Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[AnOminous]

I think it would be a big mistake to presume Schneider is shit just because Monty is shit.

I don't know, his complaint was miserably bad. It could have just been a misstep from never having done a defamation case, but it had Greer-tier failure to state a cause of action, not even a defamatory statement Nick had made (even though he had a bumper crop of dumb drunken shit to choose from).

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I don't know, his complaint was miserably bad. It could have just been a misstep from never having done a defamation case, but it had Greer-tier failure to state a cause of action, not even a defamatory statement Nick had made (even though he had a bumper crop of dumb drunken shit to choose from).

Not a barrister, but I am inclined to think David was doing this cheap in the hopes of a settlement. I would wager Monty pitched Nick as a cash rich fool with something to lose and who would settle.

The sheer obduration of Nose was unexpected. How would he know he would fight a claim that could ve been settled in 5 figures by paying 6? He is flailing

 

[Captain Manning]

Did he get paid though?

I presume there is no way in fuck he's taking this on contingency, and there's been nothing said to suggest he is. If he didn't actually get paid yet, I'm sure there's a contract in place that ensures he will be.

Also to note, these screen names are ones that were in the YT chat as long ago as 2 years. They were fans

Indeed.

I don't know, his complaint was miserably bad. It could have just been a misstep from never having done a defamation case, but it had Greer-tier failure to state a cause of action, not even a defamatory statement Nick had made (even though he had a bumper crop of dumb drunken shit to choose from).

Oh, it's pretty bad as written, but my problem with Randazza's counter is that while it's better made, it seems like a stretch as far as application of law is concerned. Like he wants another state's SLAPP to apply to Minnesota? Like... wut? I'm wondering if Randazza took this case mainly because he's interested in trying a particular or novel legal argument, and Nick is happy to blow the money to have a big name attached.

Also, leaving flawed case arguments aside, I still don't get how Nick has cause to try and go after Schneider's license. That's him malding. Writing a shit complaint is generally not cause. in and of itself, to disbar somebody. The remedy for that is to just toss the damn thing. Dismissals for failure to state a claim happen all the time.

 

[Whistlin' Crustacean]

Yet another lolcow move. Be visibly balding on stream, while simultaneously claiming not to be.

Careful now. I've been told for years at this point that believing your own lying eyes instead of "muh authoritative sources" is a far-right dogwhistle or something.
Rackets says that he's not balding. That means that he isn't. Who else is a more authoritative source on Nick than Nick himself? Not you, that's who. Do you have 475k subscribers? No you fucking don't, you bottom-barrel farmer, so shut up, listen, and donate to the Ducati lawsuit fundraiser. It's on a Christian website, so you know it's good and righteous.

Some people, honestly. What next, before and after comparisons in order to gaslight everyone else into thinking that Nicky's hairline is beating a retreat at the speed of France? Gah!

 

[AnOminous]

That's him malding. Writing a shit complaint is generally not cause. in and of itself, to disbar somebody.

That would only be something his client could really object to. It's really retarded to complain your opponent took a losing move. What you want him to do better fucking you in the ass? Pure genius.

It wasn't a fatal mistake because you almost always get an opportunity to amend at least once, which is why Randazza didn't even oppose that.

 

[Captain Manning]

That would only be something his client could really object to. It's really retarded to complain your opponent took a losing move. What you want him to do better fucking you in the ass? Pure genius.

Exactly. So what would he even complain about? That Spectre says that Schneider ridiculed Nick for showing up to his office wearing shorts?

Like what the fuck is even is going on here? This is so retarded. A guy that fucked a watermelon had a strip-mall lawyer sue Nick and Nick seems hell-bent to out-tard both the watermelon fucker and the strip-mall lawyer.

But hey, I guess it wouldn't be a lolsuit being discussed of the Farms if it wasn't batshit insane. It's funny, but also more than a little confusing.

I think I should probably just wait to see what happens (if anything happens) in order to preserve my remaining sanity. Feel free to clue me in if any of you figure this crap out.

 

[RotPockets]

Oh, that's the Marion Barry defense! That's a classic!

"Bitch set me up...I shouldn't have come up here...goddamn bitch"

No, but seriously, Cory got popped MULTIPLE times, IIRC. I recall we looked into this months ago, and found multiple charge sheets, with multiple docket #s, over different years. Unless he wants to claim his ex keeps roping him into shit (unlikely).

I think it's pretty clear he's a fucking idiot who gets caught a lot, but I just don't know how much of an "evil criminal" he is without more specifics as to what exactly he was caught with.

Gonzo Balldo Jr. - Noseguardian Muppet Baby.

CGoody/CrazyCory564/Cory Thomas Goodman/Nose Guard#1



66 KATIE DR
LANGHORNE, PA 19047
DOB: 08/24/1992
CrazyCory564@gmail.com
(215) 504-5634

https://www.youtube.com/@CGoody564/


It's daddy's house hes in.

 

[Lone Outsider]

@Strix454 One of Nick's most baffling traits is the insane amount of credibility he gives to spectre. It isn't like Nick doesn't know that Spectre massively lies/exaggerates about his marine experience at the very least. Nick's made fun of him for it before. The fact Specter has any credibility, let alone enough that it sounds like he essentially wants to use him as an unofficial investigator, is just flabergasting.

Anyone that still believe Spetrec is a dumb retarded drunkard that with a tendency to misplace their loyalty. Everybody knows now that Spectre is Halal here exactly because he is a complete liar. If he wasn't such a lair that stole valor people would still respect him for at least during some kind of service in the army.

 

[Strix454]

Oh, it's pretty bad as written, but my problem with Randazza's counter is that while it's better made, it seems like a stretch as far as application of law is concerned. Like he wants another state's SLAPP to apply to Minnesota? Like... wut? I'm wondering if Randazza took this case mainly because he's interested in trying a particular or novel legal argument, and Nick is happy to blow the money to have a big name attached.

For what its worth, Nick has explained his reasoning on this. He doesn't just want to get the lawsuit dismissed. Anyone could do that according to Nick. But out of a sense of public service, Nick wants to end the lawsuit in such a way that Monty will never be a legal threat to anyone on the internet ever again. He wants to put Monty behind an enormous anti-SLAPP judgement that Monty will not be able to pay. Nick sees the judgement as giving him the ability to conduct perpetual discovery into Monty's affairs. It will also supposedly give him the ability to stop any future lawsuits by Monty against anyone at the beginning.

Nick said that he would have never thought of this himself and that Randazza came up with the idea. And that this is why someone would hire Randazza. Its just genius according to Nick.

But as with most of the case, its easy to question the sense of this:

1) Previous to this, Monty has attempted to file all of one lawsuit against someone in 2019. He self-filed a complaint the mountain jews would have laughed at and it immediately self-destructed in court. It seems unlikely that Monty was or is some great litigation threat to the internet that only Nick can stop.
2) Nobody heard much of anything from Monty (including specifically Nick) between 2019 and October 2022. Monty appeared in 2022 to dunk on Nick in chats over his youtube ban. He isn't someone that anyone pays attention to most of the time. Monty spends nearly all of his time fighting with equally crazy people.
3) In order for the strategy to work, Nick has to spend enormous amounts of money on legal fees. Money Nick will not get back and that his attorney will keep. Even if there is a judgement against monty, monty likely has no money.
4) Legally the anti-SLAPP thing is an extreme longshot. Even if Nick were to initially win and get Colorado law applied to the case (tough enough itself), its in no way certain that him calling Monty a pedo meets any standard for applying anti-SLAPP.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

As other critics put it:
>jewlawyer getting a $10000 hair transplant done and spending $40000 on a new bike after sending a givesendgo to try and bilk $50000 from his paypigs
really makes you think...

reminder of Rekieta's life goal (not goals, plural - his only goal he can think of. Not closeted behavior at all.)

 

[Swole McPole]

I mean, the only way this would conceivably work is if Schneider is both incredibly stupid and incredibly ignorant. It's hard to fix the former, but the latter can be rectified by reading the tome of information that's been compiled about Spectre on the Farms.

The whole Spectre calling Schneider story was completely mystifying to me as well. I can only think that Spectre must have told him a pack of lies to even get him on the phone in the first place. I don't know about the USA, but here in the UK it's really fucking difficult to get your lawyer on the phone -- even if you're a paying client. They're generally really, really busy, and so they have a legion of minions whose primary responsibility is acting as a gatekeeper, attempting to fend off those people who will suck up your time and take away from the billable hours.

So how would Spectre have gotten through? "I'm a moderator on Nick Rekieta's forums, and I'd like to discuss your clients case?" There's no way in hell that'd get you past the gatekeepers, let alone get Schnieder to start chewing the fat with you. So he MUST have told him some kind of fanciful lie to get him and keep him on the phone. Given that, the idea that anything he has to say would be useable in some kind of ethics complaint just seems ridiculous. I know that Nick is gullible and is prone to believe any old nonsense that can maintain his delusions in tact, but this whole business seems like a bridge too far, even for Rekieta.

 

[Strix454]

I don't know about the USA, but here in the UK it's really fucking difficult to get your lawyer on the phone -- even if you're a paying client.

Its equally difficult in the United States. What makes it seem even more unlikely to me is the questions Spectre claims to have asked and received answers to. An attorney in an active case just would not answer those sorts of questions or provide that sort of information to someone they didn't even know. If someone comes calling asking your personal opinions of the defendant in a case where you are the plantiff's attorney, it seems unlikely that the information would be given to them.
As far as making a complaint about any of it, that would seem extremely dangerous for Nick to do. Because the whole matter would immediately raise questions about why someone is gathering information on an opposing attorney in an active legal matter and presenting it to the defendant in the case. Its ethically very dangerous ground and I can understand completely why Randazza would want nothing to do with any of it.
Its also not just that Spectre has no credibility, its that Spectre is a loose cannon and could say anything if he were questioned in an official investigation.

 

[localsinsight919]

Rekieta is commenting on the hearing and ripping on Dave while Cgoody shills the GSG that has 2 small donations in like 2 weeks lol

Gonzo Balldo Jr. - Noseguardian Muppet Baby.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

Rekieta is commenting on the hearing and ripping on Dave while Cgoody shills the GSG that has 2 small donations in like 2 weeks lol View attachment 5065610

Another glorious triumph! His 475,000 loyal fans are sweeping Rekieta to victory!

 

[Captain Manning]

Rekieta is commenting on the hearing and ripping on Dave while Cgoody shills the GSG that has 2 small donations in like 2 weeks lol

As long as he says the right things, and continues to cultivate Nick's thot farm, he's got job security. I think most people are in agreement Nick doesn't need the money. Nick wants lewd pics and expensive toys, and the GSG is intended help offset the later (and he's hoping people are too dumb to figure that out).

View attachment 5065643View attachment 5065644

Again, that's way more shit than can be hand-waved away by his being on a lease with a scummy ex.

If he said "Look man, I just REALLY like dope, and I get caught a lot" I'd buy that. He'd also demonstrate that, unlike Spectre, he has a honest bone in his body.

Hell, I'm not even sure I'd give him too much shit for his rap sheet if it was all things like pot and shrooms. We even got a lot of people on the Farms that advocate for their legalization.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

Eat like a duck / sound like a pig time again I guess.

 

[AnOminous]

reminder of Rekieta's life goal (not goals, plural - his only goal he can think of. Not closeted behavior at all.)

That shirt is gayer than any pants Vic Mignogna ever wore.

There's no way in hell that'd get you past the gatekeepers, let alone get Schnieder to start chewing the fat with you. So he MUST have told him some kind of fanciful lie to get him and keep him on the phone. Given that, the idea that anything he has to say would be useable in some kind of ethics complaint just seems ridiculous.

Unless he just went out of his mind and started spilling his guts about the legal strategy he and his client had agreed on, which would be a giant ethical breach and violate attorney-client privilege, which exists to protect the client.

And which Nick incidentally may have blown himself just by saying whose idea a specific legal strategy was. He basically divulged communications with Randazza. Real Melvin Belli move there. This is the kind of thing which is exactly why you don't talk about cases you're a party in.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

That shirt is gayer than any pants Vic Mignogna ever wore.

Unless he just went out of his mind and started spilling his guts about the legal strategy he and his client had agreed on, which would be a giant ethical breach and violate attorney-client privilege, which exists to protect the client.

And which Nick incidentally may have blown himself just by saying whose idea a specific legal strategy was. He basically divulged communications with Randazza. Real Melvin Belli move there. This is the kind of thing which is exactly why you don't talk about cases you're a party in.

 

[Captain Manning]

Its equally difficult in the United States. What makes it seem even more unlikely to me is the questions Spectre claims to have asked and received answers to. An attorney in an active case just would not answer those sorts of questions or provide that sort of information to someone they didn't even know. If someone comes calling asking your personal opinions of the defendant in a case where you are the plantiff's attorney, it seems unlikely that the information would be given to them.

"Oh yes, Mr. Fahey! It's an honor to speak to a decorated Marine officer such as yourself! I'll tell you all the things about the case I'm working..."

EVEN IF, arguendo, we assume Schneider were that fucking dumb, no competent authority is gonna assume that story is true based on uncorroborated witness testimony. Doubly so from a person with a well-established track record of lies and embellishments. I'm 99.9% certain Schneider's law license is safe if his nemesis here is Spectre.

It might be a good idea to remind people that Spectre once claimed he desperately called the Metford Police to try and save the life of Apolo Legend, and that they discovered his body because of him. Except when @I'm not a Robot looked into it, it turned out that Spectre's cooked up proof that this happened by showing his cell phone call log with an outgoing call to the non-emergency records department number in it. Not a dispatcher. He was hoping people wouldn't notice that little detail (I also just noticed he censored out the times in the cap).




(Full post detailing that little hi fuck up)

Spectre isn't just a liar who lies to attach himself to major people and events for clout, but he's really REALLY bad at it, and it frequently blows up in his face. Anybody that believes anything he says with respect to this alleged phone call to Schneider needs to get their head examined.

 

[Swole McPole]

EVEN IF, arguendo, we assume Schneider were that fucking dumb, no competent authority is gonna assume that story is true based on uncorroborated witness testimony.

And yet Rekieta appears to believe it. So much so, that he's repeated the substance of Spectre's claims numerous times. Often in front of numerous practicing lawyers who constitute his lawtube guests. Surprisingly, none of them appear to have interrupted him, Foghorn Leghorn style, to say "Now wait, I say, wait just a minute there, Nick. There's something about this story that doesn't quite ring true. While I can see that this is somebody that a midwit who never actually had a legal practice like YOU might do, in reality, practicing lawyers don't just pick up the phone and discuss the ins and outs of their cases with whatever random stranger happens to call into the office that day."

What's up with these fools? Do they not make enough money from their legal practice that a chance to appear on Rekieta's moronic streams and the promise of potential e-celeb status has made them all so befuddled that they can't think straight? Are they ALL just lolcows in lawyer's clothing? These people should be embarrassed to listen to this nonsense.