Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

[Tilapia]

Aella has noticed and praised ymeskhout's article.
View attachment 4798312
source (a)
Almost forgot to mention, not only is he a Motte poster, he's also a janny there too.

Her "debate" with Meghan was a month ago and this bitch is still seething about it. But, as she always does, she refuses to attack directly and just lets her flying monkeys handle it, retweeting when necessary.

 

[Markass the Worst]

Her "debate" with Meghan was a month ago and this bitch is still seething about it. But, as she always does, she refuses to attack directly and just lets her flying monkeys handle it, retweeting when necessary.

Almost two months ago now, actually. The "debate" was streamed on January 20th.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Relatedly to the above, Martha Nussbaum as her own problems but I can't fault her critique of that style of writing (in this case talking about Judith Butler specifically) that narcissists seem to love where they're writing to an audience that is themselves:


Attached so you don't have to track it down if you'd like to read the whole thing.

 

[keke]

What the hell is "truthfinding"? It just sounds wrong in my head and I'm not sure what I can equate it to. Is it shorthand for finding oneself, or spirit quest, or whatever the phrases people use?

Truthfinding is a convenient term they use to say “my subjective opinions are factual” without actually saying that. They don’t say fact-finding (a commonly used phrase) because it is too obvious and rationalists are not allowed to say their opinion is fact only heavily imply it, since they lean into philosophy and not science. With truthfunding, truth is beyond fact, multiple things can be true and factual at once but there is only one truth… so again, their truth (subjective opinions) become fact.

By the end of treatment, 131 inmates (85%) admitted to hands-on abuse.

Good time for me to mention something that has irritated me about her AI CP take since I first heard it. I heard a podcast with the How To Catch A Predator host where he mentioned the show worked with a criminal psychologist, might not be the actual job description but close enough. She told the shows team about her work, like when she interviewed every single inmate, convicted of child sexual abuse, across a couple prisons. Every single one of them said they started viewing CP before attacking real children. It’s basically the reverse of that study with the same conclusion.

 

[Markass the Worst]

Aella fully admits to being a hedonist and sex addict. It starts with this tweet:

source (a)
Then somebody quote tweets this (side note, the "You're unable to view this tweet" pops up when the original tweeter blocks the quoter, so it's very likely Aella blocked this person after this exchange):

source (a)
Then Aella quote tweets this:

source (a)

Speaking of Aella's warped views of the world, here's her latest take on dating:

source (a)

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

Speaking of Aella's warped views of the world, here's her latest take on dating:
View attachment 4806968
source (a)

Why would she care about other people who dated the sexual experience delivery system she is currently extracting maximum utilons from? It's not like he's a person with a soul or anything that matters like that.

 

[Edict of Expulsion]

Aella's worst fear is becoming her mother. She will never be a tradwife nor have children. She sees what happened to her mother. She prefers death to it.

Her mother is still with her religious father to this day, who she views as the root of all evil.

She has this child-with-autism understanding of the world of if she only interacts with any potential romance that it's under some poly/cuckholding contract or he's paying her then she's always in control and she is free again when it ends.

Every time she sees a John or inevitably ruins a cuckhold using her for a free lay pretending he wants a relationship it allows her to leave, which her mother is unable to do.

It's also a ton of self-sabotage where being the most putrid disgusting whore rightfully scares away any stable mates and she can say to herself that the mythical demands she set for no man that would ever consider her just aren't met yet (Peets of Chantal fame just did this through a dating profile).

She LARPs as the lowest rung of applied STEM, to reject the bimboification of her mother.

She sees her mother and sisters but notably not her father at least once a year for her birthday, so she gets at least an annual refresher on avoiding the tough subjects and seeing the pain in her mother's eyes.

Her entire life is a one-dimensional trauma response that she is incapable of overcoming. The end for her, like all hookers, will just be upping her opioid usage until the rats are incredibly surprised that someone so 'smart' like Aella would OD on fentanyl.

It fits perfectly.

 

[Jarry Seinfelt]

Aella fully admits to being a hedonist and sex addict. It starts with this tweet:
View attachment 4806900
source (a)
Then somebody quote tweets this (side note, the "You're unable to view this tweet" pops up when the original tweeter blocks the quoter, so it's very likely Aella blocked this person after this exchange):
View attachment 4806946
source (a)
Then Aella quote tweets this:
View attachment 4806958
source (a)

Speaking of Aella's warped views of the world, here's her latest take on dating:
View attachment 4806968
source (a)

What the fuck is wrong with these poly people where they have to preach about polyamory being superior to monogamy? I don't want to know what anyone else is into in the bedroom unless I'm trying to/am having sex with them, and I don't tell the world about my preferences. That feels actually reasonable to me. There's nothing "logical" or "rational" about polyamory, people are mostly irrational and emotion-driven, and making like you're an exception or that we should aspire to be some caricature of robots they've dreamed up is fucking psychotic.

Goddamn. Sorry for ranting, but these people make me feel like a Republican from the Moral Majority back in the '80s.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Then Aella quote tweets this:

source (a)

"I wanna fuck myself nonstop into boredom, I want intimacy to become as familiar as furniture, as regular as breathing, till it's the new invisible normal."

Has sex 63 total times in a year despite holding sex parties with loose notions of consent, being polyamous, a porn "star", and an escort while complaining about fucking randoms.

 

[Hybrid Icing]

That's actually really interesting... from the way she writes about it she doesn't actually understand what intimacy is.

To have a deep, deep understanding, empathy, and romantic feeling for another human being is exhausting (in a good way!) and you'd be lucky to experience it with a handful of people in your life. (Though you only really need one.)

That she thinks it's even possible to attain it with every rando she bangs is insane.

 

[Markass the Worst]

This is how dating is treated in the rationalist community.

source (a)

 

[Sanity]

Relatedly to the above, Martha Nussbaum as her own problems but I can't fault her critique of that style of writing (in this case talking about Judith Butler specifically) that narcissists seem to love where they're writing to an audience that is themselves:
View attachment 4799596View attachment 4799588

Attached so you don't have to track it down if you'd like to read the whole thing.

What Nussbaum describes has also been called the "guru effect". Coincidentally, this kind of obscure style of writing is very common among the French Theory philosophers, that basically funded post-modern philosophy, that influenced Butler and the whole tranny movement greatly. Deleuze and Lacan, the most well-known figures of this movement (in France), are the most guilty of this. Plenty of french academics praise them, even though I've never been able to make sense of anything they said. It's really weird, since other French Theory figures such as Foucault or Derrida actually make points. Yes, Foucault was a vile pedo but his writings are very interesting and rational. Strangely they're way less praised, even if Derrida literally invented whole "deconstruction" thing that the woke academic crowd loves. I think the reason is simple : since they actually come up with rational arguments, you can criticize them and find weaknesses in their reasoning. But rationality can't mysticize people. It's not beguiling. This is why Deleuze, Lacan, Butler and their greasy unwashed polycule spinoffs are guilty of the "guru effect" : they never wanted to be a rational agent that can be debated and proven wrong. They want to be admired as an high IQ elite of genetically superior brains (with genes so good people should pay for their eggs!)and create some kind of cult around them, where they get to be the enlightened caste that lead the "plebs", as the sandnigger simp puts it.

 

[NimertiS]

She posted a video on twitter about it last year. Took some scrolling through dumb polls to get it but here you go.


View attachment 4719966

Lmao she had the cheap ass nosejob.
Not the closed technique with no scarring. I know because I did it.

Buccal fat removal and the eyebrow lift were stupid choices. She looks older and surprised

I find it interesting that Emil O. W. Kirkegaard, a data-diving wrongthinking demographic realist with some banger Substack essays, has the same opinion as Aella regarding child porn, yet the very same "based" people who condemn Aella for this would never dare call him a filthy shun-worthy pedo defender. I guess I'm a hypocrite here, because I still appreciate him even though this particular opinion icks me out.

Kirkegaard has also pointed out that the problem of her large "unrepresentative" samples is overrated.

View attachment 4737193

He does have a point. If she were to say something like "X% of men are into this kink, based on my voluntary survey!", this would be a wild generalization if her sample isn't representative of the population, no matter how large. But she's more interested in statements like "men who are into this kink are significantly more likely to have this trait." If a significant relationship like this is found in her sample, it's unlikely that it doesn't also exist in the greater population unless we have a damn good reason to think otherwise. Significant three-way, four-way, and so on interaction effects that explain variance significantly better than simpler lower-order models are pretty rare in reality.



She loves to talk about how of course men are attracted to youth, slenderness, breasts, and a pronounced waist-to-hip ratio, sorry fatty feminists, nature is unfair and we can't pretend otherwise! Yet she doesn't seem to accept that demanding we "destigmatize" female promiscuity, homosexuality, and weird fetish lifestyles is just as anti-nature as fat positivity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPsych

He's just a Nazi with questionable credentials.

 

[Tilapia]

This is how dating is treated in the rationalist community.
View attachment 4814617
source (a)

That is literally how sex cults operate. NXIVM was a successful cult because Keith Raniere had the women in the cult recruit other women for him, all while obfuscating that not only was a man involved in the cult but that he was leading it.

 

[melty]

Then Aella quote tweets this:

This sounds kind of poetic (being generous here) on the surface but imagine what a hellish existence she's describing. Just wandering around fucking and sucking all day until you die. It's like that one furfag comic, Kit & Kay Boodle, where the fursonas all live in a city where everyone is having sex constantly in public, at their jobs, etc just imagine actually living like that

This is how dating is treated in the rationalist community.
View attachment 4814617
source (a)

Why didn't he just join an existing high end matchmaking site? That's not sociopathic enough? The women never noticed there was only one guy on the whole site?

Edit: I thought the story was stupid so I looked it up and it's a viral post

 

[Markass the Worst]

Aella has a poll so people can guess how much she's showered this year:

source (a)
If we generalize from 37 showers last year and predict the same rate (once every ten days on average) then it will be less than 8 showers.

This sounds kind of poetic (being generous here) on the surface but imagine what a hellish existence she's describing. Just wandering around fucking and sucking all day until you die. It's like that one furfag comic, Kit & Kay Boodle, where the fursonas all live in a city where everyone is having sex constantly in public, at their jobs, etc just imagine actually living like that

The best way I can describe it is (ironically) a rationalist/transhumanist concept known as wireheading. Where you press a button hooked up to your brain to only give you pleasure, so you get suckered into an existence of only pressing that button and nothing else.

 

[Dr. Butt]

View attachment 4819777

This is so cringe that I have to unironically use the word "cringe" to decribe it. I'm still cringing after reading it 5 minutes ago.

 

[Markass the Worst]

Aella doesn't need to shower because she uses a bidet!

source (a)

Another simp has joined in to defend Aella's "research" from criticism:

source (a)
linked tweet (a)

source (a)
He also says that twitter polls in general are Fine, Actually and accuses anyone who criticises them of not wanting to have their beliefs changed:

 

[306h4Ge5eJUJ]

the purpose of sampling is not to be generalizable to The Population™ that consists of all human beings. Having different samples from different populations is important if you want to see how consistent an effect is.

Cool beans. Too bad Aella doesn't do that and instead talks about The Population™.

 

[Markass the Worst]

Cool beans. Too bad Aella doesn't do that and instead talks about The Population™.

To be fair to her, she sometimes includes disclaimers like this one in her article about men cheating in monogamous relationships:

Who took this survey? In my Monogamy vs Polyamory post I have a breakdown, please refer to that for a discussion of how to interpret the results based on the sources. But to summarize - these are mostly (but not entirely) people who follow me; this is biased towards more liberal, sexually open circles. In general, I typically estimate around 15-20% of my test takers are heavily sourced from porn-specific areas.

source (a)
But then the title of the article is "Monogamous men in long-term relationships aren't doin too hot" when it really should be "Monogamous men in long-term relationships who follow me aren't doin too hot".
Except even that's not really accurate. Later she has the disclaimer (emphasis mine):

I’m excluding gay people for the following graphs (because some of them include heterosexual gender-based predictions), and very poly people (cause I wanna measure sexual satisfaction among people with at least semi-closed relationships. The vast majority of people measured in the following graphs responded either fully or mostly monogamous).

"Mostly" monogamous? WTF does that even mean? That implies somebody is a little bit polygamous, at which point it doesn't sound much like monogamy to me. If someone is even a little bit poly that just opens the door to a slippery slope to other poly degeneracy.
She doesn't really address this in her followup article attempting to figure out how much selection bias she had with this result.