How Biden's New Washing Machine Regulations Could Ruin Laundry Day - They're waging a war on all appliances, not just gas stoves

Manufacturers say government climate change initiative would make your washing cycles longer, clothes dirtier​

1678841185803.png
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 25: U.S. President Joe Biden makes an announcement on additional military support for Ukraine in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on January 25, 2023 in Washington, DC. President Biden said the U.S. will send 31 M-1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine to aid in their fight against Russia after Germany approved the delivery of Leopard 2 tanks to Kyiv. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Collin Anderson
March 13, 2023

When Cincinnati firefighter Ed Wallace bought a high efficiency Whirlpool washing machine, he came to regret the decision almost immediately. The machine used less water—not enough to clean Wallace's work clothes—and his colleagues at the firehouse quickly took notice. "I walked past my guys and they say, 'Dude, you stink!'" Wallace said. "I smelled myself, and yeah, that's me stinking."

Now, President Joe Biden is pushing regulations that could force Wallace's stinky situation upon millions of Americans.

Biden's Energy Department last month proposed new efficiency standards for washing machines that would require new appliances to use considerably less water, all in an effort to "confront the global climate crisis." Those mandates would force manufacturers to reduce cleaning performance to ensure their machines comply, leading industry giants such as Whirlpool said in public comments on the rule. They'll also make the appliances more expensive and laundry day a headache—each cycle will take longer, the detergent will cost more, and in the end, the clothes will be less clean, the manufacturers say.

The proposed washing machine rule marks the latest example of the administration turning to consumer regulations to advance its climate change goals. Last month, the Energy Department published an analysis of its proposed cooking appliance efficiency regulations, which it found would effectively ban half of all gas stoves on the U.S. market from being sold. The department has also proposed new efficiency standards for refrigerators, which could come into effect in 2027. "Collectively these energy efficiency actions … support President Biden's ambitious clean energy agenda to combat the climate crisis," the Energy Department said in February.

While the Energy Department—which did not return a request for comment—acknowledged in its proposal that "maintaining acceptable cleaning performance can be more difficult as energy and water levels are reduced," it expressed confidence that Whirlpool and other appliance manufacturers can comply with its regulations without sacrificing stain removal and other performance standards. For the Heritage Foundation's Travis Fisher, however, manufacturer concerns over the proposal are justified.

"When you're squeezing all you can out of the efficiency in terms of electricity use and water … you by definition either make the appliance worse or slower," said Fisher, who serves as a senior research fellow at the foundation's Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment. "Why are we so focused on the energy output, as opposed to if it's helping me wash my clothes? That standard has kind of gone off the rails."

Beyond the performance standard debate, the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers argued that the Energy Department's washing machine regulations "would have a disproportionate, negative impact on low-income households" by eliminating cheaper appliances from the market. The Energy Department estimates that manufacturers will incur nearly $700 million in conversion costs to transition to the new machines.

The department countered concerns over higher appliance prices by arguing in its proposal that consumers will ultimately save money under the regulations through lower energy and water bills. Still, those estimated savings won't apply to all consumers, roughly a quarter of whom "would experience a net cost" thanks to the efficiency rule, according to the Energy Department's proposal.

The Energy Department is required to conduct efficiency standard reviews every six years under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, which Congress enacted in 1975, two years after an Arab oil embargo inflated gas prices in the United States. The Clinton administration subsequently established the country's first washing machine energy and water efficiency standards in 2001, just before former president George W. Bush took office. Those standards led to "ruined laundry, ongoing maintenance, and service calls," prompting Whirlpool to release a cleaning product "specifically designed to address moldy washing machines," according to George Washington University's Sofie Miller.

The debacle has not stopped the Biden administration from moving forward with more stringent appliance energy efficiency standards, which have not been updated for washing machines since 2012. The tightening of those standards "could put performance at risk" but is unlikely to provide "meaningful energy savings," the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers says, because most appliances covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act "now operate at peak efficiency."

"They keep tightening the standards, and I'm not sure their reasoning makes sense anymore," Fisher told the Washington Free Beacon.

Source (Archive)
 
I don't need the nanny state to tell me how to wash my clothes and my ass, I've got it covered.
If we live in such a "global climate crisis", why do the rich still live by the ocean? Wouldn't it make more sense to live more inland to be protected from storms?
A cursory glance at the water levels over time in places like Ellis Island is enough to make people realize it's bullshit. If we really were a decade away from disaster, for real this time we promise, the nuclear industry wouldn't be getting mothballed.
 
If they're that worried about water, then how about they make it illegal to have grass lawns in SoCal, you know, where IT'S A FUCKING DESERT! and stop allowing pistachio and almond farmers to suck up all the water.
You can't, the Jewish family owning those almond farms will bribe all the environmental regulators and get the Colorado reservoir for themselves. That, and all the illegals drinking and pissing away the water. 22 million and counting.

I have one of those energy saving machines. You have to leave the door open after a wash or else you WILL get mould. Not only will you stink, you'll have mould spores all over you.
 
Jesus Christ. Its not like the water is lost to the void, eternally ported to hammerspace every time I do laundry. Water go in, water come out. Maybe rather than spending an absurd amount of money demanding everyone use shitty equipment to back up all these expensive environmental grift studies, why don't you just expand the water treatment capacity to actually reuse that fucking water instead of discharging it into the void. Then we can have our washing machines that work, you can pat your backs, and you can embezzle construction funds like the founding fathers intended.
 
We need to get back control of the government and gut the power of the agencies and PotUS once and for all.
We've reached peak bloat and governance has reached a point where it usually looks downright irrational, even malicious to people who actually understand how reality/life works and thus how things like money work. The people who are in charge of making laws and budgeting etc. are usually born into lives where money is seemingly unlimited to them and then they find in government it's pretty much the same way with printing etc. These are not the kind of people you want running governments. In fact they are probably the LEAST qualified of all people to do so.

I'm not gonna be optimistic and say it's gonna happen soon, but we really do need a reset. Not the one they want where we become serfs, but the one where governance is once again based around the common people and they have a lot of influence in policy. What we have right now is completely unsustainable in the long run. You can get the biggest, baddest, most expensive dam to hold back the deluge but the water is still gonna find a way through eventually. Nature always finds a way to bring balance back to itself.

Jesus Christ. Its not like the water is lost to the void, eternally ported to hammerspace every time I do laundry. Water go in, water come out. Maybe rather than spending an absurd amount of money demanding everyone use shitty equipment to back up all these expensive environmental grift studies, why don't you just expand the water treatment capacity to actually reuse that fucking water instead of discharging it into the void. Then we can have our washing machines that work, you can pat your backs, and you can embezzle construction funds like the founding fathers intended.
Fun fact: Virtually every drop of water on Earth was at one time or another consumed and pissed out by a dinosaur. No joke, totally deadass. Water does not dissappear as you say, it cannot be destroyed; it just cycles and renews itself for future use.
 
Last edited:
They think it's funny to make life worse for the average person, they get off on it.

These sociopaths don't give a flying fuck if the Earth is smoking rubble in a 100 years, all this "save the environment!" bullshit is pretense just so they can get their jollies by abusing their power to abuse the "little people"

They're not gonna be happy until we're all living in third world slums and they're eating filet Minot and lobster tails behind concrete walls guarded by heavily armed mercenaries.
 
>make new machines use less water to save water
>new machines don't clean clothes properly
>people wash clothes twice or wash in twice as many loads to compensate using twice as much water

Yup sure sounds like a smart idea to me.
It's amazing how King of the Hill predicted the future
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kane Lives
Your current gov. does too little to help anyone, but a lot to fuck them, though.
The feds can't and usually don't do much, is my point, and shouldn't be tasked to solve problems that a state or municipal government can solve. The most contact a US citizen has with the fed is through the yearly tax returns. The US is a big place and the people who make the decisions that affect the people the most are the cities and states. When Biden starts genociding people I'll change my tune about it being an average presidency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kane Lives
These fucking climate alarmist faggot elites want your cars neutered or gone, your stoves gone, your dryers and furnaces gone, they want you to not be able to afford gas powered backup generators, but they won't speak a peep about real pollution. China, India, Taiwan, global shipping, nor will they stop jet-setting in private jets that burn more fuel in a one way trip to a climate conference than you will in years if you drive a somewhat efficient car. 8hrs from DC to Davos at fucking 372gph in a Gulfstream GV is 2,976gal, I don't burn that much in two years and I drive fuel guzzling classic cars with a long commute, pleasure trips and road trips.
 
Yeah, that's fantastic and all, if you already have one. The "buy used" argument will only hold up for so many years as the supply dwindles. But hey, I guess it's okay for the government to force future generations to put up with a far shittier world than that of their parents, or even than the one they grew up in, because they aren't technically doing it at gunpoint, huh?
Similar things happened with trucks - search up “gliders”

 
>make new machines use less water to save water
>new machines don't clean clothes properly
>people wash clothes twice or wash in twice as many loads to compensate using twice as much water

Yup sure sounds like a smart idea to me.
reminds me of an old MAD Magazine article "The Frustrated Environmentalist". One of the examples was "Installs a low-flow shower head to save water....BUT, ends up standing under that pathetic trickle three times as long, using up just as much water anyway!"
 
wmachine.jpg

I have a Frigidaire one (not the one in the picture) that is about to accomplish 20 years of almost uninterrupted weekly service with only 2 mayor fixes on its lifetime. My dad handed it down to me when I got married as he bought a smaller White-Westinghouse refurbished from a washer repair business (and that one still works as intended). These machines are truly workhorses imho, and I will rather wait for a spare for mine to turn up or buy a older refurbished model than to get a overpriced "high efficiency" one.
 
Re: IoT

I bought an Ecobee thermostat for my house thinking it would be a convenient means to monitor my energy usage to lower my bill, and also to set up times for the HVAC unit to run, etc.

During one of the hottest days last summer where temperatures far exceeded 100 degree Fahrenheit, the energy department was able to throttle the A/C running in my house. It was easy enough to override, but external actors were able to stop services running in my house to “prevent brownouts on the grid”.

They can absolutely do the same with your wash machines…. Not that I’d understand the benefit of having your wash machine connected to the network anyway.
 
Re: IoT

I bought an Ecobee thermostat for my house thinking it would be a convenient means to monitor my energy usage to lower my bill, and also to set up times for the HVAC unit to run, etc.

During one of the hottest days last summer where temperatures far exceeded 100 degree Fahrenheit, the energy department was able to throttle the A/C running in my house. It was easy enough to override, but external actors were able to stop services running in my house to “prevent brownouts on the grid”.

They can absolutely do the same with your wash machines…. Not that I’d understand the benefit of having your wash machine connected to the network anyway.
those stupid thermostats have ONE thing and ONE THING ONLY going for them

you can change the temperature without getting off the couch

other than that all the shit they promise and advertise is just stupid bullshit

there is a SMALL possibility they would work for a goyslop bugman, but anyone with even a tiny family the damn thing just works like a regular programmable thermostat, but with additional government overreach and chinese spying

for washmachine and dryer sperging you can do worse than Derrick https://www.youtube.com/@derrickwith2rs
 
Back