I know we have a Rick & Morty thread, but I really don’t get why there needed to be an incest-subplot in the recent episode they had. Here I kept thinking that this was supposed to be an ”edgy” version of Back To The Future, but now I don’t know what it is anymore.
All I’m saying is that I made the right choice to check out in 2015, the same way I did with Bojack Horseman back in 2016.
It seems as if the mid-2010’s was the end of mature cartoons trying to entertaining, and more of just shoving fake morality complexes and selfish behavior through animation.
I know I will never watch Bojack Horseman. It's like they think realism = nihilism. Adventure Time's weirdest episodes could get like this too, just aggressively depressing for no reason, but at least it was mostly a fun world and could swing for different tones. I can laugh at R&M bits, but nothing I've seen from Bojack has seemed worth it.
Any thoughts on the Velma being gay in the new Scooby Doo special? All I did was groan, and of course the Twitter crowd ate it all up.
It's also not even new. Velma was clearly fucking that Hot Dog chick in Mystery Incorporated once Shaggy told her he was a bros before hoes kind of nigga.
I never even got to that chick in
Mystery Incorporated because I could not sit through the Shaggy/Velma in season 1. Insanely bad and unclear how much of it was intended to be cringe. They made Velma an actual abuser there.
They made Velma gay (her falling for a very mid black girl with problem glasses is a bit on the nose) and probably expected to get buzz from a backlash but it seems like mostly no one cares
All of the characters have the classic designs and then there's the weird OC, who looks like something someone posted to their personal art Tumblr.
From this screenshot you can predict a black eye in Velma's future, along with frenzied weeping and recriminations and items being thrown around and at her in a living room.
View attachment 3716256
Anyways, certain people went into children's programming specifically to do this sort of thing. Bit weird!
From the clip I saw, it seems like the gal is a suspect, too, so Daphne is teasing her about letting feelings get in the way of the mystery. So problematic.
And I know Norville is actually his name, but why couldn't they call him Shaggy? Because of the rapper? Shaggy would just use the Shaggy Defense anyway ("It wasn't me").
It takes place before they become a team, so maybe he just doesn't have that nickname yet.
View attachment 3721238
View attachment 3721245
Pure cringe. I remember when everyone thought this show was gona be a horror adventure story instead of being a blatant Little Witch Academia rip-off with yuri pandering & was gona be better than Amphibia back when they were initially revealed.
What kid wants this shit, my god.
I'm kind of weird about Scooby Doo adaptations, I will give almost all of them a chance (when I have time) because the series has always leaned into alternate timelines where every movie is different and the supernatural is real sometimes and the characters are such great archetypes that you can give them subtle twists of characterization that end up being fun. They team up with Batman for goodness sake. If nothing else, I'm glad the art looks pretty decent for both the special and the Velma show.
But the obsession with rehabilitating Velma is a bit weird, like, she doesn't need it. Daphne is the more underutilized character, whereas Velma always had catchphrases and infodumps that made her stick out. Writers can have more fun with Daphne and Fred because they
seem so basic. Even though I have some issues with
Mystery Inc., I really loved how they did Fred there. He was dumb but in an insane, autistic way that was so funny and cute.