What I found funny, and what I also find funny about "boipucci" advocates in general, are the bizarre, glaring double standards and inconsistencies inherent in their claims. Bronze Age Homo says that women are hairy and foul-smelling in the "state of nature," as though men are not naturally hairier than women, and as though balls, asshole and man-taint give off a lovely pine scent. He says that women need comestic tricks to be beautiful, while men and boys are naturally so, as though they emerge from the womb jacked, tanned, and thoroughly manscaped. The toned, hairless male body he fetishizes so much from Greek statues existed because young men depilated their body hair and spent a lot of time at the gym (Greeks, after all, invented the gym).
His argument that women can't be beautiful because their bodies are "utilitarian" and designed for baby-making makes the least sense of all. First off, I don't know what kind of weird Huysmans-esque aesthetic this guy subscribes to, but the idea that a thing can't be beautiful if it serves a practical purpose would strike most people as completely incomprehensible. In fact, it's one of the definitions of decadence.
Second, where does he get this idea that men's bodies are *not* utilitarian? Muscles serve just as much practical purpose as wide hips or large breasts. Greeks wanted sculpted, musuclar bodies so they could fight barbarians better, not because of some faggy devotion to a cult of aesthetics. All of that came later. In fact, women's bodies are arguably less utilitarian than those of men, given that desirable secondary female charactertistics like big tits, round asses, etc. are not actually practically necessary, but evolved specifically because prehistoric men found those traits attractive (in other words, a woman with A-cups can breastfeed just as well as a buxom woman can, but large breasts present an exaggerated sense of fertility, thus they became the ideal in most cultures). To say that a hard muscled, machine-like man is beautiful and anti-ultilarian while a soft-bodied, indolent odalisque is grotesque and utilitarian is ass-backwards.