Culture Have More Sex Please



By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
On one hand it's both men and women's fault. The gigachads for slampigging it and the below average woman for letting them. But it seems it'd be easier to tell women not to spread their legs that soon rather than tell men not to desire a warm hole.
when you look at the big picture, neither of them is really at fault because they're simply operating as individuals inside the established rules of society.
the fault lies squarely with those who engineered society into this dysfunctional and self-destructive state in the first place - feminists, marxists, leftists in general.

so when you go supreme gentleman, don't take out your anger on random roasties on the street, they have no more power or responsibility than you. instead, go for politicians, academics, journalists, activists, etc. those are the actual culprits.
 
At the end of the day-female autonomy in mating choices has been restricted in some form in every society barring maybe the most primitive hunter gatherers in fuck off jungles somewhere.

Women do not make rational choices, and do not plan for the future or with the stability of society in mind. Men do. You either get female autonomy and the rot of the past sixty years or you repress women with the brutality and cruelty that entails and you get philosophy, science, architecture, religion, and aspirations beyond the mud hut.

Of course women will complain and protest this-because God did not make them as dumb as animals, so men dealt with this by ensuring women couldn't read or write, and that their ability to grasp ideas was limited. Letting women understand anything beyond pregnancy and house cleaning was a massive mistake.

Eventually Western Civilization will degenerate to an African level of animal savagery-the liberation of the female libido, is the cause of this. A civilization that reached for the stars descending back to the mud hut.

This is the true consequence of "women's lib".

when you look at the big picture, neither of them is really at fault because they're simply operating as individuals inside the established rules of society.
the fault lies squarely with those who engineered society into this dysfunctional and destructive state in the first place - feminists, marxists, leftists in general.

so when you go supreme gentleman, don't take out your anger on random roasties on the street, they have no more power or responsibility than you. instead, go for politicians, academics, journalists, activists, etc. those are the actual culprits.
You mean the Jews.
 
sounds like youre projecting
Sure, I'm pro-free speech, but if we could filter out "your/you're/yur/youre projecting" and "midwit" from the internet, let's please do. It's like every conversation is full of 140 IQ research psychologists.

I'm not projecting - you're just an asshole.

He's not a midwit - he's as dumb as you are and you just disagree with him.
 
If A&N was a reflection of the real world and not just gay incel slapfight, the white race is doomed. If you dont want your world over run with niggers, then get fucking and make white babies. This is what Hitler wanted. You love your race? Do you want to be buck broken by niggers? Your choice, either make white babies or ride nigger dick.
Remember, A&N its up to you to save the white race from nigger infestation!
I couldn't care less about racial politics but could you please hide your lust for new taxpayers a bit better? It's creeping me out.
 
If A&N was a reflection of the real world and not just gay incel slapfight, the white race is doomed. If you dont want your world over run with niggers, then get fucking and make white babies. This is what Hitler wanted. You love your race? Do you want to be buck broken by niggers? Your choice, either make white babies or ride nigger dick.
Remember, A&N its up to you to save the white race from nigger infestation!

You're right which is why I'm absolutely in favor of disposing of marital rape laws, mass cloning, and implementing policies that insist all White girls be pregnant from 15-30.
 
I am not reading the article, but no sex is the symptom and saying having more or just do it will not help and lead into more issues that are common in lonely people. It is like saying to a grieving person “be joyful.” Sex should be seen as the fulfillment of a healthy relationship not a end in itself. The issue is men (and women in this case) are not forming relationships that lead to fulfillment
Exactly, sex is not enjoyable if you can't do it with someone that you actually feel attraction to. That's what a lot of people do not understand. You don't necessarily need a "relationship" to have sex you just have to be on the same page as your partner(s).
strong "poor? just make more money lol" vibes
except with that situation, money/wealth/value is not finite and people can actually create it out of thin air through work/labor.
but with relationships that isn't the case - unlike the economy, the dating market really is a zero sum game.
This is largely true, except that a lot of poor people don't have any financial skills and are either don't have disposable income or they impulse buy everything they want, or other contributing factors. The whole "you don't need food stamps" meme is a bit on the nose and kind of gives off the vibe that having a lower income automatically means that you don't deserve to enjoy life or have a couple of nice things for yourself.

That picture does look like something from a blackpill forum but to be honest, maybe things always have been that way, to an extent. The myth that the 1950s is some magical era where everything was wonderful in America does continue to persist, but it's easy to imagine life in a time and place that you have never experienced personally especially if your life now is not that great. Nostalgia's one hell of a drug.
I was perfectly willing to have as much sex as I could get until women convinced me it wasn't worth the trouble.
I don't think the author meant that you should have sex with women.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
How if no one is ever attracted to you or displays any interest?

If you're ugly or socially awkward enough it's virtually impossible.

Why are you poor? Just be rich brah. Same energy.
Just have the government give people girlfriends and money and they'll stop being poor and lonely! WRITE YOUR GOVERNMENTS!

I kinda miss Marjan sometimes, that dude was funny.
lol no. female promiscuity numbers are at record highs.
women put out more than ever before in history, just not in a way that is healthy or useful to anybody in the long run
Yeah, with the same handful of guys every other woman is, then they be at work like "Dude you gotta try Tinder it's full of sluts it's crazy" to the office nerd, not realizing that his perception of reality, or results, isn't even close to some others. If you want to have sex with random sluts more power to you, but it's not for everyone.
the reason their a “loneliness epidemic” is that the social simulators are getting good enough that you don’t actually need to interact with others at all and still have your social needs fulfilled.

i never leave the house unless i need to because everyone out there is either a miserable cunt like me, a scammer, a moron or a political person. why would i interact with these low quality people when i can just put on a podcast and have all my social needs filled while i actually get something done?
I despise "social simulators" as much as I do most people. But you're definitely on point. Hell, if you put anything other than "I like football, beer, popular music, Disney+, and my pickup truck" or something stupid like that, they'll probably not show interest in the first place. God forbid you have an interest in, I dunno, ancient history or home gardening or something else that I would consider more engaging.
I like this pic and the Tweet:
View attachment 4530241
On point for a "drift" party as those nips have drifted wonkily apart. Almost Keffals-tier cleavage.
They look so fake and bolted on, probably an "upgrade" to get more viewers for her LonelyFaps account.
So it's our fault for their rampant degeneracy because we don't make enough money? Seriously? How the hell is that supposed to work? Men aren't the majority making the decision to end marriages.
Just because you're married to her, doesn't mean she loves you.
I don’t need to have sex. I’m a Kiwi Farms A&H regular.
Same here, and I'm a fundie incel manlet despite being over 6 feet tall, atheist, and having had more sexual experience than your average Redditor.
Terminally online people also get blackpilled about society a lot easier. The Farms, 4chan, twatter and many other places on the internet tend to highlight the worst of the worst. In reality you have good odds of running into decent people out there if you don't do stupid shit and just live your life a bit.
Running to the web is a pretty bad form of cope.
I was blackpilled long before the internet was a thing, we just didn't have a term for it.
Yeah, it's not women who tailored the economy to make it impossible for a single income to support a household. Watch the women interviewed, they say that they can't wait to give the job back to the men, when they return home from the war.

Hint: They invented feminism to trick women into working during their childbearing years, own the banks and wear small hats.
You can support a household on a single income if you're the only one living in it.
 
"Sure!"

1676470457337.png


"NO NO NOT LIKE THAT!!!"
 
I couldn't care less about racial politics but could you please hide your lust for new taxpayers a bit better? It's creeping me out.
Taxpayers? WTF you talking about. Its really strange I use language that is normal to here, and talk about saving the white race and Im still wrong. There is really is no pleasing some people. You know what would fix this? Thats right, having more sex.
But I can see how this must really get your panties in wad. Id be mad too is someone told me to have sex when It was never going to happen in the first place. So my advice to you is: have more sex, but sadly you dont have the balls too. My sympathies for being deemed unfuckable and destined to be a genetic dead end by nature. I really feel for your parents, they will knever know the joys of being grandparents.
 
Taxpayers? WTF you talking about. Its really strange I use language that is normal to here, and talk about saving the white race and Im still wrong. There is really is no pleasing some people. You know what would fix this? Thats right, having more sex.
But I can see how this must really get your panties in wad. Id be mad too is someone told me to have sex when It was never going to happen in the first place. So my advice to you is: have more sex, but sadly you dont have the balls too. My sympathies for being deemed unfuckable and destined to be a genetic dead end by nature. I really feel for your parents, they will knever know the joys of being grandparents.
OK-taking your premise seriously, what if I propose legalizing rape and bride kidnapping to save the White race?

Not that I am proposing that-but if we really take "saving the White race" as our overarching priority then surely any means to do is justified no? If not, why not?
 
Isn't badgering random women for sex almost universally seen as sexual harrassment at best these days?

I'd rather not be a social pariah.
That's not simply being a social pariah, that's inviting much worse. I know of a guy at my gym that's doing stuff like that and it's not endearing anyone to his cause.
And wouldn't you know, the woman who authored this article has an Onlyfans? She farms attention on all sides of this issue -- even her substack is quasi-titillating stuff about porn and men's sex issues so she can appeal to a wider array of coomers.
Failing to connect with others can be a really bitter pill to swallow, especially when you know it’s due to shit that is now typical of modern relationships, which are more like burdensome flings than meaningful commitment if they ever even take off.

I’m sure that the people who try, get scorned, and then retreat to the internet to cope are still the overwhelming majority. Give it time, though. Soon there’ll be more people who outright refuse to try at all due to how doompilling the current state of things. There will be a lot of young people getting exposed to the ills of the average modern relationship and to the internet’s most predatory parasocial shit before they even know what sex is - if they don’t get molested by a troon first.
Like I said, they didn't necessarily mean for men to have sex with women. They just want the non-Chads out of the pool.
They're there to have drinks and hang out with friends. Almost every woman says she doesn't want to deal with random men when out in public.
That being said, a bar is not a good place for most men to meet a decent woman. Especially if you don't want someone who drinks.
 
It's ironic that many people in my generation think that if you're not getting laid 24-7 you're a loser, and yet are hostile to the idea of being parents. But who cares, we can just import more people if nobody's fucking making them.
Well, due to birth control and abortion, current generations have managed to separate sex from procreation as two different things that have nothing in common to each other. Some of them are really surprised when, despite their use of birth control, a pregnancy still happen. They really thing they can be completely irresponsible about sex without having to worry about becoming a parent.

And yes, it's funny that they are so hypersexualised that they think not having sex every other day is a bad thing and it's even granted to be called "asexuality". You woke up and don't feel like any man around you is hot enough that you should bang his brains out? Then worry, darling, you are now asexual.
 
They're lying. They want to be approached by the right men and be completely invisible to all the others.
Have your cake and eat it too, that sums up dating in current year for sure. Before anyone says shit maybe it's always been this way.
The question is: when will women finally decide "oh, the hell with this" about social status the way more and more men are doing with sex?
Women are dependent on social status it's practically their survival mechanism. On the other hand a man is much more likely to be able to survive on his own out on a frontier of some sort. It's just how our brains are wired.
Once again, this an economic issue. People don't have sex because they can't afford the outcome of sex which is kids. You aren't going to screw too many women without getting one pregnant. The decline in birth rates follows the deindustrialization of the US. Then you have all the legal and illegal foreign labor making things worse. All thanks to capitalism. Capitalism has to go. We need something else. This capitalism shit isn't working. It's destroying the country and making sure white people go the way of the Dodo and Dinosaurs.
Nobody wants your white nerd dick, women only want the BBC.

Yeah, let's try communism again! We'll do it right this time!
Hard to do that when women, like this writer, would probably be disgusted by my "problematic" views.
Like what? Like how you don't want to jack off while watching her get fucked by a conga line of random men from Tinder? Yeah that would probably do it.
 
Back