Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 103 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 73 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 164 40.1%

  • Total voters
    409
Well, it really seems like he only cares about growing his Locals subscribers, and now views youtube as just a way to market that.

So in a sense losing subscribers on youtube doesn't matter, as long as he has some churn of new people tuning in.
I'm sure that's his cope. It's absolutely great for him to be hemorrhaging viewers.
 
Watching the SimpCast 56 with Alex Stein as a guest for the possibility of details about Ralph and the wrestling event but then all of a sudden. Good to see Nick spreading holiday cheer.
1672027463100.png
 
Didn't most of the wine moms come during the Depp trial?
I believe he got quite a bit from the 2020 election/Sophie Long as well.

Also uh. Isn't Ahn trying to run for a political position? Why the fuck is she on with Nick then? Cause most people are gonna take one look from these clips in a political ad and not vote for them.
 
I believe he got quite a bit from the 2020 election/Sophie Long as well.

Also uh. Isn't Ahn trying to run for a political position? Why the fuck is she on with Nick then? Cause most people are gonna take one look from these clips in a political ad and not vote for them.
Same reason she fucks dogs.
 
I have observed Nose's community for quite a while, and from my observations, Elissa has met Nose and LR at least 2 times at meetups in Houston. This is probably what gives here the personal connection to feel 'embarrassed' by proxy.
That explains a lot. I did not know she had personally interacted with them.
Ah well that answers that question. However, she also says that she can't have "Kayla be done dirty like that" and "feels embarrassed" on Kayla's behalf. That still strongly suggests she simps for Kayla thinks all the mockery Nick and more importantly to her, Kayla, are receiving is somehow wrong.
It's revenge porn (so she claims). Personally I still think that's some poor decision making to argue for someone you barely know. What if Nick's wife is a-okay with this shit?

More than likely his more tech-savvy twitch streamer daughter caught wind of what Rekieta has been up to.
Cedar fever is a legit issue year round in Tyler in a warm winter.
So what phase is he in now? Red (nosed) giant?

And does he have enough mass to go supernova?
Transitioning from main-sequence to red giant or super giant.

Also Ahn's story of meeting her husband lol. We also got a subtle shoutout "haters on the internet dunking on you".
Sounds like a DSP moment.
 
Last edited:
Also uh. Isn't Ahn trying to run for a political position? Why the fuck is she on with Nick then? Cause most people are gonna take one look from these clips in a political ad and not vote for them.
I know that Rekieta never listened to Opie and Anthony, so I wanted to share something with him. Does this sound familiar? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCk0oLhaUDw That's right. It's Ahn. I first saw her when she appeared on a Legal Vices trial stream. Right in the middle of everything, she says something like, "Oh, I feel so sorry for her" and just completely killed the energy. One of the things I have always liked about Rekieta's streams is not taking any of this often macabre content seriously, so to me, she is a bit out of place.

(long) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF_v9f7wnfk
 
Also uh. Isn't Ahn trying to run for a political position? Why the fuck is she on with Nick then? Cause most people are gonna take one look from these clips in a political ad and not vote for them.
Was. The election is over. It was probably closer than anyone expected, but it wasn't really close (58/42).

 
One thing I hate about Nick is he does that stupid voice when he's talking about something he likes. I don't know how to explain it. Sargon does it too; a good example I can think of is when Sargon was talking about Encyclopedia Dramatica and he says "I loooooove ED!". I think it's in the stream he did where he tried to kill Jim. It's so fucking gay and Rekieta does it and it's really annoying but I sound like a schizo trying to describe it. I don't even know what to call it. SoyVoice? Does anyone know what I'm talking about? Am I insane?
As a person I really like enthusiasm. If someone is enthusiastic about something corny, it makes me happy to listen to them. I think generally people like to hear genuine enthusiasm.

Aye, there's the rub. Genuine. Nick talking about locals is actually genuine enthusiastic. I think it's a dumb thing to like, I think it is bad content, but he is genuinely enthusiastic about it.

Comparitively, him talking about the balldo isn't genuinely enthusiastic. There are a lot of things he says he likes that he doesn't really like. The phony part is the annoying bit. Same thing with Sargon and ED: Sargon was terrified of ED and he masked that with pretending to like it more than he does.

I think your ancient brain just detects the tone of voice when they aren't being genuine. It's a streamers tightrope to walk. Bring genuine brings in the viewers, but being phony brings in the advertisers. Also, being phony allows you to milk your viewers better, as you tell them the lies they need to hear. This is why Null is bad at getting rich of this stuff.

Merry christmas motherfuckers.
 
Comparitively, him talking about the balldo isn't genuinely enthusiastic. There are a lot of things he says he likes that he doesn't really like. The phony part is the annoying bit.
Rackets, I know you're reading this so I'll just let you know: I do not consent to you blowing out Our Wife's asshole with the ball containment unit. Just because you can't get hard any more is not a good reason to stick unnatural objects into Our Wife. If you are worried that you are not sexually satisfying her any more you should just leave it to us.
 
Sad to see Nick turning into Jack Murphy. “Critics of my sex pest activities are incels!” Now his lady is posting lingerie pics to his thirst Fed trap locals chat, several female members posting nudes of themselves. This shit isn’t just fun degeneracy, it’s sex pest shit that almost always devolves into a complete disaster.

After all the hand wringing over YT, he crawled back like a basic bitch. He got the sympathy bucks from being banned and taking a stand for a few weeks, then slowly walked back every single one of his plans to disassociate from YT. I’ll admit that it worked on me and now he’s stopped streaming to Odysee, the only streaming service that actually allows free speech. Reminds me of how Salty Cracker will say hate speech is free speech and that he supports free speech, but his Odysee streams are moderated by Cozy streamers and you will be immediately banned if you say “nigger” or “faggot.”

All these glory niggers are the same. I keep thinking, hoping that maybe one of them isn’t. But they all are.
 
Rackets, I know you're reading this so I'll just let you know: I do not consent to you blowing out Our Wife's asshole with the ball containment unit. Just because you can't get hard any more is not a good reason to stick unnatural objects into Our Wife. If you are worried that you are not sexually satisfying her any more you should just leave it to us.
Since Rekieta is now mentioning on stream that he wants other men to touch his junk I think it's safe to say Kayla Rekieta will be getting someone else to throw a grain of race into outer space from now on. #SlatternlyWoman
 
Sad to see Nick rushing towards the Ralphamale lifestyle, however the harvest must be bountiful with Nick's sacrifice we might keep Jim alive for a few months in order for him to cackle at Ralph getting beat up by a deformed midget at his wrestling tournament.
 
The problem I have with Nick is that in the over the last year+ that I've been watching I gained a lot of respect in what seemed like reasoned and principled views, even when I didn't necessarily agree. And now, he's tossed all that shit out the window. The things he's doing now directly contradict the things HE SAID in the past. Either he was lying then or some real shit happened that broke him. No shit some people are going to speak out against you when you betray the ideas that fostered their respect in the first place. He went from gay toasts to anyone with $20 and ranting about troons and censorship to gayer depravity that no one wants to hear about and ranting about his viewers.

"I hate drama" fuck you, retard.
Nick only hates drama that involves him. His channel was literally birthed on internet drama (the maddox lolsuit) and he routinely revels in it.

This pic is right after Kurt tells Megan to wipe that smirk off her face and Nick says "oh shit!" Nick's face is clearly one that detests drama.

kurtincel.jpg


Nick's mistake was making internet fwiends with a bunch of orbiting retards looking to cash in on a rising trend that intrinsically gatekeeps out a significant portion of the public from being able to do it. The drama from Kurt and Branca likely wouldn't exist if Rekieta didn't building a stable of lawyer streamer friends. Because they're his fwiends, he feels compelled to defend them or at least comment on it all. Metokur was right. All this "internet friends" shit does is fuck things up and make people pick sides. It inherently facilitates and exacerbates drama.
 
Since Rekieta is now mentioning on stream that he wants other men to touch his junk I think it's safe to say Kayla Rekieta will be getting someone else to throw a grain of race into outer space from now on. #SlatternlyWoman
Sounds pretty gay. When is Nick going to come out and join the Alphabet People community?
 
I think that's unlikely. What the idiots that keep reporting him don't seem to grasp is that his conduct has to be tied to his practice in order to be actionable. Nick acting like a drunk Internet shitlord is both out of their jurisdiction and (often) protected speech. The idiots reporting him are trying to apply the same tactics they would employ to get somebody fired, but not understanding that a license issued by a government authority is entirely different.

To put this in better perspective, it would be like somebody here getting their driver's license suspended over saying "nigger." That's not gonna happen. At least not for those of us in the U.S..

@AnOminous also put it best at one point: In reading those complaints, the first thing they'll usually check for is whether the complaint is made by a client. party, or attorney to an action that the lawyer being reported on is involved in. If the answer is no, it'll usually get binned PDQ.
You're right that all of the complaints that spur from random comments said on Nick's show are going to be thrown out without any investigation, but it's worth thinking about the timing of the most recent complaint saga.

At the time Nick read out the complaints, he was pissed. The Keffals brigade had just got his Twitter account banned, and they were about to take out his Youtube and Twitch accounts as well. So not only did he read out the response from the MN Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, he also read out the complainant's names and said he'd be posting their addresses on Locals later.

That got put on ice when he got banned from Youtube. My memory may be wrong, but IIRC, when he got restored to Youtube he said he would probably put the addresses up at a later time., and then he disclosed he's being investigated again and we haven't heard anything since. He may have gone too far this time, IMO. You're right that someone being an attorney does not abrogate their First Amendment right to express their opinion. And yes, ethics complaints against attorneys are kept confidential for the benefit of the attorneys, who still have the right to publicize the substance and disposition of those complaints if they want to.

But if Nick is really being investigated again by the OLPR, I suspect what's going on is that they or one of the complainants are alleging that Nick's threat to dox the complainants constitutes intimidation that will deter people from going through the ethics complaint process. The frame of "if you file an ethics complaint against me, I will post your full name and address online to my several thousand braying paying fans" is a terrible look for an attorney, even if the complaints are frivolous, which they were in this case btw. It may not be a terrible look for an entertainer/shock jock, but it's a terrible look for an attorney.

This 2000 article by an OLPR lawyer notes that intimidating a potential complainant, even one whose claim is unsubstantiated, poses a risk of creating "a chilling effect on the bringing of complaints, which are of public importance" and therefore may violate Rule 8.4(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits "conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice":
1672109531193.png
Now the conduct in the cited case was aggravated because in addition to leaving a voice mail in which the attorney asked the complainant to "give [him] a call or come into [his] office because you are going to hear from [him]", he later appeared to threaten a lawsuit even though individuals are immune from civil liability associated with making ethics complaints in Minnesota. And guess what: the initial complaint against this guy was dismissed! Just in 5 minutes of searching I found multiple cases in Minnesota alone where the lawyer gets hit with an ethics complaint and freaks out and threatens to sue, which results in professional discipline even though the initial complaint was later found to be baseless.

The bottom line is that even though the rules may have been written at a time when most people were still in the phone book, the people judging these complaints are not stupid. The stream is there and you can plainly see by his attitude that Nick viewed the dox (and potentially even the threat of dox) as a reprisal against the people who made frivolous complaints against him. Same attitude existed with the Locals post where Nick mocked the guy who prostrated himself and begged for his address to not be made public. Guess what. The complaints were frivolous, but you have to sit there and take it. You can gloat all you like when they're dismissed if you like. Nick could probably argue that he had a legitimate interest in revealing the names since it revealed social media figures who urged complaints against him didn't bother to do so themselves. But what you can't do, at least according to the OLPR, is engage in conduct which is deliberately intended to intimidate potential ethics complainants.

Nick better hope that they don't conclude that his behavior falls under that category. But at the end of the day this was just another example of Nick's poor decision making that is spiraling out of control, and I don't have any sympathy. First, even if this goes anywhere, the most likely result is be a private reprimand where they slap him on the wrist and tell him "don't do this again". But secondly I don't have sympathy because he was dangling the dox as a way to promote his Locals. Even Harry Morris, who has been in the sektur for about 5 minutes, realized that the move is to post somewhere in an anonymous or pseudonymous manner that cannot be linked directly back to you.

That last comment brings me me to a fun hypothetical scenario that could be embarrassing for Nick.

Let's say there was a person who is accepted to actually have had an attorney-client relationship with Nick.
Let's say that this former client has repeatedly stated that he believes that he has concerns about Nick's professional conduct in the context of that attorney-client relationship, and in fact already mused publicly about filing an ethics complaint.
Let's say that this former client stated for months his desire to keep his home address, which, completely hypothetically, was located in the Los Héroes suburb of Mérida, Yucatán, México, out of public knowledge.
Let's say that this former client - let's give him the name "Ethan Ralph" - could thus make a facially plausible claim to the OLPR that he was intimidated by Nick's actions into refraining from filing an ethics complaint.

That would sure be an interesting and hilarious scenario. Luckily for Nick, this hypothetical individual has two dozen other feuds on his mind before this one, and he lacks the intelligence to competently prosecute even a single feud at any given time.
 
Last edited:
Back