Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 162 40.2%

  • Total voters
    403
Pretty rare moment of Uncivil being the ray of sunshine. There's an inverse relationship between his cheerfulness and everyone else's that you can use to measure the relative level of misery in the room.

While I agree that jury analysis is largely a bunch of palm reading bullshit, being a lawtist only gets you so far as well. It doesn't matter what the law says, a jury can and will do whatever they want. Look at the Kim Potter trial. There's no possible logical path that gets them to intent when even the prosecution conceded that there was no intent.

So you might as well try a bit of palm reading. And like Joe was saying, while you're not going to be able to read most people, there are some occasional signs that can indicate how a juror is feeling about the person they're listening to. Is it rock solid, 100%, We Can Determine The Outcome Of The Case With This? No. But you can't do through legal analysis either. As they've said in every trial, you can never predict the verdict. It's all guesswork. Legal analysis will certainly get you much further. But, if you've got a jury of 12 people all giving Ronnie O'Neal style death glares to one particular person, I mean come on, it's at least worth some consideration. It's a point of interest if nothing else, and in these week plus long trials of the same dry facts slowly being repeated ad nauseum, it can make for a nice breather. Especially for entertainment purposes, which is what his show is.
 
Nick talking shit on DUI guys analysis is hilarious. He's like the only one of these guys who actually does trial practice. Sure DUI guy has a huge ego, but welcome to lawyers.
Runkle, Gouveia, Sean, Emily, Peter Tragos, Barnes, and Joe (I think he used to) did/do trial practice
 
Not that anyone cares but I no longer think my initial theory has legs. I definitely subscribe to the "Putting on the mask for the parents theory". Up to 30k a year in tax free gifts from each side of the family and that's just to Nick and Kayla. It would explain a lot of the discrepancies between claiming to live in poverty and what reality shows. I also changed my mind about being laugh at all of this, it's too funny not to laugh at this retard.

Also Drex is a groomer, even if the intent wasn't there, there was grooming. He had built trust between him, and the girl, and her mother, and he parlayed that into a sexual relationship with the girl. That is the definition of grooming.
 
Oh my fucking god, he really did holler like a rage pig for 10 minutes straight while his guests just awkwardly sat there. And for the self proclaimed grift king to tell his audience to stop being grifted by experienced lawyers analyzing a jury? He much more downhill is he going to go?

Also, Nick, you're a lawyer, right? You should know that even if a public discord server was subject to two party consent, only 11 states are two party consent states. Yours is not one of them
consent .png
 
Oh my fucking god, he really did holler like a rage pig for 10 minutes straight while his guests just awkwardly sat there. And for the self proclaimed grift king to tell his audience to stop being grifted by experienced lawyers analyzing a jury? He much more downhill is he going to go?

Also, Nick, you're a lawyer, right? You should know that even if a public discord server was subject to two party consent, only 11 states are two party consent states. Yours is not one of them
View attachment 4464672
Something he, himself, talked about in earlier streams, funny enough.
 
Something he, himself, talked about in earlier streams, funny enough.
I wonder if he just thinks his retard orbiters won't even look into what a two party consent law is. The thing is that they'll then just assumes that they are now legally safe to post whatever they want because their not-practicing-law-anymore-law Pope said something.

Makes for more content, I guess
 
Holy shit Nick, please pull up. You have a lucrative streaming career in a relatively niche subject that you won't be elbowed out of any time soon. You have a family, a cute wife who takes care of herself, a big house, you're probably set for life.

This is literally just some FOMO bullshit, nobody regrets having an actual woman to bust nuts in rather than getting scabies from a sketchy rub 'n' tug. Nobody wakes up at 40 and says "wow I'm sure upset I started a family and contribute to my local community when I could have been a drugged up burnout this whole time".

Post a statement, say you've been stressed lately and turning 40 is messing with your head a bit and you've reacted to it all poorly, saying things you didn't really mean. Take a month off streaming, take your wife on a date that doesn't involve a balldo, and take some of the faggot dad advice you used to dish out.
 
Whining lawtuber throws a tantrum, has a seething bitchfit about being expected to cover a trial instead of cooming in the hands of an immigrant.
View attachment 4464601
(Sorry if this has already been posted, took a while to upload & I had to clip it twice to reduce the size)
You could see his guests squirming and praying for him to shut up, towards the end of that rant he was basically shitting on the whole idea of "lawtube" and telling the audience they were retards because these lawyers know no more about the cases than their audience and are just scamming money by pretending they do :story: he's so far off the fucking deep end and hates what he does he's started trying to destroy it for everyone.
 
Last edited:
Holy shit I just went and watched it. He revealed why he is so mad in the middle of the rant he is super fucking mad he has to do any legal content at all. "I could be doing anything... I could be going into the cities and getting a happy ending massage!" uhhhhh bruh.
Even Joe tried to say he is only doing it because it is basically his job at this point and he is just like no no no it's totally different. He legit hates his audience at this point like seething hatred that's what that rant was all about although tbf the body language analysis is dumb but wine moms etc eat that shit up either shut the fuck up about it or don't do it faggot
Branca: "Now I feel bad for mentioning it."
You think?
Agreed. That's what I got from the rant, he hates the audience he built and he hates doing any legal content. But now he's too deep. He sucks as lawyer and this is his only viable way of continuing enough income to feed his litter of kids and pay for a nanny, etc.
 
You could see his guests squirming and praying for him to shut up, towards the end of that rant he was basically shitting on the whole idea of "lawtube" and telling the audience they were retards because these lawyers know no more about the cases than their audience and are just scamming money by pretending they do :story: he's so far off the fucking deep end amd hates what he does he's started trying to destroy it for everyone.
Nick should wear his pope hat when he rants like this.
 
Holy shit Nick, please pull up. You have a lucrative streaming career in a relatively niche subject that you won't be elbowed out of any time soon. You have a family, a cute wife who takes care of herself, a big house, you're probably set for life.

This is literally just some FOMO bullshit, nobody regrets having an actual woman to bust nuts in rather than getting scabies from a sketchy rub 'n' tug. Nobody wakes up at 40 and says "wow I'm sure upset I started a family and contribute to my local community when I could have been a drugged up burnout this whole time".

Post a statement, say you've been stressed lately and turning 40 is messing with your head a bit and you've reacted to it all poorly, saying things you didn't really mean. Take a month off streaming, take your wife on a date that doesn't involve a balldo, and take some of the faggot dad advice you used to dish out.
Fuck that are you crazy?
This is the best content we've had out of Balldo Man since his coomer arc started.
If he's starting to turn into an angry drunk and lashing out at his audience this is gonna be great.
Fuck the prudes Nick tell them to fuck off Dad, they can't tell you what to do! Drink more, take ALL the drugs, and start banging hookers bare back, (monogomously of course) you're smarter than those Fan Fic Kiwi Faggots! Show them how it's done! BALLDOS TO THE WALLDO!
 
Fuck that are you crazy?
This is the best content we've had out of Balldo Man since his coomer arc started.
If he's starting to turn into an angry drunk and lashing out at his audience this is gonna be great.
Fuck the prudes Nick tell them to fuck off Dad, they can't tell you what to do! Drink more, take ALL the drugs, and start banging hookers bare back, (monogomously of course) you're smarter than those Fan Fic Kiwi Faggots! Show them how it's done! BALLDOS TO THE WALLDO!
Nick should write a manifesto and do daily segments called "Unpruded" where he blames the prudes for everything.
 
Nick should write a manifesto and do daily segments called "Unpruded" where he blames the prudes for everything.
See I love a fellow man of vision.
He needs to get a Staff to go with his Pope hat but with a gold Balldo on the end when he delivers these rants, fuck it, sermons.
If he's gonna "choose his midlife crisis" he needs to stop half assing it! Kick our wife out of the house, and those kids he hates to spend time with, it's obvious he resents them, and they're cramping his style.
Then he can move in his Locals leather factory and live it up like the fucking drunken Hugh Heffner wannabe he was always meant to be.
 
Nick: "I do the show that I want and if you don't like it you can leave"
Also Nick: "I hate doing these trial shows! I hate having DUI Guy on! I hate grifting lawyers pretending to know what they're talking about! I only do it because you guys want me to!"
Which one is it Nick?
One thing that's interesting has been the fact that despite declaring that he was bored with doing legal content at the time he made that first statement, most of his content on the night shows in the past month has been legal content, and he's been doing a trial too. There's a pretty big discordance there. Now we know that he still despises the content he's been doing.

You could see his guests squirming and praying for him to shut up, towards the end of that rant he was basically shitting on the whole idea of "lawtube" and telling the audience they were retards because these lawyers know no more about the cases than their audience and are just scamming money by pretending they do :story: he's so far off the fucking deep end amd hates what he does he's started trying to destroy it for everyone.
Yup. I don't have a timestamp but there's a specific moment where he mocks the idea of watching the documentary that was made on this family or whatever to get an insight to talk about on the case. He was very close to just tearing apart the whole concept of the trial streams that he's been doing to shreds.
 
Last edited:
Back