Brianna Wu / John Flynt - DEAGLE NATION STILL LIVES

How long will Revolution 60 come to Steam?


  • Total voters
    610
Status
Not open for further replies.
John's trying to amplify his grift.

The panel asked that tech companies work with Giant Spacekat and Digital Sisters to form solutions and measurable benchmarks. They recommended better tools to report harassers and a system to ban those users.

Wu also hopes the tech companies agree to internal reviews by a third party agency, which she estimates would cost between $150,000 and $200,000.

"It's time to put resources into that," she says. "I don't expect to get everything we're looking for, but we need tech companies to start talking to us."
So much for the conceit that Giant Spacekat develops games. Time for a tranny conman shakedown of Zuckerberg.

Edit:
John v John

"We need tech companies to start talking to us."

vs.

View attachment 77415
https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/694226596044079104
I love how instead of saying how they could improve their actual games, she just uses it as an opportunity to whine. Never change John.
 
This one is pretty amusing... According to this article, Wu organized the SXSW harassment summit. I'm sure that will cause some uncomfortable callouts on twitter if the wrong people (or blue whales) hear about it...
3 upvotes so far

image.jpeg
 
They induced labor and stole her baby, too.
What's happening? Natalie!? Natalieeeeeeeeeee!

View attachment 77047
God, now I'm imagining Natalie as The Boss. "SEE THIS SCAR? IT'S PROOF THAT I WAS A MOTHER"

I guess it works. They're both fictional characters.
God bless that dangerous faggot:

View attachment 77312
I'm crying, this is beautiful.

Ouch.
https://tweetsave.com/randileeharper/status/708498768929366016

Shunned again, John. That's gotta sting, big guy.
OH MY GOD THAT'S EVEN BETTER THAN HER FREAKING OUT OVER MILO

edit: this resume all the summit, Wu talking shit non stop and the others tweeting or wondering how the hell they ended here

2a81d555f6.jpg
Watching about twenty minutes worth and about half of it, out of a panel of four women, Wu has yammered on about her problems. I'm more interested in listening to the other three women than Wu's whining personal vendetta about a hashtag.
She has barely talked
Goddammit, way to speak over women of color the whole time, you asshole.

It kills me that Munoz keeps trying to speak about legitimate, atrocious issues, & Wu is talking like she has it so much worse. My inner free-bleeding radfem is fucking frothing at the mouth right now.

That is still the worst case of meth mouth I've seen on anyone not living in Florida.
Well, you heard @Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. --- fluoride is put in the water to brainwash women, so she probably doesn't drink it. Hence the teeth.

Edit:
John v John

"We need tech companies to start talking to us."

vs.

View attachment 77415
https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/694226596044079104
"IF YOU LIKE ME, PLEASE TELL ME"
 
Did they show how many people were streaming the panel? I remember that AirPlay definitely had more than a thousand streamers.
 
View attachment 77421
>Women in gamedev don't have free speech because of Kotaku In Action, that's why I get all these speaking engagements. It's not like I'm actually a woman or anything.

Wu thinks free speech means people have to actually show up when Wu is speaking. Instead of staying away in droves, as they do, leaving Wu to preach by yelling over the other panelists in an otherwise empty room.
 
I am too late for the party and feel rather masochistic today.
Does anyone have a link to a recording of the entire thing?
It was essentially 80-90 minutes, with Brianna talking about herself and her opinions for about, I'm gonna guess about 50 minutes worth of it. She interspersed it with the other panelists taking about very real problems like revenge porn and journalists in Turkey being arrested for being female, which Wu would always come back into the conversation, name drop her company, name drop online groups that have called her out on her shit, and repeat.

At the end, they opened it up to all of three questions, all of them pretty much devoured by Wu.

The entire panel very depressing, not just because of the subject matter, but by the fact that instead of being about actual problems, it became another Wu Pity Party. I mean, just look at the other panelists during this entire event. It's obvious they have things they want to say, but none of them speak up and are effectively silenced by Wu's yammerings about Gamergate.

There was one part in particular, and I apologize I cannot remember the content of it, where Mitchell, the African-American in the panel, was geting a bit emotional about what she was talking about. You could hear it in her voice, see a flicker of fire in her eyes. But then Wu just slushes on in and brings the conversation back in about herself and one more of her insipid stories. It is goddamn maddening.

"Calling you out on your lying ass" isn't "Silencing free speech."

Furthermore, please tell us more about how you let your sick dog die out in the cold while you were to busy looking at Twitter and how it's GG's fault.
 
Wu in front of a judge &/or under oath of any kind would spell doom. Nothing like that will ever be initiated by Wu.

There's two stages to that. The setup to ripping them apart on the stand is the pretrial discovery, and parties are by definition subject to deposition. The stated purpose for this is to get the parties (and other witnesses) on the record as to what they'll testify to and have their answers available for use to cross examine them.

However, one other fun purpose is just to have your team beat the shit out of them and fuck with them. That's an improper purpose, of course. But depositions are not subject to most of the rules of evidence, there are no judges there, and if you refuse to answer questions in deposition and then lose a motion to compel your testimony, you automatically owe not just the legal costs (negligible) but the legal fees necessary to compel your testimony (huge).

If you dick around in discovery and lose, you could easily win your case and despite this, end up owing more money for legal fees to compel discovery than you would have lost if you'd lost the case.

Wu would not fare well in this kind of scenario, and probably has the minimal sense to know this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back