Dr. Kathy Rumer, DO / "The Butcher of Ardmore" / Rumer Gender Surgery / Rumer Cosmetic Surgery / Delaware Valley Aesthetics, PLLC - Sex-reassignment surgeon notorious for botched surgeries, constantly suing and being sued

Another victim. This one's story has been making the rounds on Twitter.

View attachment 3655092
"I CAN'T BELIEVE CHOPPING OFF MY OWN DICK WOULD HAVE CONSEQUENCES"
Also, 21 years old, holy shit.

I'm pushing 30s and sometimes it feels like i haven't even begun doing stuff, i can't imagine being 21 and feeling like it's over already.
So the rumors are true that plastic surgeons will deny revisions if you complain publicly.
Imagine having a surgeon mess up and you having to butter her up to get her to do her job.
How petty.
What constitutes a "mess up" when it comes to this kind of surgery? It seems that no matter what you do, the complications of having a gaping wound between your legs are inevitable.
 
Found some audio of Rumer refusing to see a troon for his post-op appointments unless he takes down a bad review.


Archive was supposed to be attached but it doesn't seem to be working. I HAVE the archive in case the youtube video goes down at least.

Edit: Archive upload working now, Here is archive.



This reddit thread (Archive) supposedly contains addition details/backstory.
 
Last edited:
What constitutes a "mess up" when it comes to this kind of surgery? It seems that no matter what you do, the complications of having a gaping wound between your legs are inevitable.
For purposes of a malpractice lawsuit? There is no definition of a mess up. All the dick choppers have their own techniques and refuse to work on each other's work. There's no "standard of care" because there's no standard.
 
In 2017, the CHOP gender clinic reached out to Rumer to provide data on post-op satisfaction in patients under 18.

20221121_221458.jpg
 
So Richard "Rachel" Levine, Biden's astoundingly incompetent Assistant Secretary for Health, knew full well that boys and girls under 18 were going through those butchers at least since 2017 -- and he encouraged it, or at least did not oppose to it.
 
In 2017, the CHOP gender clinic reached out to Rumer to provide data on post-op satisfaction in patients under 18.

View attachment 3911832
I fucking hate this evil bitch so much.
Imagine giving CHILDREN irreversible medical care when they're too young to legally have a dysphoria diagnosis, let alone consent to that shit. Then, imagine that same bitch is a vindictive ass to everyone who is even remotely unsatisfied.
I'd wager Rumer has a large chunk of patients offing themselves because she not only butchered them, but refused to even see them again because they warned people about it.
 
Cross posting from the Lolcow and Lolcow LLP thread: Rumer's defamation suit against an anonymous poster (John Doe) has ended with a default judgment in Rumer's favor: Even though Rumer horror stories are a dime a dozen, the judge ruled that John Doe is entirely liable for the damage to Rumer's reputation and has ordered him to pay the $169,000 she's already paid to a reputation management firm to restore her good (lol) name plus $5,000 in punitive damages. For an extra dose of crazy this is notably less than the damages she requested: if I read the ruling right she wanted over $1 million to cover all future reputation management costs on top of what she'd already paid, plus another $1 million in punitive damages. I wonder how long until she realizes that one random guy on Blogspot wasn't her only problem and the defamation judgment did nothing to stop all the other sites calling her a quack butcher.....
 

Attachments

Cross posting from the Lolcow and Lolcow LLP thread: Rumer's defamation suit against an anonymous poster (John Doe) has ended with a default judgment in Rumer's favor: Even though Rumer horror stories are a dime a dozen, the judge ruled that John Doe is entirely liable for the damage to Rumer's reputation and has ordered him to pay the $169,000 she's already paid to a reputation management firm to restore her good (lol) name plus $5,000 in punitive damages. For an extra dose of crazy this is notably less than the damages she requested: if I read the ruling right she wanted over $1 million to cover all future reputation management costs on top of what she'd already paid, plus another $1 million in punitive damages. I wonder how long until she realizes that one random guy on Blogspot wasn't her only problem and the defamation judgment did nothing to stop all the other sites calling her a quack butcher.....
Oh I'm sure she knows that she has legions of unhappy patients. You don't get the nickname "Butcher of Ardmore" from one angry guy. It's probably more about deterrence. "She sued that guy for $1 million so I'm definitely not going to post an honest review because I don't want to deal with that." And we know it's not about the money. Absolutely sickening. It'll work, too, because her patients are all Medicaid and they can't afford lawyers.
 
Cross posting from the Lolcow and Lolcow LLP thread: Rumer's defamation suit against an anonymous poster (John Doe) has ended with a default judgment in Rumer's favor: Even though Rumer horror stories are a dime a dozen, the judge ruled that John Doe is entirely liable for the damage to Rumer's reputation and has ordered him to pay the $169,000 she's already paid to a reputation management firm to restore her good (lol) name plus $5,000 in punitive damages. For an extra dose of crazy this is notably less than the damages she requested: if I read the ruling right she wanted over $1 million to cover all future reputation management costs on top of what she'd already paid, plus another $1 million in punitive damages. I wonder how long until she realizes that one random guy on Blogspot wasn't her only problem and the defamation judgment did nothing to stop all the other sites calling her a quack butcher.....
I mean, to what extent do people want to antagonize the doctors? They are just doing what you paid them to do.

What's worse i never see a story about "i called the doctor, admitted that i made a mistake and asked them for help into how to unfuck myself" it's always "MY NEOVAGINA ISN'T WORKING, I ALREADY TOOK 322 PAINKILLERS AND THIS FLESH EATING BACTERIA IS GROWING, THIS DOCTOR FAILED AT MAKING ME A WOMAN AAAAA AAAAA".

Even when they stare at the eyes of whatever eldritch abomination was summoned between their legs, they still can't take responsibility and they blame everyone else instead. I'm agree that this doctor should've won the lolsuit, even if i don't agree with what she does.
 
I mean, to what extent do people want to antagonize the doctors? They are just doing what you paid them to do.

What's worse i never see a story about "i called the doctor, admitted that i made a mistake and asked them for help into how to unfuck myself" it's always "MY NEOVAGINA ISN'T WORKING, I ALREADY TOOK 322 PAINKILLERS AND THIS FLESH EATING BACTERIA IS GROWING, THIS DOCTOR FAILED AT MAKING ME A WOMAN AAAAA AAAAA".

Even when they stare at the eyes of whatever eldritch abomination was summoned between their legs, they still can't take responsibility and they blame everyone else instead. I'm agree that this doctor should've won the lolsuit, even if i don't agree with what she does.
My take is much different.
I do not care what an adult does with their body. They can get the fugliest surgery ever, and if they're happy, who cares?
My problems are with botched shit & giving kids troon surgery.
Like, a neovag is always going to stink, and will always need dilation. A neopenis will always have notable scarring and cannot get hard. (unless the patient got the scrotoplasty (?) where they squeeze the balls to get it hard) Both have drawbacks even when it's supposedly successful.
However, it's clear that even among these usually-scarce (until 10 years ago, despite the first vaginoplasty happening in the 1950s to a WW2 vet, at least that I know of) surgeries, Rumer is especially careless, tactless, and cruel. Normal double mastectomies aren't lop sided with misplaced nipples and flesh, even if the grand majority of FtMs get scarring. I'd argue FtMs should seek out doctors who have done that for not only troon patients, but other conditions that would require it, as they'll have more experience and care.
I believe that patient satisfaction, as long as it isn't expecting too much, is the ultimate make or break. I don't know the details of the case, but I do know Rumer shouldn't have won unless the patient falsified evidence/details.
 
Cross posting from the Lolcow and Lolcow LLP thread: Rumer's defamation suit against an anonymous poster (John Doe) has ended with a default judgment in Rumer's favor:
Yeah, and I'm totally sure whoever it was plans to pay. Y'know, if they're ever foumd.

Funny thing about "John Doe": it means they don't know who you are.
:thinking:
 
Yeah, and I'm totally sure whoever it was plans to pay. Y'know, if they're ever foumd.

Funny thing about "John Doe": it means they don't know who you are.
:thinking:
Not in this specific case: Rumer was able to identify John Doe based on communications with co-defendant Jamie Miller and user data for the "Rumers Anonymous" blog that made the allegedly libelous posts but proceeded as a Doe defendant because both defendants had their names sealed based on Miller's claim that "as a result of this lawsuit, [Miller's] personal information has already appeared on a notorious internet forum that directs harassment and threats to transgender women". You read that right, us Kiwis pointing and laughing at a lolsuit was enough to get everyone's names sealed (of course, this came too late for Miller).

From the judge's ruling:
Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint, identifying Defendant John Doe, on November 17, 2021. ECF No. 46.
Plaintiffs attempted to serve Defendant John Doe the Second Amended Complaint via overnight delivery to defendant’s last known address. ECF No. 53 at 3, (Exhibit 3). Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Alternative Service on December 8, 2021, citing evidence that Defendant John Doe was actively evading service and requesting leave to serve via email. ECF No. 53. This Court found that the Plaintiffs made good faith and practical efforts to locate and serve the defendant
 
Back