Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 25.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 63 17.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 145 39.2%

  • Total voters
    370
Nick has finally come out of the closet and admits to being a full on homosexual.

He says that his ideology (lolbertarianism) now requires everyone to live as a radical, atomized individuals pursuing their craziest desires taking no heed of norms, commitments to family, opinions of others, morals, etc.

Isn't that what Jack Murphy did? Didn't he fully live out Nick's stated ideas? Shoudn't he be praised for not listening to the prudes/incels and doing his horny thing to the maximum extent? How about keffals? Nick's newest cope manifesto is literally the ethos of the transgender activists like keffals and amateur cuck pornographers like Mr. Murphy.
 
Last edited:
Oh, so he's gone full hedonist but will say "ackshually it's lolbertarianism!", that's some Clinton tier playing with definitions here Nick.

Just call yourself an apex gigachad, grow out your beard and don't bother buying pussy hooks because I just know you already have a set or three.
 
He says that his ideology (lolbertarianism) now requires everyone to live as a radical, atomized individuals pursuing their craziest desires taking no heed of norms, commitments to family, opinions of others, morals, etc.

Isn't that what Jack Murphy did? Didn't he fully live out Nick's stated ideas? Shoudn't he be praised for not listening to the prudes/incels and doing his horny thing to the maximum extent? How about keffals? Nick's newest cope manifesto is literally the ethos of the transgender activists like keffals and amateur cuck pornographers like Mr. Murphy.

This is why I moved away from libertarianism, it seems to devolve eventually into hedonism. One of the reasons I thought Nick was alright was because he seemed an exception to the norm of libertarian -> coom hedonism lifestyle. Boy was I wrong
 
What's the source for the Locals deal? He's had Locals since before Rumble and even when he made the Rumble deal he never mentioned a Locals deal added as well. He always had Locals after party circle jerks. People are only now paying attention since he whining to the wine moms.
 
He says early in this video that he was testing what his fans would put up with over the past year and took the steady paypig numbers as a sign that he could let his freak flag fly without losing subscribers. So it's not a sudden shift, he's been feeling stifled for a long time and felt like he was being fake on camera. But only caring about direct subscribers means the potential for growth will stagnate. A YouTuber doesn't need to be perpetually growing, and doesn't need to cater to the lowest common denominator, but there needs to be some flexibility and some way to bring in new audience members as old ones leave. They can be the same kind of people, but you can't just lock yourself into the few insane people who spend all day in chat.

Talking about how he totally doesn't want to have sex with everyone, he just wants to appreciate every hot woman. lollllll.

Him saying the internet couldn't keep up with LR - and that even he barely can - says to me that she's in the driver's seat with all this. Rackets is just very good at convincing himself of things because of his lolyer mind.
Its rather depressing how we went from his biggest group of fans fighting the good fight for free speech to haters and bad people in the span of a couple weeks. All for saying maybe, just MAYBE its a bad idea to spend hours every night talking about your sex life instead of, you know, the law and shit.

What I don't understand is that Rackets should KNOW this is how the spiral down goes. He's seen it before. He's laughed about it before. He's commented about it before. Yet he seems blissfully unaware he's in the spiral. I suppose though, being unaware is one of the hallmarks of a cow. Its just sad to see it with him.
1672339458510.png
 
I have been looking into live viewer numbers and and i honestly believe they are pretty damn close to honest. This view was made even stronger because rumble has fewer viewers than youtube during trial streams. If they were doing some fudging of numbers they'd do it all the time.

As for video views... they are very sketchy to say the least. I have seen a 20k jump in video views within 10 minutes. That simply doesn't happen on streams.
Not sure. I think his live viewership for the Brooks trial was extremely strong for Rumble, but that was shortly after he was banned so potentially there would be a boost from that. But frankly, I'm not convinced of the extent to which the view counts for all these platforms are directly comparable, especially live viewer counts.

How much of a 3-hour stream do you have to watch for it to count as a "view"? For example, for Youtube, it's just 30 seconds. If you are watching a live stream and close the tab, how long does it take for you to be kicked out of the live viewer count? What if you pause it? There are no right or wrong answers to these questions. What would be most useful is a direct one-to-one comparison with Youtube numbers, but it's not fair to say that Youtube's subjective choices on view counts should be treated as the ground truth.

The Rumble live stream view counts are interesting now that Nick is turning off the Youtube streams. As far as I can tell, Nick has been averaging about 4-5k viewers each on Youtube and Rumble since he got his YT account back.

Nick's stream numbers have tended to peak midway through the first hour. I believe he's said that the peak is around 45 minutes. At 1:00:00 to 1:30:00 when he turns off the Youtube stream, his Rumble numbers goes up massively. I clicked through just to see what his numbers were like a couple days ago and he was just over 10k. So if Rumble counts live viewers the same way as Youtube, then we have to have some combination of either:
  1. Close to 100% of Youtube viewers are crossing over to Rumble. I view this as unlikely since the Youtube comments were full of people complaining about Rumble when he came back to YT, but it's always possible.
  2. Nick's numbers now peak later in the night even though he streams very late to begin with.
Now as far as I can tell from a quick search Youtube/Google does not publish any real definition of its "concurrent viewers" metric as it relates to live streams. It simply says "Concurrent viewers: The number of simultaneous viewers. Peak concurrent is the highest number of viewers during a live stream", which is vague as hell. There's no reason to think that Rumble's equivalent would be identical. It would be hard to replicate even if you really wanted to.

I know this is late- but I remember Rekieta talking to Barnes about a potential civil rights lawsuit against the Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility commission or whatever. Why does he think they have changed their mind and want to investigate? So far they have rejected (rightfully) non-client complaints in a perfunctory fashion.
I posted some speculation about this several pages ago.
 
Its rather depressing how we went from his biggest group of fans fighting the good fight for free speech to haters and bad people in the span of a couple weeks. All for saying maybe, just MAYBE its a bad idea to spend hours every night talking about your sex life instead of, you know, the law and shit.

What I don't understand is that Rackets should KNOW this is how the spiral down goes. He's seen it before. He's laughed about it before. He's commented about it before. Yet he seems blissfully unaware he's in the spiral. I suppose though, being unaware is one of the hallmarks of a cow. Its just sad to see it with him.
View attachment 4161268
Is it a lack of awareness of the spiral, or is it obstinant refusal to acknowledge it as such and course correct? I've said it before, and I'll say it again, our boy is deep in the throes of a true blue mid life crisis. I don't know to what extent LR is involved in pushing him into it, but given the nose ring, back-tattoos, and her participation in it, I'm guessing she's definitely hurting him, not helping.
 
Nick has finally come out of the closet and admits to being a full on homosexual.
You can see in the cope that he now realizes the damage he has done to himself. Calling everyone prudes and incels didn't work, so he had to come up with something else. But no matter how much he tries to blame his own audience or play the liberatarian card, he can't overcome the central problem that his personal ideology isn't meaningfully different than Preston Poulter or keffals. Somehow him making fun of other sexual weirdos is fine, but he is stunning and brave when he shares his private life.
He is also really attached to his hero narrative. That he is somehow he and his wife are just horny explorers of sexual possibilities. But that doesn't quite line up with swinger Nick who goes high to gay bars and brags about using limp dick toys.
 
"You don't deserve to be subservient to anyone"
"Some of my friends are much happier now that I'm being more open and honest"
And this is the key failure in libertarian philosophy. That freedom is free? Horseshit. Think about it for just 5 fucking minutes, you're dependant on all sorts of things, the people who maintain the systems you live in don't cease to exist just because you cease to see them. We are all one cooperative organism as homo sapiens, even neanderthals banded together. To think you're a rogue, without actually being a total trailblazer and maverick, is absurd. Freedom isn't free. On the left, people think sexual freedom extend all the way to children, when no child ever naturally thinks of sex. In this same way, the extreme right and their strange proclivities to S&M, rollplaying, orgies, is also a factor of their lack of understanding of boundaries. Nobody cared when you went off to retreats and kept it quiet, but now you're trying to say it's normal and fine for people to be degenerate, to normalize "sex work", out in the open, for your audience. That's some fall of Rome shit and I'm 100% against it. Freedom isn't free, it's earned, and the ways we earn it is by abiding common morality, only that grows the appropriate space where we are free to participate in a buffet of options, still bound by absolutist reality we inhabit.
 
He says that his ideology (lolbertarianism) now requires everyone to live as a radical, atomized individuals pursuing their craziest desires taking no heed of norms, commitments to family, opinions of others, morals, etc.
Another lolbert who confused libertinism for libertarianism. Just having the right to do something doesn't make it right to do, and you aren't truly free if you're a slave to your own basest impulses.
Somehow him making fun of other sexual weirdos is fine, but he is stunning and brave when he shares his private life.
It's like he's on a speedrun of cowing out, collecting cow traits like Pokemon. Now he's at the seething stage of the cycle that starts with cringy oversharing. Don't tell me if it had been Ron Toye with the Balldo that he would have relentlessly mocked him as using the gayest, most cucked sex toy ever invented.
 
It's no Viper or Corvette.
TBF, it's not meant to be. The Mustang is on the same tier as the Camaro or Challenger. There's a difference between a "muscle car" and a "pure sports car." The true Ford equivalent to the Viper or Corvette was the now discontinued Ford GT (directly inspired by the GT40 of Ford vs. Ferrari fame).

Nick has finally come out of the closet and admits to being a full on homosexual.
Oh JFC, we're back to the "projection" BS again, are we?

No Nick, you did not keep your personal life private. I mean, you did, in a way... I guess, but you utterly (and probably quite intentionally) fail to acknowledge that you put up a front as to what your personal beliefs were, and they (by your own admission now) don't comport with what you now say they always were.

How does this nigger not get this? Who is fucking still buying this "projection" excuse? I'm guessing few people considering he's trying so hard to peddle it. Was the juxtaposition with Idubbz shit not enough? Does somebody have to pour through the gorillion hours of Weeb Wars footage to find the other numerous examples of him professing a belief he clearly doesn't actually hold?

Fucking hell, if he said "okay guys, I was trying to live a lie and I can't do it anymore" he'd come across as more honest. But no, he's gonna claim everybody is suffering a mass delusion, and that's the only reason he's losing subs and views. Good luck with that, I guess.

He says that his ideology (lolbertarianism) now requires everyone to live as a radical, atomized individuals pursuing their craziest desires taking no heed of norms, commitments to family, opinions of others, morals, etc.

Isn't that what Jack Murphy did?
And Idubbz. Somebody who Nick and Drex lambasted for similar behavior when the façade was still going on.

Well, now the shoe's on the other foot, and he doesn't like it. That's just too fucking bad.

You can see in the cope that he now realizes the damage he has done to himself.
Yeah, no shit. How embarrassing.

EDIT: Typo.
 
Last edited:
Nick has finally come out of the closet and admits to being a full on homosexual.

This fucking guy. He really can't handle it when people rightfully call him a hypocrite, and will twist his brain in knots to try (and fail) to explain (to himself) why he isn't. It's seriously eating at him.

"Oh, it's not me being a hypocrite, it's uh... A hypocrisy from the narrative that people from opposing sides collectively decided about me. Also like, I was like, just trying to hide who I was, and keeping things private before, and now I can't. No wait, actually I've changed a lot in the last year, yeah, I'm like a different person than I was. Oh, it's all so complicated though and I just don't want to get into it, really. But, I'm not a hypocrite okay?"

No one forced him to go pounding on the table and railing on people time after time after time after time after time after time for all their own oversharing of their sex lives, or laughing at them for the things they choose to do with their significant other, or harping on how important his faith and traditional family values are, or talking about how you should never put your kids in a position where they or their friends find out about your sexual antics.

This is alllll Rackets' own doing. His own thoughts and his own supposed principles that he volunteered to the world. No narrative required. He laid out specifically and repeatedly who he is, what his values are, what it means to be a man and a father, and he never hesitated to use the perverse actions of others as a bludgeon against them. He could've simply not done these things from the start instead of being a fraud.
 
How does this nigger not get this? Who is fucking still buying this "projection" excuse? I'm guessing few people considering he's trying so hard to peddle it. Was the juxtaposition with Idubbz shit not enough? Does somebody have to pour through the gorillion hours of Weeb Wars footage to find the other numerous examples of him professing a belief he clearly doesn't actually hold?
"Projection" is one of those words when used appropriately everyone knows what you're talking about but when used outside of that context it's a buzzword signalling that you are out of options to defend yourself so you spit out the word salad equivalent of "no u"
It's looking pretty rough for Nicolas lads
 
This fucking guy. He really can't handle it when people rightfully call him a hypocrite, and will twist his brain in knots to try (and fail) to explain (to himself) why he isn't. It's seriously eating at him.

"Oh, it's not me being a hypocrite, it's uh... A hypocrisy from the narrative that people from opposing sides collectively decided about me. Also like, I was like, just trying to hide who I was, and keeping things private before, and now I can't. No wait, actually I've changed a lot in the last year, yeah, I'm like a different person than I was. Oh, it's all so complicated though and I just don't want to get into it, really. But, I'm not a hypocrite okay?"

No one forced him to go pounding on the table and railing on people time after time after time after time after time after time for all their own oversharing of their sex lives, or laughing at them for the things they choose to do with their significant other, or harping on how important his faith and traditional family values are, or talking about how you should never put your kids in a position where they or their friends find out about your sexual antics.

This is alllll Rackets' own doing. His own thoughts and his own supposed principles that he volunteered to the world. No narrative required. He laid out specifically and repeatedly who he is, what his values are, what it means to be a man and a father, and he never hesitated to use the perverse actions of others as a bludgeon against them. He could've simply not done these things from the start instead of being a fraud.
And this right here is why someone like Vaush can get away with coded pedophilia support. Vaush has always presented himself as a libertine socialist who is all about unrestricted personal gratification supported by big government largesse. Him having a deep think on the merits of lolicon porn and whether under 18 year old's can "consent" is just par for the course with him. He's never presented himself as anything other then what he is, and the audience he has cultivated because of that expects it and gets it.
 
Back