𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Did he reconstitute a real BoD? Last I read he made himself Emperor, I mean sole director, which sounded impossible given he has lenders and equity investors. Perhaps it was just more sensationalist noise from him and only temporary until delisting or something
I have no clue about the actual deal and how it is structured, whether the loan is against twatter or against musk or against your mom or whatever.

I'm just popcorning from the sidelines.
 
I wonder if all these companies can just drop their advertising on the platform.
What's more interesting is whether any of these companies will pause for even a second to ponder the wisdom of abandoning one of the (supposedly) biggest websites on the planet along with all those juicy eyeballs before they pull the trigger.

These advertiser boycotts always tickle me. They're always done to appease an angry mob that rarely (if ever) buys the actual products in question anyway, and they often cost the affected brands a noticeable portion of their market share. i.e. you never get a net-gain in revenue or market share by stopping advertising.

Besides, in most cases these companies just go right back to their usual ad buys a few weeks after they think everything's blown over anyway (and they're never wrong).
 
Reading all of those fired messages was weird.... felt like I was reading a bunch of comments someone wrote in a senior class yearbook rather than people talking about losing their jobs.
You could practically hear "Good Riddance (Time of Your Life)" playing over those maudlin fucking things.
 
I really do enjoy this banter.
1667599019809.png

1667599061323.png

1667599249741.png

 
Last edited:
This is the one I've been seeing around Twitter.
Hey, look, upload worked for once.
I can see they didn't let Musk write this one. He probably would have attached the "Coping and Seething" video.
 
Elon took his tweet down already, but still:

View attachment 3758714
Okay, I've got to fucking ask, because I'm trying to be objective and I don't know who's bullshitting who anymore. I was going to ask if this tweet was real. Honestly, I don't trust journalists because this fake/offensive tweet narrative by Elon Musk, seemingly right after he took control over Twitter, glows brighter than the fucking sun. If this tweet was real, what was the context, was he shitposting? Does he believe it's real, who the fuck knows.

I do not give one solitary fuck about Elon Musk and he's being a little bit of a dick about the Twitter thing, which I appreciate, but come the fuck on man the (((media))) has got the fix in and is currently brainwashing stupid people into thinking he's the antichrist. No wonder advertisers are pulling out, media and everyone who loved twitters mass-censorship echo chamber just want to burn it to the ground on their way out.
 
Okay, I've got to fucking ask, because I'm trying to be objective and I don't know who's bullshitting who anymore. I was going to ask if this tweet was real. Honestly, I don't trust journalists because this fake/offensive tweet narrative by Elon Musk, seemingly right after he took control over Twitter, glows brighter than the fucking sun. If this tweet was real, what was the context, was he shitposting? Does he believe it's real, who the fuck knows.

I do not give one solitary fuck about Elon Musk and he's being a little bit of a dick about the Twitter thing, which I appreciate, but come the fuck on man the (((media))) has got the fix in and is currently brainwashing stupid people into thinking he's the antichrist. No wonder advertisers are pulling out, media and everyone who loved twitters mass-censorship echo chamber just want to burn it to the ground on their way out.
Yes, it was/is real. Elon was trolling Clinton. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
Okay, I've got to fucking ask, because I'm trying to be objective and I don't know who's bullshitting who anymore. I was going to ask if this tweet was real. Honestly, I don't trust journalists because this fake/offensive tweet narrative by Elon Musk, seemingly right after he took control over Twitter, glows brighter than the fucking sun. If this tweet was real, what was the context, was he shitposting? Does he believe it's real, who the fuck knows.

I saw the tweet live and screenshot it. It was later deleted. Of course he didn’t believe the conspiracy theory, but he’s happy to spread insane disinformation and cause chaos. Trolling, in other words. You can see the results.
 
Yes, it was/is real. Elon was trolling Clinton. Nothing more, nothing less.

I saw the tweet live and screenshot it. It was later deleted. Of course he didn’t believe the conspiracy theory, but he’s happy to spread insane disinformation and cause chaos. Trolling, in other words. You can see the results.
So real, but keeping true to the 'ethics' of journalism, any contextual framing of the actual event was thrown out in order to paint whatever picture they wanted and shat out to the world to sew the seeds of misguided outrage. It's nothing if not on-brand for them. No wonder people want places like this on the internet to die, I would have never known.
 
  1. I hate that I know this, but tiktok has rules against talking about the mechanics of social media. All social media and not just tiktok.
  2. -t guy that had no problem with a the House of Saud site 2 weeks ago. Unless I've missed something, doesn't Musk buying twitter buyout the Saudi's as well?
Unless I'm reading it wrong, there's Prince Alwaleed bin Talal that contributed to the buyout along with Qatar Holding. Those are the two main middle Eastern entities I can see involved.

The prince is now the second largest shareholder of the company. So he was a good Saudi before, but now under Musk he's a bad one.


FgKCh3FXEAAwjUV.png
 
So real, but keeping true to the 'ethics' of journalism, any contextual framing of the actual event was thrown out in order to paint whatever picture they wanted and shat out to the world to sew the seeds of misguided outrage. It's nothing if not on-brand for them. No wonder people want places like this on the internet to die, I would have never known.
I think it’s fair to say he retweeted fake news though, along with what seemed to be an endorsing comment. Many will have believed it.
 
So all the twitter trannies are migrating to this new tumblr-like thing called Cohost (a).

cohost1.png

The "small team of developers" is literally three persons of gender.

staff1.pngstaff2.pngstaff3.png
(1, 2, 3)

And yes, there's a dedicated pronoun field. They all talk in lowercase like reddit does.

Trannies are migrating en masse while doomposting that twitter is going to disappear or whatever.

tweet1.pngtweet2.pngtweet3.pngtweet4.pngtweet5.pngtweet6.pngtweet7.pngtweet8.pngtweet9.png
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)

In fact some of them went further and put their cohost url in their name.

names1.pngnames2.pngnames3.pngnames4.png
source (a)

Such as this bluecheck who supports vandalising innocent people's property.

tyreextinguishers.png
source (a)

But this isn't the urbanism thread. Anyways, the site already has a pedo problem just like twitter, unsurprisingly.

shota1.pngshota2.png
Fd3GbC7XoAEBrUc.png
source (a)

Predictably, this "we might unban it later" stance caused a lot of controversy, resulting in the staff making this post to clarify things.

staffshota.png
source (archive.ph, ghostarchive)

But this did not help. You can scroll for miles and miles of angry mass debates in the comments of that post, to the point where staff decided to run the fun and locked it.

locked.png

This has resulted in many a cohoster justifying why they should be allowed to coom to drawn children on the site.

Such as this one with the "muh edge cases" argument.

edgecases1.pngedgecases2.pngedgecases3.png
source (a)

Or the "it's just age play" argument.

ageplay.png
source (archive.ph, ghostarchive)

I remember Null saying that 9chan was ruined when he allowed loli because surprise surprise they posted the real stuff when he wasn't looking. Time will tell if Cohost will allow pedophiles on their site like twitter does or not.
 
I think it’s fair to say he retweeted fake news though, along with what seemed to be an endorsing comment. Many will have believed it.
Looking it from the outside in that is objectively true and doing that was a pretty stupid move on his part. Twitter feels like the sort of type fast think later kind of place, but the entire world was watching him just looking for an opportunity to broadcast his mistake so they could blast him, and Twitter by extension for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oxyjen
I think it’s fair to say he retweeted fake news though, along with what seemed to be an endorsing comment. Many will have believed it.
Yeah but he's a boomerized cuckservatard with a brain prone to that sort of politically irrelevant shit.
Pelosi's husband is gay and takes it up the anus! OMGGGG!
- policy changes resulting from faggy husband=0
 
I think it’s fair to say he retweeted fake news though, along with what seemed to be an endorsing comment. Many will have believed it.
Sounds like a problem with the many.

We will never have healthy, good, free takes on social media so long as we decide that it is someone elses responsibility to make sure the dumbfucks of the world aren't juked. Its an impossible task, and all it does is create lines of approved lies, and rejected lies, under someones control. It is genuinely better when all lies are permitted, as they drown and balance each other out. Its not easy to figure out what's a lie, but when you hear four contradicting narratives, you'll either realize somethings amiss, or you're too retarded to be saved.

We can't walk on eggshells around retards just to prevent them from doing something even stupider.
 
Back