Careercow Ben Collins / Benjamin Thomas Collins / @oneunderscore__ - Journo Scum

Wishing Ben a wonderful soy Christmas from all of us here at the Kiwi Farms. I'd wish for him to develop a hernia after shoveling his driveway, then get his surgery mixed up in the hospital with the supposed troon "Ben Collins" who Lucas claimed was the one making donations to him, but Ben never had a dick and balls to begin with.
 
Can you please add the little soybeard?
Soy Beard Ben Collins.png

Naturally.

He really does have a soy beard - his genetics don't allow for a full beard, so he must instead settle for a patchy, bitch beard - a reflection of his low-testosterone, and status as a faggot.
 
I'd wager tracker accounts on Twitter would have been fine in say Obama Era. Now, an address posted or a location posted can be instantly targeted or actively harassed to allow stalkers or other bad actors to follow them.
I don’t think a lot of people know this, but flight trackers are an odd part of American NCAA sports reporting during their off-seasons.
I’ve seen this especially for NCAA football and basketball coaching searches. Fans and beat writers will try to predict coaching changes. A lot of fan bases have specific Twitter accounts run by someone who tracks university planes and they will try to puzzle out which decisions are being made. The universities will have the FAA redact their information but their flights get tracked anyways. Sometimes it gets spicy, for example people have shown up to airports to heckle a new coach or an athletic director. Athletic administrators will sometimes even fly to one airport but drive to a different city to keep their movements out of the news.
Here’s an article from the Obama era mentioning the practice.
Link | A

I feel like someone who makes their flight information private is just issuing a challenge to a turbo-sperg to figure it out. It’s not doxing, it’s more like using public information to solve a puzzle.

It’s pretty funny that the guy who tracks Elon’s plane has done a lot more research one one hobby than Ben “kill shot” Collins has in his entire journalism “””career.”””
 
Just want to clarify what I meant about the difference between what we KF does and average journos bc the autism is over 9000 (as usual).
I'm ordinarily happy to effortpost, but anyone who doesn't see the difference between what we do here and what Ben Collins does is a moron, troll or both. The differences in reach, external legitimacy, truthfulness, resources, accuracy, interest in accuracy, stated motivation, job title, and income between what we do and what people like Ben Collins and Taylor Lorenz do are obvious.

Until Josh gets to be paid to repeatedly publish news articles and go on cable news, just to make up lies about Lucas and all other troons, to try and get them deplatformed, demonetised and canceled, let alone having a hundred forum members being able to do the same thing in support, there is no comparison. It's such an obvious bait/troll move that it's a shame to realise that, no, some people are legitimately that stupid that they can't tell the difference. But then I remember I'm on a forum for mocking exactly those stupid people, and that makes it better.

Tl;dr: Wake me when the Farms tries to fundamentally break the internet because Ben Collins said some mean words, while pretending we're doing it because he's a terroristic threat to our lives based on easily disprovable lies.
 
Just want to clarify what I meant about the difference between what we KF does and average journos bc the autism is over 9000 (as usual).

This is one of the big differences, even thought it doesn't matter much in a legal sense. Nobody here thinks we're on a holy crusade against lolcows. And if someone does it, it's up to each person.



Context and intention is the difference between any actions that look the same. Me and my friends talking about how we hate someone and how we could find ways to kill this person, is not the same as actually planning it, buying all things we need, and develop a real plan that we execute.

Journalists have the intention of hurting their targets.

KF only wants to talk about people we find funny. Nobody here is going after someone's job. If someone gets fired because of what it's written here, it's up to

1. the stupid lolcow who committed any action that would merit being fired and
2. the employer who decided to google the employee.

It's the same as me telling someone else "did you know that X is cheating on his girlfriend?" and the girlfriend following me around to spy on what I have to say about X. It's not my fault. I'm not the guardian of X's secrets. I'm not telling him to cheat and I'm not telling his gf what he's up to.

Me spying on X to find out he's cheating and then going to his girlfriend so she can break up with him and probably kill him, that's totally on me.

Journos don't even just keep the info contained on their website or news. They have nets of people who not only push for the destruction of their target, but promote the content while pointing their fingers at this person, whose only crime is often only making a silly meme.

So, if you ask me if KF and journos are doing the same? I'd say not at all, not remotely.
I am of the opinion that the journalists have poor intentions. I am also of the opinion that what they are doing is not provably criminal and should not have resulted in a Twitter ban. You are right to differentiate between this site and what these journos do, to a point. However, I think that they should be able to do what they were doing online, even if its scummy.
 
Just want to clarify what I meant about the difference between what we KF does and average journos bc the autism is over 9000 (as usual).

This is one of the big differences, even thought it doesn't matter much in a legal sense. Nobody here thinks we're on a holy crusade against lolcows. And if someone does it, it's up to each person.



Context and intention is the difference between any actions that look the same. Me and my friends talking about how we hate someone and how we could find ways to kill this person, is not the same as actually planning it, buying all things we need, and develop a real plan that we execute.

Journalists have the intention of hurting their targets.

KF only wants to talk about people we find funny. Nobody here is going after someone's job. If someone gets fired because of what it's written here, it's up to

1. the stupid lolcow who committed any action that would merit being fired and
2. the employer who decided to google the employee.

It's the same as me telling someone else "did you know that X is cheating on his girlfriend?" and the girlfriend following me around to spy on what I have to say about X. It's not my fault. I'm not the guardian of X's secrets. I'm not telling him to cheat and I'm not telling his gf what he's up to.

Me spying on X to find out he's cheating and then going to his girlfriend so she can break up with him and probably kill him, that's totally on me.

Journos don't even just keep the info contained on their website or news. They have nets of people who not only push for the destruction of their target, but promote the content while pointing their fingers at this person, whose only crime is often only making a silly meme.

So, if you ask me if KF and journos are doing the same? I'd say not at all, not remotely.
"my intentions are petty so they aren't intentions at all"
 
Boy, this faggot and Taylor Lorenz getting shoah'd off the platform all in the same weekend. Nice way to end the year. I hope they stay gone but they'll probably (undeservedly) be let back on at some point.
Ben isn't banned from Twitter, he's just been temp-suspended from his job at NBC.
 
Back