US Porn ID/Device-level Porn Filtering Megathread - Feds WILL know your fetish and you will LIKE IT!

Thinking it over some more, the biggest irony for these kinds of bills is that companies like Facebook and Google will only be further encouraged to allow adult content on their websites just so they can have a reason to tie real world ID to your account.
Nah, they don't need to do that. They can run their own ID verification app, which you use with other services, and tie that to your account. Facebook already tried to get into ID verification a fair few years back. No reason why they wouldn't try again.
 
The thing I find most dumb about Kiwi Farmers screaming tHiNk Of ThE cHiLdReN is them having total memory loss from being kids and finding ways around this stuff. Yeah good luck trying to scrub the Internet free of every dirty picture that could rape Little Johnny's virgin eyes.
True, but theres a massive difference between finding a few playboys and seeing some woman tits and ass, and going to pornhub or wherever and seeing some woman fit a manhole cover in her asshole or someone woman cucking her husband with 10 spear chuckers.

You simply cant compare what you could be exposed to 30+ years ago to today. Its simply not in the same universe.
 

In theory, facilitating the access to pornographic material by a minor is probably illegal already. But if you interpret that as anyone giving an unrestricted, unsupervised access to the Internet to a minor, that's basically 9/10 parents going to jail overnight.
The void in parental control opened by gen X parents who didn't know any better is basically impossible to close now.
I just wanna say that I appreciate you mentioning Gen X parents, they are the cause of alot of the things we see now and I never see it mentioned anywhere
 
True, but theres a massive difference between finding a few playboys and seeing some woman tits and ass, and going to pornhub or wherever and seeing some woman fit a manhole cover in her asshole or someone woman cucking her husband with 10 spear chuckers.

You simply cant compare what you could be exposed to 30+ years ago to today. Its simply not in the same universe.
Yeah. I'm late twenties and my first sexual exposure (outside of being raped and molested for a year as a kid) was Natsume 2 by Zone, where she gets all holes and her urethra fucked by a tentacle monster. Definitely a bit more risque than a Victoria's Secret mag.

That being said, that's not the norm, and I'm not going to let events like that justify us sliding into the most god awful, estrogen addled dystopia imaginable. Retards will always use "think of the children!" as an excuse to justify taking your rights away at gunpoint, and this is absolutely no different. Doubly so when actual sexual deviants are actually molesting, grooming, and raping actual kids in public schools right this fucking second while you bleat about internet porn.
 
True, but theres a massive difference between finding a few playboys and seeing some woman tits and ass, and going to pornhub or wherever and seeing some woman fit a manhole cover in her asshole or someone woman cucking her husband with 10 spear chuckers.

You simply cant compare what you could be exposed to 30+ years ago to today. Its simply not in the same universe.
I agree that the porn is more harmful than it used to be, normal Pornhub's front page is gross. But I'm focused on the practicality of policing, which is even harder now than raiding Little Johnny's Playboy stash in his treehouse. Yeah, these censorship tools exist and will work, until Little Johnny gets like nine or so and his buddies at school show him it and how to get around it. It's a lost cause.
 
True, but theres a massive difference between finding a few playboys and seeing some woman tits and ass, and going to pornhub or wherever and seeing some woman fit a manhole cover in her asshole or someone woman cucking her husband with 10 spear chuckers.

You simply cant compare what you could be exposed to 30+ years ago to today. Its simply not in the same universe.
smut always existed, either little johnny found some playboys or depending on the situation another nignog-train. I think I've seen my first shit involving eels on some mates age old betamax tapes (and no it wasn't japanese either), it was part of his parent's porn stash. the myth that there was no porn or it was more "soft" is just that, a myth from people who don't even were alive before the internet.

the big difference is also most people figure out what gets them off and stick with it (most people need to figure out what it is first as well). some chick fitting a manhole cover in her ass not giving you a stiffy it's nothing more than a ridiculous curiosity (especially if you're a teen), and I assume that's the same for most people.
inb4 "porn makes you more degenerate over time" - only if the latent proclivity was already there. otherwise it's like arguing seeing a lot of b/g action will inevitably turn you gay because you've seen a certain quota of dicks.

You're right; porn will always be a problem as long as demand for it exists. I understand that going after consumption would probably help in the short term (maybe even long-term), but I don't see it being feasible in the US except in maybe a few select stages. As idealistic as it sounds, I think it has to be resolved at a cultural level - people need to not want porn to eliminate demand completely. I don't have a solution to achieve that, but that's the only way I can see it working.
porn is just one symptom, banning it won't fix society's ails over night or even a decade. people have ALWAYS jerked it off, it it wasn't porn it was the hot neighbor/classmate/coworker or your mom's victoria's secret catalogue.
most people also aren't coomers, which itself is just another symptom of the retarded over-consumption of everything and making it your personality in absence of anything else.
"consume responsibly" also includes porn.
 
How did kink.com manage to succeed despite the FBI crackdown/CC pressure?

"Kink.com's" operation was a ring of a dozen or so websites that did not ship video.

When Bush admin cracked down they were able to convict Max Hardcore and Extreme Associates because they shipped 'obscene materials' over state lines.

Kink.com's owner (Peter A.) didn't buy the kink.com domain name until much later for I think 65k when domain name speculation was in a slump so it was a big deal at the time. He rebranded it to be softer, more glamorous and housewife friendly, bought the armory and became yet more highly connected in the SF LGBT political class.

Whatever material Visa dictated was unacceptable they dropped or didn't produce when Visa made new regs. They started doing before/after interviews and publicizing them. They made it female friendly, Chaddish or used female tops and crossed over with porn stars. Their early material was actually quite good but pretty undergroundish. New gay sites as well, which cemented their political place as "one of them" in SF/Cali.

You could say they changed and ferociously cucked themselves into compliance in a way only a Britcuck can (the owner is British). The system instead went after the notable, red-blooded and politically isolated Americans who said "fuck you" to Ashcroft's DOJ.
 
As of yesterday, Virgina governor Glenn Youngkin has officially signed Senate Bill 1515 into law.

§ 59.1-577.1. Controller and processor responsibilities; verifiable parental consent.

A. A controller or processor shall obtain verifiable parental consent prior to registering any child with the controller's or processor's product or service, or before collecting, using, or disclosing such child's personal data that has been verified by such child's parent or guardian. A controller or processor shall provide the parent or guardian the option to consent to the collection and use of such child's personal data without consenting to the disclosure of such child's personal data to third parties.

B. A controller or processor shall make reasonable efforts to obtain verifiable parental consent by taking into consideration available technology to ensure that the person providing such consent is the child's parent or guardian. Verifiable parental consent may be obtained from the parent or guardian by:

1. Providing a signed consent form to the controller or processor;

2. Using a credit card, debit card, or other online payment system that provides notification of any transaction with the controller or processor to the primary account holder; or

3. Providing a form of government-issued identification to the controller or processor.

Yes, the same day Chris Chan got out of custody.
 
Last edited:
Yeah. I'm late twenties and my first sexual exposure (outside of being raped and molested for a year as a kid) was Natsume 2 by Zone, where she gets all holes and her urethra fucked by a tentacle monster. Definitely a bit more risque than a Victoria's Secret mag.

That being said, that's not the norm, and I'm not going to let events like that justify us sliding into the most god awful, estrogen addled dystopia imaginable. Retards will always use "think of the children!" as an excuse to justify taking your rights away at gunpoint, and this is absolutely no different. Doubly so when actual sexual deviants are actually molesting, grooming, and raping actual kids in public schools right this fucking second while you bleat about internet porn.
Imagine admitting to being molested on a shit posting site, kek. Either way, Natsume 2 is a classic. Good shit. You could've seen worse things.

As our official Pornography Historian, you will never beat porn consoomption. The problem is that in order to create healthy self pleasuring habits, parents have to teach their children that porn can be a deadly rabbit hole just like everything else. The problem is most parents aren't willing to do that because it's an icky topic. So kids easily fall into those blurred lines of fiction and reality and it's truly sad. The laws will do nothing but force more control and people will find ways around them. If there's any good to come from these laws it's maybe one or two coombrained speds refuse to hand over their ID and quit porn altogether. That's the best case scenario. The worst case scenario is the weirdos go underground and everyone makes money except you. The public schools are only a symptom of the problem. The problem is porn. It makes you weird and into strange shit. I could go on for years about everything I've seen, because I've virtually seen it all, but it causes a huge disjoint in reality. The porn is the answer but it's a long term solution. Not a short term band-aid which is what you can argue we need right now.
 
Government porn IDs aren't going anywhere as long as Clarence Thomas is on the Supreme Court. We all know his favorite porn star is Long Dong Silver and he's probably still mad about that.
 
Government porn IDs aren't going anywhere as long as Clarence Thomas is on the Supreme Court. We all know his favorite porn star is Long Dong Silver and he's probably still mad about that.
I keep hearing people say that these kinds of bills won't last because "1st amendment", but unfortunately I don't see how there's an argument to be made there. Haven't we already set the precedent by requiring ID to buy/view physical porn? Maybe you could argue that these sites are mediums of communication and that the ID requirements target specific forms of "speech" with legal and financial burdens, but otherwise I dont think there's any law that prevents these from being enacted.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FunPosting101
LOL this stuff is just going to move to the dark web, I look forward to the day everyone knows how to use Tor, will make the system more secure for everyone else when 1 billion people are using it at any given time.
 
I'm late to hearing this, but it seems Mastercard has already been demanding Patreon to use ID verification for any creator page with adult content since last October.

https://support.patreon.com/hc/en-us/articles/8335146084877


Patreon uses a third party system called Jumio.
I hope credit card companies keep doing this stuff, would rather not the government have to step in and ruin internet privacy. Either way, its about time that we make sure kids can't get on mommies device and see a woman get blacked all because their retard friend at school told them to look it up.
 
I hope credit card companies keep doing this stuff, would rather not the government have to step in and ruin internet privacy. Either way, its about time that we make sure kids can't get on mommies device and see a woman get blacked all because their retard friend at school told them to look it up.
Oh sorry I phrased that post a bit confusingly, they require Patreon's content creators to verify their ages. The people who pay to watch it don't have to verify with id. Basically they just want to make sure no one is buying/selling porn of minors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr
Shouldn't this be the parents' responsibility, in the first place?
I recall when a bunch of parents got angry over ask.fm because their kids would be asked an anonymous question, and it would be horrible. These parents are being lazy and relying on the sites and the government to do their job for them. Like I'm too tired to parent my kids, so I'll just plop them in front of a phone and call it a day and let them do whatever on the Internet. Like they do realize that sites like Facebook are much more of a security risk for children?
Oh, the libs will change it from porn to 'fake news' so that your browser will only show CNN and Huffpo forever. And you won't be approved for an N-word loicense.
Yeah, that's definitely what they're leading into. Notice how laws like this are never used for their "intended" purpose when written.
 
As bad as porn is, this is not cool. Don't be like those darn Patriot Act niggers from 2001 who supported invasion of privacy just to own the Muslims.

Invasion of privacy is invasion of privacy, no one should support the NSA under any circumstance.
patriot act only happened because boomers didnt have the moral courage to declare TMD after 9/11
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Vecr
Porn is as psychologically damaging as heroin is physically damaging. This is bad, but porn itself is a major corporate tool and source of income. They aren't targeting it or cracking down on it, they love it. This is just a convenient excuse to further intrude on the privacy of people using it.
 
Back