Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.2%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 25.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 62 16.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 143 39.1%

  • Total voters
    366
Stop derailing the thread with law talk.
I consider it on topic, because it criticism of someone just uncritically parroting a Nick bad take. Nick was pushing that shit hard during the trial, and it's a good example of how wet behind the ears Nick is. He's near a decade into his "practice" and committing the baby-lawyer sin of getting overly attached to a misreading of the statute that he likes/makes his side win. Pro tip: if you can't talk you most skeptical college (I recall brancha and Kurt giving him friction)into your analysis atleast being a maybe, then the judge will probably no sell it.
 
Last edited:
“Content is for the audience!” Is a retarded take also but for different reasons if you take the content being for the audience to it’s logical conclusion then cancel culture and tranny brigading and review bombing etc would be valid in his philosophy it’s what the audience wants isn’t it? He’s always been retarded
Edit: if anything content being for creators is a based take but only if you weren’t a cuck for years doing something you hated for the money and only made what you wanted from the beginning and fuck everyone else
I don't think "content is for the audience" is a retarded take. It literally means "the product is for the purchaser." I'm purchasing the product. If the product turns into shit, like Rackets's night show has, I'm taking my money/time/engagement elsewhere.

Now, to rebut each of the examples. Cancel culture and tranny brigading are specifically done NOT by the audience, but by some offended outsiders who aren't fans and weren't gonna buy the product anyway. And review bombing certainly has its place as a tool for disgruntled customers to express dissatisfaction. For example, to review a game on Steam, you must have it purchased. So it's an in-built check on whether you are, in fact, part of the audience.

Are you applying to be a janny? You know they do it for free, right?
I consider it on topic, because it criticism of someone just uncritically parroting a Nick bad take. Nick was pushing that shit hard during the trial, and it's a good example of how wet behind the ears Nick is. He's near a decade into his "practice" and committing the baby-lawyer sin of getting overly attached to a misreading of the statute that he likes/makes his side win. Pro tip: if you can't talk you most skeptical college (I recall brancha and Kurt giving him friction)into your analysis atleast being a maybe, then the judge will probably no sell it.
I think feral cat was making a funny. You know, because Nick's not a real lawyer anymore.
 
Last edited:
From late September 2022, Nick feels the need to talk about sex because the Church doesn't, but when it does, the Church conditions and breaks us to think sex is only for procreation and only in the missionary position:



Apparently asking fellow church-goers about their sex lives is something Nick does. This correlates with his odd interest in his parent's sex life. Nick needs to know, and if you don't tell, you are a broken and conditioned prude. This is not healthy behavior.

Conservative churches do address sexuality (same-sex marriage being a prime example). Nick seems to interpret not discussing sex lives at church as being done out of fear, and not out of respect for privacy (or because they just aren't interested).

Nick's description of conservative Christian churches are too extreme to not be a strawman. These days there are more churches drifting away from conservative values, with ministers who dress in drag as they minister to children now. I think Drag Me to Church was done at a Lutheran church for example, and society is suffering for this permissiveness. Still, Nick's cartoonish caricature of conservative Christians seems to serve his purposes as long as you don't look too closely and watch a lot of cartoon/television shows.
 
I don't think "content is for the audience" is a retarded take. It literally means "the product is for the purchaser." I'm purchasing the product. If the product turns into shit, like Rackets's night show has, I'm taking my money/time/engagement elsewhere.

Now, to rebut each of the examples. Cancel culture and tranny brigading are specifically done NOT by the audience, but by some offended outsiders who aren't fans and weren't gonna buy the product anyway. And review bombing certainly has its place as a tool for disgruntled customers to express dissatisfaction. For example, to review a game on Steam, you must have it purchased. So it's an in-built check on whether you are, in fact, part of the audience.



I think feral cat was making a funny. You know, because Nick's not a real lawyer anymore.
What I’m saying is content is just content if he was truly based he would have just been making whatever the fuck he wanted the whole time but instead he revealed himself to be a whore for the internet and then like a typical woman bitched when whoring made him rich and successful. People get too invested in content creators and this debate just proves that point further the leave it alone philosophy that kiwi farms has is a good one content just happens without (too much) of our influence obviously Nick and others read their threads and every cow has their share of a logs but we don’t go seek them out so they have to hear our autistic diarrhea. We are the one true content all hail the content
 
My unsolicited opinion is that nick is correct and I agree with him. He wants law opinions instead of palm readings and feels that the people doing analysis could better use their skills elsewhere.
I wish he went on that rant before his downward spiral, because he is 100% right. The jury analysis during the Depp trial was genuinely insufferable at points and DUI guy was basically writing fan fiction about the jury members. I haven’t watched the coverage of this ongoing trial so maybe it is less insufferable now. During certain trials the endless super chats from people begging Nick to bring on a body language expert, a pseudoscience, were an insight into how moronic the average trial watcher is and I was glad to see him shut that down then as I am now. Though he was very polite about shutting down the body language thing despite the super chats every stream, so it’s interesting how enraged he was here.

Shame he hates doing trial coverage so much and is an out and open borderline boomer coomer now, because he can run a show decently.

It must be said James from Court is insufferable and every so often he turns into a complete incel retard on Twitter.
 
Last edited:
I agree, but it may or may not affect your viewpoint to keep in mind that he took the case pro-bono because he was friends or something with the defendant. That was the crux of his telling off the judge if I'm remembering correctly. She made a comment about "being able to afford a lawyer so you should be able to afford restitution" or something similar and Nick just had to confront her in the elevator about it.
I'm ambivalent to the whole pro-bono thing because maybe she couldn't pay and nobody was willing to defend her, I don't know. But mouthing off to the judge (even in private) was probably the most retarded thing possible aside from maybe shittalking the judge publicly to the press (Which he did on youtube). Had he kept his mouth shut the judge would be at worst neutral to him. She could very well hate him now and rule against him as much as she can (without throwing the case) just to fuck him over.
 
Last edited:
I don't think "content is for the audience" is a retarded take. It literally means "the product is for the purchaser." I'm purchasing the product. If the product turns into shit, like Rackets's night show has, I'm taking my money/time/engagement elsewhere.

Now, to rebut each of the examples. Cancel culture and tranny brigading are specifically done NOT by the audience, but by some offended outsiders who aren't fans and weren't gonna buy the product anyway. And review bombing certainly has its place as a tool for disgruntled customers to express dissatisfaction. For example, to review a game on Steam, you must have it purchased. So it's an in-built check on whether you are, in fact, part of the audience.



I think feral cat was making a funny. You know, because Nick's not a real lawyer anymore.

Yes. Thought him ever being a real lawyer is questionable. At least before he would pretend to be a lawyer. Now he is seething coomer Nick. It's not just his law content that sucks now. We went from comfy big brain/chad dad panels to coomer caucuses with Camelot. Very disappointing.
 
In an alternate universe, Rick Nekieta exists. He’s swoll, a welder, never heard of anime, and hates lawyers
 

Attachments

  • 3E93B36E-0D91-4151-8F35-FC6DA242AA2E.jpeg
    3E93B36E-0D91-4151-8F35-FC6DA242AA2E.jpeg
    81.2 KB · Views: 75
I consider it on topic, because it criticism of someone just uncritically parroting a Nick bad take. Nick was pushing that shit hard during the trial, and it's a good example of how wet behind the ears Nick is. He's near a decade into his "practice" and committing the baby-lawyer sin of getting overly attached to a misreading of the statute that he likes/makes his side win. Pro tip: if you can't talk you most skeptical college (I recall brancha and Kurt giving him friction)into your analysis atleast being a maybe, then the judge will probably no sell it.
@feral cat #6385 was just being cheeky
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2023-02-09 at 8.32.35 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2023-02-09 at 8.32.35 PM.png
    28 KB · Views: 38
Last edited:
1. 9/10 trials aren't publicized so we don't know about them.
2. 9/10 trials aren't filmed or streamed.
3. Legal documents are almost always dense and boring. We don't always get Russell Greer's or Maddox's that make them hilarious.

He could cover the dumb as shit celebrity trials but Emily Baker has the monopoly on that and I don't think Nicks audience gives a fuck who Cardi B fucks and sues this week.
He makes his money by making some shit entertaining or explaining why shit like Maddox was insanely stupid within the law.
I’m criticizing Nick for being a lazy fuck and waiting for shit to fall in his lap. He always had two audiences: the legal nerds and the Dick Show/ Kiwi Farms people.

The issue I have with Nick is that he very lazily subsisted on the news cycle of stuff under Trump, SCOTUS, and Big Cases. He at some point did prep for shows by reading stuff ahead of time and then reading it on stream with notes actually ready. I don’t think he ever put any thought into how to grow his channel beyond sheer luck and his rants about being a social media expert make me slightly MATI. The AIDS-ridden polack never even got his editor to timestamp videos or add chapters to his videos.

I have no issues with paying someone to edit your shit or manage social media accounts, but Nick basically pays someone worse than Elissa or the trolls now mocking him.
 
Not sure but I'm keeping a loose list of who's going.

"BREAKING NEWS" the location has been published:




The guy who runs the place is a big Trumper: https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/...hotel-11k-for-coronavirus-violations-2106371/

One assumes it'll be in the room pictured in the above article. Nick has said there is a stage.
A hotel event room. I could not possibly imagine a more boring situation. Sitting around those dumb circle tables with a bunch of other strangers who are only there to talk about Coomerman, Balldo's, and reminiscing about Locals chats of yore. All while Nick hosts a subpar podcast on stage that you can hopefully hear in your uncomfortable seats, half of which will have to be turned around so you aren't even able to rest your arms on the table. I want to shoot myself just thinking about it. Why didn't he do it at a bar or something more open and social?

Imagine you are one of his remaining "normal" fans going to the event completely unaware of his downward spiral and degeneracy and getting stuck at a table with ACompleteRandom, Sally, GingerSnaps, and RobinFox. Will the schizo get two seats and switch between them as she talks to herself?
 
From late September 2022, Nick feels the need to talk about sex because the Church doesn't, but when it does, the Church conditions and breaks us to think sex is only for procreation and only in the missionary position:

View attachment 4480700

Apparently asking fellow church-goers about their sex lives is something Nick does. This correlates with his odd interest in his parent's sex life. Nick needs to know, and if you don't tell, you are a broken and conditioned prude. This is not healthy behavior.

Conservative churches do address sexuality (same-sex marriage being a prime example). Nick seems to interpret not discussing sex lives at church as being done out of fear, and not out of respect for privacy (or because they just aren't interested).

Nick's description of conservative Christian churches are too extreme to not be a strawman. These days there are more churches drifting away from conservative values, with ministers who dress in drag as they minister to children now. I think Drag Me to Church was done at a Lutheran church for example, and society is suffering for this permissiveness. Still, Nick's cartoonish caricature of conservative Christians seems to serve his purposes as long as you don't look too closely and watch a lot of cartoon/television shows.

Yeah, Churches have marriage classes and if you do any research, even the most conservative ones include sexuality as a discussion topic.

I don't know about permissive, so much as silent. They all have this haunted look you see that first year your kid comes home from liberal arts school.
 
Yes. Thought him ever being a real lawyer is questionable. At least before he would pretend to be a lawyer. Now he is seething coomer Nick. It's not just his law content that sucks now. We went from comfy big brain/chad dad panels to coomer caucuses with Camelot. Very disappointing.
"Coomer caucuses". I love it.
A hotel event room. I could not possibly imagine a more boring situation. Sitting around those dumb circle tables with a bunch of other strangers who are only there to talk about Coomerman, Balldo's, and reminiscing about Locals chats of yore. All while Nick hosts a subpar podcast on stage that you can hopefully hear in your uncomfortable seats, half of which will have to be turned around so you aren't even able to rest your arms on the table. I want to shoot myself just thinking about it. Why didn't he do it at a bar or something more open and social?

Imagine you are one of his remaining "normal" fans going to the event completely unaware of his downward spiral and degeneracy and getting stuck at a table with ACompleteRandom, Sally, GingerSnaps, and RobinFox. Will the schizo get two seats and switch between them as she talks to herself?
And not only a subpar podcast, it's a coomer caucus with Dick and Camelot. Any event where late stage Rekieta is the least degenerate panelist should be banned on obscenity grounds.
 
I didn't see anyone talking about it much but I listened to most of the Flawd show last night and overall I thought it was an alright show, decent conversation, low degen talk, but I didn't finish it so it could've devolved after i stopped listening. At one point Nick seemed to almost recognize he has a drinking problem, of course he qualifies it saying instead he drinks too much "sometimes" and doesn't list alcohol when talking about "the only thing" he was addicted to being Everquest.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Catching up on my logger backlog. Here is the Murdaugh Day 9 stream archive with a raging Carimachet in it

Raging at Nick because she is 'built differnent

Carimachet
[TD]
Rackets is corrupt​
[/TD]
Carimachet​
Rackets can you stop 🛑 whining like a 7 year old​

Carimachet​
I almost died as a child > and many times so I don’t really corrupt in the same way it’s a long story that you could give one fuck about you just want to be right and argue which is corrupt​

Carimachet​
Rackets is too hormonal​

Carimachet​
Yes men actually do have hormonal embalances rackets as a medical professional I have knowledge of that and as a legal professional you have a massive white man rich guy blind spot biases which is against legal frames constructed over millennia get out of your own way​

Carimachet​
Rackets Cries about no motive gets evidence of motive whines like a ten year old about it mistates that financial ruin is not a motive historically​

Carimachet​
Rackets what’s the motive *whining​

Why do I have no humour?

Carimachet​
Are you called a whore by kiwi farms like the others in chat ?​

Carimachet​
Why doesn’t kiwi farms call you a white even though you were the first to show your ass in chat and they call lady rackets a whore​

Carimachet​
You love people calling Sally a whore and giving you a pass even though you showed your ass first in chat ?​

panzerdood​
wat happen to sally​

panzerdood​
i was anawares​

Carimachet​
You like panzer making fun of Sally being raped as an attack on her in chat ?​

panzerdood​
cari pls u know am retard i was entirely unaware​

Carimachet​
You a cgoody chat bot making fun of Sally for being a rape victim as an attack on her > you attacked her​

panzerdood​
saying "that tick was a god damn rapist" is not an attack on sally bby​

Carimachet​
You attacked her for being a victim of rape cgoody chat bot​

panzerdood​
wassa joke​

Carimachet​
You are unaware of what you write here just ask your frens on kiwi farms to show you their vast collection of everything that is said here like your friends say they have copies of and threaten people in here with​

panzerdood​
josh moon is my bestest fren i will axe him​

panzerdood​
i can be ur enemy cari is fine​

Carimachet​
Targeting people that have been raped with a rape “joke” is not a joke but harassment and you get to hide behind anonymity and not be held accountable because once again you are an infant​

Carimachet​
Cgoody is death​

Carimachet​
You are death​

panzerdood​
pls no do​

Carimachet​
You and Mandy were in love with YouTube mods last night and ganged up on sally called her a whore and targeted her with rape jokes Mandy is a YouTube mod so is cgoody (steam grp. whatever)​

Carimachet​
It’s rackets YouTube mods and chat bots coming into chat and shitting all over the place threatening people with all the data that has been gathered by kiwi farms calling sally a whore then acting like Mandy didn’t start the whole ass showing in chat and massively in love with Mandy why isn’t Mandy called a whore too and threatened? Rackets is responsible for his mod and chat bot insanity attacking people in chat​

Carimachet​
You think it’s the first time I talked with someone as vapid of life as you are ?​

Carimachet​
Zino was also a bag of meat last night too​

Carimachet​
More chat bot rape joke’s because you are anonymous you think there’s no blowback for your disgusting behavior > watch what happens​

They ran to bug Nose:

RekietaLaw​
I still don't even know what happened​

panzerdood​
i did make a joke about a tick raping me tho​

RekietaLaw​
something happened, a couple people reached out​

Carimachet​
Of course not >>>>> it’s perfectly fine for me to have to read someone talking about suicide in your chat because of the horror of your YouTube mods and cgoody chat bots​

Julia543​
Kalea and Elissa Clips were in chat last night and everybody was on edge. Some people were saying they had no clue who Kalea was and Steve C and Andrew and Xino were trying to say she’s an OG. Then because Xino said that, Kalea got labelled Cynthia 2.0 which is bullshit. Pretty much everybody calmed down because it was bad moods flaring up, except for Cari who is being Cari​
BartonBella​
Be straight with me. We're there rape jokes directed at a rape victim​
Caligulove​
Why is everyone being a faggot? Cease this faggotry at once, please​
panzerdood​
im just glad i was there to offend everyone​
panzerdood​
yw​
Buzzion​
carimachet is blowing it way out of proportion, but Sally was upset from Kalea coming in with Elissa and praising the kiwi fags​

Carimachet​
I know and asking sally about your trauma regarding it some big joke the. The person talks about suicide and you don’t give one fuck chat bot​

Carimachet​
Saying that is fine but targeting someone that you know has been raped with some rape “joke” crosses a line into targeted harassment and it’s very unethical and sociopathic > especially when elissa brings in her little YouTube mod of rackets friend come in and start fucking with sally at the same time​

panzerdood​
i made a joke about a tick raping me nick​


People Call Cari out
Julia543​
For fucks sake, Kalea has been here, Elissa didn’t bring her in​

Charlie101101​
Shocking with Cari 🙄

Still-Life​
Everyone deserves to be raped now.​

Carimachet​
Meanwhile Mandy that began the whole showing your ass in chat is well loved by the chat bots and YouTube mods > and she loves the YouTube mods too > why ? But sally is somehow a whore ??????​

Julia543​
I like Cari and I’m annoyed she’s bringing up stuff right now. Both can be true​

MrStirFry99​
are you bi-polar?​

Carimachet​
You are death​

icancook​
whore who YOU TO TELL PEOPLE what they can joke about​

Carimachet​
It’s not a joke if it’s targeted harassment you think it’s ok to joke about someone’s rape ?​

MemoreX​
if you can take dick you can take a joke. One can also always close the browser, if internet is too scary​

Cari Proceeds to call people CHAT BOT as SPAM like 30 times

Carimachet​
Chat bot​


Nose found another venue

RekietaLaw​
GUYS, I MAY HAVE JUST GOTTEN A VENUE FOR AN ACTUAL REASONABLE PRICE​


Chat wanted Douggy Tenapples to go to VEGAS?

nerfmild​
Invite Dante​

RekietaLaw​
dante?​

nerfmild​
From your outro music​

Julia543​
The guests are plentiful from dante?? to Drexel​
MemoreX​
Your outro: Guests are plentiful from Dante to Drex or sumthin​

RekietaLaw​
DOUG T​
MemoreX​
DOUG of course​

Julia543​
🤣🤣🤣🤣 tell him chat renamed him Dante​

Nose in TN in Autumn and more

RekietaLaw​
OK, Going to be in Nashville week of SEPT 12th, confirmed. Starting to plan that Meetup​

RachelTheRiveter​
I forsee a nationwide tour coming​

RekietaLaw​
Vegas, Philly, Houston, Nashville so far​

nerfmild​
RACKETS LIVE! ON ICE! THE FUCK LAWTUBE TOUR!​

RekietaLaw​
Vegas is going to be closer to budget...Venue way cheaper, but guessing I'm gonna get hit with add-ons. I'm HAPPY to add on shit if I can, though​

Vegas Details:

RekietaLaw​
POTENTIALLY an open bar....waiting for full quote​

RekietaLaw​
I said I'm not trying to MAKE money. I'm just trying to get people out to have some fucking fun.​

Julia543​
Lol the bar was the answer to your question​

BabouTheOcicat​
Yep. Nick might be a stingy lawyer but he takes care of his fans.​
nerfmild​
I'll be drinking whiskey, not Tequila....no risk of my pants coming off unless I shit myself​

Lady Rackets hiding:

Andrew_Wahoo​
When's your next YouTube video?​

RealLadyRackets​
Not sure. I'm laying low.​


White knight brags

Andrew_Wahoo​
I love people in here 87% of the time. Pretty sure I made Elissa cry yesterday.​
 

Attachments

Vegas, Philly, Houston, Nashville
What a fine selection of shitholes he plans to have meetups in. I recommend Gaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center for Nashville, would be fitting. Are those also going to be paid things? Hard to imagine paying money to speak to a drunk retard, let alone in a crime ridden wasteland.
 
Last edited:
Back