Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
The problem with it is that I don't see what the grift is. I mean did he really plot and scheme for years to gather up a stable of old rando worn-out women that he can get lewds from? The whole turn toward degeneracy has (at best) been a wash in terms of money. I don't see any growth prospects in doing the content he is doing and appeal to the audience he wants.
If it was actually a grift with some sort of rational goals to it, it would make more sense. But I don't see any. If he wants money, there are ways for him to get more money. If it was about women or sex, there are better women and better ways to get that.

I view it very simply.

Rekieta said that his old audiences were very male. I believe he cited a number of under 10% female, which I presume is sourced from his Youtube statistics. With the Depp trial and to a lesser extent the Rittenhouse trial and the trials in the middle, his audience became vastly more female. He said something like 40% female for his Youtube now and 50% for the Locals chat. I don't know the exact numbers he stated, it was from a clip posted here last month. So in other words, the percentage of his audience who are women has gone up 4-5x.

His audience has also gotten bigger, or at least had gotten bigger, so the total pool of women has gone up by more, perhaps up to an order of magnitude. And the number of thirsty women who are prepared to post lewds for attention has gone up by a similar number.

As for the age of them, I think he's just taking what he can get. My takeaway is that the influx from the trial streams was probably older on average than his initial audience.

We'll see what happens in Vegas.
 
I view it very simply.

Rekieta said that his old audiences were very male. I believe he cited a number of under 10% female, which I presume is sourced from his Youtube statistics. With the Depp trial and to a lesser extent the Rittenhouse trial and the trials in the middle, his audience became vastly more female. He said something like 40% female for his Youtube now and 50% for the Locals chat. I don't know the exact numbers he stated, it was from a clip posted here last month. So in other words, the percentage of his audience who are women has gone up 4-5x.

His audience has also gotten bigger, or at least had gotten bigger, so the total pool of women has gone up by more, perhaps up to an order of magnitude. And the number of thirsty women who are prepared to post lewds for attention has gone up by a similar number.

As for the age of them, I think he's just taking what he can get. My takeaway is that the influx from the trial streams was probably older on average than his initialI
I LIKE WHERE THIS IS HEADING!!!!

Also another example of women ruining everything.
 
I view it very simply.

Rekieta said that his old audiences were very male. I believe he cited a number of under 10% female, which I presume is sourced from his Youtube statistics. With the Depp trial and to a lesser extent the Rittenhouse trial and the trials in the middle, his audience became vastly more female. He said something like 40% female for his Youtube now and 50% for the Locals chat. I don't know the exact numbers he stated, it was from a clip posted here last month. So in other words, the percentage of his audience who are women has gone up 4-5x.

His audience has also gotten bigger, or at least had gotten bigger, so the total pool of women has gone up by more, perhaps up to an order of magnitude. And the number of thirsty women who are prepared to post lewds for attention has gone up by a similar number.

As for the age of them, I think he's just taking what he can get. My takeaway is that the influx from the trial streams was probably older on average than his initial audience.

We'll see what happens in Vegas.
Typically women tend to better consumers because they will retardedly waste more money on dumb shit. If his strategy is to try to monetize his more female audience now good luck. Its a bold strategy cotton. I haven't seen them give the money for more than a locals membership. His superchat audience still seems to be the totally alpha chad winners who don't even have a friend and need a stranger online to toast their dead goldfish. Maybe Nick needs to sell terrible shoes or ugly purses to properly grift them to empty the purse.

Excellent work Yandex. Looks like Nick isn't the only one checking his thread and not caring.

Greetings to Nick's Locals!
Look, Crusader Joe knows this site better than anybody else. He could link anything he claims but that would involve proving he isn't a lying coomer. Obviously we are being watched by a crack team of super sleuths who can't even link their claims about content on the farms. I was hoping to read bad messages about Cynthia and I'm left here waiting on the Internet spergtective to provide me the links.
 
Look, Crusader Joe knows this site better than anybody else. He could link anything he claims but that would involve proving he isn't a lying coomer. Obviously we are being watched by a crack team of super sleuths who can't even link their claims about content on the farms. I was hoping to read bad messages about Cynthia and I'm left here waiting on the Internet spergtective to provide me the links.
No receipts Joe
Couldn't back up his claims
Very sad man he is
 
And then Nick says this:

View attachment 4322288

Reminder: Nick is not about money or pandering. That's a principled man right there.

It seems a lot of people were under the impression that Nick was being tongue-in-cheek whenever he claimed to be a money-grubbing grifter. Nick was one of the "good ones", and not getting mad was because it's all irony and jokes. How convenient.



You may find this interesting. Null shared this insight with Metokur in September regarding pedophiles (minor edit on my part):


If you didn't watch it, the idea is that when a degenerate of a certain caliber (pedophile) tells you who they are, believe them. Null goes on to talk about sick degenerates that get off on telling the truth around the 2:18:00 mark. An interesting watch if you can stomach it.

In any case, the main objective isn't deception on the face of it. The objective is confusion. Confusion can create doubt where convenient. If the degenerate themselves is confused, then it makes it all the better for their own conscience.

A more aggressively narcissistic approach would be: "It's a joke until it's not a joke, and then the joke's on you for believing it was". It's a subtle way of shifting the blame from the deceiver to the deceived in an attempt to make the deception seem justified. This mental slight of hand is strikingly effective on people unfamiliar with sophistry (and even some who are).

Another perspective: It's not about whether or not you trust someone, it's about what you trust them to do. If you don't know them well enough to do that, reserve judgement until you do before making a meaningful decision.

For example, I could say that I trust Nick to say what he thinks is in his best interest at the time (like most hypocrites). I trust Nick to try and lawyer his way out of accountability by redefining terms and selective presentation of evidence that favors him to counter evidence to the contrary (which is, curiously enough, also provided by him). I do this because Nick has demonstrated this behavior.
The best indicator of future behavior is past behavior. Don't listen to what a liar SAYS - watch what they actually do and what the actual effect is. None of these e-cancers do anything unless it benefits them or helps them escape the consequences of a previous fraud gone wrong.
 
Preface: This is almost certainly not true, don't sperg about it Locals...or do.

So Mandy is posting really old pictures of herself on her phone. Ignoring why someone would have decades old nude pictures of themselves still on their devices, wouldn't it be interesting if the nude she posted was from when she was underage. So there's a POSSIBILITY, although again it's almost certainly not the case, that Sea Pea was posted to Nick's Locals and he and his members have jacked off to it.
 
1674528235736.png
I'm pretty sure Art doesn't know what a gay op is.

In fact, I'm pretty sure Art barely knows how to life.

Dumbest motherfucker in that group. Though I have to say that Crusader Joe is now giving him a good run for his money.

Also,
1674528480269.png
I haven't seen shit this cringe since PULL. It's like a gaggle of 16 year old "mean girls" up in that bitch. Meme better, you vapid whores.
 
Preface: This is almost certainly not true, don't sperg about it Locals...or do.

So Mandy is posting really old pictures of herself on her phone. Ignoring why someone would have decades old nude pictures of themselves still on their devices, wouldn't it be interesting if the nude she posted was from when she was underage. So there's a POSSIBILITY, although again it's almost certainly not the case, that Sea Pea was posted to Nick's Locals and he and his members have jacked off to it.
I just assumed "Mandy" was CGoody or some other mentally ill drug addled hanger on from the balldinian order catfishing with some pictures from an old girlfriend from 10-15 years ago.
 
Breaking the rules around nus
The problem with it is that I don't see what the grift is. I mean did he really plot and scheme for years to gather up a stable of old rando worn-out women that he can get lewds from? The whole turn toward degeneracy has (at best) been a wash in terms of money. I don't see any growth prospects in doing the content he is doing and appeal to the audience he wants.
If it was actually a grift with some sort of rational goals to it, it would make more sense. But I don't see any. If he wants money, there are ways for him to get more money. If it was about women or sex, there are better women and better ways to get that.

-------------------------------------
Willard : They told me that you had gone totally insane, and that your methods were unsound.

Kurtz : Are my methods unsound?

Willard : I don't see any method at all, sir.
You think the Lionel Hutz that is alcoholic, drug addict Nick could totally make more money in other ways? What other ways? The law degree he used to waste 100k of his audiences money in a field he clearly knew nothing about? The rage hog was right again without him this probate lawyer would be nothin.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Also,
View attachment 4324678
I haven't seen shit this cringe since PULL. It's like a gaggle of 16 year old "mean girls" up in that bitch. Meme better, you vapid whores.

Did Montagraph start creating meme's for Nick's Locals? Same vibe.

Smear 21.jpg

I just assumed "Mandy" was CGoody or some other mentally ill drug addled hanger on from the balldinian order catfishing with some pictures from an old girlfriend from 10-15 years ago.
You actually could be more right than you know. CGoody supposedly dated and banged Mandy so it's been weird to me that she's been posting decades old pictures and he hasn't said a word about it or mentioned "Those are old pictures" or anything that would demonstrate a raised eyebrow from a man who is seeing pictures from his ex that look 15 years younger.
 
Dude...

View attachment 4323969
View attachment 4324102
(this last part means some of his writing is in F.3d).

I'm not a huge fan of Legal Eagle's content either, or his politics, and I would never recommend him as a surrogate for Rekieta's old content, but I'm pretty sure he destroys Nick on just about every lawyer-related metric than is objectively quantifiable between the two. Youtube subs. Work experience. Money earned. Litigation record. Etc. Fair is fair.

I'm genuinely surprised. I suppose I shouldn't be, but he's so fucking pedestrian it's hard to see how he could have been so successful and be so.... awful at the same time.

Not so much that he's got an academic background -- but that he's got any significant practical experience. Here in the UK, you'll get practicing lawyers contributing to CPE but it's very rare that they have academic positions. Generally, the old saw 'if you can't do, teach' applies.
 
Did Montagraph start creating meme's for Nick's Locals? Same vibe.



You actually could be more right than you know. CGoody supposedly dated and banged Mandy so it's been weird to me that she's been posting decades old pictures and he hasn't said a word about it or mentioned "Those are old pictures" or anything that would demonstrate a raised eyebrow from a man who is seeing pictures from his ex that look 15 years younger.
And isn't he the only one who has supposidely directly interacted with Mandy?

Things just don't add up. If Mandy were really a young girl (or even a girl) she certainly wouldn't only have 15-year-old potato quality pictures. Women are addicted to their phones. Just as much as they are addicted to taking selfies. She would have thousands of pictures online on assorted social media platforms.
R (12).jpg
 
Dude...

View attachment 4323969
View attachment 4324102
(this last part means some of his writing is in F.3d).

I'm not a huge fan of Legal Eagle's content either, or his politics, and I would never recommend him as a surrogate for Rekieta's old content, but I'm pretty sure he destroys Nick on just about every lawyer-related metric than is objectively quantifiable between the two. Youtube subs. Work experience. Money earned. Litigation record. Etc. Fair is fair.

Nick was successful because he catered to an audience with different (and less "safe") politics, and broke things down for them. Not because he was a better lawyer than LE or anybody else.


It's a cult.
Don't forget the nose. Devin also has a bigger nose. Though, yeah, shitty political leanings don't affect the quality of the lawyer sadly. If it did our justice system might be a smidge better and the ACLU wouldn't be taken seriously by even the left.
 
And isn't he the only one who has supposidely directly interacted with Mandy?

Things just don't add up. If Mandy were really a young girl (or even a girl) she certainly wouldn't only have 15-year-old potato quality pictures. Women are addicted to their phones. Just as much as they are addicted to taking selfies. She would have thousands of pictures online on assorted social media platforms.
View attachment 4324789
Plus she did back out of that one convention she was gonna go to to have Nick write on her tits. When you lay it all out like that it's really fishy.
 
And isn't he the only one who has supposidely directly interacted with Mandy?
Slept with, actually. Although that was mentioned by some rando in a comment from one of Elissa's videos. I shared that here weeks ago.

Obviously, I don't know the veracity of such claim. I just passed it along.

1674530897244.png

Is the theory here that she doesn't actually exist?
 
Got what I think is a stable version of the logger up today. Only a few minutes late to the Monday chat start. Will be headed to bed and wake up tomorrow to see how it does. If it works I will consider V 1.0 a success.

I do not have the chat switching automatic feature down quite yet, the output text needs clean-up to removed HTML tags, and embed links for Twitter do not work, but it is good enough for what it is I think.

I will check the EXCEL file tomorrow after Nick kills the Monday chat in favour of the Tuesday. I will have an official christening tomorrow night then if it works--else I will burn the abortion in the fires of Moloch and start again.
 
Back