Dylan James Mulvaney / Days of Girlhood / Day __ of Being a Girl - Dylan Explains It All, a gay man interprets 'girlhood' in all glorious technicolor.

[Ghostse]

Ironically maybe putting a crazy cartoon demon on the can might help it sell better. People might think that the beer is something you can get really fucked up on and add to its appeal.

That is Espolon's schtick.



"Are you ready for a spoon-wielding Skeleton riding a chicken to charge through the crowd tonight? If not, don't drink Tequila."

 

[Smithfield Ham]

Imagine if Starbucks Coffee or Tumblr decided to do a brand deal with Ted Nugent, you'd probably get similar results.

 

[Amin Yamumm]

They specifically made Dylan cans and mentioned the 365 days milestone. With Dylan’s face. The TikTok may have been typical influencer activity. But a special can makes me think there’s bigger plans. Or was. Like a TV commercial.

Did they make Dylan cans, or just a few for PR? It's not that expensive for the company to get one of their graphic designers to (badly) draw the troon and to print it on a few cans.

Can you imagine what a shelf load of Dylan cans would look like?

The parent company may have "lost" between $5bn and $6bn, but their sheer size will absorb that, and eventually make it back, if they haven't already.

What I am interested in is the number of sales of Bud Light. That number will have dropped alarmingly if all the videos of stock in supermarkets are replicated nationwide.

The sales from the distributors to the retailers for last month maybe healthy, but let's see what the reorders are like next month when stock sales in the retailers have dramatically slowed.

If I was working at the Bud Light brewery in Houston, I think I'd be looking for a new job.

 

[The Grillcast™]

"WooOOaH BrOs bud light btfo'd they lost billions because they hired a heckin tranny, we did it reddit!!1"



It's almost like a couple billion dollars is a drop in the bucket to them and it's a standard market fluctuation. In my rural watering hole, nobody is drinking the faggot beer (literally has sold not a single bottle this week) - yet annhusier Busch or however you spell it is still selling big because the average boycotter doesnt understand that they own a shitload of breweries and realistically, they'll probably be back to bud next month once this blows over.

Pic related, all the boycott has done is the intended purpose of the ad - get the name out there beyond the already built in audience of alcoholic boomers and have the brand be the focal point of online culture wars for the last week or so. As the greatest president in US history once said, "Mission Accomplished"!

 

[Smithfield Ham]

"WooOOaH BrOs bud light btfo'd they lost billions because they hired a heckin tranny, we did it reddit!!1"

View attachment 5049734

It's almost like a couple billion dollars is a drop in the bucket to them and it's a standard market fluctuation. In my rural watering hole, nobody is drinking the faggot beer (literally has sold not a single bottle this week) - yet annhusier Busch or however you spell it is still selling big because the average boycotter doesnt understand that they own a shitload of breweries and realistically, they'll probably be back to bud next month once this blows over.

Pic related, all the boycott has done is the intended purpose of the ad - get the name out there beyond the already built in audience of alcoholic boomers and have the brand be the focal point of online culture wars for the last week or so. As the greatest president in US history once said, "Mission Accomplished"!

View attachment 5049711

Yes, I'm sure a marketing campaign losing a company 6 billion dollars will be of no concern to a profit-driven company. After all, companies are known to be happy with breaking even or coming slightly under projections, and have never turned their whole business upside down to chase growth.

 

[The Grillcast™]

Yes, I'm sure a marketing campaign losing a company 6 billion dollars will be of no concern to a profit-driven company. After all, companies are known to be happy with breaking even or coming slightly under projections, and have never turned their whole business upside down to chase growth.

Of course they're willing to turn their entire business upside down to chase growth, that's why they hired the most seethemaxxing astroturfed trannoid of 2023 to promote their shitty beer. If you actually believe they didn't see any backlash coming as a result of that (or that said backlash will have any lasting results), you're delusional brother.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

Regular people dislike lunacy. Troons might cope, seethe and especially dilate but they won't change that fact

I think the issue for Bud Lite consumers is not the existence of trans people. Dudes in dresses have been around for a long time. But it’s the obnoxious way this culture is being forced into everything that people resent. You drink a beer to relax, not to be lectured about the harms caused cisheteronormativity. It’s the inescapability.

I find it incredibly interesting that out of all the trans people that exist somehow Dylan is the one that the government and corporations are choosing to associate with. He's new to the trans scene, incredibly fucking obnoxious, and doesn't have a chance at passing whatsoever. It just seems so logically bankrupt.

But he also doesn’t have any known skeletons in his closet, unlike most established troons. I’m pretty sure his publicists keep him on a tight leash.

Did they make Dylan cans, or just a few for PR? It's not that expensive for the company to get one of their graphic designers to (badly) draw the troon and to print it on a few cans.

The can was a one-off for Dylan.

 

[Attractive Sexhaver]

Imagine if Starbucks Coffee or Tumblr decided to do a brand deal with Ted Nugent, you'd probably get similar results.

I actually feel your Starbucks idea is less stupid than what bud light did. There are tons of blue collar and working class people that drink coffee, and with Starbucks pivoting to pop up locations with no in store experience, it's not out of the realm of possibility starbucks could make a play for the trucker and night shift worker types that get coffee from McDonalds or Dunkin Donuts.

Young girls just straight up aren't drinking beer, and with how sugary all of our food is these days, I don't see a significant number of them moving over to beer. It's especially baffling because AB has a shit ton of girly and zoomer friendly drinks that would benefit from a tranny mascot. I'm pretty sure they have a white claw competitor, and anyone retarded enough to drink that probably would be swayed by a big name tranny influencer.

The bud light move makes about as much sense as Joel Osteen branded buttplugs. It's insane to me that anyone thought this was a good idea.

 

[It's Over Anakin]

I think the issue for Bud Lite consumers is not the existence of trans people. Dudes in dresses have been around for a long time. But it’s the obnoxious way this culture is being forced into everything that people resent. You drink a beer to relax, not to be lectured about the harms caused cisheteronormativity. It’s the inescapability.

Plus you don't want to be seen drinking what everyone starts to call Tranny Beer

 

[YazeePro]

What's the deal? Morons sold shares because they don't support trans rights but overall the commercial is a tremendous success because everyone is talking about it and the brand got more audacity with trans women promoting beer.

So, if a company started printing Hitler on their products in order to promote them, would you also start buying their stocks? I mean, surely it would be a "tremendous success" because "everyone is talking about it and the brand got more audacity", right?

Wrong! You should consider that a stock price is not only representing the actual material value of the company but also the goodwill; the value of the brand. If a brand fucks up it's image, it loses brand value. And the value you lose if your core customer base is pissed off at you, is something that can be extremely hard to rebuild. For companies, bad PR exists. The stock would only be worth buying if you believe that the outrage is so short-lived that the Mulvaney marketing stunt has no lasting negative effect. Or that the increase in profit will be so positive, that it outweighs the damage of the troon marketing.

There are countless examples of companies that ruined their brand by misguided marketing campaigns or because of how they handles incidents and it took years upon years for them to get their goodwill back on the level is was prior to those particular incidents.
Take a look at Gillette. Around 2019/2020, Gillette (a brand whose core consumer group consists of mainly men) started to jump on the woke bandwagon and produced their incredibly offensive ad that displayed males as the universal aggressor against women and how niggers need to step up to stop White men from harassing women. It tried to appeal to a , from their commercial point of view, less important demographic by attacking their core consumer base.

What happened to the brand value? It plummeted and continues to do so until today ...

Source
Even mainstream media had to admit, that Gillette dealt sustained damage to their brand image. Forbes, for example, saw it fit to proclaim that "For Men, Gillette Is No Longer The Best A Brand Can Get".

And the stock price? It dropped together with the brand value. For one, yes, we can clearly see the effect of the corona "pandemic" on the stock... but it should be clear that the suffering brand image did not help the situation. In fact, if Gillette would not have engaged in that kind of advertising, the stock price would be better:

Why I mention Gillette? Because I see it as comparable in terms of how big a blunder the Mulvaney campaign is for Budweiser. Worse for $BUD, it has a worse market position than Gillette had. If you go to a store to buy razors, your choice is more often than not limited to Gillette and maybe one or two other brands. For beer, the alternatives on the market are countless. In other words, Budweiser is more reliant on their brand image than Gillette; therefore, this marketing campaign fail is more likely to hit them even harder.
I would not be too sure that by pandering to troons and the woke crowd, clearly in opposition to their core consumer base, Budweiser will increase their profits over the loss of brand value. So, saying that their stock has become more attractive might not be the correct assessment of the situation.

 

[Rickenbacker]

Wonder if Jack Daniels will get similar losses after they hired some drag queens to promote their shitty whisky

 

[Depressed_Oni]

It's finally nice to see normal people fighting back against this Troon shit and the only language these corporations understand is money and this is probably one of the biggest backfires in American business history. I didn't major in business management but even I could of told the fucking Horse Person VP that alienating 98% of your customer base so you can try and score some virtual signaling points with less than 2% of the population makes no fucking sense business wise. I only ask myself was this done intentionally or not? On one hand liberals have entered this weird area where they are actually starting to believe the nonsense and bullshit they spew and maybe the horse person really did think this was going to be an epic business move, or on the other hand she saw this beer being evil white male patriarchy beer and she wormed her way into being CEO with all the right buzzwords and decided to take the company down a peg.
Really though her resemblance to a horse is far greater Than May and Hila.
View attachment 5045637View attachment 5045641View attachment 5045645View attachment 5045661

You posted the exact same photo 4 times like we wouldn’t notice

 

[2legit2quit]

It's going to be worth it in the minds of the liberals who think trump is a Nazi and not allowing gender affirming care = minors death. The problem is people are so checked out of the world that they will believe whatever the media says. Remember when the news media said that we would all die from COVID.

bahahah i just imagined a bunch of antifa hipsters drinking bud light to own the conservatives LMAO, thanks for that image, i think everyone will probably still just drink PBR

 

[Dread First]

I'm too much of a cynic to expect boycotts to have long-term effects in these times, yet it must be said: it's incredibly cathartic to watch almost every MSM outlet scrambling to justify Dylan invading more spaces where he doesn't fucking belong.

bahahah i just imagined a bunch of antifa hipsters drinking bud light to own the conservatives LMAO, thanks for that image, i think everyone will probably still just drink PBR

No one buys PBR unless they wanna get arrested my guy.

 

[2legit2quit]

I'm too much of a cynic to expect boycotts to have long-term effects in these times, yet it must be said: it's incredibly cathartic to watch almost every MSM outlet scrambling to justify Dylan invading more spaces where he doesn't fucking belong.



No one buys PBR unless they wanna get arrested my guy.

View attachment 5050224

i did say antifa hipsters right? like i know the people in this town that were at the block party / 2020 floyd riots and they love PBR b/c it is cheap and part of a citywide special. it's that or yuengling in these parts LOL.

 

[Random Internet Person]

Imagine if Starbucks Coffee or Tumblr decided to do a brand deal with Ted Nugent, you'd probably get similar results.

It’ll never happen, but it kind of fits with the idea of “fight fire with fire, play the same game the left plays to expose the absurdity of the rules that are basically cheating” that I think some MAGA folks are advocating for in the name of sticking it to the left.

The parent company may have "lost" between $5bn and $6bn, but their sheer size will absorb that, and eventually make it back, if they haven't already.

"WooOOaH BrOs bud light btfo'd they lost billions because they hired a heckin tranny, we did it reddit!!1"

View attachment 5049734

It's almost like a couple billion dollars is a drop in the bucket to them and it's a standard market fluctuation. In my rural watering hole, nobody is drinking the faggot beer (literally has sold not a single bottle this week) - yet annhusier Busch or however you spell it is still selling big because the average boycotter doesnt understand that they own a shitload of breweries and realistically, they'll probably be back to bud next month once this blows over.

Pic related, all the boycott has done is the intended purpose of the ad - get the name out there beyond the already built in audience of alcoholic boomers and have the brand be the focal point of online culture wars for the last week or so. As the greatest president in US history once said, "Mission Accomplished"!

View attachment 5049711

Sounds like the house wins again. And the only way to beat the house is to nuke it and salt the earth so nothing ever grows again. And that’s a best case scenario.

@YazeePro You forget one issue: Busch is more than Budweiser. It’s more than the Clydesdales. It was mentioned here earlier, but the only way to really lay a blow is to basically be an absolute dickhead wherever you’re getting your booze and basically go out of your way to state your intention to refuse to buy ANY product under the Busch umbrella.

 

[WelperHelper99]

That's actually surprising. I would have thought they would have breweries scattered all over the continent.

They do- for each of their beers, 13 to be precise. The Houston Texas plant only handles Bud, meaning that if product sits on shelves enough, it's going to have a cascade effect, grain orders canceled, beer tossed out, just because they will have overstocked

 

[Lightning]

Needless to say, with troons you lose!

 

[draculasboyfriend]

a guy on JRE said that dude is pretty

 

[DamnWolves!]

Anyone else remember Gillette? Most people don't even know about this campaign, and the ones who do and aren't disgusted by it are making fun of the ones who are disgusted by it.

I switched from Fusion Vs to a safety razor; got a pack of 200 "superior Nippon steel" blades from Amazon that will literally last me a lifetime. So, they lost at least one customer.

But Gillette is owned by Proctor & Gamble, which makes, well, everything. I consider myself a fairly informed consumer, but even I can't stop using all of their stuff.

InBev is kind of similar, insofar as they own a shitton of brands and it will be hard for normies to avoid them all.