🐷 Ethan Ralph's Twitter / Tweets - A collection of thoughts, insights and musings from the internet's favorite gunted hobbit

Will the "MMA" fight between Gabe Hoffman and Ethan Ralph 🐷 happen?

  • YES!

    Votes: 26 7.1%
  • lol no

    Votes: 339 92.9%

  • Total voters
    365
Ralph should maybe spend 5 seconds researching coins before spending money on them. I bet he got ripped off.
View attachment 5017039
View attachment 5017099

Those coins are what coin merchants call "junk silver" because they are only .720 fine. They are sold in sacks by the pound. It's what people call Pre-1965 coins in the USA.

Where as the kiwi-coin is .999 fine
View attachment 5017063

Also LOL at Ralph saying he has a 401k. We all know he is poor.
No employer to sponsor one and he doesn’t even set aside his taxes… of course he doesn’t have one. It was a figure of speech
 
T / A
1681141130347.png

Big Win Mondays!
 
The return of Phoenix Ralph. After his last legal campaign ended in Total Vickers Death, Ethan Ralph is back to publish more legal musings, which will surely be seen as having come from one of the greatest legal minds of the the 21st century.

You see, the Vickers clan haven't read up on Two Party Consent laws, and probably aren't even aware they existed. Idiots, outsmarted by the Ralphmale once again.

His plan is so fool proof, he is so confident of his ultimate success in court, especially after his previously successful legal manoeuvres secured him more continuances (judge a big KS fan I hear) that he's sharing his strategy for all to see -what could go wrong?
Screenshot_20230410-165928~2.png
... What Ralph's Xanax addled mind seems to fail to understand is why it is that Two Party Consent laws make recordings of conversations inadmissible in most instances. This is because making the recording is itself a criminal offence, and from my understanding that makes this an issue of the fruit of the poisonous tree. It's equivalent to being wiretapped by the police and being prosecuted for what you've said, if the police had failed to get an applicable warrant ahead of time. The evidence would be found to be inadmissible and thrown out.

The relevant question here then, is whether or not recordings of DMs sent by Ralph are criminal. The answer to this is that they are not.

The reasoning is clear, when you send a DM via WhatsApp, Instagram, Twitter... or any service, you do so in full knowledge that this DM will be saved. Not only to your device, but also the device you sent it to and probably also to whatever server it was sent via. Therefore, you have no expectation that it would not be recorded. Ralph's argument is akin to complaining that a phonecall from a jail can be used in court, despite the fact those who use the phones are agreeing to the call being monitored prior to using them.

What's funnier is the idea that the Vickers' weren't aware of this - because I guarantee they are all very, very alight to these concepts. Remember, Ralph's saving grace in the revenge porn trial was that Faith was not allowed to bring in evidence where she recorded Ralph admitting he did it, because of Two Party Consent. The rules they had around it were so restrictive, that Faith decided not to take the stand regarding it. They know what it is, and consequently so do I because this is why what Ralph is saying wrung untrue.

However, it's also irrelevant - unlike Ralph the Vickers have hired legal counsel, people versed in family court and who can guide them through this. Meanwhile Ralph who has had every Pro Se motion he ever wrote flung out of court and laughed at publicly thinks he's going to be able to get one over on them. It's comical.

At least we know that these continuances haven't allowed Ralph to find a lawyer he can afford. Trial will be fun.
 
Ralph specifies that he is talking about "logs" in a further tweet. How can he know there are logs if he had an expectation they wouldn't be recorded?

Two Party Consent & One Party Consent are effectively wire tapping laws and only really apply when there is passage of information that you aren't expecting to be recorded - such as a phonecall.
 
At least we know that these continuances haven't allowed Ralph to find a lawyer he can afford. Trial will be fun.
Ralph specifies that he is talking about "logs" in a further tweet. How can he know there are logs if he had an expectation they wouldn't be recorded?

Two Party Consent & One Party Consent are effectively wire tapping laws and only really apply when there is passage of information that you aren't expecting to be recorded - such as a phonecall.
ralph just fucking give up and stop saying faith has a loose pussy so you can move on and have some money for rozy hopefully if you dont blow any money saved from lack of lolfare on drank n drugs too. isnt faith saying "lol tiny dick" to alogs who want them dead anyway and not being able to go on a tirade about pussy in response a small price to pay for having a life?
 
begging a random woman to follow you back on an internet website is such a badass outlaw thing to do
She's some andrew tate pick-me. She fills the same niche as shoe0nhead a woman who gives men permission to feel badly about women. Despite cozy bridging the gap between the new and old incel movements she never thought to follow him back. She follows destiny tho
 
"Yeah I know I called Faith a loose pussied whore on my show but ya hono I did not give that slut skank consent to use this against me in the court of law! There's a one party consent law and I did not consent!"

And then the Judge declared that Faith is indeed a loose pusied whore and donated to the Killstream.
 
I assume he's talking about the diary and how they're going to prove it was him who sent it. So, he's hoping that DMs he sent to Hatchet (does Vickers even have those?) cannot be included so that he can run with the "mah waif did it" story.
The "main" log came from Dedman posting it publicly, and both he and Hatchet verified the authenticity of the messages in a sworn affidavit, The logs specifically mention Ralph wanting to send him something very "spicy", so even if whatever specific DM he is thinking about is not admissible, the main log points to him orchestrating the whole thing.

I doubt this will help him, but it's fun to see that he left coming up with a defense for the last possible minute and is scrambling to find anything that can save him, and once thinks he does, he pretends he's a legal expert.
Looking forward to the outcome, it's sure to be entertaining one way or the other.
 
At least we know that these continuances haven't allowed Ralph to find a lawyer he can afford. Trial will be fun.
Ralph is even more retarded at law than Russell Greer. You think staring at bars for a few months because of his pitiable failure to understand law would have taught him a lesson, but nope, not the Ralphamale, he remains obdurately stupid in the face of all the stupid results he gets from the stupid things he does because of the stupid things he thinks about law.
Ralph wins again. Two party consent means if he doesn't consent to getting in trouble, he won't. Can't believe he figured it out.
Well duh, all you have to do not to go to prison for committing crimes is just say "I do not consent to the jurisdiction of this court, plus there's a FRINGE on that flag."
 
EOR'd better hope that the Vickerses don't get The Daiymo to tell the court in writing his end of that conversation that got leaked with EOR asking him "WHERE WULD ONE OF MAH FANS SEND YOU SOMETHING REALLY SPICY?!".

Ralph specifies that he is talking about "logs" in a further tweet. How can he know there are logs if he had an expectation they wouldn't be recorded?

Two Party Consent & One Party Consent are effectively wire tapping laws and only really apply when there is passage of information that you aren't expecting to be recorded - such as a phonecall.
I am 99.99% certain that EOR is referring to the leaked text chats between he and The Daiymo .
 
I doubt this will help him, but it's fun to see that he left coming up with a defense for the last possible minute and is scrambling to find anything that can save him, and once thinks he does, he pretends he's a legal expert.
whats amazing is how low his upper ceiling for intelligent thought really is, this is all the fruits of his effort and its about the level of retardation you get from a lazy late night melty lazily searching things online for an hour straight because i procrastinated. but thats like him at his best, this is him with his life on the line. and hes so sure hes not a retard that he just points to whatever retarded crap he did as this massive coup even as the last thing he pointed to on this very topic was instantly thrown out with i assume a reaction of "the fuck even is this shit? is this a court document or a comedy script or a prank?" by a judge.
 
Back