Careercow Jonathan "Full" McIntosh / RadicalBytes - "Pop Culture Detective", Cucked hard by Anita Sarkeesian, King Snowflake

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
He continues to be 20 years late to the virtue signalling brigade

8hnR0Rv.jpg
Even Jack Thompson's not this big of an insufferable cunt.

The more I read Joshathan McIrishcunt's tweets, the more I actually pity Anita. Golddigging narcissistic styro-head she is, she actually had to spend more time with this clown than any woman since his last Puerto Rican nanny. No amount of easy money's worth that when you don't even get the chance to whip him in the teeth with a bicycle chain after he publically says a dead political columnist was worse than a camelfucker who murdered thousands of innocent civilians.
 
The funny thing is PFTcommenter (a guy who parodies a sports fan with terrible hot takes) actually wrote this example into his joke column the other day.

https://twitter.com/PFTCommenter/status/754361898997583872

This reminds me when Salon would start writing columns that matched up with the Twitter account that would parody Salon. Or the people who would watch Colbert and agree with him.

Does he actually believe this shit or does he just have to pretend to be this insane to stand out?
 
What does this guy do for fun?

"Fun" is an oppressive tool of the Patriarchy, which Josh is helping to dismantle by aggressively not enjoying things. As a sinful white male, it's the most he can do.

Edit:
BloodSport.png
 
Last edited:
"Fun" is an oppressive tool of the Patriarchy, which Josh is helping to dismantle by aggressively not enjoying things. As a sinful white male, it's the most he can do.

Edit:
I have actually seen it argued by SJWs and the alt-Right that fun things are merely a distraction provided by the Patriarchy/feminists/reptilian aliens to keep us complacent and not fight back. Not because, you know, people like being entertained, and even people in active war zones seek things to bolster their spirits and take their minds off the living hell they're trapped in.
 
And Twitter is a modern age fighting pit where egoistic glory hounds battle for the fleeting attention of the fickle audience. Please stop using it to sate your primitive masculine urges of tribal acceptance, Jon. You are literally enslaving those poor syllables to feed your ego, much like the vile Pokemon slavers do with their imaginary pets.
 
It kinda shows how out of touch with people Jonathan was that he was surprised people made fun of him for comparing Pokemon to dog fights-something which has been a tongue in check joke for decade. For a guy who wants to critique pop culture he's remarkably oblivious.

Also what's this guys degree in?

Hmmmmmm, looking at Jonathan's instagram implies he has an enthusiasm for card games

https://www.instagram.com/radicalbytes/

Netrunner in particular, odd to see him indulging in cyberpunk-a genre know for moralmyopia. A little re-assuring however to see a human traits, I assumed he's just into boring hipster crap.
 
Last edited:
If he agrees that it doesn't turn people violent, then he believes people are able to separate fantasy from reality. Then what the fuck is the concern with the ideological messages being sent?

I, as well as many people, believe that the motives that lead to the involvement in Vietnam were fucked beyond belief, but that didn't stop us from empathizing with Joker in Full Metal Jacket.

It must really suck to not have a vagina to shield yourself with, Johnny boy. He can't seem to see the logical conclusion that has been arrived at by 8 year olds for 20 years, now: Pokemon aren't real. They do not have the ability to feel physical or emotional pain, given that they aren't real. Thus, there's nothing morally wrong with this.

Because, again, imaginary. Yet, this is some amazing revelation he's had. Someone should tell him there are actually pieces of legislation against animal cruelty. Serious ones, too. Ones that result in heavy fines and even jail time. You know; felonies.
 
He can't seem to see the logical conclusion that has been arrived at by 8 year olds for 20 years, now: Pokemon aren't real. They do not have the ability to feel physical or emotional pain, given that they aren't real. Thus, there's nothing morally wrong with this
Exactly. This is why I can gun down hordes of enemy soldiers in whatever FPS war game I'm playing this week, or shoot raiders in Fallout 4 and not feel bad. They aren't real. They don't actually exist. Playing violent video games will not make me grab an assault rifle and shoot up a movie theater/nightclub/school/whatever. Mass shooters who played violent video games didn't go on killing sprees because of the games, they played the games because they gave them an outlet for violent urges that were already present. And what of the recent mass shooters who didn't play violent video games? How does Jonathan account for them?
 
Exactly. This is why I can gun down hordes of enemy soldiers in whatever FPS war game I'm playing this week, or shoot raiders in Fallout 4 and not feel bad. They aren't real. They don't actually exist. Playing violent video games will not make me grab an assault rifle and shoot up a movie theater/nightclub/school/whatever. Mass shooters who played violent video games didn't go on killing sprees because of the games, they played the games because they gave them an outlet for violent urges that were already present. And what of the recent mass shooters who didn't play violent video games? How does Jonathan account for them?
The same way he accounts for the overall historical trend away from violence which can be observed in every civilization on the planet.

He ignores it. Hitler? Timur? Solano López? Never even knew videogames existed? Well, shoot. They couldn't possibly have been desensitized enough to kill people! Now let's talk about Law & Order: SVU. . . .
 
The same way he accounts for the overall historical trend away from violence which can be observed in every civilization on the planet.

He ignores it. Hitler? Timur? Solano López? Never even knew videogames existed? Well, shoot. They couldn't possibly have been desensitized enough to kill people! Now let's talk about Law & Order: SVU. . . .
But Law and Order did that GamerGate episode, therefore they can do no wrong.
 
It kinda shows how out of touch with people Jonathan was that he was surprised people made fun of him for comparing Pokemon to dog fights-something which has been a tongue in check joke for decade. For a guy who wants to critique pop culture he's remarkably oblivious.

Also what's this guys degree in?

Hmmmmmm, looking at Jonathan's instagram implies he has an enthusiasm for card games

https://www.instagram.com/radicalbytes/

Netrunner in particular, odd to see him indulging in cyberpunk-a genre know for moralmyopia. A little re-assuring however to see a human traits, I assumed he's just into boring hipster crap.

Netrunner? I wonder if he likes playing as the criminal who risks unpleasant death-by-hacking in order to steal secrets, or the corporation trying to kill the thief?

Something something morality, something sensitivity, toxic masculinity.
 
Back