You're fine. Your position seems to be that he's grifting off the culture wars for his own personal gain, and nothing of what he's doing is really affecting the culture wars any. That CG is a grift and a sham designed to enrich those who identify as CG. That the financial enrichment
is the only endgame. I think everybody with an IQ above room temperature figured that out a
long time ago.
What
doesn't make sense to me is this idea all of sudden that FROG isn't pulling in the money that the data we have suggests he is. Indeed, I don't think he'd be getting the vitriol he gets if he was a financial failure. In a perfect world, that values tangible contributions over bloviating about the sins of the other side, FROG might be a failure, but we pretty clearly don't live in
that world.
You basically answered your own question. Brooks is salty because Marvel is performing like ass. He's looking to blame CG instead of taking a critical eye to his own side. I think this was discussed and generally agreed to months ago when Dean Assaf interviewed him with a bunch of gay softball questions.
Frankly, Brooks is an idiot for lashing out an FROG and CG. He's playing right into their narrative that they are this big influential force that is affecting the industry. If somebody is
really that inconsequential, like isn't the smarter move to just to ignore them?
This is peak lolcow behavior. It's similar to how Rekieta claims to not care about people laughing at him, but is also desperate to convince people he doesn't care. If you really don't care, you wouldn't keep talking about it.