Plagued The Alt-Right

Oh no! Not the UN! The unplacable enemy of all dictatorships and theocracies! What, they would have sent a sternly worded letter?

No, but they would have exposed him embezzling money from his own country.

Hey don't discount the UN as if its not a thread.

The last thing you want is a bunch of Blue Berets to come to your country and start fucking all of your underage children all day long.

And yet, he turned a blind eye to his own soldiers doing that.
 
The regime routinely imprisoned, tortured and executed political dissidents. Do you honestly think they gave a fuck about the UN "revealing" embezzlement? It would have come as no surprise to anyone, especially the average Chilean. It would certainly be the first time any dictator feared the UN. NATO, yeah, I would see your point, but the UN?
 
the Alt-Right will be the next big problem group in the vein of the Religious Right and SJWs before them
most likely.
especially i they get triggerd over anything that has black people or anything they deem as "jewish" or some shit.

I just hope that they let me and my hispanic wife and kids alone.
 
Prolific Salo Forum poster and alt-right twitter mainstay BronzeAgePervert explains why finding women beautiful is degenerate.

BronzeAgeFag01.jpg
BronzeAgeFag02.jpg
BronzeAgeFag03.jpg
 
The funniest thing about a lot of these wanna-be Greco-Roman pederasts is their lack of self-awareness--which admittedly is the funny thing about a lot of the alt-right. The male body is "pudgy and amorphous" as well if you don't work out (and surprise surprise, most alt-righters tend to be keyboard jockeys). The reason ancient Greek men were all buff and fit was that they were expected to fight and generally participate in the world while ancient greek women were kept mainly at home (with some exceptions, such as those of the Spartans). In a society where women can hit the gym, surprise surprise, we have girls that look like Maria Kang rather than "amorphous blobs."
 
http://smashcm.blogspot.com/2014/02/gastronomical-diversity.html
94.jpg

This is especially dumb, when considering that Nigerian Food looks like this:
https://sneed-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/72/55/c6/7255c6ea3c55d3e0e5405ef61c9e09af.jpg
https://sneed-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/48/9c/a0/489ca06b4763d0e4d248e3b2e3b6885a.jpg
okro_seafood_nigerian_food_1q-Food-platter-123.jpg
And european food has Cazu Marzu, which is maggot-infested cheese.
I'm not saying European food is bad, far from it, a lot of it is great, but so is non-western food. I feel like a lot of these people who are repulsed at refugees can't appreciate a good Felafel.
How much do wanna bet that smashcm (my brain pronounces it smash come) has never cooked meat? For all I know that it is actually a picture of American raw meat.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Abethedemon
What I found funny, and what I also find funny about "boipucci" advocates in general, are the bizarre, glaring double standards and inconsistencies inherent in their claims. Bronze Age Homo says that women are hairy and foul-smelling in the "state of nature," as though men are not naturally hairier than women, and as though balls, asshole and man-taint give off a lovely pine scent. He says that women need comestic tricks to be beautiful, while men and boys are naturally so, as though they emerge from the womb jacked, tanned, and thoroughly manscaped. The toned, hairless male body he fetishizes so much from Greek statues existed because young men depilated their body hair and spent a lot of time at the gym (Greeks, after all, invented the gym).

His argument that women can't be beautiful because their bodies are "utilitarian" and designed for baby-making makes the least sense of all. First off, I don't know what kind of weird Huysmans-esque aesthetic this guy subscribes to, but the idea that a thing can't be beautiful if it serves a practical purpose would strike most people as completely incomprehensible. In fact, it's one of the definitions of decadence.

Second, where does he get this idea that men's bodies are *not* utilitarian? Muscles serve just as much practical purpose as wide hips or large breasts. Greeks wanted sculpted, musuclar bodies so they could fight barbarians better, not because of some faggy devotion to a cult of aesthetics. All of that came later. In fact, women's bodies are arguably less utilitarian than those of men, given that desirable secondary female charactertistics like big tits, round asses, etc. are not actually practically necessary, but evolved specifically because prehistoric men found those traits attractive (in other words, a woman with A-cups can breastfeed just as well as a buxom woman can, but large breasts present an exaggerated sense of fertility, thus they became the ideal in most cultures). To say that a hard muscled, machine-like man is beautiful and anti-ultilarian while a soft-bodied, indolent odalisque is grotesque and utilitarian is ass-backwards.
 
Back