- Joined
- Mar 19, 2021
Baaaaased! Remember that trans surgery regret rates are very low and that this is just a terf conspiracy.Crosspost
This patient is probably just blaming Rumer because they didn't dilate every day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Baaaaased! Remember that trans surgery regret rates are very low and that this is just a terf conspiracy.Crosspost
"I CAN'T BELIEVE CHOPPING OFF MY OWN DICK WOULD HAVE CONSEQUENCES"
What constitutes a "mess up" when it comes to this kind of surgery? It seems that no matter what you do, the complications of having a gaping wound between your legs are inevitable.So the rumors are true that plastic surgeons will deny revisions if you complain publicly.
Imagine having a surgeon mess up and you having to butter her up to get her to do her job.
How petty.
For purposes of a malpractice lawsuit? There is no definition of a mess up. All the dick choppers have their own techniques and refuse to work on each other's work. There's no "standard of care" because there's no standard.What constitutes a "mess up" when it comes to this kind of surgery? It seems that no matter what you do, the complications of having a gaping wound between your legs are inevitable.
It's literally called the CHOP gender clinic. You can't make this shit up.In 2017, the CHOP gender clinic reached out to Rumer to provide data on post-op satisfaction in patients under 18.
I fucking hate this evil bitch so much.In 2017, the CHOP gender clinic reached out to Rumer to provide data on post-op satisfaction in patients under 18.
View attachment 3911832
CHOP is actually an acronym for Children's Hospital Of Philadelphia.It's literally called the CHOP gender clinic. You can't make this shit up.
There's no literature, so let's do experimental surgeries, then sue the patients who didn't like the results. That's how The Science is done.In 2017, the CHOP gender clinic reached out to Rumer to provide data on post-op satisfaction in patients under 18.
Oh I'm sure she knows that she has legions of unhappy patients. You don't get the nickname "Butcher of Ardmore" from one angry guy. It's probably more about deterrence. "She sued that guy for $1 million so I'm definitely not going to post an honest review because I don't want to deal with that." And we know it's not about the money. Absolutely sickening. It'll work, too, because her patients are all Medicaid and they can't afford lawyers.Cross posting from the Lolcow and Lolcow LLP thread: Rumer's defamation suit against an anonymous poster (John Doe) has ended with a default judgment in Rumer's favor: Even though Rumer horror stories are a dime a dozen, the judge ruled that John Doe is entirely liable for the damage to Rumer's reputation and has ordered him to pay the $169,000 she's already paid to a reputation management firm to restore her good (lol) name plus $5,000 in punitive damages. For an extra dose of crazy this is notably less than the damages she requested: if I read the ruling right she wanted over $1 million to cover all future reputation management costs on top of what she'd already paid, plus another $1 million in punitive damages. I wonder how long until she realizes that one random guy on Blogspot wasn't her only problem and the defamation judgment did nothing to stop all the other sites calling her a quack butcher.....
Who's the owner? Robert W. Chambers?to a reputation management firm to restore her good (lol) name
I mean, to what extent do people want to antagonize the doctors? They are just doing what you paid them to do.Cross posting from the Lolcow and Lolcow LLP thread: Rumer's defamation suit against an anonymous poster (John Doe) has ended with a default judgment in Rumer's favor: Even though Rumer horror stories are a dime a dozen, the judge ruled that John Doe is entirely liable for the damage to Rumer's reputation and has ordered him to pay the $169,000 she's already paid to a reputation management firm to restore her good (lol) name plus $5,000 in punitive damages. For an extra dose of crazy this is notably less than the damages she requested: if I read the ruling right she wanted over $1 million to cover all future reputation management costs on top of what she'd already paid, plus another $1 million in punitive damages. I wonder how long until she realizes that one random guy on Blogspot wasn't her only problem and the defamation judgment did nothing to stop all the other sites calling her a quack butcher.....
My take is much different.I mean, to what extent do people want to antagonize the doctors? They are just doing what you paid them to do.
What's worse i never see a story about "i called the doctor, admitted that i made a mistake and asked them for help into how to unfuck myself" it's always "MY NEOVAGINA ISN'T WORKING, I ALREADY TOOK 322 PAINKILLERS AND THIS FLESH EATING BACTERIA IS GROWING, THIS DOCTOR FAILED AT MAKING ME A WOMAN AAAAA AAAAA".
Even when they stare at the eyes of whatever eldritch abomination was summoned between their legs, they still can't take responsibility and they blame everyone else instead. I'm agree that this doctor should've won the lolsuit, even if i don't agree with what she does.
Yeah, and I'm totally sure whoever it was plans to pay. Y'know, if they're ever foumd.Cross posting from the Lolcow and Lolcow LLP thread: Rumer's defamation suit against an anonymous poster (John Doe) has ended with a default judgment in Rumer's favor:
Not in this specific case: Rumer was able to identify John Doe based on communications with co-defendant Jamie Miller and user data for the "Rumers Anonymous" blog that made the allegedly libelous posts but proceeded as a Doe defendant because both defendants had their names sealed based on Miller's claim that "as a result of this lawsuit, [Miller's] personal information has already appeared on a notorious internet forum that directs harassment and threats to transgender women". You read that right, us Kiwis pointing and laughing at a lolsuit was enough to get everyone's names sealed (of course, this came too late for Miller).Yeah, and I'm totally sure whoever it was plans to pay. Y'know, if they're ever foumd.
Funny thing about "John Doe": it means they don't know who you are.
![]()
Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint, identifying Defendant John Doe, on November 17, 2021. ECF No. 46.
Plaintiffs attempted to serve Defendant John Doe the Second Amended Complaint via overnight delivery to defendant’s last known address. ECF No. 53 at 3, (Exhibit 3). Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Alternative Service on December 8, 2021, citing evidence that Defendant John Doe was actively evading service and requesting leave to serve via email. ECF No. 53. This Court found that the Plaintiffs made good faith and practical efforts to locate and serve the defendant