Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votes: 401 71.7%
  • Autphag

    Votes: 102 18.2%
  • Luke McKee

    Votes: 6 1.1%
  • Donny Long

    Votes: 50 8.9%

  • Total voters
    559
Maybe when you're talking to an austist about cartoons. Talking to me maybe won't be so fun for you.

Trust me sir, Autphag had the exact same mindset as you and proceeded to make a fool of himself in front of 30 people on TS.

His claims included:

Jews Doing 9/11
Jews caused the Fall of the Western Roman Empire
Jews are unconsciously contributing to the NWO without realising it
Celtic peoples are similar to black people, with reduced IQs and shit like that.

You are merely a slightly less autistic version of him.
 
Trust me sir, Autphag had the exact same mindset as you and proceeded to make a fool of himself in front of 30 people on TS.

His claims included:

Jews Doing 9/11
Jews caused the Fall of the Western Roman Empire
Jews are unconsciously contributing to the NWO without realising it
Celtic peoples are similar to black people, with reduced IQs and shit like that.

You are merely a slightly less autistic version of him.

We'll see about that.
 
Most of the differences in people of different races in terms of behavior can be explained by societal means. African Americans are raised with different values in their family and therefore explains most of the differences in their behavior.

I've known intelligent black people, I've also known dumb Asians. The biggest determinator in if you're going to have a high IQ is having an enriched environment. With quite a few African Americans they grow up in poverty, and the culture has less emphasis on getting an education, poverty leads to poor prenatal care and inadequate parenting, and even education, which increases the cycle of poverty.

People tend to hang around with peers of similar cultural values, hence black people hang around with other black people, due to the environment, then a lot of them become gang-bangers because there's a higher rate of crime and less education in impoverished areas, and it makes that kind of lifestyle seem more normalized.

Also, African Americans have a significantly lower rate of depression than Caucasian populations, this is because African Americans are raised to show anger and express their frustrations, while caucasians are raised to internalize.

Tl;Dr most of the difference in IQ between races is due to environment, and people of African American heritage when raised in an enriched environment display similar IQ to caucasians raised in an enriched environment.
 
Most of the differences in people of different races in terms of behavior can be explained by societal means. African Americans are raised with different values in their family and therefore explains most of the differences in their behavior.

I've known intelligent black people, I've also known dumb Asians. The biggest determinator in if you're going to have a high IQ is having an enriched environment. With quite a few African Americans they grow up in poverty, and the culture has less emphasis on getting an education, which leads poor prenatal care and inadequate parenting, and even education.

People tend to hang around with peers of similar cultural values, hence black people hang around with other black people, due to the environment, then a lot of them become gang-bangers because there's a higher rate of crime and less education in impoverished areas, and it makes that kind of lifestyle seem more normalized.

Also, African Americans have a significantly lower rate of depression than Caucasian populations, this is because African Americans are raised to show anger and express their frustrations, while caucasians are raised to internalize.

Tl;Dr most of the difference in IQ between races is due to environment, and people of African American heritage when raised in an enriched environment display similar IQ to caucasians raised in an enriched environment.

So how do you explain the consistent international pattern, including international adoption (noting Asians), and the failure of scholastic intervention programs to have an effect?
 
So how do you explain the consistent international pattern, including international adoption (noting Asians), and the failure of scholastic intervention programs to have an effect?

There's not an international pattern. I have witnessed from experience, that African Americans even act different depending on the city, or where their family comes from. For example, black people from Innercity Chicago will act different than a black person from a small town.

Immigrants from Africa I have found to be hard working.
 
There's not an international pattern. I have witnessed from experience, that African Americans even act different depending on the city, or where their family comes from. For example, black people from Innercity Chicago will act different than a black person from a small town.

Immigrants from Africa I have found to be hard working.

The same pattern of low black, middle white and high East Asian IQ is found everywhere, in all racial mixes. Your subjective opinion of "act" means nothing.

Immigrants are a selected group, and again your opinion is of no value.
 
The same pattern of low black, middle white and high East Asian IQ is found everywhere, in all racial mixes. Your subjective opinion of "act" means nothing.

Immigrants are a selected group, and again your opinion is of no value.

Yet everything you say regarding race can be explained in terms of class as well. The poorer you are, the less likely you are to have a good education, especially in a toxic environment like a ghetto, where the gangs that run it don't want people to get out of the cycle of poverty.
 
The same pattern of low black, middle white and high East Asian IQ is found everywhere, in all racial mixes. Your subjective opinion of "act" means nothing.

Do you have a source from an approved scientific journal, even still, different races grow up with different cultures, the average IQ, of say a village in Africa when compared to the United States is obviously going to be less than when compared to an educated, wealthy country.

Also, quite frequently, there are concerns in terms of ethnocentrity in terms of IQ tests which don't always effeciantly demonstrate intelligence but more so determine your capability to learn. The IQ test has been standardized using mainly populations of either American caucations or Europeans so obviously, they'll reflect higher IQ scores for that reason.

Also, different cultures learn different types of intelligences, in indigenous populations, living and being able to live off the land and hunt/gather takes a large amount of intelligence that Caucasians don't have. Not every type of intelligence is measured by IQ tests, but just the ones that are considered to be valuable in a Western society.
 
Last edited:
It seems posters missed what I said about tran.s national adoption and Asian IQ.

Perhaps they could address that instead of repeating themselves.

I notice you added something about hunter gathering requiring intelligence. You could say that. High IQ whites and Asians can do this. They can also do physics. So we're arguin semantics. Let's focus on IQ and the ability to do tech. If we define intelligence as running around picking up plants, we agree. I do not define it like this.
 
It seems posters missed what I said about tran.s national adoption and Asian IQ.

Perhaps they could address that instead of repeating themselves.

I haven't read any studies on national adoption and IQ among races, when raised in an enriched environment, but it depends on what age they were adopted.

Orphanages in different countries can have a large amount of neglect, Russia being one.

Also, there's a chance that the country where the child was adopted from may have poor prenatal care, due to poverty, which may impact the intelligence more than race.
 
I haven't read any studies on national adoption and IQ among races, when raised in an enriched environment, but it depends on what age they were adopted.

Orphanages in different countries can have a large amount of neglect, Russia being one.

Also, there's a chance that the country where the child was adopted from may have poor prenatal care, due to poverty, which may impact the intelligence more than race.

I suggest you do a lot of reading. It's all on the internet. Try Rushton and Jensen's 30 years.
 
I suggest you do a lot of reading. It's all on the internet. Try Rushton and Jensen's 30 years.

Or you could link me to an approved scientific article by them instead of referring me to a book written by people who most likely have biases, and a possibility of flawed or inaqeduate research that is picked and chosen in order to prove the point they want to make.
 
I'm not sure, but I think I might have had some irl contact with this dipshit a few years back. I used to go shooting with this guy who talked a lot of shit about race wars and niggers and jews all that stuff. Where I'm from that's pretty common, so I kind of just ignored it for the most part, and then when I got sick of it I just stopped hanging out with him. But here's the interesting part: his name was Michael, he was a legit neo-nazi, he looked kinda like the guy in the OP, and he sperged a lot about using the internet to promote "the truth". Like he would brag about posting race shit on wikis and stuff. He also talked a lot about his shit literally, like he'd ramble on and on about the shits he took the night before and how there was corn in them, and I was like dude shut up what the fuck are you talking about. And he would literally just bring that stuff up out of nowhere while we were reloading magazines or whatever. No idea if it's the same guy but it was pretty hilarious.
 
Or you could link me to an approved scientific article by them instead of referring me to a book written by people who most likely have biases, and a possibility of flawed or inaqeduate research that is picked and chosen in order to prove the point they want to make.

I was hoping you would have the modicum of initiative to Google "Rushton and Jensen's 30 years" and find the peer reviewed paper as the first result. Shall I read it to you before bed? You can explain why it's flawed and biased at breakfast.
 
I was hoping you would have the modicum of initiative to Google "Rushton and Jensen's 30 years" and find the peer reviewed paper as the first result. Shall I read it to you before bed? You can explain why it's flawed and biased at breakfast.

Maybe you can explain why white supremacists always look like cavemen.
 
I was hoping you would have the modicum of initiative to Google "Rushton and Jensen's 30 years" and find the peer reviewed paper as the first result. Shall I read it to you before bed? You can explain why it's flawed and biased at breakfast.

Oh hi you're here.

So are you the guy I went shooting with who talks about corn in his poop? I'm genuinely curious.
 
Back