You know, for a site in which users generally understand that 13% of the population is committing 50% of crimes, I’m quite surprised to see the retards here not understanding how ratios work when it comes to medical information just because they (those that HATE the vaccine) don’t like it.
Lmao you just cited the 13/50 statistic to probably the
one person in this thread that's likely to turn around and "well ackshually" and inform you how that's just a racist fox news misunderstanding of math. Well done, no truly I mean it
Lol ironic that the guy who doesn't understand statistics and denominators is calling someone else "dense".
You literally are admitting that the unvaccinated are dying at higher rates by saying that the number of vaccinated is increasing, so thank you for admitting that I am right. You are proving the adage that Republican boomers hate education more and more each time you post, especially with this post given your inability to understand statistics and denominators.
And again, I know reading is hard for 75 year old senile men who receive SSI for being a low IQ autist, but the rate of complications from the vaccine is far lower than getting the same effects from covid itself. Now, I know you have autism and thus things that aren't 100% are automatically 0% to your senile, diseased brain, but that's not how the world works.
You are showing the signs of crippling autism here, son. Using /pol/ terms like "niggercattle" and not understanding how things that aren't 0% and 100% are proof that you have crippling autism. Please, talk to your case worker about these things and she can explain it you.
Ironic coming from the guy who claims watching Tucker Carlson makes him know more about medicine than doctors and medical scientists and that Alex Jones is the epitome of health
Anti-vaxers have a reputation for being uneducated retards for a good reason
And again, you continue showing that you have no fucking idea how basic math works beyond being able to use a calculator to add and subtract terms lmao. Sad.
Okay let me hold your hand and spell it out for you using your own example, over time.
Say you have, as you said, 800 people out of a thousand who receive a medicine, leaving 200 who don't. You run this trial 3 times.
Most recent trial, 100 people die, 58 who received the medicine.
At that point, even though the 200 who didn't receive it make up 42 deaths, there is still just over 1 in 2 deaths who are people that received medication. You could even round up to 3 in 5 since 58% is close to 6/10.
And this number is up from ~40 out of 100 (2 in 5) people who were medicated and died a few months ago.
And that number was up from ~20 people out of 100 (1 in 5) who were medicated and died a few months before that.
Now you do you see the point I've been trying to slow walk you through? While you're still giving the same number of people the medication, more of those people are ending up being "the one" who died in any death statistic. Now, I can hear you from here, already reaching your fingers to your eyes to blot out the horrible facts. But consider that objectively - within a 14 month, 3 trial span, you went from any 1 in 5 deaths being from your medicated group, to 3 in 5. The odds of a medicated person being in any given death count has effectively tripled. And there is no evidence that this trend is stopping or changing.
That is what I mean when I point out to you that the unvaxxed population doesn't even factor in as much,
because the rate of deaths who were jabbed keep increasing. That should not happen in a safe or effective vaccine, what should happen is an inverse where the trend of people vaxed that are dying declines or stays low.
If I sold you a software that required updating every 4 months, and with each update the odds of your computer bricking went from 1 in 5 to 2 in 5 to 1 in 2 over a year, I highly doubt you'd recommend that software to anyone and would probably complain.
Why are you so committed to your autism that you operate on looser, more retarded standards regarding your health?