- Joined
- Aug 13, 2018
See the Ukrainian forces.
No.
Russia started with more than 3000 tanks, and currently only has 1800 tanks available for its new offensive. That is what you call “considerably less equipment”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See the Ukrainian forces.
No.
Russia started with more than 3000 tanks, and currently only has 1800 tanks available for its new offensive. That is what you call “considerably less equipment”
Are you seriously claiming Russia invaded with 15000 men and a force of more the 3000 tanks. Do you even realize how dumb that statement is ? If you're going to lie at least try to make it believable.
Russia had 150,000 men and 3000 tanks in the first wave. In the second wave, Russia has more people, less overall equipment, and is currently experiencing record casualties as a result.
One, this is not the place for this, second, orders from Null. That shit hurts our SEO.Why? That makes no sense. I could understand mandating full articles to be spoilered so they don't waste screen space, but this?
If you can't obey the rules, then not here.so where are we going to shitpost about the slawslapfight?
Because AT is under jurisdiction of AT mods. Null doesn't personally rewrite rules.and why didnt deer feeder make a post about it like he does for everything`? is this a case of jannies taking over? are we taken over?
Lmao. This thread, and the A&N were a trashfire long before me. Incidently, I'm the reason why this thread didn't get deleted, quite a bit of a desire from Mods to toss this (and possibly the A&N one into the trash bin).@Useful_Mistake --Why are both threads such trashfires only since you started jannying
This thread is general discussion. All discussion should go here. The A&N thread is not for discussion, unless it directly relates to the article discussion. Happenings thread is more discussion based, A&N thread is more of a repository of information.Trying to make the 2 Uke threads into two cookie-cutter [information] [discussion] threads will never work. People like to comment in the same thread where the info is posted, and every single non-regular-Ukethread-user (99% of the site) won't read/find the rules and will just post in the 'wrong one'.
If you want a circle jerk (for either side), go somewhere else. Either people can discuss things here, or they can't, and both threads get deleted. Let me make this perfectly clear, this is the last chance for both threads to survive. Neither of these threads has a great mod approval. Both of them have mods wanting to kill those threads. I want these threads to survive. Behave. Want to slapfight? There is a thread for that in mass debates with my name on it. There is also one in Deep Thoughs.You want to end slapfighting and get both threads back to posting info/videos and civilly discussing things? Let this thread be the neutral/pro-RUS thread and A&N be the pro-Uke thread. Or lock this thread and create 2 separate Happenings threads for both camps. I think everyone in both camps would agree that what you're doing is not working and is just shitting everything up - and would agree that just for Christ sake, please stop jannying.
One, this is not the place for this, second, orders from Null. That shit hurts our SEO.
If you can't obey the rules, then not here.
Because AT is under jurisdiction of AT mods. Null doesn't personally rewrite rules.
Lmao. This thread, and the A&N were a trashfire long before me. Incidently, I'm the reason why this thread didn't get deleted, quite a bit of a desire from Mods to toss this (and possibly the A&N one into the trash bin).
This thread is general discussion. All discussion should go here. The A&N thread is not for discussion, unless it directly relates to the article discussion. Happenings thread is more discussion based, A&N thread is more of a repository of information.
If you want a circle jerk (for either side), go somewhere else. Either people can discuss things here, or they can't, and both threads get deleted. Let me make this perfectly clear, this is the last chance for both threads to survive. Neither of these threads has a great mod approval. Both of them have mods wanting to kill those threads. I want these threads to survive. Behave. Want to slapfight? There is a thread for that in mass debates with my name on it. There is also one in Deep Thoughs.
Any further discussion on the rules or complaints should either be made in a seperate Mass Debates thread, TtS, or DMs.
Normally there's always at least one MSM outfit who'll take a playful swipe at one of the others for being grossly wrong or out-of-line.
All this actions are to make better deal for USA.He's just pointing out the US shouldn't be dicing with Nuclear War, blowing up pipelines and sending $120 billion when the US is in dire economic straights.
The US has consistently supported Ukraine since after the fall of the Soviet Union. With Russia’s resources being in competition with US resources (mainly gas), it’s natural that on paper, Russia and the US would be opposed to each other. Additionally, Russia has their own ideology they want to dominate, which is different from US ideology. Ukraine acts as a nice buffer to Russia’s influence spreading, at least that’s what neocons/neolibs believe. Even if public opinion changes on supporting Ukraine, the official US stance is still going to be in favor of Ukraine because of the politicians. I personally don’t particularly care for either side in this war, but it is what it is.The only major outlet I've seen pushing back has been Tucker on FOX. And he isn't getting into the weeds. He's just pointing out the US shouldn't be dicing with Nuclear War, blowing up pipelines and sending $120 billion when the US is in dire economic straights.
I guess the establishment orders still stand. Whip the public into a frenzy over Putin.
All this actions are to make better deal for USA.
Smashing pipe - to be sure that after wart EU will still buy natgas from USA, nto from east.
No, it didn't. You do realize that's more 10 plus tank battalions. Something that would mean that on average a infantry support for said battalion would be 15 men or less. And even more less, if you take into account artillery, recon, motorized rifle units separate of the tank battalion etc, etc. There is no army that would have such TO&E. or OOB setup.
You're clearly making stupid shit up like a fucking 8 year old.
Edit
Christ, if Russia really did invade with 3000 tanks its invading arm would be the size of a million and a half more or less.
From what we can tell, Bakhmut is basically lost and the AFU is pulling out as much as they can and leaving a skeleton crew to hold the Russians back until they do.Honest Question, can some one on both sides of this war give a current sit-rep? All my news sources just stopped talking about Ukraine all together, they seem to be worried about weather balloons of mass distraction.
Is the war over? who won? where is the front line at if not? how is this shit flinging slav fight going? I am starting to miss my State sponsored Propaganda over media silence ...... can I get a clue?
I will state this again - all such losses will by paid with use of confiscated assets. That 300 B. Probably not a dime will return to previous owners.someone now has to pay money to repair it
Actually the cuckservatard MAGApede side of "politicians" in the US would likely sabotage all the help to Ukraine since they are fully gayopped by Russia and think that a country of 40M is only relevant because some nearly dead democrap president had shady deals there.The US has consistently supported Ukraine since after the fall of the Soviet Union. With Russia’s resources being in competition with US resources (mainly gas), it’s natural that on paper, Russia and the US would be opposed to each other. Additionally, Russia has their own ideology they want to dominate, which is different from US ideology. Ukraine acts as a nice buffer to Russia’s influence spreading, at least that’s what neocons/neolibs believe. Even if public opinion changes on supporting Ukraine, the official US stance is still going to be in favor of Ukraine because of the politicians. I personally don’t particularly care for either side in this war, but it is what it is.
It’s a faction, but even within that group, Trump supports Ukraine. His support differs from the Biden administration, as he would rather the war end with Russia getting the land they captured and leaving the rest alone. Biden just wants the war to prolong.Actually the cuckservatard MAGApede side of "politicians" in the US would likely sabotage all the help to Ukraine since they are fully gayopped by Russia and think that a country of 40M is only relevant because some nearly dead democrap president had shady deals there.
How is forcing Ukraine to lose 25% or so of its lands and emerge from a war nearly destroyed "support", lmao?It’s a faction, but even within that group, Trump supports Ukraine. His support differs from the Biden administration, as he would rather the war end with Russia getting the land they captured and leaving the rest alone. Biden just wants the war to prolong.
The more eastern parts of Ukraine are historically pro-Russia. Western Ukraine is more pro-Ukraine. I see it as a good compromise. Offering nothing and a winner take all stance is how you get a war to last longer, and that’s what Zelensky is pushing. Wars typically have to end in some compromise.How is forcing Ukraine to lose 25% or so of its lands and emerge from a war nearly destroyed "support", lmao?
Trump did send funding to Ukraine in 2019. He isn’t against aid, but he finds the increase to sending tanks a bad sign of escalation. You don’t want to escalate too fast, otherwise it becomes a situation you can’t control. Ukraine aid overall is actually cheap compared to spending on the welfare state in the US, so it’s really a crapshoot with the Biden administration. On one hand, sending foreign aid has the risk of making the war larger, but on the other hand, the money spent domestically is far from ideal. Either way, money is being spent less than optimally.Trump is what the pro-Russia side wanted, and still want the most. He's the only candidate that has alluded to stopping aid and funding to Ukraine.