Megathread:
It's one thing to have not made that distinction and been called out for it. Thing is, that's not what she did.
Not only did she not do this, but she went out of her way to make patently fucking clear that she saw no demarcation between CP and loli/shota whatsoever, both in her deposition to follow and in her defense of an honest-to-god CP-trafficking pedophile who had gotten caught by the police.
I would argue this guy is a contender.
UPDATE: From the GG Megathread:
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
I agree with @Dynastia that gg is great for the salty drama. What I find fascinating about this is that the gg autists have only zeroed in on this particular cow because she is a pedo working for a company that "censored" the pedo content of a video game. It's really interesting that this is causing both sides to lose their minds. One side is defending someone who advocates pedophilia while the other is basically saying "you can't censor our pedo videogames because you hire pedos"
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
Might be good to have these saved for documentation.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2015
Which one is that? Nyberg? The fucker who wrote the vir-ped article for Salon? Chescaleigh? One of those self-righteous faggots from Extra Credits?
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
What does Jamie Walton have to do with 8chan? They're delusional.
- Status