Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 26.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.6%

  • Total voters
    355
I am rather sick of him being on the rag about not getting rumble cash and being pissy at the viewers. He forgot that people watch streams to escape their shitty day. If they wanted to be yelled at they'd talk to their wives or girlfriends.
edit: fixed words
Also even if there's some issue with his Rumble deal, the money he's currently getting from locals alone is significant, over 5000 subscribers at $5 a month.
 
Rumble did go public recently so I'm not confident in them, I guess Nick is a good way to see when to jump ship
Fuck it, how do you get a license to make and sell mutual funds? Someone needs to do an anti-esg fund where the only criteria is that the stocks have low ESG scores.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiggieSmalls
Fuck it, how do you get a license to make and sell mutual funds? Someone needs to do an anti-esg fund where the only criteria is that the stocks have low ESG scores.
Some good news i heard yesterday is that people are pulling money out of the ESG fund.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Puff
The difference is that hedonism is raping children on a nudist beach.
I would retract that statement if I were you, unless you really believe that raping children is somehow more pleasurable than eating ass.
But seriously, Hedonism is at its core about placing pleasure as the highest good. Meaning, it's not committing immoral acts, but the pursuit of pleasure that defines hedonism. The problem for you is that is raping children an actual difference? I would say no because under the libertarian definition of freedom, restriction principles like the NAP exists for this every reason.
 
I would retract that statement if I were you, unless you really believe that raping children is somehow more pleasurable than eating ass.
But seriously, Hedonism is at its core about placing pleasure as the highest good. Meaning, it's not committing immoral acts, but the pursuit of pleasure that defines hedonism. The problem for you is that is raping children an actual difference? I would say no because under the libertarian definition of freedom, restriction principles like the NAP exists for this every reason.
I would wager that child rape violates the NAP.
 
I would wager that child rape violates the NAP.
My point is that if you need an outside principle to restrict freedom such as the NAP than your definition of freedom is moronic.
 
My point is that if you need an outside principle to restrict freedom such as the NAP than your definition of freedom is moronic.
Then you need to state it clearly. Are you saying that freedom is an all or nothing thing? What is "freedom" without an outside principle to restrict it? We use morality to do it all the time, the NAP is just a specific morality that is hard to attack as being overly restrictive.
 
Then you need to state it clearly. Are you saying that freedom is an all or nothing thing? What is "freedom" without an outside principle to restrict it? We use morality to do it all the time, the NAP is just a specific morality that is hard to attack as being overly restrictive.
Freedom to me is the ability to self actualize, but for libertarians it's more about the ability to make your own choices. If you need outside principles to restrict freedom than how is freedom the highest good and if freedom isn't the highest good than what is, and why is it in conflict with freedom?
 
Just catching up on the stream from last night but good god I thought we were done with the Nick thirst streams for a while now that the sex embargo with lady rackets is over we get it you’re getting old and after 18 years with the same woman you’re bored can we talk about something else now? At least faran wasn’t there this time Megan isn’t gonna let herself act like a drunk college girl
 
Just catching up on the stream from last night but good god I thought we were done with the Nick thirst streams for a while now that the sex embargo with lady rackets is over we get it you’re getting old and after 18 years with the same woman you’re bored can we talk about something else now? At least faran wasn’t there this time Megan isn’t gonna let herself act like a drunk college girl
he's gonna have a cringe sex and dating tips panel show with females.
 
LegalMindset is setting up a dating horror stories show with a 50/50 male/female split. That could be fun because you have far less of a risk of a struggle session like the Faran stream.
Yea Faran's stream was meant to be a trap for Branca. Didn't work. Turns out the self defense guy is more than able to defend himself.
 
IS there a chance that Rakieta gets a re-vote on his cowdom if he does something extremely retarded? I feel like he's edging towards that ever so slowly a bit. Still not fully there since he technically works a real non dead end job (LTG says KYS).
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Exterminatus
IS there a chance that Rakieta gets a re-vote on his cowdom if he does something extremely retarded? I feel like he's edging towards that ever so slowly a bit. Still not fully there since he technically works a real non dead end job (LTG says KYS).
I only speak for myself, but I only really consider a cow a cow if they're ridiculous AND they try to cancel their critics.

Nick is arguably pretty ridiculous (I like most of his content but that nudist beach shilling was weird, yo), and when he gets criticized he calls them faggots. What he hasn't done yet is try to cancel, DMCA, or SLAPP someone into silence. The moment he does that he's 100% a lolcow. Until then he's a strangely enjoyable charismatic weirdo.
 
I would retract that statement if I were you, unless you really believe that raping children is somehow more pleasurable than eating ass.
But seriously, Hedonism is at its core about placing pleasure as the highest good. Meaning, it's not committing immoral acts, but the pursuit of pleasure that defines hedonism. The problem for you is that is raping children an actual difference? I would say no because under the libertarian definition of freedom, restriction principles like the NAP exists for this every reason.
Under libertarianism you've got the weirdo who wants to eat booty on the nude beach and under hedonism it's the weirdo who wants to rape a kid. For the sake of argument, though, let's say it's "only" statutory rape and you'd have to check the kid's ID to know for sure.

Realistically I think the difference is that hedonism is mostly an individual perspective, and libertarianism allows an individual to be hedonistic to a degree but it's an external societal framework that puts some constraints on the individual nonetheless, because what's best for the individual is not always best for a society.
 
Faran more or less seems massively butthurt over the struggle session streams with Mindset and Branca. First one with Mindset seemed to have been smoothed over but then that dating tips/advice stream where Branca was a bit of an ass misread the stream destroyed Chrissie bitch tits and called Faran's sister a cunt because he was so drunk mistook her joke as a personal dig and Faran apparently said in a paywall stream she'll just stream with Good Lawgic going forward.

I like Faran for the most part and I get why she would be pissed at Branca for his antics in that 2nd stream. Branca shouldn't have been invited to that stream imo he's too based for such a stream lmao.

also nick is on locals right now.

:edit: oh shit Nick may be getting involved in a lawsuit against the MN board. Will need to rewatch the stream to remember the details as I'm too tired atm to think.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Associate Rick
Back