waffle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2013
I consider it on topic, because it criticism of someone just uncritically parroting a Nick bad take. Nick was pushing that shit hard during the trial, and it's a good example of how wet behind the ears Nick is. He's near a decade into his "practice" and committing the baby-lawyer sin of getting overly attached to a misreading of the statute that he likes/makes his side win. Pro tip: if you can't talk you most skeptical college (I recall brancha and Kurt giving him friction)into your analysis atleast being a maybe, then the judge will probably no sell it.Stop derailing the thread with law talk.
Last edited: